Home » Posts tagged 'complementarianism'

Tag Archives: complementarianism

A Useful Exploration of Truth about Christian Nationalism (Part Two)

Part One

Seeds of Christian Nationalism

Scripture teaches nothing about anything remotely Christian nationalism for the New Testament church age.  Christian nationalism must arise at the most from principles through scripture that permit Christian nationalism.  Is that possible?  I think a semblance of that is.  True believers in Jesus Christ, Christians, could hope for that. However, before I write about that, I will deal with the Christian nationalism movement in the United States, as I see it.

The Christian nationalist movement in the United States arises from the false eschatology of postmillennialism and a false ecclesiology of paedo baptism and communion.  I suggest that several factors have contributed to this theonomist style or Christian reconstructionist postmillenial revival.

Recent Embrace of Protestant Theology

Not necessarily in this order, but, one, postmillennialism proceeds from recent new embrace of Protestant theology, some being a new Calvinism, or the “young, restless, and Reformed movement.”  Many factors, I believe and have witnessed, led to the attraction to this faction of professing Christianity.  The Apostle Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 1:22:  “For the Jews require a sign, and the Greeks seek after wisdom.”  The latter wisdom, one might also call, “intellectualism.”  Perhaps an insipid, superficial evangelicalism swung the pendulum to theological seriousness and the greatest allure to a muscular, Puritanical determinism with heavy historical roots.

Attack on the Male Role in Society

Two, the elimination of and attack on a male role in society and growing egalitarianism pushed young men toward a more masculine view of the world.  Postmillennial theonomy embraces not just complementary roles for men and women, but thoroughgoing Patriarchy.  This also explains the great popularity of Jordan Peterson, who promotes the significance of the Patriarchy and a unique place for men in the culture.

Other Reasons for the Rise of Christian Nationalism Propositions

Three, men responded to the degradation of the culture.  The United States slouches toward Gomorrah.  The weakness all around begs for an answer or a reaction.  Men don’t like what they are seeing.  This corresponds with the decline of the United States on the world stage, a porous border, and decrepit leaders.

Four, the Postmillennials have some effective spokesmen, that contrast with the ineffectiveness of the alternative.  I would compare Russell Moore, now editor of Christianity Today, and Douglas Wilson.  The former capitulates and whine and the latter puts on the battle fatigues.

Five, even though Trump himself is not a Christian, Christian nationalism dovetails with the rise of Trump.  It would take some explaining here, which I don’t think is too difficult, but I’ll leave it at that one sentence.

Premillennialism the Truth

Scripture is plain on the future or how everything will end.  It is not postmillennial.  Premillennialism represents a grammatical, historical interpretation of scripture.  It is how the Bible reads.  Premillennialism does not correspond well to a biblical presentation of Christian nationalism.

Based on this understanding of the future, Scott Aniol has written a different position than Christian Nationalism, that he calls Christian Faithfulness (he further argues here).  I can’t disagree with anything Aniol says about this and generally agree with his criticism of the positions of Stephen Wolf and Douglas Wilson.  I haven’t read Aniol’s new book, Citizens and Exiles: Christian Faithfulness in God’s Two Kingdoms, so I don’t know how far he goes in his vision for the nation.

The Likelihood or Unlikelihood of Christian Nationalism

Without having read Aniol’s book, I’m certain I would go further than Aniol and propose something toward Christian Nationalism without actual Christian Nationalism.  I explained some of this in part one.  In a refreshing way, Aniol calls himself a Baptist.  I am a Baptist.  Baptists as one of their distinctives claim the separation of church and state, even if the United States Constitution does not claim that.  Baptists have taken strongly a very anti church state doctrine.  The Baptists promoted and ratified the first amendment of the Bill of Rights.

Aniol has coined a new position related to the Christian Nationalism debate:  Christian Faithfulness.  My thinking has not yet congealed into a position.  Maybe it won’t get to that and I could hold some version of Christian Faithfulness.  I want to and will explain where I am right now.

More to Come

The Most Indispensable Quality for Manhood

Designed Manhood and Manhood Under Attack

A strange incongruity exists.  On the one hand, the world blurs the distinctions between men and women.  On the other, women want to be men and men want to be women and do so by embracing the natural distinctions between men and women.  The world in which we live produces this incoherence.

“God created man in his own image, . . . male and female created he them” (Genesis 1:27).  When God created the woman, he created her with a different role than the man.  He made the woman to complement the man.  Men and women are different.

Scripture throughout distinguishes men from women in their traits, their roles, their functions, and their appearances.  To do His moral will, God intends for men to be men and women to be women in the way His Word prescribes.

To oppose the plan of God, Satan and the world system attack and confuse biblical manhood and womanhood.  Men become more feminine and women become more masculine.  From this arises sex and gender confusion.  It damages both sexes, but especially the man.

The Loss of Manhood

Mostly today the man loses his identity, role, and function in society.  This occurs either through the feminization of everything or the subversion of God created and ordained male qualities.

The culture now eradicates male qualities by calling them toxic.  When a man acts like a man, he’s toxic, termed “toxic masculinity.”  He receives approval when he terminates male qualities to act more like a woman.  If he goes further to attempt a sex change, more the better.

Even though I don’t believe in toxic masculinity, I believe a fake masculinity exists that replaces the true.  Like every other doctrine, a false one supplants a true one.  Fake masculinity welcomes all the tokens of popular masculinity like beards, tattoos, booze, foul language, and risky hobbies.  These are easier to inculcate then the fundamental traits of masculinity.

What Makes a Man, a Man?

What is it that makes a man, a man?  The Bible evinces the most indispensable quality for manhood as “strength.”  In 1 Corinthians 16:13, the Apostle Paul writes, “Watch ye, stand fast in the faith, quit you like men, be strong.”  “Quit you” in the KJV is “to acquit yourself.”  “Quit you like men” translates a single verb which means, “act like a man.”  Then when Paul defines what it is to act like one, he commands, “Be strong.”

Later, when Paul writes to Timothy in his second epistle, he explains to him ‘how to be strong.’  In 2 Timothy 2:1, he writes:

Thou therefore, my son, be strong in the grace that is in Christ Jesus.

Again we read the command, “Be strong.”  Paul starts that sentence with “therefore,” so he bases this command on the content of the previous section.  If anything, its theme is unashamedness.  Rather than be ashamed, be strong.

Not Ashamed

To help Timothy, he gives him portrayals of strength that would make him not ashamed:  the faithful man, the soldier, the athlete, and the farmer.  These all describe this quality of strength.

What is the shame about which Paul speaks?  It relates to telling the truth.  Paul himself had declared in Romans 1:16, “I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ.”  Men should stand on the truth without wavering.  They should say it, which includes firmness about manhood itself.  Satan and the world system want men to back down on the truth and shirk responsibility to tell it, live it, and lead it.

Some might call this, having a backbone.  Men diminish behind the skirts of women.  They look to women for permission for what they can say.  Many times women gladly accommodate or accept that.  This changes everything in society.

Women Rule Over Them

Many times scripture says to the woman, “Keep silence or stay quiet” (1 Cor 14:34, 1 Tim 2:11-12).  This says, “Let the man lead.”  When things aren’t going well for a nation, Isaiah 3:12 describes:

As for my people, children are their oppressors, and women rule over them.

This is role, function, and quality reversal.  That means men are not ruling according to God’s design.  Now men accept this quietly.  They know if they say anything, they’re in trouble.

As a first indication of a man deferring his own manhood, he stops standing spiritually.  A common scenario in my lifetime, I go to a door to speak about the gospel.  A man or at least a male sex answers the door, sees who I am, and turns to say this conversation is for his wife.  Men lack spiritual strength or conviction.

When men check with their wives, that might sound happily egalitarian.  Maybe they use their wives as an excuse for their weakness.  I’m not saying men can’t confer with their wives, very often today men can’t decide because they’re weak.  Maybe today a majority of men support the idea of a woman ruling over them.  It would just be easier.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives