The Conflicting, Perplexing Calvinistic Doctrine of Free Will (Part Four)

Part One   Part Two   Part Three A Hebrew word for “repent” in the Old Testament is nocham and it’s mainly used of God.  It first appears in Genesis 6:6:  “And it repented the LORD that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him at his heart.”  The Old Testament makes those kinds of […]

Continue Reading →

Conspiracy Theory: Biblical Methods of Evaluation, part 5 of 7

Does the conspiracy require me to think more highly of myself than I ought to think?   The Bible’s “love chapter” indicates that “charity vaunteth not itself” and “is not puffed up.”  Scripture warns a man must “not … think of himself more highly than he ought to think; but to think soberly” (Romans 12:3), […]

Continue Reading →

Pragmatism, Playing Games, and “Recovering from Fundamentalism”

If you look at a picture of the attendees of a professional baseball game during the 1940s, you see the crowd filled with men in suits and ties.  I don’t know if they called them fans then, but were they legalists?  Anyone who would wear a suit and tie to a baseball game must be […]

Continue Reading →

The Conflicting, Perplexing Calvinistic Doctrine of Free Will (Part Three)

Part One     Part Two Part of the confidence and tone of certainty about predetermination and free will seems to come from ambiguity that conflicts and perplexes.  A Calvinist will talk to you with a look of absolute conviction.  It’s as if he’s bluffing.  He knows something you don’t know and you can’t see.  You’re […]

Continue Reading →

Conspiracy Theory: Biblical Methods of Evaluation, part 4 of 7

Part four of this series is now at the link below. This post originally covered from the sentence:  “Does the conspiracy theory produce extraordinary evidence for extraordinary claims?” to the sentence: “We cannot disprove the possibility that tiny green elephants float and dance waltzes on Jupiter’s moons, while using advanced technology to avoid detection by […]

Continue Reading →

The Conflicting, Perplexing Calvinistic Doctrine of Free Will (Part Two)

Part One Calvinists say that other systems limit God’s sovereignty or control.  Apparently when those systems assign to man free will, they limit God’s sovereignty.  Instead of God being in total charge, man is partly in charge.  Calvinists would also say this means that in salvation, ostensibly man is getting involved to the degree that […]

Continue Reading →

The Conflicting, Perplexing Calvinistic Doctrine of Free Will

As I started to write this post, I thought about whether I decided to write it or whether God predetermined my writing it.  After the smoke exited and cleared my ears, I started writing again.  Are my fingers typing on their own? Okay, so here’s how it seems to me.  I’m just reporting.  I recently […]

Continue Reading →

Conspiracy Theory: Biblical Methods of Evaluation, part 3 of 7

Part three of this series is now at the link below. This post originally covered from the sentence:  “If the conspiracy involves logical contradictions, it cannot be true” to the sentence: “If any and all real or even potential conflicts of interest are not openly and plainly disclosed by the person promoting the conspiracy, a […]

Continue Reading →

Yes and Then No, the Bible with Mark Ward (part two)

Earlier this week, I wrote part one concerning two separate videos posted by Mark Ward.  The second one I saw first, and since my name was mentioned, I answered.  He cherry-picks quotes without context.  Ward made what he thought was a good argument against the Textus Receptus. In part one, I said “yes” to his […]

Continue Reading →

Yes and Then No, the Bible with Mark Ward (Part One)

My last post of last week, the shell game with Bible words, if you followed the links, referred to a session Mark Ward did at Bob Jones Seminary, where he did refer to Thomas Ross and myself.  Someone sent that to me, and in my path to watching it, I became curious in another of […]

Continue Reading →