Home » 2016 (Page 4)

Yearly Archives: 2016

Good Article on Hillary Clinton at National Review

First, you can see Thomas Ross’s article below. If you are still voting for Hillary, you are still putting Hillary in office by voting for someone else besides Donald Trump, or you are voting for Donald Trump — any voters, even early and absentee — read Andrew McCarthy’s National Review article on Hillary Clinton.  Let […]

Continue Reading →

Keswick’s Confusion on the Holy Spirit: in Keswick’s Errors–an Analysis and Critique of So Great Salvation by Stephen Barabas, part 8 of 17

The content of this post is now available at the link viewable by clicking here.  It combines all the parts of this series of blog posts in one file. Please view the material at that link. This part covers from the words: “As already noted, Keswick theology is right to call believers to the “renunciation […]

Continue Reading →

An Analysis and Review of Kevin Bauder’s “Landmarkism”, pt. 4

Part One, Part Two, Part Three Kevin Bauder sees a “universal church” in Matthew 16:18.  Then he argues for the universal church from 1 Corinthians 12:13.  When you examine every other usage of ekklesia by Jesus other than Matthew 16:18, it is obviously an assembly and local only.  The burden of Bauder and those like […]

Continue Reading →

An Analysis and Review of Kevin Bauder’s “Landmarkism”, pt. 3

Part One, Part Two Kevin Bauder addresses the presupposition for church successionism by dealing with Matthew 16:18, treating it as the proof text for the position.  I don’t mind calling it Baptist successionism, because Baptists can trace their lineage to Jerusalem.  Succession implies an unbroken line of continuity and perpetuity suggests the permanence of the […]

Continue Reading →

An Analysis and Review of Kevin Bauder’s “Landmarkism”, pt. 2

Part One Contrary to Kevin Bauder, local only ecclesiology did not originate with “landmarkism” and J. R. Graves in the mid 19th century.  First, the church is local only in the New Testament.  Second, first century Clement of Rome provides patristic testimony to local-only ecclesiology.  Third, very early orthodox, printed doctrinal statements support a local […]

Continue Reading →

“The Old Testament is Mainly Fiction, not Fact”: the Dan Barker – Thomas Ross Debate

I am very pleased to announce that my debate with Dan Barker, President of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, on the topic:  “The Old Testament is Mainly Fiction, not Fact,” is now available online.  (Of course, Mr. Barker was in the affirmative and I was in the negative.)  Mr. Barker and his organization are very […]

Continue Reading →

An Analysis and Review of Kevin Bauder’s “Landmarkism”

Someone gave me a copy of two books by Kevin Bauder, his Baptist Distinctives and New Testament Church Order, and One in Hope and Doctrine:  Origins of Baptist Fundamentalism, 1870-1950, the latter co-written by Robert Delnay.  Despite our differences and perhaps even his protests, Kevin Bauder and I have a lot in common, I think […]

Continue Reading →

Case Study in the Rise of a False Doctrine or Misinterpretation of Scripture: Preservation Passages

Paul told Timothy that from a child he had known the holy scriptures (1 Tim 3:15).  God wrote scripture so that people could understand it, so it isn’t God and it isn’t the Bible that people don’t understand it.  What is it?  What happens?  Many things. Men teach false doctrine.  They conform scripture to their […]

Continue Reading →

Keswick’s Corrupt Gospel: in Keswick’s Errors–an Analysis and Critique of So Great Salvation by Stephen Barabas, part 7 of 17

The content of this post is now available at the link viewable by clicking here.  It combines all the parts of this series of blog posts in one file. Please view the material at that link. This part covers from the words: “Keswick adopted the error of the Broadlands Conference and its successors … Many […]

Continue Reading →

The Male and the Female Vote

I don’t want to preempt my own post from Wednesday with this little one, so please read yesterday’s posting HERE. Nate Silver has compared, if only women voted and if only men voted, percentages.  You can see the impact of women on the vote. Does this mean anything scripturally?  Should Christians take this into consideration?

Continue Reading →

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Pages

Recent Comments

Archives

Meta