Home » Articles posted by Kent Brandenburg (Page 7)

Author Archives: Kent Brandenburg

The Religion of Social Justice And Its Infiltration of Churches

For my entire lifetime, liberal theology has presented an alternative to the biblical story.  Man arises progressively through naturalistic origins.  The Christian story is superstition, proceeding from mythology in various cultures with hopes of explaining the past and the present.  Instead of taking the Bible literally, use it as an allegory, a source of archetypes for the physical well-being of mankind.  Truth that might spring from the metaphor parallels with conventional thinking, so the message can change.  Since man advanced progressively, improvements for man come from progressivism.  Cultural change mainly in the way of equaling social outcomes is salvation.  Liberalism is religion in all the ways I’ve just described.  For instance, ‘presenting your body a living sacrifice’ is enduring personal loss as an object of change through education, government, psychology, etc.Before the coronavirus, I talked every week to liberal Methodists, liberal Lutherans, liberal Catholics, liberal Presbyterians, liberal Congregationalists, and liberal Baptists.  My next door neighbor, an elderly man, who just died in the last two years, was a conservative Lutheran, who grew up in a Missouri synod church in Northern Wisconsin, but lived his adult life in California.  There was no Lutheran church for him in our area, because all of them had turned liberal.  He lit up when I talked to him.  It made sense, except for the salvation by grace through faith alone.  He would not accept that he couldn’t be saved through his good works.Social justice could be said to be a branch of the larger denomination of liberalism.  Liberalism accepts social justice in its hierarchy.  Membership of a certain generation within evangelical or fundamentalist churches would not accept liberalism, it’s denial of the bodily resurrection of Christ, the virgin birth, miracles, and the blood atonement.  The door stays closed to classic liberalism, but it opens to social justice, which is a denomination within big liberalism.  In fact, liberalism makes its way into churches through social justice.  Evangelicals have made way for the denomination of social justice into its churches through the lies it has told about social justice to pander to potential constituents.  For instance, they leave out the liberalism of Martin Luther King, Jr.  They embrace to a degree a Mother Theresa as if she were a saint.Even conservative evangelicals present themselves as a face of social justice with stories of stands taken during the civil rights movement against the racism of Southern Baptist churches.  Those types of stories are confusing, because they don’t give a clear delineation for who is preaching what.  There was racism in the United States, but did that mean that the black church leaders were preaching the same message as the white churches?  Even if the varied factions could have put aside the racial differences, would they still be meeting together, aligned with a common doctrine?  Common ground should not be attained by ignoring doctrinal error, including on the gospel.A good source for racial history in the United States is the massive amounts of writing found in the fourteen volumes of the Booker T. Washington Papers (look at the index here).  C. Vann Woodward called them “the single most important research enterprise now under way in the field of American black history.”  Many years ago, I read large chunks of these for hours in order to write a docudrama that our school performed on the life of Booker T. Washington.  Washington was relentless and harsh in his criticism of black clergy.  You can read this even in the classic Up from Slavery, which should be required reading in schools and especially Christian schools.  Washington and George Washington Carver would not be receptive to the social justice movement and its actual, real effects on black people in the United States.How is social justice even infiltrating conservative churches?  It comes into the church with themes similar to and apparent counterparts to orthodoxy.   Those themes fall on the ears and minds of younger members through school and media, unprepared to diagnose the counterfeit.  In many, if not most cases, they also might just be unconverted.  They are thorny ground, raised with the acceptability of worldliness, because their leaders did not inform them well enough on cultural issues.  They even attacked those who did in order to indulge potential members for church growth.  They covered for this with the concept of “gospel first importance” or “essential doctrines,” not found in scripture.  The church lost saltiness on the earth and dimmed light to the world.  It’s probably too late to do anything about the damage, but the churches and leaders should repent, and take the true Christians they have left and stand where they didn’t.  I’m not hopeful.The infiltration of social justice occurs with first a well-known theme of sin.  It is a perversion of the doctrine, but the sin and guilt relates to apparent injustice, which really is differing outcomes based upon socio-economics.  The law broken isn’t the law of God, but political correctness.  There are even standards that must be kept like the Pharisees or the Judaizers of the day of Jesus and the Apostles.  If those standards are not kept, separation occurs like not eating with the Gentiles.  These are almost never real sins that are committed.  Judgment comes on not accepting political correctness or following its standards.  They are changing standards, called progressive ones, but they can change based on progressivism.Younger church members embraced the idea of group guilt for an entire race of people.  Sin and guilt doesn’t work that way in reality.  Sin and guilt are individual, so this is a perversion, an important one.  God says the “soul that sinneth, it shall die” (Ezekiel 18:20-24).  Group sin and guilt then changes the nature of redemption.  If no one committed a sin, just found himself already guilty for lacking in pigmentation, then there is also no individual redemption or forgiveness.  He must attempt to do penance by showing all the indications that he is woke.  He must use the correct language, take the correct posture, which might include kneeling, and then perhaps to pay an indulgence in the way of reparations, a kind of tithe to the system.  Redistribution of wealth is part of membership in the new group of the redeemed; however, never really finding redemption because the indulgence must keep being paid.The canon of social justice isn’t scripture, except for allegorized scripture.  It is leftist propaganda and psychology.  Members become duped in psychology and sociology.  Members of the Supreme Court have already joined this church by calling transgenders a sex.  There is no outcry in the country, even from evangelicals, because of the fear of retribution of some kind, a shaming way past the level of the shunning of the Amish.Psychology and sociology have been canonized even in churches.  My father hit me when I was a child.  Social justice would shun him.  If I mouthed off to my dad or my mom, one or the other might smack me in the mouth, not in an injurious way.  I am a victim.  I could claim victim status.  This is part of the psychology.  The fear actually kept me from evil.  It wasn’t sufficient, but it helped me in the short term, until my beliefs were settled.  The next generation resents spankings and if it received any physical discipline beyond spanking, that stands as justification for almost any behavior choice in contradiction of authority.Saints in social justice are victims, even if they are wicked criminals, who have robbed and raped.  Victimhood itself is a form of sanctification, where blame shift occurs.  Someone is released from all blame as a victim, a kind of redemption from guilt.Patriarchy is a social construct as a doctrine of the denomination of social justice.  Women are elevated in their position, so that any criticism is also a violation of political correctness in the canon of social justice.  Anyone who says a woman should take a required role is misogynist.  Men themselves in the general canon are misogynists.  Any man who continues on male patriarchy should be shunned.You can see that the doctrine does not center on the condition of the heart.  It is external behavior.  The kingdom teaching would be progress until there is a classless, sexless, completely equal society.  As you might know, this won’t or doesn’t happen.  It will be turned into an oligarchy much like the nation of Chaz up in Seattle right now, ruled by violence.What I’ve described in this post won’t end well.  It is against God.  God is still in charge.  There is a real, true God with a real, true Bible, that is the standard by which He judges.  Someone can invent his own world in his head, but he still lives in God’s world where God is the judge.  True saints should reject the denomination of social justice in the religion of liberalism.   Yes, today you will be persecuted.  You really are salt and light and you are being persecuted for righteousness.  Standing against the religion of social justice is righteous.

Lack of Application of Scripture to Cultural Issues and Ecclesiastical Separation Now Haunting Conservative Evangelicals Like MacArthur

Scripture exhaustively and scrupulously furnishes and profits unto every good work (2 Timothy 3:16-17).  For scripture to do this, it must be applied.  The Bible doesn’t say, “Thou shalt not smoke crack pipes.”  The Bible does make that point, but it must be applied to do so.  Scripture applies to cultural issues.  God wants His Word applied to cultural issues.  To obey God’s Word, the Bible must be applied to cultural issues.  When one disobeys God on cultural issues, he is sinning against God.Not applying God’s Word to cultural issues resulted in bigger evangelical churches, including the conservative ones.  They didn’t apply the Word of God to many different cultural issues.  I’ve read what they have said through the years and confronted them directly on those.  These issues, like many through the years, bleed over into many other doctrinal and practical issues of God’s Word.  You can see this in scripture too.In 1 Corinthians 6:18 and then 1 Corinthians 10:14, the Apostle Paul made two related commands:  “Flee fornication” and “flee from idolatry.”  In other places in scripture, God commands, “abstain from fornication” (1 Thess 4:13) and “ye shall make you no idols” (Lev 26:1).  The first two commands are beyond the second two.  How does someone obey the first two commands, which are more than merely not fornicating and not making idols?Is “flee” to sprint away in the other direction?  Does that obey the command?  Does a believer obey the command to flee by running really fast and hard a different direction?  It might seem like I’m insulting your intelligence, but these commands must be applied in order to be obeyed.  In 2 Timothy 2:22, Paul wrote to Timothy, “Flee youthful lusts.”  Same thing.  In 1 Timothy 6:11, Paul commands, “Flee these things,” things referring to “many foolish and hurtful lusts,” which are related to money.  These “flee” commands are some of many similar type commands that require application to obey.One is not adding to scripture or going “above that which is written” when applying these commands.  It isn’t adding to scripture like a Pharisee.  These types of evangelical, including conservative evangelical, attacks are red herrings.  They make way for not applying scripture, especially on cultural issues.In the great meeting of the Antioch and Jerusalem churches in Acts 15, James instructed the Gentile believers in the combination Jew and Gentile churches to “abstain from pollutions of idols.”  What is the obedience to that instruction?  How do idols pollute?  How does one insure he is not being polluted by an idol?  This is the first thing James said directed toward the Gentiles in his speech.  The meaning of “pollutions” could be “contaminations.”  This goes further than just abstaining from idol worship, but relates to association, something Paul addresses then in 1 Corinthians 10.Evangelicals and conservative evangelicals, including John MacArthur and Phil Johnson, have called fundamentalists and separatist believers, “legalists,” because of their application of the above types of commands in scripture that relate to social or cultural issues.  These issues do not reside in a vacuum.  They affect gospel oriented issues, even as they did in the Gentile cities, where Paul ministered.  I’m pointing out these two men, because now they and others, but especially them are being attacked because of their stands against evangelical compromise on cultural issues.  They are being attacked like they themselves attacked others in many different instances.  They accommodated the worldliness that now haunts all of evangelicalism.  They still don’t separate over it.  I welcome them outside the camp, bearing the reproach, that they themselves have given out.In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus said that the root identity of the believer, the citizen of His kingdom, is light and salt (Matthew 5:13-16).  Being those two meant not abrogating the Word of God (Matthew 5:17-20).  These are presented as salvation issues.  Someone leaves darkness to light.  He leaves the world system to the kingdom of God.I see pollutions or contaminations of all sorts of kinds in conservative evangelicalism too.  They have not broken with worldly “worship,” dress, and entertainment or amusement.  They see these as liberty issues.  Onc cannot flee from youthful lust and worldly lust and “make not provision for the flesh” (Romans 13:14) and accept these activities.  Peter refused to eat with Gentiles in Antioch in the presence of Jerusalem Judaizers and Paul withstood him to his face for that.  No scripture prohibited not eating with Gentiles — that was another application of scripture by Paul.Is the kingdom of Jesus Christ going to have the worldly and sensual worship of conservative evangelicalism?  Will it have the immodest swimming activities with bare legs and plunging necklines?  Will the inhabitants of the kingdom of the Lord listen to rock music and hip hop?  Will the women and the men dress in androgynous fashion in the kingdom of Jesus Christ, or will there be a return to the distinct male and female garment?Phil Johnson has sad that strict application of scripture lead to the progressive evangelicalism we see today.  They were pendulum swinging away from the legalism, caused by fundamentalists.  No.  The lack of consistent application of scripture leads to further capitulation.  Evangelicals continued to associate.  They didn’t flee.  They kept making provision.  Even without actual idolatry, it leads to pollution, contamination.  The contamination results in the gospel distortion now rampant in evangelicalism.I don’t think the conservative evangelicals will separate.  They won’t start applying scripture like they should have before, like true believers have through the history of Christianity.  They will bewail the fall of evangelicalism loudly, as if they had nothing to do with it.  Their compromise helped cause it.

Why David’s Life Would Matter

The background of Psalm 30, written by King David, was his numbering of Israel.  2 Samuel 24 and 1 Chronicles 21 mention the event.  God offered David his choice of punishments: three years of famine, three months of war with Israel’s enemies, or three days of pestilence. David chose pestilence.  About 70,000 people died in three days.

David himself was sick unto death and he prayed to God about it, like an argument for his continuing to live (Psalm 30:8-10).

I cried to thee, O Lord; and unto the Lord I made supplication.  What profit is there in my blood, when I go down to the pit? Shall the dust praise thee? shall it declare thy truth?  Hear, O Lord, and have mercy upon me: Lord, be thou my helper.

God wasn’t going to kill David with disease, but David didn’t know that.  While 70,000 of his people were dying because of what he did, he thought he would too, so he made his case.  What would a good case be to make to God in order to live?  What purpose would impress God that your life is worth living?  David says two related purposes in verse 9.
What David did that made his living superior to dying was, one, praising the Lord, and, two, declaring the truth of the Lord.  Could the opposite argument be made?  If someone does not praise the Lord and declare the truth of the Lord, does he have an argument before God for living?
David believed his life would matter if He praised God and declared God’s truth, which is His Word.  Any one of us could argue about lives mattering, but David didn’t see his own life mattering unless he did those two things.  When you think about lives mattering, what do you think makes them matter?  Are you even thinking right about life and why it matters?
The Lord doesn’t accept all praise.  If you regard iniquity in your heart, He doesn’t hear your praise (Psalm 66:18).  It must be acceptable to Him (Romans 12:1).  He is holy.  Praise is about Him being praised, not making you feel good, because your “praise song” “rocks.”  God is praised through reverence and solemnity.  They are required for His offerings.
Declaring the Lord’s truth is declaring all of what God says in His Word.  That’s trickier to evangelicals.  Praise has become easier to hoodwink.  People won’t want to hear the truth, so declaring all of it won’t make you popular.  It’s why God wants us here though.
On Sunday, David taught Psalm 30.  He taught about why David’s life would matter, except he didn’t know he was sick like David in the Bible.  David Sutton, the other pastor at our church, started feeling dizzy about 2/3 of the way into his lesson.  He started a migraine.  He went out the side door to lie down in the office.  The emergency room said his brain was bleeding.  An ambulance took him to Redwood City, and the next morning did a cerebral angiogram and found a small leak on his brain stem.  The doctor said they thought he would make a full recovery.  He would need to stay in the hospital though for ten days or more.
David Sutton’s life matters to God.  We are hoping for a speedy and strong recovery.  We’re rejoicing in his life.
You should ask yourself about your own life.  Could you make the same argument for why you should live?

Contemporary Indications of the Reprobate Mind

Where I live at this moment has the fifth busiest traffic in the country on Highway 80, headed toward what is called the MacArthur Maze.  During coronavirus, it’s been different, but before March 2020, traffic would come to a complete standstill because people would turn to look at an accident.  The same principle applies as the world stares at the present devastation in America.  Scripture provides commentary and explanation for what they see happening.  What is it?

In Romans 1:28, the Apostle Paul writes, “And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind.”  The flow of Romans 1 is that men knew God, but they suppressed that knowledge.  God turned them over to what they wanted, as His act of judgment.  An indication of God’s turning them over, is their “reprobate mind.”  “Reprobate” is depraved.

The lust is what fools the person, their thinking that what they like, based on their feelings, is good for them.  James 1:14 describes it as being drawn away of one’s own lust, and then enticed.  The enticement is in the mind.  Nothing or not enough is there to stop the lust.  When someone is saved, Hebrews 9-10 describe the inward transformation, the purging of a defiled conscience.

What looks horrendous to many, construed by and through a reprobate mind looks attractive.  Someone’s trash really is a treasure.  It is a perspective, a worldview, a grid by which someone measures.  The chaos in Seattle many call a street festival.  The right instinct is trash.  Why does someone see it as depraved and others as acceptable?  This is the reprobate mind.

The most influential party platform in the United States is built upon killing babies in the mother’s womb, destroying the most fundamental unit of relationship, the family, by eliminating male and female roles, promoting homosexuality, and they are proud about it.  Then Paul say in verse 32 that it is not only those who do the same, but have pleasure in them that do them.
These people and their activities are advocated or defended on social media by a majority of 18 to 30 year olds.  They take pleasure in them that do them.  They elect them to office.  They choose them for congressman, senator, and president.  That’s who they want.  They reject those who point it out, hate them.
Because of the depraved mind, they can’t find favor in what God does.  They don’t want what He wants.  They are not for righteousness.  The problem is not an external problem.  It is an internal one.  That’s who they are.  Like Jesus said in Matthew 12:35:

A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things.

Earlier in Matthew 15:18 He then said this:

But those things which proceed out of the mouth come forth from the heart; and they defile the man.

There is a salvation problem here.  It’s possible that someone, like Lot, is vexing his righteous soul, but more likely, someone not saved.  He has forsaken the church for the world.
A common reaction in many cases is to mask the pain of conscience.  Some of these were trained in a different way by their parents, but they anesthetize it in three ways at least.  One, they listen to sensual music that pushes everything out but their own lust.  Two, they set up boundaries against those who say something different.  They don’t listen to their parents.  They push away a church that teaches the truth.  This allows them to continue to be misinformed.  Then third, they speak evil of dignities, like 2 Peter 2 talks about.  They tear everything down that came before them, including the law of God around them.  They’re pigs.
Apostates scorched earth the previous generation of righteousness.  They’ll find something.  Everyone can, but that’s the not the point.  The point is like those in Ezekiel 18:2:

What mean ye, that ye use this proverb concerning the land of Israel, saying, The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge?

This proverb took root as a philosophy of the day.  The fathers ate sour grapes and now the children’s teeth are set on edge.  The latter doesn’t follow from the former.  The former is just used as propaganda.  These were bad people.  These were the ones that either built these statues or they allowed them to stay.
The children don’t care about the teeth.  They just use them to nullify anything the parents or authorities say.  “You ate sour grapes.”  The result doesn’t follow, but it doesn’t matter that it doesn’t.  This phenomena of apostasy occurs to a certain degree with any generation, but because of technology especially,  has multiplied.   Most of these don’t study out almost anything from scripture.  They don’t have the means or the interest.  They’re not looking for the truth.  They won’t even be challenged.  The point isn’t knowing what scripture says.  They can’t stand for almost any kind of debate, which is why they set up boundaries, where they are unaccountable.
The boundaries of children with teeth set on edge are also a psychological barrier with the auspices of self-care.  Personal well-being necessitates not being under any kind of analysis.   The bent teeth really are in the head, psychological bent teeth of this generation.   This is the reprobate mind.  They hence redefine love to be toleration, what they call “unconditional love,” as opposed to “transactional.”  These are what the Apostle Paul calls “vain philosophies” in Colossians 3, or today, psychobabble. They pervert the gospel, which is transformational, someone turning from these excuses to serve the living God.
Sodom and Gomorrah had nothing to hinder the lust.  Without righteous souls as salt and light, nothing was there to stop the downward slide.  The United States has reached a new state of existence.  Instead of standing up, too many churches are encouraging the depravity with their silence.  It’s a tipping point.  This portends for a different kind of judgment in the future, maybe very close.

The Apostle Paul’s Response to A First Century Gospel-Destroying Cancel-Culture Wokeness Plague on the Church

The Apostle Paul had woke credentials.  He lists them in Philippians 3 in case anyone might wonder.  No one was more Jew than he was.  He took great advantage of that in Gentile cities when he visited the synagogues first.  If he went to the Gentile first, his hearing with the Jews would be diminished.  If anyone could say, “You ain’t Jew,” it was Paul.  He attended the top of the Jew only schools.  He could be on speed dial to talk about oppression, because he was raised in the minority environment of Tarsus, a Gentile province.

The plan of God was a Jew and Gentile church.  That was patently clear through Jesus’ life and ministry.  That was plain with the Ethiopian in Acts 8 and then crystal in Acts 10 and 11 with Cornelius.  The Old Testament already taught it start to finish especially beginning with the Abrahamic Covenant (Genesis 12) and then the uber-obvious book of Jonah.  Once Paul was converted, born-again, saved, believed the gospel, transformed by Jesus Christ, or purified by faith alone, he set about to preach it to everyone.
Paul comes onto the scene of the first century church in a conspicuous way in Antioch with Barnabas.  That church in Syria exploded with Gentile growth and then sent those their top two leaders on the first missionary journey with Gentiles prominently in mind.  Every stop brought Gentile success.  They were gone for two years and returned to Antioch to find a woke mess back home.  Wokeness occurred all over, following Paul in almost every town, but it arose most in Jerusalem, where Jews were the majority.
The essence of wokeness was subjugation of Gentiles to Jewishness.  The Jews started canceling any fellow Jew for visible association with Gentiles.  Out of fear of retribution, the Apostle Peter submitted to the Jewish demands and wouldn’t eat with Gentiles in Antioch.  Being Gentile wasn’t villified in Antioch.  It was sufficiently Hellenized, already cosmopolitan.  Gentiles flooded that church.  Yet, the pressure was still enough for Peter to cave to woke interests.
Later in Acts 15, when Peter stood to speak on wokeness to a gathering of Antioch and Jerusalem church members he recounted his experience with Cornelius.  Cornelius believed and received the gift of the Holy Spirit.  He was never circumcized.  He didn’t cede to any Jewishness for salvation.  Faith brought every bit of purification Cornelius needed.  He couldn’t be any more woke than faith alone.  No Jewishness was required.
Jewish lives mattered, but so did Gentiles.  In many locations Paul preached, Jews rioted because of Paul’s general message of faith only.  It was unacceptable.  Jews got violent.  They stoned Paul.  They chased him out of cities.  He never relented.  These Gentiles needed to show solidarity by kneeling to Jewish culture.
Paul withstood Peter to his face over canceling one lunch date.  This act required accedence to Jewishness to the extent that it confused the gospel.  Could Jews enter the kingdom of the promised Messiah by faith alone or by faith plus deferral to Jewishness?  Woke Jews created a list of demands for both Jews and Gentiles.  For one, Jews couldn’t enter Gentile homes or eat with them.  Gentiles must be circumcised and observe dietary restriction.  God would not accept Gentiles by genuine faith alone.  Concession must be made to Jewishness.
In Jersualem especially, but also even in the Gentile world, Jews could pressure Gentiles through various means, physical and psychological.  If Jewishness wasn’t accepted, the Jews held enough sway still to bring enough Gentiles to attain their demands by force.  They had the numbers, even if they weren’t in a majority.  The threat of violence and social shame manipulated those on the margins.  Even if they didn’t agree, they dreaded the reproach, so preferred to keep their head down and go along.
Paul never ceded to the pressure of wokeness.  He arrived.  He preached the pure, unadulterated message without the garnish of Jewishness to render it politically correct.  This would acquiesce to what he called “excellency of speech” (1 Corinthians 2:1).  The gospel was good enough.  The church was enough.  Neither he or Jesus attempted social change in their day.  They focused one hundred percent on the future kingdom, not the present one.
Today wokeness has entered the church in very similar fashion as it did in Paul’s day.  When Paul encountered it in Antioch, both he and Barnabas made haste to Jerusalem to confront it and excise it.  If allowed to stand, it would have established two gospels, one by works and one by grace.
The new woke gospel teaches group guilt that requires group repentance.  It’s not the soul that sinneth that dies, but the race that sinneth.  The former woke gospel added circumcision and the present one adds resignation to racial privilege and a kind of reparation, an adequate penitence for cooperation with wrong outcomes in the past.  Their teeth really are bent because you ate grapes (Jeremiah 31:29).
“To do justly, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with thy God” (Micah 6:8) is hijacked to mean ‘genuflect to race.’  Kneel.  Vote for Joe Biden.  Hate Trump.  Post a black meme on blackout Tuesday.  Walk in a protest march.  Talk in an urban dialect.  Allow for liberation theology.  Center kingdom teaching around acceptable social causes.  Blame wrong outcomes on systemic racism.  Admit white privilege.
Those keeping track know that it is more than race, but also gender and sex.  Beleaguered people include same sex and transgender.  And in the end, it really is about choosing whatever identity you want, unchallenged.  This contradicts actual salvation, but this is twisted to the acceptance of it being compassion, honesty, and self-care.  Toleration is compassion.  Authenticity is honesty, that is, not being someone you’re not, at least to you.  Self-care is self-love, which has become at the root of loving your neighbor, as yourself, the emphasis being on loving your self.   It is suicide to an entire culture, let alone the church.
Churches pandering to millennials craft their message around wokeness.  They see it as church growth success.  They are making merchandise of the weak, compliant, emotional, and superficial.  I see almost an entire generation of apostasy on a level never seen in the United States.  Christianity subdues itself to the world.

When Black Lives Really Do Matter to Someone

Race is a social construct. The Bible doesn’t mention race, except the human race, the single Adamic race.

Some have more melanin than others, so their skin is darker to varying degrees with actually very little physical difference between people. The DNA of any two human beings is 99.9% similar in content and identity. God doesn’t care more for someone with more melanin and neither should any person.
Skin color identifies and distinguishes. If a crime is committed, race is one means of describing a suspect. I heard Shaquille O’Neil in recent years call himself the black Steph Curry. He brought attention to the variation in their skin color.  He did that.  For what reason?
Enough of that though.  Black lives matter and they matter to me too. They don’t matter less than white or yellow or brown or red lives.

The meaning and value of human life and lives are wrapped up in their being made in the image of God.  This is not any more clear than in Genesis 9:6: “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.” With the first murder, that of Abel, God said (Genesis 4:10): “the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.”  The shed blood cried out to God for retribution.  The life of the flesh is in the blood (Leviticus 17:11).

Life matters to God, so it should matter to us. Black lives matter.  When they do matter to someone, how can one tell? How can you tell if black lives matter?  People say it, but is it the truth?  Should it be that someone types a hashtag for everyone? Is it opting for a blackout Tuesday? Attending a march or anti-racism protest? Is it by facilitating an uncomfortable conversation about race? Through countless memes, videos, and posts about race on social media pages? Instructions on how to educate ourselves? Should it be through an explanation of white privilege? Giving book recommendations about race? Maybe more than any other way, will people know black lives matter to you by your criticism of other non-black people who use language you can label as oppressive?
People aim to appear to care.  It’s a show — the Pharisee part of this. It signals virtue, which is in fact absent in most cases. Someone who has done nothing for black lives shouldn’t be touting his own compassion with memes.  He is a Pharisee praying on the street corner.  He poses like picking the most appropriate image is his big sacrifice, seeking the approval from those from which he hungers it.  Black lives matter is another hoop to jump through for acceptance or at least, not rejection.
Someone should ask, what did Jesus do? What did the Apostle Paul do? They were both concerned about the gospel.  This life is very, very short.  The Jewish problem with Gentiles was judged by its affect on the salvation of Gentiles through a perversion of the gospel. Jesus didn’t protest slavery in the Roman empire. The gospel would bring the owner and slave together like Philemon and Onesimus in Philemon, now brothers beloved.
Our church is heavily pigmented mainly because we don’t target anyone.  We don’t pander to any audience, which is the essence of impartiality.  We don’t reach out to the blacks, to the whites, to the Asians, to the Hispanics, to the Indians.  Hyping race is racism.  Ignoring it isn’t.   We reach out to everyone regardless of this social construction called “race.” We treat race like it doesn’t exist, because it doesn’t.
Since race doesn’t exist, black, white, red, or yellow culture doesn’t exist. It’s only scriptural or unscriptural culture, spiritual or carnal, godly or ungodly, or sacred or profane. There is no black music or white music. The English language isn’t white or black. You can’t “sound black” or “sound white.” You’re either saying it right or saying it wrong. You’re not helped by saying it wrong.  Race itself is a lie, so the pressures created around it to cave to wrong behavior are the price of the lie.  It’s what turns people into racists.
When black lives matter to you, first, you care about the eternal soul of the black person. Instead of accentuating skin color, do you talk about the two ways the Bible categorizes people: saved or lost, sheep or goats, tares or wheat, or light or darkness?   When you don’t preach the gospel to black people, don’t tell me that black lives matter to you. They don’t. How many black people have you preached the gospel to, professing Christian? If it’s none, when you have black people all around you, you are a heartless hypocrite with zero compassion. Stop promoting yourself on social media like you care. You don’t. You are a pathetic self-promoter. That’s all you are.  When black lives matter, you want black lives to be eternal lives, which has nothing to do with skin color and everything about believing the gospel. If you haven’t done that, and you don’t do it, you hate black people, while saying that you love them.
I knocked on every door of the iron triangle in Richmond, California.  I skipped no neighborhoods.  On many occasions, I played basketball in areas where there were only black people, and afterwards I preached the gospel to them.  I knocked on every door in Parchester Village, the Rodeo projects, and North Richmond.
When black lives matter to you, second, you make disciples of black people to Jesus Christ. That is very similar, almost identical to evangelizing, except this means you are sacrificing to spend time with at least one black person to teach him to observe all things whatsoever the Lord has commanded. How many black people have you discipled? Some of the loudest at publicizing their own racial virtue, have done zip. It’s most of you reading. Please sit down. Retire your social media from the spread of this lie that black people matter to you.  They don’t.
The third way to tell if black lives matter to you is your support of missions to black people.  It’s not just them, but it’s the whole world, which includes black people.  Africa is mainly black.  Are you willing to go to Africa out of love for Africans?  Actual Africans from the continent of Africa?  Our church supports three missionaries to Africa and at one time, four, but now one has gone to Australia to evangelize that country.  Do you keep up with missions to Africa?  Do you read missionary prayer letters from Africa?  More black people live in Africa than any other place.  What are you doing to reach Africa?
Another way to tell if black lives matter to you is, four, do you sacrificially serve black people?  What do you do to help black people?  Helping someone means involvement.  You work with them directly.  You bear their burdens.  I’m not talking about a hand out.  I’m talking about helping them personally get out of a cycle, maybe by providing free child care, which my wife and I did for years for two black girls, while their mother worked.  I would have helped them if they were white or Asian too.  Race is a  social construct.  I stood before a crowd of almost entirely black people every month for eight years, asking if I could take any one of them out to find a job.  If someone wanted it, I would meet him at a location in town to try and help.  This was my own time, not spending the taxes someone else pays.  We have had black people living with us, providing them short term housing, until they could get a place to live.
Do black lives matter to you if you don’t oppose black abortion?  Between 2012 and 2016 over 136,000 black children were murdered in New York City through abortion.  Do these black lives matter?  All black lives matter, not just one murdered by a police officer.  More black people are killed by abortion than any single means, so, five, you can tell that black lives matter to you if you oppose the abortion of black lives.  That is not popular to say.  You can’t post that on your social media and receive two hundred likes from the readers.  If you are silent about black abortion, then black lives don’t matter to you.
Very few black people are killed by white people.  It’s difficult to find official statistics, so I go back to 2013.  According to the FBI in 2013, 2,491 black people were murdered in the United States, 189 by white people and 2,245 by black people.  409 white people were killed by black people.  The biggest danger to black lives are black people.  If it is black lives that matter and not just politics, then the biggest threat to murder, besides abortion, are black people killing each other.  Six, if black lives really do matter, all of them, then more attention must be given to blacks killing blacks, than whites killing blacks.
No murder is justified, but if black lives matter, then the focus should be on what ends the most black lives.  That isn’t white people.  It’s a very small number of black people who are killed by white police officers.  It’s a very large number of black people killed by other black people.  Every black person is made in the image of God.  Every black person is endowed by the Creator with the right to life.  Black lives matter.
If it really is black lives matter, then these six above will be heard.  Do you first care if black people will be in the kingdom, will be in heaven with you?  That’s forever, not just the short life that we live, but all eternity.  Do you second care about what ends the most black lives, so that the most possible black people can live?  If you do not hear about these, then it isn’t about black lives, but about something else.

The Nation Was Hacked

The post analysis of the coronavirus pandemic might and will likely show gross incompetence mainly from leftist mayors and governors in the United States with a corollary influence on everyone else because of the politics and fear. Everyone needs to be prepared for the cover up, massive number of lies.  I’m just predicting here.  The government didn’t know what it was doing.  Other countries, like Sweden and South Korea, did the opposite and succeeded.  This was of the nature of the Russian collusion fraud.  Most of the country is duped and scammed by its most foolish.  The whole nation was hacked.

It was almost impossible for the sensible and right thinking to counter the insanity.  There is so much crazy, an consequence of rampant false beliefs and behavior, the reprobate mind, that a sufficient opposition could not be raised.  The millennials and their immersion in and subjugation to social media, putting up their own barriers or boundaries against wisdom, helped spread foolishness like a virus.  Many of them right now are using the down time to sit in the streets and block roads, if not promoting other dangerous and unrighteous causes, without a clue about the  meaning of life or what they are even talking about.

At the worst, people wanted to destroy the United States or at least inflict great harm for political gain.  I’m not sure if that theory is true.  I think mainly it is people who are fearful and incompetent.  It spread to every part of government.  I’m not saying there was zero threat from the virus.  It could have been handled differently, but there is also so much division in the country, completely disparate worldviews, that the country couldn’t move in a smart, cohesive way.  I still believe it is a bow shot by God on the country, one that isn’t being seen or heard though, as seen in the acceptance of these riots and the desire to believe the notion of systemic racism in the police force, resulting in the undermining of law and further and exponential lawlessness.  George Floyd’s death, an unjust one, is an outlier, and now more people will die overall from the effects of it.

Should There Or Could There Be Unity in the United States?

Today my wife and I drove up separate vehicles to Oregon.  This is the first of a few trips to get moved up.  Straight trip it is less than six hours.  When we got close to the border of California and Oregon, there was a large barn along Highway Five, which on its roof read in gigantic lettering, The State of Jefferson.  If you aren’t from the Western United States, maybe you haven’t heard of it.  I enjoyed seeing those words.  I hope for that state.  Medford would become part of the new state if it came into being along with part of Northern California.

We stopped for gas in a small town in the mountains, and what stood out to me were, no masks.  Masks should feel weird, but I’ve been wearing them so long that now no-masks already felt worse.  “What’s with you people?”  Lighted signs on almost every overpass encouraged to fight Covid-19.  The State of Jefferson has moved on.  I could imagine dart boards with Gavin Newsome on them. The gas station attendant wore no mask.

As I waited for the bathroom to open for my first public bathroom usage in three months, I listened to the attendant.  He was chatty.  On his own, he complained about the state of the nation.  Not a single mask.  One guy had the Ace Hardware shirt, apparently just finished with work and filling up on his way home.  He informed the attendant that Antifa had stopped in Medford today and would be in that little town, two and a half hours away, tomorrow, wreaking havoc.  The message was, get ready.
For a few days, Americans have confronted Americans everywhere.  The emerging narrative is, we need a president who will bring the country together.  Trump has increased division, won the last election by dividing people.  Biden brings people together and Trump divides people.  People will keep saying that.  What is “bringing people together”?  How does that happen?  It happens by ignoring the differences.  Is that what we want as a country?
The left doesn’t want division.  They want complete lock-step agreement, like with Hong Kong and China.  One media.  One education system.  One party.  Unity.  Is more division actually bad?
This country is done with unity.  Division is the permanent state.  I don’t know how it will end.  It would be nice to keep freedom as long as we can.  That will require division.  The differences are so significant, so deep, that unity isn’t tolerable any more.  Unity would mean capitulation.
I’m going to be fine with division.  I don’t accept the other side.  I”m not looking for common ground.  I don’t believe it or trust it.  The only alternative I see is some kind of permanent division, two or more separate countries, no more United States.  It’s already not united states.  I don’t foresee a comeback.  It’s going to get worse.
None of what I’m writing here should stop a true Christian, because the New Testament doesn’t depend on politics or a particular system of government.  True Christianity will survive the circumstances.  The country may not.

What I Wanted from Missionaries That I Expect and Want for Me as a Missionary

The two words for missionary are “evangelist” and “missionary.”  Evangelist has in that word, preach the gospel.  Missionary has in that word, mission.  I’m not trying to insult your intelligence.  Indulge this post.  Read on.

For preach the gospel, an evangelist should preach the gospel.  To do that, he must preach the actual gospel, not get professions of faith.  He should be squared away on the gospel.  It should be a true one.  I’m not going to explain that in this post, but that is very important to me.  As a pastor, I would want that as of vital importance.  The evangelist should know the gospel.
As an aside, consider with me the doctrine of “spiritual warfare.”  This comes from 2 Corinthians 10:3-5.  I would want a missionary to do spiritual warfare, that is, pull down the strongholds in people’s minds, the ones keeping them from salvation, using the spiritual weapon, scripture.  Knowing scripture better helps with spiritual warfare.  I call this the skillful use of the sword after Ephesians 6:17.  “Word” there is the Greek word, rhema, not logos, so it is the use of the particular passage necessary to win the spiritual battle.  But I digress.
The evangelist knows the gospel and then he preaches it to everyone.  I think of Matthew 13.  The seed should be sown on every type of soil:  hard, rocky, thorny, and good — in other words, everyone.  In 1 Corinthians 3, Paul wrote that some sow and some water.  Sowing is the job of the evangelist.  Jesus commands in Mark 16:15, preach the gospel to every creature.  Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think most evangelists take this part seriously.
Asking an evangelist if he will preach the gospel to every creature, I’ve found, is offensive, when asked.  I stopped asking it of evangelists (missionaries), but it is still what I wanted.  It is what I expect of me as a missionary.
It’s possible at this juncture, you think that one person can’t do that.  I understand that thought.  I know it isn’t a one man job.  It should be the goal either for the one evangelist or others working with the one evangelist or trained by him.  His narrative should include the gospel is being preached systematically to everyone.  He’s trying to do that.  I also understand the concept of the “free offer of the gospel.”  Not everyone will want to hear it.  It isn’t preaching it to everyone, but trying to preach it to everyone.
The second part of what I want from a missionary relates to the word “mission.”  “Mission” comes from the Great Commission.  What is the Great Commission?  I don’t mean to sound demeaning, but most missionaries wouldn’t be able to answer that question, according to what scripture says.  If I said, you don’t know what the Great Commission is, most missionaries would be offended.  I don’t say that, but bear with me again here.
Matthew 28:19-20 has one verb.  What is it?  Could most missionaries answer that question? There is one verb and three participles.  What is the verb and what are the participles?  How do the participles function with relations to the verb?  The verb is the Great Commission.  It is an imperative.  There is one command in those two verses.  What is it?
It is the verb translated, “teach,” the Greek word, matheteuo, or “make disciples.”  The Lord Jesus Christ with all authority both in heaven and in earth commands the church to make disciples.  I say, the church, because “you” is plural.  He is speaking to everyone there in that first church.  Are people in churches making disciples?  Do missionaries expect themselves to make disciples?  How?  I think many don’t have a clue.  I don’t mean that in a condescending or demeaning way.  If you are a missionary and you do havc a clue, then you know I don’t mean you.
I want a missionary to obey the mission.  Is he a missionary if he isn’t?  The imperative, “make disciples,” depends on the three participles:  go, baptize, and teach.  Those participles modify “make disciples.”  One cannot make disciples, obey the mission, without go, baptize, and teach.  “Teach” is a different Greek word than the other word “teach,” and it is the more common word.  However, I often say someone hasn’t taught anything unless someone learns it.  It’s not a lecture if it is teaching.  Much more can be said on that.  How does someone ensure someone is learning?  And, therefore, someone is teaching?
These are the most basic things I wanted from missionaries.  They are controversial and offensive usually.  They are what I expect and want for me as a missionary.  If that brings more confidence to you about what I will do, then perhaps you would support us in doing it as we start in Oregon and then later go to England, as I wrote in my last post.  Someone already called.  Maybe you would too.
As a pastor for thirty-three years, I wanted to reproduce what we did through a missionary (evangelist).  That could be done if someone preached the gospel and fulfilled the mission.  I’m going to do that, Lord-willing, if the Lord tarries and I live.

I Am a Missionary

The New Testament teaches three offices:  pastor (pastor-teacher, bishop [overseer], elder, preacher), deacon, and evangelist.  From my purview, most people are messed up on the third.  The evangelist has turned into what best might be called an itinerant revivalist.  The evangelist is much closer if not identical to what people call a missionary today.  An evangelist in the Bible really is a missionary.  When Paul and Barnabas were sent out in Acts 13, they were evangelists or missionaries.

1 Timothy 3 says pastors do the work of the evangelist.  It’s a requirement.  Pastors are not evangelists, but they do evangelist work.  What is that?  It is preaching the gospel to the lost.  That is in the word ‘evangelist.”  “Eu” means “good” and “angel” means “message.”  The two together are “good news,” which is “gospel.”  The evangelist takes the front end of a church starting.

The pastor does the work of the evangelist, and the missionary, the evangelist, does pastoring. Paul and Barnabas, neither were pastors, but they both did pastoring.  Scripture lists official qualifications for the office of the pastor and the office of the deacon.  They are slightly different, because they are different offices.  The evangelist should have qualities characteristic of someone who would do that job.  Barnabas was a missionary.  The basis for his being in that position was the following traits (Acts 11:24):

For he was a good man, and full of the Holy Ghost and of faith.

That list is similar to what we read of Philip, who was an evangelist, and Stephen, who probably was too in Acts 6:5:

And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip.

Philip, who we know was an evangelist (Acts 21:8), was full of faith and the Holy Ghost,  Then Barnabas was a good man, full of the Holy Ghost, and of faith.  The unofficial qualifications for a missionary are a good man, full of the Holy Ghost, and of faith.  It’s obvious he also should be doing the work of the evangelist.  This is a man who should be especially gifted as an evangelist.  There is no spiritual gift of evangelism, but when I say someone is gifted, I mean something like Acts 14:1:

And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both together into the synagogue of the Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews and also of the Greeks believed.

I’m pointing to two words there:  “so spake.”  Someone can “so speak” that more believe.  What is that?  There are qualities that would result in biblical evangelism.  I see two characteristics of successful New Testament evangelism.

First, since New Testament evangelism is an oral work, those who speak, Peter says (1 Peter 4:11), should “speak as the oracles of God,” which means evangelism needs to be scripture.  Faith comes by hearing the Word of God (Romans 10:17).  This is the spiritual weapon to pull down strongholds in people’s minds (2 Corinthians 10:3-5).  1 Peter 4:11 says that “the oracles of God” are what glorify God in spiritually gifted speech.  Paul said this was the basis of evangelism in 1 Corinthians 1-3.

When Paul wrote to Timothy about perfecting saints for the work of ministry (Ephesians 4:11), a major part of which is evangelism, it would have been the knowing scripture to the extent someone could use all of it.  A good example of this are all the evangelistic sermons from Jesus and the Apostles in the New Testament.  Emulate those.  They are filled with scriptural quotes and allusions.

Second, evangelism that will succeed must be bold.  When the Holy Spirit fills someone, he speaks the Word of God with boldness (Acts 4:31).  This was what Paul asked the Ephesians and Colossian saints to pray for him (Ephesians 6:20, Colossians 4:4),  If Paul needed that, every believer needs that.  This is a prayer I pray every time I evangelize.

When my wife and I came to California in 1987, I started as an evangelist and became a pastor.  I’m becoming an evangelist again in 2020.  I am a missionary again.  The church I started in 1987 in the San Francisco Bay Area is sending my wife and I to Jackson County, Oregon to evangelize.  We want to reproduce our church.  I’m leaving someone I trained to pastor.  He has helped me train other men since then.

Upon a church starting, a man trained and ordained as a pastor by our church will pastor that church.  Our church has two pastors.  Hopefully by November our church will have two more pastors.  My wife and I (and also my dad and mom, who live with us) are moving to Oregon, Lord-willing, at the end of June, next month.  Pastor David Sutton will pastor our church.

Our church, Bethel Baptist Church, will support us financially, but we are looking for other support.  I’ve started a church and trained several pastors.  If you are a pastor or really anyone from another church, will your church support our evangelism of Jackson County, Oregon with the true gospel?  Let me know if you are interested in being a part of this work.

I can guarantee you this.  I will work hard at evangelizing this whole area.  I will work at preaching the gospel to every creature.  That’s why we are going.  We want to reproduce our church and we hope you could be a part of it.  We will be true missionaries.   We want to do this and we’re excited about it.

What if a church is started?  If people are saved and a church forms, then we will move somewhere else to start a church.  Right now, when we’re done here, we want to go to England to start another church.  This might sound like an odd combination.  My wife and I took a trip to England two years ago and we are concerned for England in a unique way.  England is hemorrhaging churches.  We want to go there and do something about it.  We want to go there with the rest of our life and preach the gospel, train someone else, and start a church there — but first, Jackson County, Oregon, where 220,000 people live in Southern Oregon on Highway Five just outside of California.

I would be glad for you to call us, encourage us, pray for us, and support us.  Our midweek service is on Thursday night. This first year, I am open either in a virtual way or traveling to your church to present this work.  This will be worth the money your church can give to missions.  You can trust what we will do.  We will do what I’ve described in this post.  Maybe you would just take us on, sight unseen, and some day we can meet in person, so we can get started right away.  If I heard what I was saying, and I was assured it would occur, I would want to support it.

I am a missionary.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives