Home » Posts tagged 'cancel culture'

Tag Archives: cancel culture

How Does a Culture, Including a Christian Culture, Survive Without a Cancel Culture?

Previous Articles (One, Two, Three)

“Cancel culture” has a nice ring to it, a kind of poetic rhythm when one says the two words together.  Go ahead, say them, “cancel culture.”  It does now have a Wikipedia article.  When I googled books with the terminology “cancel culture,” a glut of books appeared written in 2020-2021 with “Cancel Culture” in the title.  I’ve not read one of them.  I wanted to know how early the term appeared, because it’s been on my radar for at the most two years.

A book, Environmental Impact Assessment, written in 1979, reads:

We have come to the realization—yet again—that knowledge is power, that we need to keep building on our science and be ever mindful that a democratic society is based on genuine public engagement, not the so-called cancel culture that is denying genuine dialogue (author’s italics).

Before I graduated from high school, the quote appeared.  Surprising.  That’s the first and only usage I found in the twentieth century.  I don’t know who popularized it.  I went about trying to trace it, but I don’t know who originated the terminology.  Originally, it seems, it was “call-out culture,” the idea here being that described by Adrienne Matei on November 1, 2019 in The Guardian:

The contemporary idea of a “call-out”, however, generally refers to interpersonal confrontations occurring between individuals on social media. In theory, call-outs should be very simple – someone does something wrong, people tell them, and they avoid doing it again in the future. Yet you only need to spend a short amount of time on the internet to know that call-out culture is in fact extremely divisive.

She pointed to a statement by former President Obama in an Obama Foundation Summit, which was on October 30, 2019, in which he said:

If I tweet or hashtag about how you didn’t do something right, or used the wrong word or verb, then I can sit back and feel pretty good about myself, because, ‘Man, you see how woke I was. I called you out.’ That’s not activism.

The rise of the term “cancel culture” seems to occur in the middle of 2020, which also happened to be right at the beginning of the Covid-19 ‘pandemic.’  Now it is well entrenched, and the earliest popular book seems to be Primal Screams, which said:

Consider an example that materialized in March 2019, captured in a New York Times piece called “Teen Fiction and the Perils of Cancel Culture.”  It reported the case a (sic) young black man who identified as gay and was employed as a “sensitivity reader” by various publishing houses.  In that capacity, he enforced “cancel culture” (i.e., the flagging that progressive groupthink would deem unacceptable).

Wouldn’t it be an interesting job to be a “sensitivity reader”?  I had never heard of it until this quote.  I googled that too, and it appears a lot, 40,000 times.  As a pastor, a chunk of your congregation could take that job while listening to your sermons.  The New York Times article was written on March 8, 2019.

Cancel culture emerged as perhaps one of the top issues for the 2022 mid-term elections.  The cancel culture tried to cancel Joe Rogan on Spotify and failed.  On the other hand, Whoopi Goldberg said something offensive about the Holocaust on her show, The View, and they cancelled her for a few weeks, so she could take time to reflect on her ignorance, stupidity, or callousness.  Another aspect, it seems, of cancel culture is a reaction to the unvaccinated, losing one’s job even if he has natural immunity.  This relates to the trucker protest on the U.S. Canadian border, which is bigger than a vaccination issue.

During this last six months I’ve worked on a lot of writing projects and wrote almost two chapters on sanctification for our book, The Salvation That Keeps On Saving.  The two chapters are “Dedication and Sanctification” and then “The Biblical Theology of Sanctification,” the latter of which I’m halfway done, the former I’ve completed.  For the latter, I am looking at every use of the related Hebrew Old Testament and Greek New Testament words for sanctification, which is almost 1,000.

You reader know that God canceled in the most severe way everyone on earth except for eight people in Genesis 6-9.  He ordered the cancellation of all the Canaanites.  When Israel didn’t, Israel suffered greatly for that.  The Assyrians and Babylonians tried to and succeeded greatly at cancelling Israel.  The Bible requires churches to cancel someone’s church membership, called by us, “church discipline.”  Jesus taught that in Matthew 18:15-17 (See our book, A Pure Church).

God says in Leviticus 20:24, “But I have said unto you, Ye shall inherit their land, and I will give it unto you to possess it, a land that floweth with milk and honey: I am the LORD your God, which have separated you from other people.”  Two verses later, He continues: “And ye shall be holy unto me: for I the LORD am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should be mine.”  It’s not just Old Testament.  Jesus said in Matthew 13:49, “So shall it be at the end of the world: the angels shall come forth, and sever the wicked from among the just.”  Many more examples occur.

I’m sure that you would know that cancellation is a biblical teaching, that conservatives were canceling people before liberals or leftists were.  It’s tough to say, but our country found it’s unity around the ability to agree on who deserves cancellation.  The left wants to cancel anyone who uses “hate speech” against any type of LGBTQ, etc.  You know that.  It’s not just that, but also going back into the usage of certain unacceptable words and whether someone appeared in black face in the 1970s.
The John T. Scopes trial, the so-called monkey trial, dealt with cancellation of evolution from the public school.  Now schools cancel creation.  No one can teach creation in public schools.  Conservatives, who once cancelled evolutionists, would like intelligent design at least taught.  The government cancels the ten commandments.  Governments cancel statutes of the founding fathers.  At one time, everyone would have cancelled a statue to Karl Marx.  A tiny few would like a Hitler statue erected.
The story of cancellation seems to be the following.  Cancellation was mainly conservative.  Conservatives supported it.  Now conservatives are cancelled on nighttime television, movies, mainstream media.  Everyone goes to their own network to hear their news.  Both sides cancel each other.  However, in the mainstream conservatives are cancelled.  Conservatives now, putting the first amendment up there in a greater way, accept a foul mouthed Joe Rogan.  In an effort to reject cancellation, they accept what they cancelled themselves.  Does this have a better future?
Some say that sunlight is the best antiseptic.  There is perhaps a scientific point there.  Lysol might argue against it.  If we allow everyone to say whatever they want to say everywhere on every outlet, we will be better off.  Sarah Palin is challenging this in court against the New York Times, who she says, libeled her.  Maybe they did.
What I’m writing is that cancellation is a Christian, biblical position.  I get that we don’t like being cancelled.  The better thing might be to practice biblical separation.  Others are practicing a form of separation, that isn’t biblical.  If you don’t support their sin, they cancel you.  This is the kind of cancellation the Roman Catholic Church did during the Inquisition.  We don’t like that.  We should oppose that.
Cancellation defines morality.  What will you separate over?  The left separates over its values.  The right separates over theirs.  Is the solution to accept anything or everything?  This is new too.  An acceptance culture is not the solution to a cancel culture.
Scripture is clear that without cancellation, severing or separation, a culture cannot continue.  It won’t.  What we value cannot be preserved without separating it from what will corrupt it.

Can Anyone Be Effeminate? Consider the Chinese

As I begin to write this post, it feels like something canceled on twitter, youtube, and facebook.  No one must think this or this way.  It must not be said or written.  Perhaps a future reeducation camp in store for someone who crosses this boundary.

I was speaking this week to someone from China and the subject of effeminate Chinese men came up. This story made the news at the beginning of September 2021.  You can find articles at major news outlets, such as ABC News and the Washington Post, reporting that as Xi Jinping, the general secretary of the ruling Chinese Communist Party (CCP), starts a third term, the government cracks down on every sector of society with a “rectification” campaign.  As part of pressure to align with the government’s vision of a powerful China and a healthier society, the CCP has banned effeminate men on television.

Apparently the trend or growth of effeminate men in Chinese society spread across the border of China through South Korea.  South Korean and Japanese singers influenced Chinese pop stars toward unacceptable “niang po,” a Chinese insulting slang for effeminate men, which means “girlie guns.”  The National Radio and TV Administration said that broadcasters must “resolutely put an end to sissy men and other abnormal esthetics.”

In a positive way, China’s government has ordered its broadcasters to encourage masculinity, a practice just the opposite of that of the United States.  Its government says it wants to put a stop to abnormal beauty standards.  The Washington Post article quotes Rana Mitter, an Oxford professor of modern Chinese and politics as saying:

The party does not feel comfortable with expressions of individualism that are in some ways transgressive to norms that it puts forward.

China does not see a future without two clearly delineated roles between men and women.  Where does China get that idea?  China wants effeminate women and masculine men.

Is there hope for any country that forsakes the God-ordained or natural roles of men and women?  1 Corinthians 11:14 and Romans 1:26-27 read:

Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him?

For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature.  And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

China sees something abnormal or a transgression of natural norms and stops it.  The United States encourages it and prohibits discouragement.  Listening to a podcast a few weeks ago, Jordan Peterson in an interview seemed to bemoan or mourn the illegality in Canada of conversion therapy.  Not long ago society required masculinity and the fulfillment of the male role in society.  Now it’s bullying to do so.

Churches now cooperate with the perversion of men, ignoring effeminate behavior.  Imagine someone in a church telling a boy to stop acting like a girl.  Churches now exalt soft-spoken, effeminate sounding and acting men, calling their mannerisms the fruit of the Holy Spirit.  Today’s tone police cancels masculine tone.  Churches need their own rectification campaigns.

Will men do anything?  Will the ostensibly godly men of churches do anything?

If the Lord tarries and you live, prepare for world takeover by the Chinese, the country with the last men standing.

************

Other articles from What Is Truth on the subject.

Refreshing Honesty from “Desiring God” on Men Acting Effeminate

Noticeable Increase in Effeminate Sounding Men

Ability to Judge, Standard of Judgment, and Judging Effeminate Behavior (and Separating from It)

Act Like Men, Not Like Girls

Beauty, Worldly Lust, Effeminate and Truth in the Real World

No Reason to Fret the Harry Styles Vogue Cover Unless Designed Gender Distinction or a Male and Female Item of Clothing

God Designed Roles, Their Symbolism, and Sodomy

Cancel Culture and Religious Persecution

Everyone should cancel something.  I remember canceling my subscription to Sports Illustrated when it started publishing the swimsuit issue.  I understand the marketing aspect of that issue.  Sports Illustrated can make more money with the issue than without, so they’re willing to lose the lesser number of subscribers for the greater number.  Sports Illustrated could stay in business.  This isn’t canceling Sports Illustrated.  They stay in business.  I’ve canceled it, because it’s the right thing to do.

Amazon, the behemoth corporation, canceled a book by Ryan T. Anderson, that was published three years ago.  Joe Biden becomes president and Anderson’s book, When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment, is canceled.  Amazon suddenly wouldn’t allow it on.  I understand, he can sell the book, but Amazon doesn’t own the internet.  In particular, Amazon cancels a book, which isn’t politically correct.  It cancels a point of view closer to a biblical view.  Silencing a biblical point of view we would understand as persecution.
When you read the book of Acts and look at the history of persecution, you can see a rising trajectory.  In Acts 2, opponents of the truth mocked the believers as drunk with new wine (Acts 2:13).  Mockery is a root level persecution, but it also portends of things to come.  We’re already to mockery in this country.  It’s hard to make an exact comparison, because Rome and Palestine were not democracies or republics.
More than ever people think you’re silly for being a Christian.  You see the look in their faces.  This is especially in the big cities, the blue areas.  It’s everywhere though especially related to true biblical Christianity.  If you dress modest, carry a Bible, so that they know you’re a Christian, you are marginalized, excluded, and unfriended.
Second in Acts 4 was threatening.  Authorities threatened the disciples about talking.  Evangelism is more difficult.  The Covid-19 has affected this.  People are more emboldened to say you can’ talk to someone about the Lord if he doesn’t want it.  I understand the laws about trespassing.  I’ve been kicked out of two apartment complexes and threatened at another housing complex.  We still have opportunities.  I’ve noticed a difference, that’s what I’m saying.
The third step was imprisonment.  This is when the government punishes someone.  That’s happened too.  I would compare this to government policy even short of throwing someone into jail like what occurred with Peter and John in Acts 4.  This is the man in Colorado who wouldn’t bake a cake.  This is a child punished in the public school for saying a biblical truth.  This is the outlawing of biblical child discipline.  This is the exclusion of biblical doctrine in the state schools.
Fourth in Acts 5 was beating.  Peter and John were beaten for their testimony for Christ.  Peter and John of course rejoiced because they were counted worthy to suffer for His name.  The government is punishing people, but not with actual physical punishment.  However, there is a threat of unofficial physical punishment for those who stand for the truth.
Fifth is the killing of first Stephen in Acts 7 and then James in Acts 12.  Before that, Jesus was crucified.  I think we’re a ways off from being put to death in the United States for preaching Christ.  Maybe that won’t even come until the Antichrist reveals himself.  Right now you’d be killed still in several other countries and the United States does not have a policy of standing for those people.
Cancel culture is religious persecution.  It’s not at the level of beating and death, but it is in that trajectory, as seen in the book of Acts.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives