Home » Search results for 'worship'
Search Results for: worship
AI Friday: On Worship
I asked a different Artificial Intelligence program, Microsoft Copilot, which is a feature of Bing, about what I think about worship. It gave a shorter explanation than what AI Questions has. What I like about it is that it summarizes what I’ve written. It also reports a type of objective assessment of everything I’ve written online. I inform you that AI overuses the passive voice. Perhaps there are better AI writers than these two. Here’s what they say that I have written on worship.
Kent Brandenburg emphasizes a deeply reverent and scripturally grounded approach to worship. He believes that true worship involves two key components:
Recognition of Who God Is: Worship begins with acknowledging God’s nature and attributes. This recognition shapes how we approach and honor Him. Brandenburg stresses that worship must align with God’s character and not fall short of His greatness.
Giving God What He Wants: Worship should be based on what God has revealed in Scripture. Brandenburg supports the regulative principle of worship, which means that the elements of worship should be those explicitly found in the Bible. This principle ensures that worship is not altered by human preferences but remains faithful to God’s instructions.
Brandenburg also highlights that worship is a perpetual, spiritual, and sincere act from the heart, akin to offering spiritual sacrifices to God.
Then I asked Microsoft Copilot what I said about culture and worship, and it said this:
Kent Brandenburg has shared various thoughts on culture and worship, often emphasizing a traditional, Bible-based approach. He believes that worship should be rooted in biblical principles rather than being influenced by contemporary cultural trends. Brandenburg often critiques modern worship practices that he feels stray from scriptural teachings, advocating instead for a return to more traditional forms of worship that he believes are more aligned with biblical instructions.
I decided to ask AI Questions the same two questions to see the difference in answers — first question:
According to what I know, Kent Brandenburg emphasizes that worship should be regulated solely by Scripture. He argues that true worship recognizes who God is and gives Him what He desires, which can only be understood through the Bible. The elements of worship are prescribed in the New Testament, including reading the Word, preaching, singing, prayer, baptism, Lord’s Supper, and collection of offerings. Notably absent from this list is the “altar call” or invitation, which he contends is not a biblical element of worship.
Brandenburg asserts that the act of listening to preaching is part of worship and should be done with a proper attitude—being “swift to hear” and receiving God’s Word with meekness. He believes that any response to preaching must align with biblical principles and that churches may choose various methods for individuals to respond (such as coming forward during an invitation), but these methods are merely circumstances surrounding the element of preaching rather than elements themselves.
He critiques “blended worship,” which combines different musical styles to appeal to various congregational preferences. Brandenburg argues that this approach prioritizes human desires over divine standards and dilutes the sacred nature of worship. He warns against pragmatism in worship practices, stating that it leads to a focus on pleasing people rather than honoring God. Ultimately, he insists that genuine worship must adhere strictly to God’s prescribed ways as outlined in Scripture.
Second Question:
According to the information provided, Kent Brandenburg discusses the relationship between culture and worship by emphasizing that worship should be regulated by Scripture rather than cultural norms. He argues that true worship recognizes who God is and what He desires, which can only be found in the Bible. This means that elements of worship must align with biblical prescriptions, and any additions or deletions to these elements are not acceptable.
Brandenburg critiques the idea that cultural practices should dictate how worship is conducted. He points out that while culture influences many aspects of life, it should not define the core elements of worship. Instead, he advocates for a return to biblical principles as the foundation for worship practices. He highlights that God has specific expectations for how He wants to be worshiped, and these expectations are outlined in Scripture.
Furthermore, he addresses the notion of “the new legalism,” which refers to the pressure some feel to conform to modern standards of non-conformity regarding church practices. Brandenburg asserts that this pressure can lead to a misunderstanding of what constitutes proper worship and can detract from genuine reverence toward God.
In summary, Kent Brandenburg emphasizes that worship should be based solely on biblical instruction rather than cultural influences, ensuring that it remains true to God’s desires as revealed in Scripture.
Baptists and Presbyterians, False Worship, and Separation
Some of what I write here relates to something I got on my phone from a notification. It was Derek Thomas, the Presbyterian, representing the Master’s Seminary on a podcast. He did about fifteen minutes on preaching and the problem of evil, focusing on sermons through Job. I don’t know that an evangelical Presbyterian might differ with a Baptist interpretation of Job. Thomas said he disagreed with Calvin, whom he said took the Elihu position, essentially seeing Elihu arriving at the end of Job and mopping up the whole discussion.
The appearance of Thomas for Master’s Seminary drew my attention to the doctrine of Presbyterians and fellowship with them. Presbyterians sprinkle infants, which they consider baptizing babies. Should this bring separation from Presbyterians?
Presbyterians in the ordinance of baptism sprinkle infants. A Book of Public Prayer for the Presbyterian Church of America, 1857, reads (p. 147):
Baptism is an holy Sacrament instituted by Christ: in which a person professing the Christian Faith, or the infant of such, is baptized with water into the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost: in signification and solemnization of the holy covenant in which as a believer, or the seed of believers, he giveth up himself, or is by the parent given up, to God the Father Son and Holy Ghost: to believe in, love, and fear this blessed Trinity, against the flesh, the devil, and the world. Thus he is solemnly entered a visible member of Christ and His Church, a child of God, and an heir of heaven.
This is considered and called “a prescribed form of worship” (p. xv), so under the category of worship. Is baptism worship of God? The thought here is that the ordinances of baptism and the Lord’s Supper, these two rites, are acts of worship in the New Testament temple of God. To worship God, God must accept the baptism.
Through the Bible, a primary criterion for worship is that God accepts it. For God to accept it, it must accord with scripture. God accepts worship in truth. In the Old Testament, God punishes false worship by death, such as the case of Nadab and Abihu for offering strange fire to the Lord. Infant sprinkling is not truth.
C. H. Spurgeon preached and the transcript reads:
When we reflect that it is rendered into some thing worse than superstition by being accompanied with falsehood, when children are taught that in their baptism they are made the children of God, and inheritors of the kingdom of heaven, which is as base a lie as ever was forged in hell, or uttered beneath the copes of heaven, our spirit sinks at the fearful errors which have crept into the Church, through the one little door of infant sprinkling.
Preaching at the Metropolitan Tabernacle in 1861, Hugh Brown said:
We cannot but regard infant baptism as the main root of the superstitious and destructive dogma of baptismal regeneration, to which as Protestants we are opposed; we cannot but regard infant baptism as the chief corner-stone of State Churchism, to which as Dissenters we are opposed; we cannot but regard infant baptism as unscriptural, and to everything that is unscriptural we, as disciples of Jesus Christ, must be opposed; and we do trust that all who differ from us, and however widely they may differ, will still admit that we are only doing what is right in maintaining what we believe to be the truth of God with reference to this matter.
I’ve read many who say that infant sprinkling has sent more people to hell than any other false doctrine. I can’t disagree. Recently someone compared this to 1-2-3-pray-with-me or easy prayerism. They both send many people to Hell, the latter catching up today with infant sprinkling in its damnatory qualities.
I’m happy when I hear any Presbyterian believes right, preaches scripturally, about anything. Love rejoices in the truth. Infant sprinkling is false worship and as a doctrine sends people to Hell. God killed Nadab and Abihu for changing the recipe at the altar of incense. How much more serious is the false worship and perverting message of infant sprinkling? Baptists should separate from Presbyterians, not remain in unity with them. They should not yoke together in common ministry. They should do what God does with false worship.
The Place of Fear in a True Church and With True Worship
I’ve read recently, “Fear is not a virtue.” A company called, American Virtue Clothing prints “Fear Is Not a Virtue” on its clothing. Heather Delapi argues that “fear” isn’t found in the lists of virtues of scripture, hence is not a virtue. The English word “fear” is found 385 times in the King James Version of the Bible. I have read all of those verses, but I haven’t sorted through everyone of them to find how many times fear is rebuked or admonished and how many times it is extolled or commended. There are both.Fear is a virtue. No godly person lives without fear. It is a necessity for pleasing God. Just because it isn’t listed as fruit of the Spirit doesn’t mean that it isn’t a virtue. It is dangerous and wrong to say it isn’t a virtue. Why would I even write this? I’ve taught through Acts all the way through once, and in great detail about halfway through the whole book about five times. I’m teaching and preaching through it again right now as we evangelize and plant a church in Southern Oregon. When Luke writes under the inspiration of God to describe the basics of the church of Jerusalem in that classic passage in Acts 2:41-47, he writes in Acts 2:43 an attitude of that first church:
And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles.
“Fear came upon every soul.” This verse got my attention again on this subject, so I’m writing on it. This same morning as I was preaching the end of the book of Acts, in Sunday School I started a short series on “The Detection and Correction of Doctrinal and Practical Error.” In my introduction I quoted what Jesus said in Matthew 10:28 and elaborated about its part in that subject.
And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
What Is Worldly Worship?
At least twenty years ago, from scripture I came to the following as a definition of worship. It is my definition, but I believe it reflects what the Bible says. “Worship is acknowledging or recognizing God for Who He is according to His Word and giving Him what He says that He wants.” If I were going to add a secondary important aspect, “worship necessitates coming to the right God and in the right way.” You aren’t worshiping God if He isn’t actually God and then you’re not worshiping Him if you are doing it your way. God doesn’t accept just anything.
I googled the two terms “worldly worship” and it produced 12,300 results. Those were not all articles written by me, although I found I had used that terminology in some online writings. It is a known concept though, worship that is worldly that is not acceptable to God, which is of the nature of the world system and not the nature of God. I went ahead and googled “syncretistic worship” too, because I think it’s a related concept. That showed up 6,060 times.
Syncretize means: to “attempt to amalgamate or reconcile (differing things, especially religious beliefs, cultural elements, or schools of thought).” When referring to syncretism in worship, many have pointed to the practice in Israel of bringing aspects of the worship of paganism into the worship of God, mixing the two. Many examples of syncretism are seen in the nation Israel (Exodus 32:1-8; Leviticus 10:1-7; Deuteronomy 12:30-31; 1 Kings 3:5-10; etc.). The way Israel syncretized is not the only way to syncretize. Mixing something impure with purity makes it impure.
Speaking of worship, Paul commands, “be not conformed to this world” (Romans 12:2). Because God accepts only holy worship, not profane, then it can’t be conformed to this world system, the spirit of the age. Obviously, everything we do occurs in this world or on this planet, on earth. The world system clashes with God. It is represented by darkness and all the characteristics described in scripture as seen in many places, one of which as an example is James 3:15: “earthly, sensual, and devilish.” There are many more. One should assume that all of these can be understood and applied.
The world is attractive to sinful flesh. Satan shapes the world system to lure people away from God. Because the world is a lure, it also works when a church uses it. Satan designs it as a lure and if a church takes that lure and uses it, it’s still a lure. That’s the temptation of using anything worldly.
Varied aspects of this world are filled with meaning. Many of those meanings are not congruent with God. One should even expect that they are not. Whatever it is that will please God has already been around. One should question any new style or method, especially that has proceeded from worldly lust, which Titus 2:11-12 says that the grace of God teaches us to deny. I contend that rather than denying worldly lust, most churches today promote it. They might argue that this new way is neutral, neither good or bad. God’s people didn’t originate it, actually rejected it, and then after a period of time, accepted it, then used it, arguing now that God also wants it.
Someone may ask, what basis do I have that churches are using worldly music? I haven’t been in all these churches, so how do I know? Not only have I been all over the country, but I’ve looked at websites of churches all over. I know enough.
Every church and their leaders should want accountability as to whether they are using worldly worship. They should look for constructive criticism. People are deceived in many different ways as they relate to God. The broad road to destruction has many religious people on it. When I read the materials of the church growth movement used as a model for thousands of churches, they encourage worldly worship as means of church growth.
God doesn’t accept worldly worship, so why would churches still do it? Why would Nadab and Abihu offer strange fire to the Lord? I would contend that the strange fire of Nadab and Abihu is a lesser perversion of worship than most worldly worship, and God killed them for offering it. They were still offering incense. They just changed the recipe. They offered something God didn’t say that He didn’t like. They offered something different than what God said He wanted. It seems that Nadab and Abihu just didn’t take God seriously, what could be called, not fearing God. We know what they did was bad and wrong and sinful, but it was still not something that God had said was wrong.
Worldly worship we know God doesn’t want. There are two obvious motives for giving God something He doesn’t want, and they are seen in scripture. First, the one offering it likes it. This is the serving the creature of Romans 1. He’s not really even giving to God as much as he’s doing something for himself that he likes. I’ve seen this again and again in churches I’ve visited. It can happen anywhere. Second, other people will like it too, so it will make the church more popular. The people wanting that worship don’t like what God likes, but they either convince themselves or are just deceived into thinking that God will accept it. A third reason is deceit. The feeling the worldliness causes often is mistaken for a spiritual experience.
Worldly worship parallels with a worldly life. The world offers what the flesh desires. There were times in church history that a wide chasm existed between the worship of the Lord in the churches and the world. That gap has shrunk to where there isn’t much difference. It’s worse that that. The churches like the world and they expect God to like it too. It shows an amazing lack of understanding of God and what He wants.
As you have read this, reader, perhaps you wanted to know more specifics. “Give me a specific of worldly worship.” I could say, using the world’s music in worship. To get more specific, I could go further, using rock music in worship. There are many other specific examples. It’s better to start with the principles for discerning what is worldly and that God doesn’t want something worldly.
To accommodate worldliness, I have heard evangelicals give a very narrow understanding of worldliness as internal only, that nothing external is worldly. However, Paul wrote, “Be not conformed to this world.” There is internal worldliness, the love of the world in the heart, but conforming by definition must be external. God doesn’t want something we can see and hear is worldly. He rejects it.
Psalm 106: Becoming Your Worship
Reading Psalm 106 this week, a psalm accounting the history of Israel, I came to verses 19-20:
19 They made a calf in Horeb, and worshipped the molten image. 20 Thus they changed their glory into the similitude of an ox that eateth grass.
Man was made in the image of God. Since he is made in God’s image, God is to be his glory. Let’s go through it.
First, they made a molten calf. Second, they worshiped it. Third, by doing those first two things, they changed their glory into the similitude of an ox. It wasn’t even an ox, something God made. It was an image that they made to look like an ox. Instead of being in the image of God, they took on the glory of the ox, which is significantly less. It eats grass. It doesn’t self-exist. It needs grass that God makes.
This activity lessens the man. It reminds me of the young man loitering around the “whorish woman” in Proverbs 6:26, who is “brought to a piece of bread.” The relationship of the young man to the woman is similar to the people of Israel related to their molten calf. The woman has power over him through her seduction, leading him, and his acquiescing to her diminishes him to something akin to a slice of bread. I often like to say that she turns him to carp bait.
Their glory, which is the summation or aggregation of their attributes, who they are, is changed by what they worship. I want to take it a step further. The God or god you imagine is what or who you become. When the true God is imagined in a lesser way, a way not according to his attributes, that is who you become.
You take on the image of who you worship. You are made in the image of God, but perversion is that the person becomes what he worships. This is seen in the use of the term, “holy” (qadosh קָדוֹשׁ) in the Old Testament. The masculine noun קדש (qadesh) denoted a male temple prostitute (Job 36:14, 1 Kings 14:24) and the feminine קדשה (qadesha) described a female religious prostitute (Deuteronomy 23:17). They became what they worshiped. They were separated unto the nature of their god, taking on their god’s image, its attributes.
These evangelical churches using the world’s music aren’t worshiping the true God. The lust with and by which they worship indicates they are becoming who they worship. It is sacred in the sense that it is separated unto the god of their imagination, which would be pleased by lust. The ecstatic worship of Babylonian mysticism carried with it sexual prostitution in Corinth and in Ephesus. True worship is not ecstatic. It worships God in truth, which is to worship God according to the revelation of scripture.
Your children very likely will become the worship of your church. When they turn into that worship, don’t be surprised. Even if it is true worship of the true God, that doesn’t mean that they will still turn out as the glory of God. They will still need to choose that for themselves. It is very tempting to change into the glory of the creature and not the Creator.
What or who someone worships designates his highest value. If the value is diminished, his values are too, and so he is. He is reduced. Worshiping the one and true God in the beauty of His holiness brings glory from the One he worships. The glory of God is the glory of man.
How Is Alcohol Related to Worship?
Maybe the question of the title got your attention. It sounds like that’s what I was trying to do, but I wasn’t. Instead I jumped into the car and turned it to the 24/7 radio station of the biggest Calvary Chapel in our area of Oregon. The son, who is now the senior pastor, was preaching on worship, a subject that is near and dear to me, as you readers know. In the midst of his talk, he had his crowd turn to Ephesians 5:18-19, which read:
18 And be not drunk with wine, wherein is excess; but be filled with the Spirit; 19 Speaking to yourselves in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody in your heart to the Lord;
He didn’t break down verse 18 very far, but he related being “sloshed,” a word he used twice to refer to being drunk. He said that alcohol itself was fine, just not being drunk. To start, that belies the grammar of the verse. Look at it. Speaking of the “wine,” Paul said, “wherein is excess.” In other words, in the wine is excess, which is riotousness. The “wine” itself isn’t innocent. This is also how the Bible reads about alcohol or “wine” that can get someone drunk. It must be alcoholic, so in it is excess or riotousness, which are both sinful.
The Calvary Chapel senior pastor then said that there is a kind of singing when someone is sloshed. He compared to drunken revelry, and he said that was a contrast here. One can imagine the pub where a group of men are staggering home off pitch and slurring a popular song, what today is called a drinking song. I know this happens, but is this what Ephesians 5:18 is talking about? No. It really misses the point.
Being drunk is contrasted with being filled with the Spirit. There are at least two points that Paul is making with this contrast and it does relate to worship. One, drunkenness puts alcohol in control of someone. He’s controlled by the alcohol. The Greek words for “filled with” mean “be controlled by.” The believer is commanded to be controlled by the Holy Spirit and not alcohol. The alcohol is related to worship, but someone is never to be controlled by anyone or anything but the Holy Spirit. That means in every area of life, which the next twenty something verses reveal.
The control of alcohol brings excess and riotousness. The control of the Holy Spirit results in something else, what follows in the proceeding verses. Alcohol really does control. Someone can understand that. With that understanding, come to the Holy Spirit and imagine His controlling instead. Alcohol almost totally takes over with limited human control. Holy Spirit control is almost total control with a background of human control. A person is still doing something, but he’s controlled by Someone else as a whole, the Holy Spirit.
The second point of Paul is to relate to the false worship of Ephesus at the temple of Diana that the audience of the church at Ephesus would know. In the base of the pillars were ornately carved grapes. Drunkenness was part of the worship. It would bring a state of ecstasy, which was confused with a kind of divine control. This out of body type of experience of drunkenness gives the impression that someone is out of control, which he is, but that he is under the control of divine power. He isn’t. It’s the alcohol. Paul contrasts the false worship of Ephesus with the true worship of the true God. It isn’t ecstatic, which unfortunately and ironically is the worship of these Calvary Chapels.
The rock music of the the CCM that even originated with the first Jesus’ movement of the first Calvary Chapel in Costa Mesa, California gave the impression of something spiritual occurring. It wasn’t. It was entirely fleshly, ecstatic, like the drunkenness of the worship of Diana. Fleshly music brings a kind of ecstasy like that produced by alcohol that gives a counterfeit, false experience of spirituality. It might be “a spirit,” but it isn’t the Holy Spirit. It isn’t Holy and it isn’t Spiritual. Spiritual worship does not arise from the flesh, from alcohol, or from rhythm. These churches manipulate their listeners, giving them the wrong understanding of true spirituality. It is a form of idolatry.
There is actually no contrast in the worship of the Calvary Chapels with the world’s temples. They incorporate the ecstatic experience of the world into their so-called “worship.” In so doing, their people develop a false imagination of God. Their worship gives them a false god that does not have the same nature as the One and True God.
The local Calvary Chapel pastor compared drunken singing to the singing of Ephesians 5:19. First, he approved of alcohol as long as someone isn’t “sloshed.” He was saying this in a mocking tone, like he was embarrassed to be preaching about something bad related to alcohol. He was approving of alcohol as long as it didn’t result in drunkenness. In many people’s minds, being “sloshed” is a further level of drunkenness than the mere term drunken or legal drunkenness. This is missing the teaching of the verse and is dangerous to his audience.
The worship of Ephesians 5:19 proceeds from the control of the Holy Spirit. This is not carnal or emotional. It might result in emotions, but it is not emotional. Colossians 3:16 is a parallel passage and it compares Spirit filling to being controlled by the Words of Christ. If someone is controlled by the Holy Spirit and the Word of God, the first way that will manifest itself is in true worship.
The participles of Ephesians 5:19 relate to being controlled by the Holy Spirit. You can or will know if someone is saved and then filled with the Spirit, based upon your worship. Worship comes first in this list of manifestations. False worship is controlled by something other than the Holy Spirit. It doesn’t have to be alcohol. It could also be fleshly music that brings a closely related ecstasy to that occurring in the false worship in Ephesus.
The Command to Worship the LORD in the Beauty of Holiness
Without doubt, scripture teaches that worship of God must be regulated by what God says. The point of this post comes from Psalm 29:2
Give unto the LORD the glory due unto his name; worship the LORD in the beauty of holiness.
I’ve seen this verse many times. Many. Yet, something occurred to me when I read it in my Bible reading this year that really struck me. Since true worship of God is regulated by scripture, then worship should be regulated especially by this verse. There are not many verses as stark as this one on worship of the LORD. The teaching is also repeated three times. It’s not a stand alone.
1 Chronicles 16:29, “Give unto the LORD the glory due unto his name: bring an offering, and come before him: worship the LORD in the beauty of holiness.”Psalm 96:9, “O worship the LORD in the beauty of holiness: fear before him, all the earth.”
Worship Is God’s Priority for Men: The Case of 2 Chronicles 26
Man isn’t going to make his way through life without sinning, but he can as a habit or lifestyle come to God by faith in worship of Him through the means and in the way prescribed by God. 2 Chronicles reiterates this. In the midst of annals of especially various battles and conflicts with other nations, worship of God surfaces again and again.
Uzziah became king of Judah. 2 Chronicles 26 says “he did that which was right in the sight of the Lord” (v. 4). He “sought God” (v. 5). Verse 15 says, “he was marvelously helped, till he was strong.” The next verse (16) says:
But when he was strong, his heart was lifted up to his destruction: for he transgressed against the LORD his God, and went into the temple of the LORD to burn incense upon the altar of incense.
I think we should assume that “being strong” in this sense means that he was so strong that it went to his head. It’s the opposite of 2 Corinthians 12:10, the Apostle Paul, “for when I am weak, then am I strong.” The strength comes from the acknowledgment of weakness. Uzziah’s strength came from above and he didn’t recognize that, so he was really weak, the opposite of what Paul talked about. I think you get it.
So. “His heart was lifted up to his destruction.” Destruction sounds serious. That isn’t successful, being destroyed. What caused that? The strength that didn’t come from Uzziah, but he was considering it to be his strength, lifted up his heart, so that he did something that merited destruction. Another layer is that Uzziah “transgressed against the LORD his God.” Everyone transgresses against God, and it doesn’t result in destruction. What did result in destruction? This verse states it very plain.
He “went into the temple of the LORD to burn incense upon the altar of incense.” Well, is it wrong to burn incense at the altar of incense? No. It wasn’t wrong. So why did that result in destruction? Just because something isn’t wrong doesn’t mean that it is right. Worship is regulated by what God says, not by what He doesn’t say. God designated the priests to burn incense on the altar of incense. When Uzziah did it instead, this was according to God “to his destruction.” God does not want innovation in worship. He wants exactly what He said that He wants.
The next few verses read:
17 And Azariah the priest went in after him, and with him fourscore priests of the LORD, that were valiant men: 18 And they withstood Uzziah the king, and said unto him, It appertaineth not unto thee, Uzziah, to burn incense unto the LORD, but to the priests the sons of Aaron, that are consecrated to burn incense: go out of the sanctuary; for thou hast trespassed; neither shall it be for thine honour from the LORD God.
I guess you could call this an intervention. When someone violates biblical worship, it must be stopped and other people should involve themselves in stopping it. In this case, it’s someone in authority, but the worship of God is more important than his office. They couldn’t just “agree to disagree.” They had to do something about it.
Uzziah thought he was participating in an honorable activity, something an honor for him to do, burn incense to God. He might have felt good about it. Azariah and 80 other priests brought that to his attention, probably risking their lives to do so even as verse 17 calls them “valiant men.” It took guts for them to perform this intervention and to stop Uzziah from doing this.
People offered incense to God. It was permissible for them to offer it, but it wasn’t permissible for just anyone to do this. They had to be ordained and qualified people to do it. They were consecrated to do so, or in other words, they were set apart to do so, fulfilling the scriptural requirements. Others were not permitted to do it.
Silence wasn’t permission. This is very often where worship goes off the rails. If scripture doesn’t say it’s wrong, then someone is at liberty to do it. God didn’t tell Cain he couldn’t bring fruits and vegetables. That didn’t mean that bringing fruits and vegetables was right.
Today professing Christians, including leaders, say that a church shouldn’t stress over methods. It’s not worth being strict, onerous, or intolerable over methods. That’s not how scripture reads and especially when it comes to worship. Believers through the centuries observed that all worship must be regulated by scripture, including in its methodology. This is the regulative principle of worship. This text in 2 Chronicles 26 is further evidence of this.
Why are so many men, 81 of them, needed to stop one man from practicing false worship? I have noticed through the years, that when men are not functioning based on scripture, they are operating based on something else mostly related to their feelings. What they are doing is closely related to their own personal opinions. It’s pride. When someone crosses someone in a personal way and against their emotions or feelings, they react in an emotional way and even a violent way. It’s not an easy reaction. It can be difficult to deal with.
Consider what occurs in the next two verses:
19 Then Uzziah was wroth, and had a censer in his hand to burn incense: and while he was wroth with the priests, the leprosy even rose up in his forehead before the priests in the house of the LORD, from beside the incense altar. 20 And Azariah the chief priest, and all the priests, looked upon him, and, behold, he was leprous in his forehead, and they thrust him out from thence; yea, himself hasted also to go out, because the LORD had smitten him.
Worship Is God’s Priority for Men: The Case of 2 Chronicles 25
The impression from an overview of scripture is that worship is God’s priority for men. Jesus said to the woman at the well, God is seeking for true worshipers (John 4:23). Jesus said this. David was a man after God’s own heart (1 Samuel 13:14). What was David’s priority? The worship of God. 1 Chronicles 25:14-16 provide another example:
14 Now it came to pass, after that Amaziah was come from the slaughter of the Edomites, that he brought the gods of the children of Seir, and set them up to be his gods, and bowed down himself before them, and burned incense unto them. 15 Wherefore the anger of the LORD was kindled against Amaziah, and he sent unto him a prophet, which said unto him, Why hast thou sought after the gods of the people, which could not deliver their own people out of thine hand? 16 And it came to pass, as he talked with him, that the king said unto him, Art thou made of the king’s counsel? forbear; why shouldest thou be smitten? Then the prophet forbare, and said, I know that God hath determined to destroy thee, because thou hast done this, and hast not hearkened unto my counsel
Amaziah, king of Judah, conquered the Edomites based on a prophecy from God. God gave his mercenary army the victory over Edom, which had rebelled against his great-grandfather, Jehoram (verse 14). He obeyed God in slaughtering the Edomites. However, as you can read above, he brought Edom’s gods and bowed down to them and burned incense to them. How did God react to that?
God’s anger was kindled against Amaziah, because of the false worship. There’s more. God was the one who delivered the Edomites, and these new gods could not deliver them. So, God sent a prophet to confront Amaziah.
False worship doesn’t make any sense. God gives every good thing and yet people worship another god and in numbers of different ways. What is it? It doesn’t explain the insanity of this, but we know it still occurs. The true God is not worshiped in a true way. He’s ignored. He’s refused. What causes men to choose a different god or worship the true God in a way He would never accept? Why do they do it?
Maybe it doesn’t matter why. Maybe all that matters is that they do it. In the end, the judgment will come for what, but why still matters. It doesn’t say, but I think we know. We’re supposed to know. God gives everyone every good thing, but God expects something from His worshipers. False gods don’t have the same expectations as God. It’s like doctor shopping. You shop for the god of your choice and have him be your god, and then you get what you want.
Another avenue today is to keep the God of the Bible but conform Him so much to your own preferences and your own style, that He’s not even the same God. He’s god, not God. That’s all over “evangelicalism.” People are important to evangelicalism, and evangelicalism’s god conforms to people. That’s who he is.
The wrong worship and the wrong god merge into one another. They become indistinguishable at some point. Keeping the same “God” is just a masquerade. And then people are so self-deceived, they just don’t know anymore. God knows and He’s angry.
In many ways, people again in a self-deceived way are thinking they can fool God. He won’t know. Or He’ll understand and accept. 2 Peter describes apostasy and in the most rudimentary way, it is not wanting accountability or authority. This does challenge the goodness of God and redefines goodness. Goodness becomes the object of man’s lust, and man doesn’t want a God who doesn’t give him what he wants. Reader, God knows. You won’t get away with it. His worship is His priority.
God is angry with false worship as described in the previous four paragraphs. On the other hand, someone who prioritizes that worship, as flawed even as he may be personally, is a man after God’s own heart. He prioritizes the true worship of God. That doesn’t excuse His flaws, but it’s helpful to know God’s priority.
Amaziah’s worship story is an amazing one. Do you agree? But let’s move on.
God sends a prophet to warn about false worship. True prophets warn against false worship, preach true worship. Practical, successful living matters to God, but worship is the priority. Today that would be to worship the right God the right way, which is in His church, regulated by scripture. Church growth is not the priority, except for more true worshipers. If there isn’t true worship at all, God doesn’t want church growth. He wants church disappearance or elimination.
The message from God through the prophet is not to seek after other gods. Don’t seek them in whatever way anyone may seek them. On the other hand, seek the true God. People don’t know Him, because they don’t seek Him. He must be sought to be known. This relates to a lot about believing the Lord. He is available and can be known, but we must seek Him. Sure, we can’t seek Him without His seeking us, but we must seek Him. It’s crucial.
The first half of verse 16 accounts of the threat by Amaziah to the prophet. That sounds serious, threatening someone who impedes your false worship. I’ve stood at the door arguing about worship for hours. A lot of people would say, let it go. It’s not important, the gospel is important. Except for the gospel is about worship (see John 4:23 again).
When doing spiritual warfare with someone about worship, it is emotional. People don’t want their worship rejected. If it is, something isn’t wrong with them, the false worshipers, it’s you the prophet. It was so serious for Amaziah that he threatened the prophet in one of the most mafia like threats in scripture. There were two components. First, there was a veiled threat of his job as the king’s counsel, a job he would have lost anyway if, second, he was killed by Amaziah.
I want to emphasize that false worshipers want to defend their false worship. I contend that it’s not about their god. It’s about them. They want what they want, and their god is allowing it. God gave the victory. He deserved to be worshiped, but whatever the gods of Edom offered Amaziah, he preferred it.
Not allowing the false worship is like taking food from an animal. I’ve found this to be the reaction. The false worshiper attacks the prophet to keep the worship. I’ve experienced dozens of personal attacks in similar situations with people angry over the challenge of their worship. Cain is an early example in scripture, challenging God and killing his brother over this same issue.
The prophet addressed both threats in an economy of words and in reverse order. Getting straight to the point, God is going to destroy you, implying that you are not going to destroy me. Second, you didn’t listen to my counsel anyway, so you really can’t threaten me with my job. The prophet stood up to the false worshiper and his false worship. He did not back off. This is God’s will, to confront false worship.
Modern evangelicalism and fundamentalism attack those who confront false worship. If you are reading this and you’re one of them, you’re probably defending your attacks with bad arguments. They call it a tertiary issue. You will be canceled by them for confronting false worship. Love is love after all according to the leftish value list. Love would accommodate false worship. God will kill over it. The prophet actually was saving Amaziah’s life. That is actual love, not the toleration of the leftist values now foremost in evangelicalism and fundamentalism. I face those values every week and almost every day.
2 Chronicles 25 is another case for worship as God’s priority for men.
WHAT IS TRUTH, INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: BEAUTY, MUSIC, WORLDLINESS, AND WORSHIP
(J) for Jackhammer article [all of my articles from Aug 2006 to Feb 2011]
(T) for Thomas Ross article
Music: Psalm Singing
Music: Standard
Worship
Recent Comments