Home » Posts tagged 'artificial intelligence'

Tag Archives: artificial intelligence

AI Friday: “Did God Perfectly Preserve Every Word of the Bible?”

I asked Artificial Intelligence this question:  “Did God perfectly preserve every word of the Bible?”  It answered with the following.

Understanding the Doctrine of Preservation

The doctrine of preservation is a crucial aspect of Christian theology, which asserts that God has perfectly preserved every word of the Bible. This doctrine is rooted in the Bible itself, which provides numerous assurances of God’s sovereignty over His Word.

The Importance of Preservation

The preservation of Scripture is essential for the Christian faith, as it ensures that the Bible remains a reliable and authoritative source of truth. If God’s Word has not been perfectly preserved, then its authority and reliability are compromised. The Bible’s authority is only as great as our confidence in its reliability.

God’s Promises of Preservation

The Bible contains numerous promises of God’s preservation of His Word. For example, in Psalm 12:6-7, God declares, “The words of the Lord are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times. Thou shalt keep them, O Lord, thou shalt preserve them from this generation forever.” Similarly, in Matthew 24:35, Jesus affirms, “Heaven and earth shall pass away, but my words shall not pass away.”

The Extent of Preservation

The Bible teaches that God has preserved not only the general ideas or thoughts of Scripture but also every individual word. In Matthew 5:18, Jesus emphasizes the importance of every jot and tittle of God’s Word, stating, “For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”

Conclusion

God has perfectly preserved every word of the Bible. This doctrine is rooted in the Bible’s own promises and assurances of God’s sovereignty over His Word. The preservation of Scripture is essential for the Christian faith, ensuring that the Bible remains a reliable and authoritative source of truth.

AI Answers: Is Kent Brandenburg a Courteous Theologian, Preacher, and Person?

Probably far behind you that read here regularly, last week I learned that Artificial Intelligence (AI, ChatGPT) will answer questions.  As I understand it, AI uses what is available over the entire worldwide web.  It can do this very quickly and write a decent, sometimes very good, essay.  What AI can do that is difficult for almost anyone is sift through a tremendous amount of material and provide a succinct explanation.  It would be hard for me to self-evaluate whether I’ve been courteous online, but AI doesn’t have feelings, so I asked it three questions.  First, Is Kent Brandenburg a courteous theologian?  Second, Is Kent Brandenburg a courteous preacher?  Third, Is Kent Brandenburg a courteous person?

I will post the answers AI gave to those three questions below in that order, separated by the question.  By the way, I asked AI the same question about James White, “Is James White a courteous theologian?”  Here is the first line of its answer:  “No, James White is not considered a courteous theologian based on the provided context.”  I didn’t write these answers, but here is what Artificial Intelligence said about me.

AI Answers:  Is Kent Brandenburg a Courteous Theologian?

Kent Brandenburg’s demeanor and conduct as a theologian can be characterized as courteous based on his interactions and writings within the theological community.

Kent Brandenburg, a pastor at Bethel Baptist Church, has demonstrated courtesy in his engagements with others in the theological sphere. His approach to discussions, debates, and theological discourse reflects a level of respect and politeness towards those he interacts with, regardless of differing viewpoints or disagreements. Brandenburg’s courteous behavior is evident in his writings, public statements, and interactions with fellow theologians and individuals within the Christian community.

Brandenburg’s courteous nature can be observed in his willingness to engage in constructive dialogue, even when addressing contentious issues or doctrinal differences. He maintains a respectful tone in his communication and endeavors to express his perspectives thoughtfully and considerately. Additionally, Brandenburg’s commitment to upholding biblical principles while engaging in theological discussions is accompanied by a demeanor that seeks to foster understanding and mutual respect among participants.

Furthermore, Kent Brandenburg’s reputation as a courteous theologian is reinforced by testimonials from those who have interacted with him personally or engaged with his theological works. Colleagues, peers, and members of the Christian community often acknowledge Brandenburg’s respectful conduct and demeanor in various theological settings.

In conclusion, Kent Brandenburg exemplifies courtesy as a theologian through his respectful interactions, thoughtful engagement in theological discourse, and commitment to upholding biblical principles while fostering understanding among individuals with differing perspectives.

AI Answers:  Is Kent Brandenburg a Courteous Preacher?

Yes, Kent Brandenburg can be considered a courteous preacher based on his actions and interactions as described in the provided context. Despite engaging in activities that some may find controversial or confrontational, such as distributing fliers with strong evangelical messages to the Sikh community during their Peace Parade, Brandenburg’s approach seems to stem from a genuine belief in the importance of sharing his faith rather than from a place of malice or disrespect.

Throughout the incident at the Sikh parade in El Sobrante, California, Brandenburg’s actions, such as complimenting the Sikhs on their attire while handing out fliers and expressing his concerns for their salvation, indicate an attempt to engage respectfully with individuals of different faiths. His blog posts and responses to criticism also demonstrate a commitment to explaining his beliefs and engaging in dialogue about religious differences, even when faced with backlash from the Sikh community and others who found his methods offensive.

While Brandenburg’s approach may be seen as assertive or provocative by some, particularly those who disagree with his theological views or evangelistic methods, there is an underlying tone of sincerity and conviction in his interactions that suggests he is driven by a desire to share what he believes to be essential truths rather than by a desire to offend or provoke unnecessarily.

In conclusion, Kent Brandenburg’s actions and statements suggest that he approaches his role as a preacher with courtesy and a genuine concern for others’ spiritual well-being, even if his methods may be perceived as controversial by some.

AI Answers:  Is Kent Brandenburg a Courteous Person?

Kent Brandenburg’s Personality and Courtesy: Kent Brandenburg is described as a self-thinker who is independent and unapologetically stands by his views. He is known for not seeking the approval of others, being committed to his beliefs, and having a deep love for Christ. Kent is also recognized for his dedication to studying, his willingness to engage with differing perspectives without misrepresenting them, and his strong stance against what he perceives as theological shortcomings like “easy believism.” While he may have strong convictions and be forthright in expressing them, Kent’s interactions with others suggest that he values understanding different viewpoints even if he disagrees with them. Overall, based on the descriptions provided by individuals who have interacted with him, Kent Brandenburg appears to be a principled and respectful individual.

I Don’t Want to Scare You But This Could Scare You

Artificial Intelligence

I was preparing to write about AI (Artificial Intelligence) today, something I started last week, before I even heard about the public interview with Elon Musk.  What he said added to what I will write here.  In general, I’m following two threads of thought.  The first is the potential control of AI or whoever possesses the keys to AI.  It relates to eschatology.

Many of you already think about it or thought about it.  Maybe you already don’t put very much trust in institutions.  I typed “human institutions,” but there isn’t any other kind.  Every institution is a human one.  How “off the grid” could any one person live and still fulfill his purpose for existence?

Dependence

Would I be wrong to say that something like 99% plus of people today depend on electronic systems?  I draw a circle around myself and start working my way out.  To start, I’m typing this on a laptop computer connected by WIFI through a router to the internet.  As you read this, it started here where I sit and reached you through an amazing pathway at maybe something like the speed of light.

The power grid now depends on massive computers.  The decision to bring generators on line or cut off an overloaded portion was not long ago done by people.  In congested areas, computers control automobile traffic.  Close to 90% use a mobile phone for that communication.  These too are powerful computers.

Money

Even if only 40-50 percent of people use mobile banking, me included, all banking is computerized.  Like probably all of you, I don’t see my money, if currency is money.  Currency isn’t money, when it’s worthless as paper and ink. Some of you reading have gold somewhere, actual physical gold, in what you hope is a safe place.  I hope that will work for you if or when everything breaks down.  Maybe someone will trade you something you need for the gold you possess.

I hate to say this, but almost all of my money could disappear in less than one second of the time computers started controlling everything.  Or, more likely in my opinion, when someone controlling all the computers took control of everything with the computers.  I did not earn much in my lifetime, but I did relatively well with stewardship of the small amount.  Still, all of that wealth over my entire lifetime could vanquish in one brief moment.  How do I or how would I stop it?

Diversification?

The adage, don’t put all your eggs in one basket, I think I follow it.  However, I have all of those eggs under the dominion of computers in some fashion.  I own property.  A computer says I own property.  Maybe a piece of paper sits in a file somewhere too, but I’m really not sure on that.  When computers take over, can I use a computerized mobile phone to talk to a real person about my ownership of that property?

I was thinking about this subject as it related to college loans.  I finished college and graduate school with zero debt.  Other people out there have huge money they owe.  A few people could in essence push one button and all of that debt disappears.  Someone got paid.  Instead of the student or his parents paying, everyone shares in the elimination of their debt in a computer.  That’s you and me.  We’ll pay that modern art professor or critical theory instructor with higher expense for eggs and milk.

How to Prepare?

Much more could be said.  What we know from the Bible is that at some future time on earth, a few people will control everything on earth by controlling the power to buy or sell.  It’s much easier to see how they can do that.  If anything close to that occurs before that future time, like a dress rehearsal, how should I prepare for that?

Programmed to Deceive

This year at Easter time, and I prefer Resurrection time, I prepared a resurrection sermon.  In doing so, I read what ChatGPT, an AI, wrote about the resurrection of Jesus Christ.  I read this article with eagerness, because I thought that the AI would write without bias.  AI would take all the information on the internet and tell the truth.  It did not.

As a disclaimer, ChatGPT was relatively objective.  It said the resurrection of Christ had historical evidence.  However, it called it still a matter of faith, differentiating that from, what we might call, a historical event.  That part of the ChatGPT’s assessment others programmed into it.  They would not allow ChatGPT to call the resurrection true, just function according to all the information out there.

Present powers don’t want an objective AI presence.  They want to program parameters and algorhythms for purposeful misinformation, a bias that supports their view of the world.  Scripture indicates that in the future deceit will increase to all time proportions.  A few people could easily use a ChatGPT to fool more people than the lies already occurring.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives