Part One     Part Two

Statements for Consideration

Consider these three statements:

The King James Version is divinely inspired.

God immediately inspired the King James Version.

God gave the King James Version by inspiration.

Do all three have the same meaning?  Are all three true?  If not all three are true, then is any one of them?

I will answer these questions.  To start, let’s read the first part of 2 Timothy 3:16 again:  “All scripture is given by inspiration of God.”  The King James Version translators (KJVT) translated the three Greek words:  pasa graphe theopneustos.  We have only this statement on inspiration, because it’s the only time theopneustos (“God breathed”) is found in the New Testament.  Other passages elaborate or apply.

The Considerations from Scripture

God Breathed Out

2 Timothy 3:16 says God breathed out “scripture.”  Inspiration applies in a technical and specific sense to these sacred writings that come from God.  God inspired the product produced, not the men.  Yes, 2 Peter 1:21 says “holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.”  That doesn’t contradict the truth of 2 Timothy 3:16.  It elaborates.  Inspiration, however, applies to sacred scripture alone according to 2 Timothy 3:16.

Inspiration occurred when God breathed sacred scripture (graphe).  Again, depending on the context, graphe (scripture) refers to inspired writing.  It does in 2 Timothy 3:16.

The Exclusion of Two Statements Above

God breathed out all sacred scripture.  The KJVT, and I agree, took pasa graphe theopneustos as ‘given by inspiration of God.’  When given, the sacred scriptures were either Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek.  That excludes the KJV from scripture given by inspiration of God.  Therefore, that excludes two of the above statements:

God immediately inspired the King James Version.

God gave the King James Version by inspiration.

I’m saying these two statements are false ones.  They are saying, I believe, the same thing, meaning “God inspired” and “God gave by inspiration” are the same [An early comment by Jon Gleason in the comment section explain the London Baptist Confession position of “immediate inspiration”].

To come clean at this moment, until now I never took it upon myself to come to sufficient, completed thinking on the exact subject of these posts.  I’m not done considering it, but I have arrived at sufficient enough thought to write this post (the third in a series so far).  A comment I wrote last week, I edited because it disagreed with what I am writing here.

God Immediately Inspired Some Translation

“Scripture Saith”

As of this moment, I believe God inspired some translation.  Which translation did God inspire?  He inspired at least these translations:

John 19:37, “And again another scripture saith, They shall look on him whom they pierced.”

Romans 9:17, “For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh, Even for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth.”

Romans 10:11, “For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.”

1 Timothy 5:18, “For the scripture saith, Thou shalt not muzzle the ox that treadeth out the corn. And, The labourer is worthy of his reward.”

James 4:5, “Do ye think that the scripture saith in vain, The spirit that dwelleth in us lusteth to envy?”

God inspired all of these translations. . . . in their original Greek.  He gave these by inspiration.  In almost all of these, you are reading translations of translations, English translations of Greek translations from the Hebrew text.  I use these specific verses because they say, “scripture saith.”  If sacred scriptures say it, it means God said it.

“Have Ye Not Read Scripture?”

Jesus also used the language, “have ye not read this scripture”:

Mark 12:10-11, “And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner: This was the Lord’s doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?”

He translated a copy of the Old Testament Psalm 118:22-23.  He again calls a Greek translation of the Old Testament Hebrew, “scripture.”  Jesus and the Apostles also did more than just translate.  In anticipation of this question, I say that Jesus targummed.  Even the dictionary definition of targum says:

an ancient paraphrase or interpretation of the Hebrew Bible, of a type made from about the 1st century AD when Hebrew was declining as a spoken language

God inspired everything in the New Testament, including Jesus’ interpolations inserted into a translation of an Old Testament text.

“Spoken By the Prophet”

Other examples apply.  The New Testament often says the two words, “spoken by,” referring to translated Old Testament scripture:

Matthew 2:17-18, “Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremy the prophet, saying, In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not.”

Matthew 27:35, “And they crucified him, and parted his garments, casting lots: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, They parted my garments among them, and upon my vesture did they cast lots.”

Acts 2:16-21, “But this is that which was spoken by the prophet Joel; And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams: . . . . . And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.”

Equating a Translation of a Copy with a Copy

Above are three of at least twenty “spoken by” passages in the New Testament.  1 Timothy 5:18 above gives unique information.  Paul translates to Timothy an Old Testament text (Deuteronomy 25:4) and quotes a New Testament one (Luke 10:7), and he calls them both, “scripture.”  He equates what we could call a translation of a copy of the Old Testament with a copy of the New Testament by calling them both, “scripture.”

Unlike what B. B. Warfield later asserted in his book on inspiration, copies are sacred scripture and accurate translations of copies are “scripture.”  I contend, based upon 2 Timothy 3:16, that upon the completion of the canon, God did no more breathing out of translations.  However, I also contend that accurate copies and accurate translations of those copies are in fact “scripture.”  I also contend that these accurate copies and accurate translations are inspired.  What God inspired, breathed out, remains inspired and breathed out.  That occurs also with a translation in light of further New Testament elaboration.

The King James Version Is Divinely Inspired

Because of what I explain above, I believe one of the three statements, “The King James Version is divinely inspired.”  I say that because it remains inspired.  Insofar that the King James Version is an accurate translation of a perfectly preserved text, it is inspired by God.  This is how anyone can say about the King James Version, it is the inspired Word of God.

I might disappoint some of you with the following.  The King James Version is not the only inspired translation.  Any accurate translation of a perfectly preserved copy is also inspired.  When I say translation, I also mean translation into any language, not just English.  That also means that if I sit down and do an accurate translation of a perfectly preserved copy, that too is inspired.  If it is what God said, even in a translation, then it is also scripture.

No one translates today by inspiration of God.  God by providence enables translation.  He created language for translation.  Verses above say a translation is scripture, so a translation of scripture can be scripture.  An accurate translation of scripture is scripture.  As scripture it remains inspired.