Home » Uncategorized (Page 16)

Category Archives: Uncategorized

When Black Lives Really Do Matter to Someone

Race is a social construct. The Bible doesn’t mention race, except the human race, the single Adamic race.

Some have more melanin than others, so their skin is darker to varying degrees with actually very little physical difference between people. The DNA of any two human beings is 99.9% similar in content and identity. God doesn’t care more for someone with more melanin and neither should any person.
Skin color identifies and distinguishes. If a crime is committed, race is one means of describing a suspect. I heard Shaquille O’Neil in recent years call himself the black Steph Curry. He brought attention to the variation in their skin color.  He did that.  For what reason?
Enough of that though.  Black lives matter and they matter to me too. They don’t matter less than white or yellow or brown or red lives.

The meaning and value of human life and lives are wrapped up in their being made in the image of God.  This is not any more clear than in Genesis 9:6: “Whoso sheddeth man’s blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.” With the first murder, that of Abel, God said (Genesis 4:10): “the voice of thy brother’s blood crieth unto me from the ground.”  The shed blood cried out to God for retribution.  The life of the flesh is in the blood (Leviticus 17:11).

Life matters to God, so it should matter to us. Black lives matter.  When they do matter to someone, how can one tell? How can you tell if black lives matter?  People say it, but is it the truth?  Should it be that someone types a hashtag for everyone? Is it opting for a blackout Tuesday? Attending a march or anti-racism protest? Is it by facilitating an uncomfortable conversation about race? Through countless memes, videos, and posts about race on social media pages? Instructions on how to educate ourselves? Should it be through an explanation of white privilege? Giving book recommendations about race? Maybe more than any other way, will people know black lives matter to you by your criticism of other non-black people who use language you can label as oppressive?
People aim to appear to care.  It’s a show — the Pharisee part of this. It signals virtue, which is in fact absent in most cases. Someone who has done nothing for black lives shouldn’t be touting his own compassion with memes.  He is a Pharisee praying on the street corner.  He poses like picking the most appropriate image is his big sacrifice, seeking the approval from those from which he hungers it.  Black lives matter is another hoop to jump through for acceptance or at least, not rejection.
Someone should ask, what did Jesus do? What did the Apostle Paul do? They were both concerned about the gospel.  This life is very, very short.  The Jewish problem with Gentiles was judged by its affect on the salvation of Gentiles through a perversion of the gospel. Jesus didn’t protest slavery in the Roman empire. The gospel would bring the owner and slave together like Philemon and Onesimus in Philemon, now brothers beloved.
Our church is heavily pigmented mainly because we don’t target anyone.  We don’t pander to any audience, which is the essence of impartiality.  We don’t reach out to the blacks, to the whites, to the Asians, to the Hispanics, to the Indians.  Hyping race is racism.  Ignoring it isn’t.   We reach out to everyone regardless of this social construction called “race.” We treat race like it doesn’t exist, because it doesn’t.
Since race doesn’t exist, black, white, red, or yellow culture doesn’t exist. It’s only scriptural or unscriptural culture, spiritual or carnal, godly or ungodly, or sacred or profane. There is no black music or white music. The English language isn’t white or black. You can’t “sound black” or “sound white.” You’re either saying it right or saying it wrong. You’re not helped by saying it wrong.  Race itself is a lie, so the pressures created around it to cave to wrong behavior are the price of the lie.  It’s what turns people into racists.
When black lives matter to you, first, you care about the eternal soul of the black person. Instead of accentuating skin color, do you talk about the two ways the Bible categorizes people: saved or lost, sheep or goats, tares or wheat, or light or darkness?   When you don’t preach the gospel to black people, don’t tell me that black lives matter to you. They don’t. How many black people have you preached the gospel to, professing Christian? If it’s none, when you have black people all around you, you are a heartless hypocrite with zero compassion. Stop promoting yourself on social media like you care. You don’t. You are a pathetic self-promoter. That’s all you are.  When black lives matter, you want black lives to be eternal lives, which has nothing to do with skin color and everything about believing the gospel. If you haven’t done that, and you don’t do it, you hate black people, while saying that you love them.
I knocked on every door of the iron triangle in Richmond, California.  I skipped no neighborhoods.  On many occasions, I played basketball in areas where there were only black people, and afterwards I preached the gospel to them.  I knocked on every door in Parchester Village, the Rodeo projects, and North Richmond.
When black lives matter to you, second, you make disciples of black people to Jesus Christ. That is very similar, almost identical to evangelizing, except this means you are sacrificing to spend time with at least one black person to teach him to observe all things whatsoever the Lord has commanded. How many black people have you discipled? Some of the loudest at publicizing their own racial virtue, have done zip. It’s most of you reading. Please sit down. Retire your social media from the spread of this lie that black people matter to you.  They don’t.
The third way to tell if black lives matter to you is your support of missions to black people.  It’s not just them, but it’s the whole world, which includes black people.  Africa is mainly black.  Are you willing to go to Africa out of love for Africans?  Actual Africans from the continent of Africa?  Our church supports three missionaries to Africa and at one time, four, but now one has gone to Australia to evangelize that country.  Do you keep up with missions to Africa?  Do you read missionary prayer letters from Africa?  More black people live in Africa than any other place.  What are you doing to reach Africa?
Another way to tell if black lives matter to you is, four, do you sacrificially serve black people?  What do you do to help black people?  Helping someone means involvement.  You work with them directly.  You bear their burdens.  I’m not talking about a hand out.  I’m talking about helping them personally get out of a cycle, maybe by providing free child care, which my wife and I did for years for two black girls, while their mother worked.  I would have helped them if they were white or Asian too.  Race is a  social construct.  I stood before a crowd of almost entirely black people every month for eight years, asking if I could take any one of them out to find a job.  If someone wanted it, I would meet him at a location in town to try and help.  This was my own time, not spending the taxes someone else pays.  We have had black people living with us, providing them short term housing, until they could get a place to live.
Do black lives matter to you if you don’t oppose black abortion?  Between 2012 and 2016 over 136,000 black children were murdered in New York City through abortion.  Do these black lives matter?  All black lives matter, not just one murdered by a police officer.  More black people are killed by abortion than any single means, so, five, you can tell that black lives matter to you if you oppose the abortion of black lives.  That is not popular to say.  You can’t post that on your social media and receive two hundred likes from the readers.  If you are silent about black abortion, then black lives don’t matter to you.
Very few black people are killed by white people.  It’s difficult to find official statistics, so I go back to 2013.  According to the FBI in 2013, 2,491 black people were murdered in the United States, 189 by white people and 2,245 by black people.  409 white people were killed by black people.  The biggest danger to black lives are black people.  If it is black lives that matter and not just politics, then the biggest threat to murder, besides abortion, are black people killing each other.  Six, if black lives really do matter, all of them, then more attention must be given to blacks killing blacks, than whites killing blacks.
No murder is justified, but if black lives matter, then the focus should be on what ends the most black lives.  That isn’t white people.  It’s a very small number of black people who are killed by white police officers.  It’s a very large number of black people killed by other black people.  Every black person is made in the image of God.  Every black person is endowed by the Creator with the right to life.  Black lives matter.
If it really is black lives matter, then these six above will be heard.  Do you first care if black people will be in the kingdom, will be in heaven with you?  That’s forever, not just the short life that we live, but all eternity.  Do you second care about what ends the most black lives, so that the most possible black people can live?  If you do not hear about these, then it isn’t about black lives, but about something else.

Jacoby / Ross Debate part 2, “We are Born Again In Baptism,” is now live!

The second half of my debate with Dr. Douglas Jacoby over baptism is now live!  In the first half, “We are born again before baptism,” I was in the affirmative; the second half, “We are born again in baptism,” where Dr. Jacoby was in the affirmative and I was in the negative, is now also available.  You can watch the second half of debate on YouTube by clicking here or you can watch it in the embedded video below.
Please feel free to “like” the video on YouTube and comment on it there was well as here on the blog.
While, of course, I am biased in favor of my position, I believe the truth was very clear in the two debates.
Many thanks to God for His assistance in the debate, and great gratitude as well to those who helped with the slides, with the video editing and publishing, and so on.  I am also thankful that Dr. Jacoby was willing to defend his position in a public forum like this.
If you believe that debates like this fit the Biblical pattern in Acts and are useful for glorifying God and advancing His kingdom, and you would be interested in sponsoring one, please contact me.
TDR

The Nation Was Hacked

The post analysis of the coronavirus pandemic might and will likely show gross incompetence mainly from leftist mayors and governors in the United States with a corollary influence on everyone else because of the politics and fear. Everyone needs to be prepared for the cover up, massive number of lies.  I’m just predicting here.  The government didn’t know what it was doing.  Other countries, like Sweden and South Korea, did the opposite and succeeded.  This was of the nature of the Russian collusion fraud.  Most of the country is duped and scammed by its most foolish.  The whole nation was hacked.

It was almost impossible for the sensible and right thinking to counter the insanity.  There is so much crazy, an consequence of rampant false beliefs and behavior, the reprobate mind, that a sufficient opposition could not be raised.  The millennials and their immersion in and subjugation to social media, putting up their own barriers or boundaries against wisdom, helped spread foolishness like a virus.  Many of them right now are using the down time to sit in the streets and block roads, if not promoting other dangerous and unrighteous causes, without a clue about the  meaning of life or what they are even talking about.

At the worst, people wanted to destroy the United States or at least inflict great harm for political gain.  I’m not sure if that theory is true.  I think mainly it is people who are fearful and incompetent.  It spread to every part of government.  I’m not saying there was zero threat from the virus.  It could have been handled differently, but there is also so much division in the country, completely disparate worldviews, that the country couldn’t move in a smart, cohesive way.  I still believe it is a bow shot by God on the country, one that isn’t being seen or heard though, as seen in the acceptance of these riots and the desire to believe the notion of systemic racism in the police force, resulting in the undermining of law and further and exponential lawlessness.  George Floyd’s death, an unjust one, is an outlier, and now more people will die overall from the effects of it.

Should There Or Could There Be Unity in the United States?

Today my wife and I drove up separate vehicles to Oregon.  This is the first of a few trips to get moved up.  Straight trip it is less than six hours.  When we got close to the border of California and Oregon, there was a large barn along Highway Five, which on its roof read in gigantic lettering, The State of Jefferson.  If you aren’t from the Western United States, maybe you haven’t heard of it.  I enjoyed seeing those words.  I hope for that state.  Medford would become part of the new state if it came into being along with part of Northern California.

We stopped for gas in a small town in the mountains, and what stood out to me were, no masks.  Masks should feel weird, but I’ve been wearing them so long that now no-masks already felt worse.  “What’s with you people?”  Lighted signs on almost every overpass encouraged to fight Covid-19.  The State of Jefferson has moved on.  I could imagine dart boards with Gavin Newsome on them. The gas station attendant wore no mask.

As I waited for the bathroom to open for my first public bathroom usage in three months, I listened to the attendant.  He was chatty.  On his own, he complained about the state of the nation.  Not a single mask.  One guy had the Ace Hardware shirt, apparently just finished with work and filling up on his way home.  He informed the attendant that Antifa had stopped in Medford today and would be in that little town, two and a half hours away, tomorrow, wreaking havoc.  The message was, get ready.
For a few days, Americans have confronted Americans everywhere.  The emerging narrative is, we need a president who will bring the country together.  Trump has increased division, won the last election by dividing people.  Biden brings people together and Trump divides people.  People will keep saying that.  What is “bringing people together”?  How does that happen?  It happens by ignoring the differences.  Is that what we want as a country?
The left doesn’t want division.  They want complete lock-step agreement, like with Hong Kong and China.  One media.  One education system.  One party.  Unity.  Is more division actually bad?
This country is done with unity.  Division is the permanent state.  I don’t know how it will end.  It would be nice to keep freedom as long as we can.  That will require division.  The differences are so significant, so deep, that unity isn’t tolerable any more.  Unity would mean capitulation.
I’m going to be fine with division.  I don’t accept the other side.  I”m not looking for common ground.  I don’t believe it or trust it.  The only alternative I see is some kind of permanent division, two or more separate countries, no more United States.  It’s already not united states.  I don’t foresee a comeback.  It’s going to get worse.
None of what I’m writing here should stop a true Christian, because the New Testament doesn’t depend on politics or a particular system of government.  True Christianity will survive the circumstances.  The country may not.

What I Wanted from Missionaries That I Expect and Want for Me as a Missionary

The two words for missionary are “evangelist” and “missionary.”  Evangelist has in that word, preach the gospel.  Missionary has in that word, mission.  I’m not trying to insult your intelligence.  Indulge this post.  Read on.

For preach the gospel, an evangelist should preach the gospel.  To do that, he must preach the actual gospel, not get professions of faith.  He should be squared away on the gospel.  It should be a true one.  I’m not going to explain that in this post, but that is very important to me.  As a pastor, I would want that as of vital importance.  The evangelist should know the gospel.
As an aside, consider with me the doctrine of “spiritual warfare.”  This comes from 2 Corinthians 10:3-5.  I would want a missionary to do spiritual warfare, that is, pull down the strongholds in people’s minds, the ones keeping them from salvation, using the spiritual weapon, scripture.  Knowing scripture better helps with spiritual warfare.  I call this the skillful use of the sword after Ephesians 6:17.  “Word” there is the Greek word, rhema, not logos, so it is the use of the particular passage necessary to win the spiritual battle.  But I digress.
The evangelist knows the gospel and then he preaches it to everyone.  I think of Matthew 13.  The seed should be sown on every type of soil:  hard, rocky, thorny, and good — in other words, everyone.  In 1 Corinthians 3, Paul wrote that some sow and some water.  Sowing is the job of the evangelist.  Jesus commands in Mark 16:15, preach the gospel to every creature.  Maybe I’m wrong, but I don’t think most evangelists take this part seriously.
Asking an evangelist if he will preach the gospel to every creature, I’ve found, is offensive, when asked.  I stopped asking it of evangelists (missionaries), but it is still what I wanted.  It is what I expect of me as a missionary.
It’s possible at this juncture, you think that one person can’t do that.  I understand that thought.  I know it isn’t a one man job.  It should be the goal either for the one evangelist or others working with the one evangelist or trained by him.  His narrative should include the gospel is being preached systematically to everyone.  He’s trying to do that.  I also understand the concept of the “free offer of the gospel.”  Not everyone will want to hear it.  It isn’t preaching it to everyone, but trying to preach it to everyone.
The second part of what I want from a missionary relates to the word “mission.”  “Mission” comes from the Great Commission.  What is the Great Commission?  I don’t mean to sound demeaning, but most missionaries wouldn’t be able to answer that question, according to what scripture says.  If I said, you don’t know what the Great Commission is, most missionaries would be offended.  I don’t say that, but bear with me again here.
Matthew 28:19-20 has one verb.  What is it?  Could most missionaries answer that question? There is one verb and three participles.  What is the verb and what are the participles?  How do the participles function with relations to the verb?  The verb is the Great Commission.  It is an imperative.  There is one command in those two verses.  What is it?
It is the verb translated, “teach,” the Greek word, matheteuo, or “make disciples.”  The Lord Jesus Christ with all authority both in heaven and in earth commands the church to make disciples.  I say, the church, because “you” is plural.  He is speaking to everyone there in that first church.  Are people in churches making disciples?  Do missionaries expect themselves to make disciples?  How?  I think many don’t have a clue.  I don’t mean that in a condescending or demeaning way.  If you are a missionary and you do havc a clue, then you know I don’t mean you.
I want a missionary to obey the mission.  Is he a missionary if he isn’t?  The imperative, “make disciples,” depends on the three participles:  go, baptize, and teach.  Those participles modify “make disciples.”  One cannot make disciples, obey the mission, without go, baptize, and teach.  “Teach” is a different Greek word than the other word “teach,” and it is the more common word.  However, I often say someone hasn’t taught anything unless someone learns it.  It’s not a lecture if it is teaching.  Much more can be said on that.  How does someone ensure someone is learning?  And, therefore, someone is teaching?
These are the most basic things I wanted from missionaries.  They are controversial and offensive usually.  They are what I expect and want for me as a missionary.  If that brings more confidence to you about what I will do, then perhaps you would support us in doing it as we start in Oregon and then later go to England, as I wrote in my last post.  Someone already called.  Maybe you would too.
As a pastor for thirty-three years, I wanted to reproduce what we did through a missionary (evangelist).  That could be done if someone preached the gospel and fulfilled the mission.  I’m going to do that, Lord-willing, if the Lord tarries and I live.

Newly formatted Gospel tracts

I wanted to let What is Truth? readers know about the newly formatted gospel tracts below.  The content is very similar to the presentation on the Internet here.  I would commend them to you for use in your church.
The first one below, formatted courtesy of Headwaters Baptist Church, looks like this (side #1):
and can be downloaded and personalized for your church with the other tracts at the All Content page on my website here or separately by clicking here.
Headwaters Baptist Church get the tract printed through the Bethel Baptist Print Ministry. a printing service run by an independent Baptist church.
A version of this tract in Tagalog and English (the Tagalog portion is more brief than the English, but still relatively extensive) that looks like the following (side #1):
May the Lord use these tracts for the glorification of His magnificent grace in saving lost sinners.
TDR

I Am a Missionary

The New Testament teaches three offices:  pastor (pastor-teacher, bishop [overseer], elder, preacher), deacon, and evangelist.  From my purview, most people are messed up on the third.  The evangelist has turned into what best might be called an itinerant revivalist.  The evangelist is much closer if not identical to what people call a missionary today.  An evangelist in the Bible really is a missionary.  When Paul and Barnabas were sent out in Acts 13, they were evangelists or missionaries.

1 Timothy 3 says pastors do the work of the evangelist.  It’s a requirement.  Pastors are not evangelists, but they do evangelist work.  What is that?  It is preaching the gospel to the lost.  That is in the word ‘evangelist.”  “Eu” means “good” and “angel” means “message.”  The two together are “good news,” which is “gospel.”  The evangelist takes the front end of a church starting.

The pastor does the work of the evangelist, and the missionary, the evangelist, does pastoring. Paul and Barnabas, neither were pastors, but they both did pastoring.  Scripture lists official qualifications for the office of the pastor and the office of the deacon.  They are slightly different, because they are different offices.  The evangelist should have qualities characteristic of someone who would do that job.  Barnabas was a missionary.  The basis for his being in that position was the following traits (Acts 11:24):

For he was a good man, and full of the Holy Ghost and of faith.

That list is similar to what we read of Philip, who was an evangelist, and Stephen, who probably was too in Acts 6:5:

And the saying pleased the whole multitude: and they chose Stephen, a man full of faith and of the Holy Ghost, and Philip.

Philip, who we know was an evangelist (Acts 21:8), was full of faith and the Holy Ghost,  Then Barnabas was a good man, full of the Holy Ghost, and of faith.  The unofficial qualifications for a missionary are a good man, full of the Holy Ghost, and of faith.  It’s obvious he also should be doing the work of the evangelist.  This is a man who should be especially gifted as an evangelist.  There is no spiritual gift of evangelism, but when I say someone is gifted, I mean something like Acts 14:1:

And it came to pass in Iconium, that they went both together into the synagogue of the Jews, and so spake, that a great multitude both of the Jews and also of the Greeks believed.

I’m pointing to two words there:  “so spake.”  Someone can “so speak” that more believe.  What is that?  There are qualities that would result in biblical evangelism.  I see two characteristics of successful New Testament evangelism.

First, since New Testament evangelism is an oral work, those who speak, Peter says (1 Peter 4:11), should “speak as the oracles of God,” which means evangelism needs to be scripture.  Faith comes by hearing the Word of God (Romans 10:17).  This is the spiritual weapon to pull down strongholds in people’s minds (2 Corinthians 10:3-5).  1 Peter 4:11 says that “the oracles of God” are what glorify God in spiritually gifted speech.  Paul said this was the basis of evangelism in 1 Corinthians 1-3.

When Paul wrote to Timothy about perfecting saints for the work of ministry (Ephesians 4:11), a major part of which is evangelism, it would have been the knowing scripture to the extent someone could use all of it.  A good example of this are all the evangelistic sermons from Jesus and the Apostles in the New Testament.  Emulate those.  They are filled with scriptural quotes and allusions.

Second, evangelism that will succeed must be bold.  When the Holy Spirit fills someone, he speaks the Word of God with boldness (Acts 4:31).  This was what Paul asked the Ephesians and Colossian saints to pray for him (Ephesians 6:20, Colossians 4:4),  If Paul needed that, every believer needs that.  This is a prayer I pray every time I evangelize.

When my wife and I came to California in 1987, I started as an evangelist and became a pastor.  I’m becoming an evangelist again in 2020.  I am a missionary again.  The church I started in 1987 in the San Francisco Bay Area is sending my wife and I to Jackson County, Oregon to evangelize.  We want to reproduce our church.  I’m leaving someone I trained to pastor.  He has helped me train other men since then.

Upon a church starting, a man trained and ordained as a pastor by our church will pastor that church.  Our church has two pastors.  Hopefully by November our church will have two more pastors.  My wife and I (and also my dad and mom, who live with us) are moving to Oregon, Lord-willing, at the end of June, next month.  Pastor David Sutton will pastor our church.

Our church, Bethel Baptist Church, will support us financially, but we are looking for other support.  I’ve started a church and trained several pastors.  If you are a pastor or really anyone from another church, will your church support our evangelism of Jackson County, Oregon with the true gospel?  Let me know if you are interested in being a part of this work.

I can guarantee you this.  I will work hard at evangelizing this whole area.  I will work at preaching the gospel to every creature.  That’s why we are going.  We want to reproduce our church and we hope you could be a part of it.  We will be true missionaries.   We want to do this and we’re excited about it.

What if a church is started?  If people are saved and a church forms, then we will move somewhere else to start a church.  Right now, when we’re done here, we want to go to England to start another church.  This might sound like an odd combination.  My wife and I took a trip to England two years ago and we are concerned for England in a unique way.  England is hemorrhaging churches.  We want to go there and do something about it.  We want to go there with the rest of our life and preach the gospel, train someone else, and start a church there — but first, Jackson County, Oregon, where 220,000 people live in Southern Oregon on Highway Five just outside of California.

I would be glad for you to call us, encourage us, pray for us, and support us.  Our midweek service is on Thursday night. This first year, I am open either in a virtual way or traveling to your church to present this work.  This will be worth the money your church can give to missions.  You can trust what we will do.  We will do what I’ve described in this post.  Maybe you would just take us on, sight unseen, and some day we can meet in person, so we can get started right away.  If I heard what I was saying, and I was assured it would occur, I would want to support it.

I am a missionary.

The Widespread Lie Among Church Leaders That Lordship Is Separate from the Gospel, Even A Falsehood

A newsletter came to our church mailbox, The Northwest Baptist (January-March, 2020), led by a front page by Bob Straughan with the title, “Hyper-repentance vs. Easy Prayerism Contrasted,” and its first lines:

I have written quite a lot over the years cheap shallow evangelism aka “easy prayerism.”  But I have said less about hyper-repentance aka “Lordship salvation.” . . . .  [I]t is fair to say that at least for some Independent Baptists, their way of making sure they are not practicing Hyles’ type shallow evangelism, (sic) is to overreact and embrace at least to some extent hyper-repentance.

Straughan describes this “hyper-repentance,” a term I’ve never heard, to be “Lordship salvation.”  I don’t comprehend the opposition to the inclusion of Lordship on the front end with the gospel.  Jesus is the Christ.  Someone must believe Jesus is the Christ to have eternal life.  Lordship is definitional to “the Christ.”  He is the Messiah, the King, the Lord.  People have to relinquish to that in order to be saved.  Not doing so is rebellion against Jesus Christ.  That isn’t salvation.  Straughan and all those like him do great damage and undermine the gospel with such writing.  Then Mike Haxton, who publishes the paper, uses it for such eternally harmful means.  It is conspiracy of the worst possible kind.  It distorts the gospel.

Straughan also says:

With the Hyper-repentance (sic) people there is this, “quest”, (sic) for true salvation.  Which is why you see so many people repeatedly going forward for salvation. (sic)

Is “quest” a technical term used by apparent “Hyper-repentance people”?  Remember, these are people who say belief in Lordship of Christ is part of believing in Christ.  I had not heard of these people or their favor for the word “quest.” Pack your bags, we’re going on a quest for true salvation, folks.  It’s as if men who support Jesus’ Lordship are inventing something.

What about “going forward” that Straughan mentions?   In his assessment, “going forward” is worth associating with true salvation, but Lordship is supposed to be excluded.  Someone doesn’t need to believe Jesus is his Lord, but he does “go forward.”  In the article, most times Straughan describes people being saved, he says they “go forward.”  Scripture says nothing about “going forward” as a part of biblical salvation.

I don’t know anyone I would call a “hyper-repentance” person.   I have not seen hyper-repentance.  It’s a term, maybe invented by Straughan as a pejorative.  It’s not helpful.  Who is hyper-repentance?He says pro-Lordship are hyper repentance.  There are many no repentance or false repentance people.  I estimate that might represent 90% of professing Baptists today.

There is only Lordship salvation.  No Lordship, no salvation.  That isn’t hyper anything.  That is salvation.  To call “Lordship” hyper is evil.  Lordship salvation is

  • not hyper repentance.
  • not a pendulum swing.
  • biblical salvation.
  • not a quest.
  • not accomplished by going forward.
  • not a way of making sure not to practice Hyles type shallow evangelism.
  • actual repentance.
  • not based on a concern to see more decisions made by people going forward.
  • not related to being a Calvinist.
Then Straughan uses a straw man to misrepresent Lordship salvation.  The straw man is that the salvation of someone could or should be questioned because he isn’t spiritual enough or at a high enough level of spirituality.

No one that believes in Lordship salvation, which is actually just salvation, believes Lordship means levels of spirituality.  He doesn’t even believe there are varied levels of spirituality.   He instead believes every person who receives Jesus Christ is a “partaker of the divine nature” (2 Peter 1:4) and possesses “all spiritual blessings” (Ephesians 1:3).   Everyone is equally spiritual.  Also in 2 Peter 1 (v. 1), every believer has what Peter calls “like precious faith.”  I’ve never heard or read one “Lordship salvation” person say that someone isn’t saved because he isn’t spiritual enough.

Disobedience doesn’t come from decreased spirituality.  Every believer possesses the Person of the Holy Spirit, not part of Him.  He can only have all of Him or none of Him.  Someone without the Holy Spirit isn’t spiritual at all.  The moments he does not obey the Holy Spirit, he could be said not to be spiritual.  A work of the flesh is not spiritual.  It is all or nothing with the Holy Spirit, which is also why “fruit” of the Spirit is singular in Galatians 5:22, because all of it is there or none of it is there.

James 1 says that someone sins, not because he is unspiritual, but because he is drawn away of his own lust and is enticed.   This relates to his intellect and his will.  In accordance with Romans 6, he serves unrighteousness rather than righteousness.  Enticement must be met by the knowledge of scripture.  He cleanses his way by taking heed to the Word of God.  The Apostle John says that someone born of God practices righteousness as a lifestyle.  If he knows God, as a habit he does what God wants him to do.  A believer in Lordship won’t say, you didn’t do that because you weren’t spiritual enough.  At some point, as a professing believer keeps sinning as a lifestyle, he should examine himself whether he be in the faith (2 Corinthians 13:5).

The way someone knows he is saved is by his changed life, not by whether he goes forward at the end of an evangelistic sermon.  The implication of Straughan is that church leaders who believe in Lordship salvation preach that final salvation comes to those who submit without fail to the Lordship of Christ, turning belief in Lordship to salvation by works.  This is not true.  Lordship is a matter of the will, in addition to the intellect and emotions.  Jesus is Lord.  Someone must acquiesce to Jesus’ Lordship to receive eternal life.  He will still sin.  He will struggle with sin.  The Apostle Paul describes that struggle in Romans 7.  He struggles because Jesus is Lord.  He doesn’t want to sin.  This is why the believer prays about not entering temptation and being delivered from evil.  It is a struggle.

The rejection of Lordship salvation is a separating issue for me and our church.  It is a widespread lie among church leaders.  Writing against it like Straughan and publishing it by Haxton is a grave error.  I’m happy they don’t believe in easy-prayerism, but that’s not enough.

Acts 14 and Repentance as a Necessary Part of a Biblical Gospel

Jesus preached repentance.  John the Baptist preached it.  Jesus instructed repentance as the gospel of the Great Commission (Luke 24:47).  I want to look at Paul’s preaching in Lystra.  Three well-known converts from that town are Eunice, Lois, and Timothy.   Here’s what Paul preached there (Acts 14:15-17):

15 Sirs, why do ye these things? We also are men of like passions with you, and preach unto you that ye should turn from these vanities unto the living God, which made heaven, and earth, and the sea, and all things that are therein: 16 Who in times past suffered all nations to walk in their own ways. 17 Nevertheless he left not himself without witness, in that he did good, and gave us rain from heaven, and fruitful seasons, filling our hearts with food and gladness. 

I provided the whole text, but I want to focus on the second half of verse 15:

[We] preach unto you that ye should turn from these vanities unto the living God.

The word “preach” is the Greek word euanggelizo, which means, “to preach the good news” or “to preach the gospel.”  A literal understanding is “We preached the gospel unto you that.”  That what?  What is the gospel that Paul preached?  “That ye should turn from these vanities unto the living God.”  Paul says the gospel is turning from vanities to the living God.  The word “turn” is epistrepho, and to turn is obviously repentance.  “Vanities” (mataios) is what is “worthless or useless.”  Paul says the gospel is turning not just from sin, but what is useless or worthless to the living God.

Vanities are dead things, and God is living.  They are treating God as if he is worthless and useless and their things as living.  This is worshiping and serving the creature rather than the Creator.  It’s easy to see that a lot of people who call themselves Christians are actually serving things.  They prioritize things above all else.  Those in Lystra put their things ahead of the living God.  The gospel Paul preached to them was to turn from that to God.  This is repentance and Lordship.

What is turning to the living God?  He describes that in the following verses.  They were walking in their own ways, and they needed to turn from walking in their own ways to walking in God’s ways.  That is turning from sin to God, but it is related directly to Lordship.  Walking in their own ways is keeping self as Lord.  Walking in God’s ways is relinquishing to Him as Lord.  Furthermore, this is “preaching the gospel.”  “Preaching the gospel” includes repentance and Lordship.

Douglas Jacoby / Thomas Ross Debate part 1, “We are Born Again Before Baptism,” is now live!

As readers of this blog may know, I had the privilege of debating Dr. Douglas Jacoby on the topics:
“We are born again before baptism” (Ross affirmative, Jacoby negative)
and:
“We are born again in baptism” (Jacoby affirmative, Ross negative)
a number of days ago.  The edited video is now live on the KJB1611 YouTube Channel.  You can view the debate “We are born again before baptism” on YouTube by clicking here, or you can watch it below:
I would encourage you to “like” and comment on the video on YouTube here if you believe the content is of value.  If you prayed for me and for God’s kingdom to be furthered through the debate, thank you very much!  I believe our discussion went very well and that, through God’s grace, it was clear what the true gospel was.

TDR

There’s Woke and There’s “Woke”: The Pharisee “Woke” Evangelicals

When I talk to other people here in the San Francisco Bay Area, I sometimes ask if they will explain what they believe.  For instance, if Buddhism is true and helpful, perhaps a Buddhist could explain it for my benefit.  I’d like to know why I should become one.  Along the same line, if being woke is the best thinking and behavior, could the woke people help me understand in order to become woke?

The awakening of wokeness relates to social consciousness.  Before you weren’t, but now you’re conscious of white privilege, racial inequality, and economic injustice.  Now you’re apparently no longer asleep to those.  Consciousness doesn’t need to offer any real solutions, just display consciousness of their existence.  Don’t deny it.  Admit it.  Does that help?  It doesn’t help anyone, but it appears to care.

The Pharisees became masters of what today would be a photo opportunity, to be seen of men.  Jesus described it in Matthew 6:5:

And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

Being “woke” means touting your own consciousness.  You are conscious.  You’ve sniffed of the progressive smelling salts.  You’ve taken the whole jar of blue pills.  You aren’t actually helping anyone.  You do not good for racial inequality and you do almost nothing for people that need food.
“Woke” gets credit for being with the cause by wearing your oversized flat billed baseball cap.  Nothing says consciousness like using urban dialect or having the secret handshake.  The Pharisees not only wore fringes on their garments, as directed in the Law, but also lengthened the fringes so that they were more conspicuous.
An ancient baraita, a tradition in the Jewish oral law not incorporated in the Mishnah, the regular Jewish oral tradition, enumerates “seven classes of Pharisees, of which five consist of either eccentric fools or hypocrites, the third being ‘the bruised Pharisee,‘ who in order to avoid looking at a woman runs against the wall so as to bruise himself and bleed.”  The goal here was to leave an impression that promotes your self.  Being “woke” means being a part of an exclusive coalition of proud hypocrites more interested in the guise of selflessness.
Woke, differing than “woke,” does what is best for other people, actually loves them.  1 Corinthians 13, one of the love chapters of the Bible presents fifteen actions of love.  They are all verbs.  Love does this and does this and does this and this and this. That’s what love looks like when it occurs.  “Woke” isn’t action.  Instead it is “activism,” which ironically isn’t action and, therefore, isn’t love.
The Lord Jesus Christ didn’t come to “raise visibility” in order to bring “social change.”  His life wasn’t a show.  It changed people in the most profound way possible, getting them ready for all eternity.  Activism doesn’t change anyone.  It might succeed at shaking someone down, but it doesn’t succeed at real reconciliation between people or help the poor. Christianity changes lives, transforming people, using the gospel.  It answers the only need that men have or will every have.  Jesus would often say, “See thou tell no man” (Matt 8:4).  That was Jesus.  Activism wants everyone to know — “look at me out on the street with my poster,” “watch me dump a bucket of cold water over my head,” or “hashtag whatever.”

The Pharisees woke up to the impossibility of living the actual life of God, the acquiescence of those submissive to the Messiah.  When Christ came, they wouldn’t give in or give up.  They preferred the ease of the symbolic, the right length of fringes on the garment and dropping their loud offerings into a metal container to be noticed of others.  They reduced actual care to symbolic care, which required the equivalent of yelling over a speaker phone and chanting.  Today the activism is easier than ever over social media, sending out a selfie taken on a mobile device, portraying the care for all to see.  It portrays a caring life that is only “woke.”  These are repulsed by actual wokeness, taking the yoke of Jesus upon them.  It’s not about a future kingdom under Jesus, but a present one under self.

I’m quite sure that woke arose from a perversion of an actual Christian truth of awaking out of sleep.  Paul wrote in Romans 13:11, “now is the high time to awake out of sleep:  for now is our salvation nearer than when we believed.”  Then in 1 Corinthians 15:34 he wrote:  “Awake to righteousness, and sin not.”  This is being really woke, rather than “woke.”  “Woke” is a cheap imitation, that is today very popular with the world.   The world hates being woke, but it loves being “woke.”  No one really wakes up with “woke.”
“Woke” is against what Jesus taught, labors for meat that perishes.  The world is interested in the temporal bread, the actual temporal bread of feeding people and the figurative bread of race.  Jesus told the rich young ruler to sell all he had to give it to the poor.  That is the commitment that Jesus desires.  It’s not a commitment that on the one hand purchases an eight hundred thousand house and on the other promotes giving to a homeless shelter.  Why haven’t the homeless moved into the spare bedrooms?  The dedication is more about appearance, like the bruised Pharisee — that’s what being “woke” is all about.  Man doesn’t live by bread alone, but woke activism is bread alone.  It is meat that perisheth.
Galatians 6:10 says that if we have the opportunity that we should do good to all men, especially those of the household of faith.  That would include seeking justice in a society through the scriptural means, seek right and honest things, and speaking the truth of God against an unjust, unrighteous society like John the Baptist did with Herod.  None of that will continue without the transforming change in men’s souls through Jesus Christ.  That is woke, not “woke.”

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives