Home » Kent Brandenburg » The Moral Nature of God (Part 2)

The Moral Nature of God (Part 2)

Part 1

Heaven and Earth Necessitate a Cause

God is holy.  God is good.  He is righteous.  He is love and more.  Moral attributes are the essence of God.

We know that the heavens and the earth have a beginning.  Since they do, they must have a cause.  The cause of the heavens and the earth — space, matter, time, and energy — must arise from an uncaused cause, or else an eternal regression of causes.

Infinite, Powerful, and Personal Creator

To cause the heavens and the earth necessarily requires an infinite and powerful creator.  No natural cause could precede as the first cause of the natural world.  It must, therefore, exist outside of the natural world.

The natural world also demands a personal creator or else the cause would be just another natural thing.  Related to something that begins to exist, causation comprises agency.  For something to come into existence at a particular moment, a personal agent chooses to bring it into being.  Only a personal cause can make that decision.

Tracing Back the Moral Attributes in Man’s Nature

Mankind is part of what God caused and moral attributes in man’s nature trace back to God in their origination.  People accept, recognize, or acknowledge the reality of morals.  Men judge between good and evil.  A worldwide recognition of moral law points to one that transcends human opinion.

If all that exists is matter, space, and time, like naturalism says, then there is no foundation for objective moral values.  The one and only God, Who alone created the heavens and the earth, is a moral being.  No standard for morality exists outside of a transcendent God, separate from His creation.

Objective Moral Values

When witnessing a crime such as robbery, the act is not deemed wrong solely based on personal feelings or societal consensus.  Robbery is recognized as objectively wrong because it violates a moral standard that exists independently of individual perspectives.  Theologian John Frame compares two potential sources for absolute moral authority: impersonal and personal.

According to Frame, if moral authority were to stem from an impersonal source, such as a universal law or fate, it raises questions about obligation. For example, if fate dictates certain outcomes, individuals may feel no inherent obligation to adhere to this impersonal law. In contrast, if moral authority is derived from a personal source — specifically God — then there exists a clear obligation to obey divine commands because God is viewed as a supremely wise and authoritative figure.

Moral Authority from God

Without God, morality would devolve into mere subjective preferences or cultural relativism. This leads to the conclusion that true moral obligations require a grounding in the character and will of a personal God who embodies these absolute standards.

Since moral standards start with God, men should look to God for theirs.  This is God’s world.  Everything operates according to the confines and scruples of His nature.

Moral authority proceeds from the personal God.  This means a clear obligation to obey His words, sayings, and commandments.  His will is the basis for which to judge and by which He judges everything.


Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives