Home » Uncategorized » Evan Roberts & the Welsh Revival of 1904-1905: His Education & “Preaching”: Part 2 of 22

Evan Roberts & the Welsh Revival of 1904-1905: His Education & “Preaching”: Part 2 of 22


When “Dr.
Williams, the phrenologist[,][1] .
. . measured [Roberts’s] cranium, deduced certain patterns,” and “told . . .
the young miner, ‘You ought to be a preacher,’” an affirmation also confirmed
by a minister who had heard Roberts pray publicly one time, Evan was guided no
longer to be a miner but a minister.[2]  However, his education for the ministry was
extremely limited, as was his education in general, although he was “deeply
influenced” by “C. R. Sheldon’s In His
Steps
.”[3]  Roberts “left school at age twelve, laboured
in coal mines for twelve years, undertook part-time study and a brief
pre-college course . . . [and] had no pastoral or evangelistic experience”[4]
when he became the center of the Welsh holiness revival in 1904, although a
novice (1 Timothy 3:6), one whose “schooldays were few and irregular,”[5]
and “an unqualified preacher with only six weeks of adult pre-college
education.”[6]  Incapable of careful exegesis of the Bible,
he taught “experience-based doctrine” and held to “no dogmatic beliefs,” since
he was “totally untrained” for “systematic theological instruction” or
“expository preaching.”[7]  On the contrary, “visions and voices” were
“what really constitute[d] [him a] pioneer in [the] new movement of the Spirit”
in Wales.[8]  “Evan Roberts was not intellectual . . . was
moved more by his emotions than by his ideas . . . was more intuitive than
inductive or deductive . . . had no fundamental doctrine, no system of
theology, no distinctive ideal.”[9]  He did not follow the pattern of Christ and
the Apostles, as well as of earlier revival preachers such as Jonathan Edwards
or Shubal Stearns, or earlier instruments of revival in Wales,[10]
by preaching boldly and specifically on sin, clearly explaining the death,
burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ, calling men to repentance and faith,
and strongly warning about hell and judgment to come (Matthew 5:22-30).  Instead, Roberts set forth “no dies irae to terrify, but a dies caritas to win its way[.] . . .
Sin—or at least vice—[was] seldom denounced[.]”[11]  Indeed, Roberts stated:  “What need have these people [in the Welsh
holiness revival] to be told that they are sinners?”[12]  Some associated with his ministry testified
that they never once preached the gospel to the lost during the entire course
of their revivalistic work; they saw many make what were supposedly salvation
decisions without hearing the gospel.[13]
            Thus, “Roberts does not call his
hearers to repentance . . . but speaks of having been called to fulfill the
words of the prophet Joel.  ‘Your old men
shall dream dreams; your young men shall see visions.’”  Rather than proclaiming the gospel, Roberts
“frequently describe[d] visions that had appeared to him.”[14]  Surely, in his view, describing visions would
bring more to salvation than gospel preaching. 
He also “told his congregations that he had ‘not come to terrify them by
preaching about the horrors of eternal damnation’” and “told reporters . . . ‘I
preach nothing but Christ’s love,’” after the manner of Hannah W. Smith.[15]  Nevertheless, “his message was not so much
Christocentric as pneuma-centric, a result of the influence of the Holiness
movement, especially the teaching of Keswick.”[16]  Roberts spoke at the Welsh Keswick Conference
at Llandrindod Wells in 1905 at the height of the holiness revival excitement,[17]
and the message he proclaimed throughout Wales during his work was that of the “Spiritual
Life Conventions such as Keswick and Llandrindod.”[18]  While Keswick proper was key for Roberts,
Keswick antecedents, such as the “experience . . . called ‘perfect love’ or
Christian perfection’ taught by J. Wesley and J. Fletcher . . . [were also]
given attention in this revival.”[19]  Thus, while earlier revivals had believed
that the Spirit of God bore testimony to Christ rather than emphasizing His own
blessed Person, Evan Roberts stressed (as William Boardman had before him) that
there “were thousands of believers in our churches who have received Christ,
but had never received the Holy Ghost,” a change of emphasis from “[h]eretofore”
when “the work of Christ ha[d] been the all-important truth.”[20]



[1]              The development of the quack system of phrenology was as
follows:

Franz Gall (1758–1828) and Johann Spurzheim (1776–1832)
developed an early physiological psychology known as phrenology, which held
three fundamental positions: the exterior conformation of the skull corresponds
to the interior (brain); mind is analyzable into a number of functions (e.g.,
combativeness, hope, acquisitiveness, cautiousness, and secretiveness); and the
functions of mind are differentially localized in the brain, and an excess in
any function is correlated with an enlargement of the corresponding place in
the brain. . . . [T]he term phrenology
mean[s] literally the science of the mind. The theory asserted that personality
and character traits could be judged by the location and size of bumps on the
skull. . . . Some 37 localized areas of the brain were specified to contain
independent and inherited regions relating to such character traits as
self-esteem, conscientiousness, and spirituality. Three general character
types—mental, motive, and vital—facilitated grouping of personalities. Phrenology
maps were drawn to indicate the locations of particular faculties and were then
used to analyze the corresponding bumps on the skull of a client. . . .
Phrenology had a certain popular appeal; people thought personality could be
determined by feeling an individual’s skull. However, phrenology was never
accepted by scientists because its methodology was largely anecdotal. . . . The
charlantanlike activities of Gall and Spurzheim and the multiplicity of
faculties made phrenology the last faculty psychology. (pgs. 427, 790, 872, Baker Encyclopedia of Psychology &
Counseling
(2nd ed.), D. G. Benner & P. C. Hill.  Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Books, 1999)

Interestingly, one of Evan Roberts’s “heavily
involved” helpers was “Annie May Rees, the daughter of a phrenologist” (pg. 52,
see 76ff., Voices from the Welsh Revival,
1904-1905
, Jones).

[2]              Pg. 10, An
Instrument of Revival
, Jones.  Pg.
110 mentions Evan’s interaction with another phrenologist later.

[3]              Pg. 6, An
Instrument of Revival
, Jones.  “Sheldon,
a Congregational minister, followed the liberal teaching of his day that Christ
was merely an example,” and thus the book “promotes a social gospel rather than
the Saving Gospel of Jesus Christ,” one of “[w]alking in the steps of Jesus”
rather than “trust[ing] in His saving merits and vicarious satisfaction to get
to Heaven” (Calvary Contender,
10/15/1997; elec. acc. Fundamental
Baptist CD-ROM Library
, ed. David Cloud).

[4]              Pg. xiii, An
Instrument of Revival
, Jones.

[5]              Pg. 55, The Welsh
Religious Revival
, Morgan.

[6]              Pg. 96, An
Instrument of Revival
, Jones; pg. 85, Psychological
Aspects of the Welsh Revival
, A. T. Fryer.  
Proceedings of the Society for
Psychical Research
, Vol. 19 (December 1905).

[7]              Pgs. 253, 5, An
Instrument of Revival
, Jones.

[8]              Pgs.
24-25, Rent Heavens:  The Welsh Revival of 1904, R. B. Jones, 3rd.
ed.  Asheville, NC:  Revival Literature, 1950.

[9]              Pg. 55, The Welsh
Religious Revival
, Morgan.

[10]            Thus, Vyrnwy Morgan noted “an unmistakable change of
character . . . [in] the general record of revivals” in the years that led up
to and included the Welsh holiness revival; “the notion of a material hell is
gone, never to return[.] . . . There has been a change of emphasis.  It used to be on hell; it is now on
character; it used to be on wrath; it is now on conduct” (xiv-xvi, The Welsh Religious Revival, Morgan).

[11]            Pg. 154, The
Great Revival in Wales:  Also an Account
of the Great Revival in Ireland in 1859
, S. B. Shaw. 
Chicago, IL:  S. B. Shaw, 1905.  For example, Roberts said, “There’s no need
to preach against the drink [alcohol]”—rather, a solely positive message was
sufficient (pg. 54,
The Revival in the West, W. T.
Stead).

[12]            Pg. 49, The Revival
in the West
, W. T. Stead.

[13]            Pg. 55, Rent Heavens:  The Welsh Revival of 1904, R. B. Jones, 3rd.
ed.  (Asheville, NC:  Revival Publications, 1950).

[14]            Pg. 47, The Revival
in the West
, W. T. Stead.  Stead
quotes the South Wales Daily News of
November 14, 1904.

[15]            E. g.,
“Mrs. Smith went herself to a man in prison, who was condemned to death for
murder. . . . She only told him how God loved him, and grieved over him, stayed
with him, and told him again and again, till he was conquered” (pg. 163, The Life that is Life Indeed:  Reminiscences of the Broadlands Conferences,
Edna V. Jackson.  London:  James Nisbet & Co, 1910).

[16]            Pgs. 520-521, “Demythologizing the Evan Roberts Revival,”
Pope.

[17]            Pg. 171, Transforming
Keswick:  The Keswick Convention, Past,
Present, and Future
, Price & Randall.

[18]            Pg. 54, Rent Heavens:  The Welsh Revival of 1904, R. B. Jones, 3rd.
ed.  Asheville, NC:  Revival Publications, 1950.

[19]            Pg. 137, Voices From
the Welsh Revival, 1904-1905
, Jones.

[20]            Pg. 7, The Awakening
in Wales
, Jessie Penn-Lewis.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives