Home » Kent Brandenburg » A New Alternative List to the Points of Calvinism (Part Four)

A New Alternative List to the Points of Calvinism (Part Four)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three

The Bible is a serious and authoritative book, very easy to see this with a normal read.  God doesn’t play games through it.  In it, He weighs men’s actions and He judges according to the truth those acts that they commit (cf 1 Sam 2:3, Rom 2:1-2).   He cautions men careening toward eternal punishment against their indifference and neglect.

Jesus especially out of His compassion alerts men to their futures in Hell.   He strongly warns them of pain well past a fractured femur or ten on the numerical emergency room scale, depicting its concomitant wailing and teeth grinding.  He prods and pleads like it could make a difference.  Many, many similar aspects of this, among other things, contradict the fourth point of Calvinism.

4.  IRRESISTIBLE GRACE

A Real, Free Offer?

What degree of Jesus’ pushing the pedal to the metal with HIs preaching reaches irresistible grace?  In truth man would find himself under no compulsion to believe.  He just awaits that point of ignition of the grace of God, that Calvinists call irresistible grace.  How does a warning of a potential point of no return square with the vast majority never even having the possibility of return?  It’s a free offer, but only in the nature of an opportunity Lucy would give Charlie Brown to kick a football.  The offer is a shell game, yet with nothing under any of the shells. Scripture does not read like that at all.

If the offer of the gospel is really free and real, then it allows for true rejection or reception.  I refer to two aspects:  an offer and free.  It is not an offer if the person can’t get it, take it, or receive it.  God does offer salvation.  By free, men are not coerced to take it.

By nature everyone will receive that enacted by irresistible grace.  It is irresistible.  Calvinism says that someone cannot and will not receive the gospel unaccompanied by irresistible grace.  This explains why someone will not receive it.  Who benefits from irresistible grace with Calvinism?  Only those God predetermined their election.

Parallels with Barth and Universalism

Universalism arises from the same doctrine of irresistible grace.  Twentieth century Dutch theologian Gerrit Berkouwer in his book, The Triumph of Grace in the Theology of Karl Barth, writes concerning Barth’s universalism:

[U]nbelief has been put away—the unbelief of the old man—by the decisive grace of God, which is so decisive that the inevitability of faith lies involved in it.

Carl Henry writes about Barth and this in his book, God, Revelation, and Authority:

The defect in Barth’s theology follows from his notions that all humanity is elected in Jesus as the God-man, and that sin and unbelief are ontologically impossible.  The result, at least implicitly, is universal redemption . . . . In his majestic vision of the totality of God’s triumph, and in deference to the irresistible power of grace, Barth ignores the conditional elements of biblical revelation.  He turns the sure triumph of divine grace into an implicit universalism of redemption that obscures the context of faith and obscures the indispensability of personal decision in this life for the inheritance of salvation.

When I read this, it sounded just like Calvinism, except that God elected everyone in this scenario rather than a predetermined small minority to whom He would dispense His irresistible grace.  Of course, Karl Barth was wrong.  Men must believe in real time in Jesus Christ and at that moment salvation occurs.  This doesn’t clash with foreknowledge, but it does with unconditional election.

The very existence of much of the New Testament cries that resistible grace exists, what I’m going to explain that . . . .

4.  GOD PROVIDES THE SUFFICIENT GRACE FOR ANYONE AND EVERYONE TO BELIEVE IN JESUS CHRIST FOR SALVATION

Scripture and Sufficient Grace

God inspired Gospels for the immediate delivery to various locations and future dispersion to the whole world for a saving revelation of Jesus Christ.  They present convincing saving evidence of Jesus Christ, like John says in John 20:31:

But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.

A Calvinist rendition of John 20:31 should sound like the following:

But these are written, that accompanied by irresistible grace ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ. . . .

Scripture has the sufficient grace in it for someone to believe, who hears it.  When Romans 10:17 says that faith comes by hearing the Word of God, it means it.  If a person is born again by the incorruptible seed, which is the Word of God (1 Pet 1:23), then the Word of God is a sufficient source of grace to believe in a salvific way.

Appeared to All Men

The Apostle Paul writes under God’s inspiration in Titus 2:11:

For the grace of God that bringeth salvation hath appeared to all men.

That statement coupled with what Paul wrote in Romans 1:19-20 is very enlightening on this subject.

19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.

How does God’s grace that brings salvation appear to all men?  It appears to all men through His general revelation, so much so that it renders every human being “without excuse.”  Everybody gets the necessary revelation to provide the sufficient grace for salvation.  Everyone is without excuse because everyone gets it.  If only some got the grace sufficient to save, the ones who didn’t receive would seem to have an excuse.  The revelation of God provides sufficient grace to make every human being in history culpable for receiving it.

Variations on Reception

When Jesus explains the salvation of some versus not of others, in Matthew 13 He points to the varied condition of their hearts:  hard, stony, or thorny.  No one would need Jesus’ delineation of varied soils or heart conditions if grace was irresistible.  Neither hard, stony, or thorny could resist irresistible grace.  Yet, Stephen preaches in his gospel sermon in Acts 7:51:

Ye stiffnecked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, ye do always resist the Holy Ghost: as your fathers did, so do ye.

“Always resist” seems to fully contradict irresistible grace, and it describes the hard ground of Jesus’ parable in Matthew 13.  Carl Henry writes:

God’s revealed truth of saving grace may be repressed by impenitent rebellion or received with alacrity by repentant trust.  His gracious invitation to life fit for eternity must be personally accepted; without personal appropriation God’s promise of rescue in and of itself saves no one.

In Luke 14 Jesus declares a different response between two groups.  It isn’t those who God predetermined irresistible grace and those He did not.  No, Jesus saw the poor and the lame respond well and the self-righteous and the self-sufficient refuse it.  Jesus spoke the truth.

More to Come


6 Comments

  1. Brother Brandenburg,

    I’m enjoying this series and it seems irrefutable, especially in how simply it all fits within the revelation of God’s character and plan in the Bible. I believe Dave Hunt’s book speaks to a corresponding issue with irresistible grace. If men can only be saved by God irresistibly drawing them, why does God draw so few? Of course, by itself that question does not defeat Calvinism, but it does seem to bring into question God’s character of mercy, love, compassion, and longsuffering. I don’t know if you’ve used the analogy here, but it surely seems like a “the emperor has no clothes” society amongst the reformed when it comes to plain Bible teaching.

    Ex 34:6-7 (KJV) And the LORD passed by before him, and proclaimed, The LORD, The LORD God, merciful and gracious, longsuffering, and abundant in goodness and truth, 7 Keeping mercy for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin, and that will by no means clear the guilty; visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children, and upon the children’s children, unto the third and to the fourth generation.

  2. Very good material, Bro. Brandenburg
    I found Lawrence’s “Other side of Calvinism” to be good on the subject, also.
    One author quoted in the aforementioned book said (roughly), “Baptist make bad Calvinist”. He was referring to all the demands that sinners repent and believe, then be baptized upon profession that they have experienced saving grace.
    Grace which cannt be resisted and complete
    inability to repent makes this kind of preaching silly.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives