time, Moses provoked astonishment.”[2] Dr. Douglas Petrovich, the scholar who translated the inscription, comments:
had endured bound servitude under compulsion . . . several contemporary
Sinaitic inscriptions from the same turquoise mines strongly suggest that
Egyptian authorities were the culprits. . . . This scenario matches well with
the historical narrative of Exodus[.] . . . Moses [is the] only plausible
reading [of the inscription] in this context. . . . The astonishment that Moses
provoked almost certainly followed Moses’ return to Egypt . . . [and] the
plagues reported in the Bible[.] . . . [T]he details of Sinai 361 match those
of Exodus 1-5 remarkably well . . . cogent epigraphical attestation to Moses
dating to the fifteenth century now stands in print[.] . . . [The] biblical
writer called Moses most likely is the individual named on Sinai 361.”[3]
361 (Cairo Museum); see Romain F. Butin, “The Protosinaitic Inscriptions,” Harvard Theological Review 25:2 (1932)
plate 19.
Petrovich, The World’s Oldest
Alphabet: Hebrew as the Language of the
Proto-Consonantal Script (Jerusalem:
Carta, 2016), 169; cf. 158-172.
Petrovich, The World’s Oldest
Alphabet: Hebrew as the Language of the Proto-Consonantal
Script (Jerusalem: Carta, 2016),
169-172.
Recent Comments