Home » Posts tagged 'Done'

Tag Archives: Done

Done. Yes, But…. (Part Two)

Part One     [Also a Previous Post I Forgot I Wrote]

Two Religions in the World?

A common modern aphorism, very catchy, you will read from many sources:  “There are only two religions in the world.”  Men say they are “do” and “done.”  That’s what Cary Schmidt says in his book, Done.  He’s not the only one or even the first one to say it.

I googled “only two religions in the world” and got 41,900 hits.  Then I searched google books and the first find was a book in 1884, The Life of John Calvin, by T. Lawson.  Lawson indicates the division between eighteen your old Calvin and his cousin, Olivetan.  This takes this language at least to the 16th century.  Lawson writes:

“There are two religions in the world,” we hear Olivetan saying.  “In the one class invented by men, man saves himself by ceremonies and good works: the other is that one religion which is revealed in the Bible, and which teaches men to look for salvation solely from the free grace of God.”

At the start of the next chapter, Lawson distinguishes the two religions as “Human Authority or Divine Revelation.” That’s different than “Do” and “Done” and is a little broader, if one would divide everything into two categories only.

More Than Two Religions

I disagree with the two religion adage.  Someone could divide into “do” and “done,” but not two religions.  Free gracers would agree with Olivetan and Schmidt.  Jude called their false gospel (Jude 1:4), “turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.”  This turns religions into at least three different categories, instead of two.

Someone might slot Schmidt into a third category.  A person may say it’s just a lacking or wrong definition of “done.”  Schmidt would say he is “done.”  Someone taking his identical position might agree that he’s done too.  According to scripture it’s only done, however, if a person repents and believes in Jesus Christ.  If not, it isn’t done yet.  He’s not doing for salvation, but neither is he done.

Dividing all religious categories into “human invention” and “divine revelation,” I can agree with that.  That’s not how men like Schmidt and others categorize it though.  It’s just “do” and “done.”  I get the problem between do and done:  human effort versus divine grace.  Those two contradict each other.  But people then also pervert or corrupt grace.  They turn grace into something less than saving grace.

Excluding Repentance and Lordship of Christ

Schmidt in his book excludes repentance and lordship of Christ.  I would contend that Schmidt’s faith isn’t even true faith.  He constructs different prerequisites for salvation, putting the emphasis on a prayer, asking for salvation.  This falls short of saving faith.  It’s either intellectual or emotional, fitting into a stony ground type of faith (Matthew 13:5-6).  It almost might be worldly, where the world swallows up a shallow faith (Matthew 13:7-8).

Part of the attraction of Schmidt’s idea of “done,” which I would call human invention, is someone doesn’t count the cost or give up anything.  He can go on his sweet way.  Sure, God does everything.  A person doesn’t even really believe in Jesus Christ and God still does everything.  This really is the broad road that Jesus talks about in Matthew 7:13-14.

No-repentance goes very nicely with American revivalism and evangelicalism.  I especially say American, because it relies heavily on fleshly allure and marketing.  Barnum and Bailey style.  Even the very tidy, Done, goes along with that sentiment.  It markets “done” especially to a people that want to keep going the same direction, yet receiving heaven in the end.  It’s a very short book for an easy or even easier believism.

Spreading Around the World

The densely marketed Christianity from America reverses truths of scripture.  It makes worship palatable and pleasurable to the worshiper.  It orchestrates feelings and entertains.  The purveyors calculate almost every aspect of the church experience for the attendee.  In that way, this is “doing.”  The professionals “do” church for those attending, starting with a fleshly or mystical reason to come.  So much of everything is a show for churches like these.

In many locations around the globe, this other false religion which I address in this post generates a greater bad influence than the “do” religion.  It blinds people especially in a more affluent world.  They want a stimulating and thrilling religion that is done for them.  Its advocates get the life they want on earth plus eternal life.  They really also form or envision a Jesus of their own choosing.

We don’t have two religions in the world.  More than two exist.  More than three do too.  I don’t know how many there are, but “do” and “done” aren’t all of them.

Done. Yes, But….

REVIEW OF BOOK BY CARY SCHMIDT

Many times through my life, someone said, “Christianity is a ‘done’ religion, not a ‘do’ one.”  Or something very close to that.  I gravitate toward that message; done, not do.  Sounds right.  It is, insofar you treat “done” right.

Many who write “done” don’t give it the right definition.  Let me explain.

Cary Schmidt and Done.

Cary Schmidt came from Hyles-Anderson in the Hyles days.  He went to Lancaster Baptist Church, which is also West Coast Baptist College.  Then he left there to Newington, Connecticut, where he still is.  He wrote the booklet, “Done,” which many churches hand to the lost in evangelistic packets and to new converts.  Many, many.   Hundreds of churches hand out thousands of this book.  It’s a tiny little book.  It’s short, small, and easy to read.

I have never joined the West Coast and Lancaster, spiritual leadership and striving together, orbit.  I’ve explained why here in the past.  It relates to doctrine, the gospel, and ministry philosophy.  I would not send anyone else into that sphere of influence either.  If someone was in it, I would encourage him to get out.  This does relate to the book, “done,” among many other things.

Before I talk about the problems of a false view of “done,” what is right about it?

What Is Right about Done.

Nothing is wrong with the general idea or concept of Done.  It’s good.  Jesus said on the cross, “It is finished” (tetelestai, perfect passive).  Jesus did everything on the cross for any person’s salvation.  He completed the work of salvation.  It’s results are ongoing (perfect tense).

Hebrews 10:12 says about the Lord Jesus Christ:  “But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God.”  Four times the book of Hebrews records that Jesus sat down (Hebrews 1:3, 13; 10:2; 12:2).  He sat down because His work on the cross paid the penalty for sin.  He sat down too because of His burial, bodily resurrection, and ascension, all included and necessary for “done.”  The gospel includes the death, burial, and resurrection of Christ (1 Corinthians 15:1-3).

No doubt, Jesus did everything.  We needed what He finished.  Religions and people in those religions, which teach and preach salvation by works, need to hear this “done” message.  They say “do” instead of “done.”

So, what’s wrong?  What’s wrong with “Done”?  Nothing is wrong with the word “done.”  We like it.  Does Schmidt represent it properly though?  He does not.

What Is Wrong

A False Presentation

One, what does it mean to believe in Jesus Christ?  Jesus did everything, but how do we access what He did?  Schmidt in his little booklet says you’ve got to take the gift Jesus gave like opening a gift on Christmas morning.  He makes the reception of the gift then, a two step process (p. 83):  (1)  Believe the gift is free, that it doesn’t cost you anything. (2) Receive the gift.

The way Schmidt describes it, the gift is under the tree, there wrapped and ready to take.  People do not get the gift because they won’t believe that gift is free and then because they think they might have to pay, they don’t take it.  Children know their gifts are free under the tree.  People in evangelism, however, according to Schmidt can’t or don’t believe salvation is free.

The way you get the gift, Schmidt says, is ask for the gift.  You believe that the gift is free.  That is believing.  Jesus paid for the gift, you don’t have to do that.  It is done.  Then you’ve got to receive the gift.  Schmidt makes those the two steps for receiving the free gift of salvation.  That is false.  This is the major way that “done” fails.  It is a big falsehood.  There really is very little different between what he says and 1-2-3, pray with me.  It’s a lengthier presentation of 1-2-3, pray-with-me.

Misuse or Perverting of Scripture

To make his completely false assertion about the gospel and salvation, Schmidt misuses verses of scripture:  Romans 10:9, 13, Acts 16:31, and John 3:16.  He leaves out important exposition of those verses.  He makes them mean something other than what they mean.  As a result, he twists all of the gospels and their presentation of Jesus Christ.  I would call it a very carefully crafted falsehood.

The deceit of the “done” message comes from getting one portion of the message of salvation right and twisting another vital part of it.  Many false religions do that, present some truth with error.  People understandably love the “done” part of the gospel.

If you ask almost anyone in the United States, “Did Jesus die for you?”  He will answer, “Yes.”  In all my years of evangelism, almost everyone believes Jesus died for them.  Schmidt leaves out the part of the plan of salvation that is the biggest stumblingblock to the lost, the most offensive part.  He eliminates the hard part, maybe on purpose or maybe because people deceived him in the past (perhaps Hyles and Lancaster?).

Head Knowledge/Heart Knowledge?

Schmidt (pp. 86-87) says the problem for people is that they get the ticket of salvation (head knowledge) but they won’t get on the plane (heart knowledge).  This is a false dichotomy about head knowledge and heart knowledge.  It’s useful to make it sound right, even though it isn’t.

Schmidt is right that some people think they need to earn their salvation.  They add works to grace.  That is not the difference between head knowledge and heart knowledge though.  They will not acknowledge ( in their heads) that Jesus paid it all, because their religion says they must contribute to what Jesus did.  However, that is not the biggest stumbling block today for English speaking people.

At the end of his book, Schmidt challenges the reader to become “done” instead of “do” by praying a prayer, which he records at the end to pray.  He might argue, “I argue that someone who prays that prayer, the way he receives the gift, he will become a new creature.”  When you read that short chapter, you find out that you become a new creature in that God takes your sins away as you pray that prayer.  You are new now.  You are forgiven, because you have prayed that prayer.  The change is a removal of sin.  Then you will grow as a Christian, whatever that means.

No Repentance or Lordship

“Done” says absolutely nothing about repentance.  Schmidt excludes repentance from the presentation.  When he quotes Romans 10:9, which says, “confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus,” he says nothing about the Lordship of Jesus Christ.  Christ will do everything for you.  You just need to pray that prayer.  That is the way you receive the free gift after believing it is free.  Heaven is free for you, just pray the prayer.

Both Jesus and John the Baptist preached, “Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”  To receive the kingdom of heaven, someone needed to receive Jesus Christ as King, which is to receive Jesus Christ.  They needed to relinquish their own kingdom for His.  This is not like asking for and receiving a gift.  The kingdom of heaven is a gift, but it requires repentance.  Where is that in this presentation?  It isn’t there.

What About Believing in and Receiving Jesus Christ?

“Done” leaves out receiving Jesus Christ for who He is.  “Done” leaves out a presentation of the Person of Jesus Christ.  Nothing then is done, because someone does not know who Jesus is or receive Him.

Schmidt makes “done” about receiving the gift. No.  Absolutely not.  “Done” is about receiving Jesus Christ.  John 1:12 says, “But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name.”  John 3:16 and Acts 16:31 both say, “believe in Jesus Christ.”  Schmidt leaves that out.  He quotes the two verses and says they mean, “Pray a prayer.”

Like John says at the end of his gospel, ‘believing that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the living God.’  To get into the kingdom, you must receive the King.  You are not in charge anymore, Jesus is.  Schmidt leaves all that out, which is the biggest difficulty that people have with the gospel.

By doing what he did, Schmidt deceives his reader on the gospel.  Most people reading what he wrote will not know what salvation is.  He perverts the gospel of Christ by leaving out what scripture says about believing in and receiving Jesus Christ.

More to Come (I will deal with problem number two of “Done”)

The Meaning of “Done” and the Work of Christ

I didn’t hear language until recently both in preaching and in reading of the existence of only two religions, one “do” and the other “done.”  This nice turn of phrase might help someone who thinks salvation is by works.  A popular leader in “new revivalism,” comparable to the label “new Calvinism,” wrote a book titled, “Done.”

In a sense, depending upon the explanation, the “done” versus “do” aphorism is true.  With a different explanation, it can also be false though, and dangerous.  What I read, very often it is.  Many who emphasize “done” and not “do” are wrong, mainly in their watery, pliable definition of “done.”  The ambiguity provides for doctrinal perversion.

It makes good preaching to turn to the words of Jesus, “It is finished” (tetelestai, perfect passive), the work of salvation done by Christ on the cross.  With the popularity of a new and false view of sanctification, many Christian leaders now say that since salvation is done, when you sin, just preach the gospel to yourself, so you won’t feel burdened down by the guilt.  Tetelestai is perfect passive (not to get super Greeky with you), not the aorist tense, completed action.  With the perfect, the work is done, but the results are ongoing.  Jesus works, but His work doesn’t stop working.

Paul wrote in Philippians 2:13, “it is God which worketh in you both to will and to do of his good pleasure.”  He’s not done working in you.  “It is finished,” but the results are ongoing.  How do you know your salvation is done?  Jesus said, “Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven” (Matthew7:21).  “He that doeth.”  That’s not “done;” that’s “do,” “doeth.”  For the one who is really “done,” he will “do.”  When someone isn’t doing, then his salvation isn’t done.

The work that Jesus does transforms the actual life, not some kind of fanciful, chimerical life, not actually lived.   Some of the “done” people say, Jesus lives it, and you just claim what He did as if it was you.  Some reading this may say that you’re not believing that.  You are when you lump sanctification with justification.  How you know you’re saved is that He keeps saving you.  Evidence.  It shows up.  God provides measurables.

Partly why Jesus’ righteousness doesn’t show up in the the “done ones” is that they did not repent, unless a deconstructed, dumbed down repentance.  They changed their mind about their not trusting in what Jesus did.  They repented of depending on self.  This is the so-called repentance of the Pharisees that diminishes righteousness, what Paul called, ‘establishing your own righteousness and not submitting unto the righteousness of God’ (Romans 10:1-4).

Salvation is “done,” don’t get me wrong.  What does “done” mean?  When God saves someone, He changes him, makes him a new creature (2 Cor 5:17).  Sin doesn’t dominate him any more (Roman 6:14).  The eternal life he possesses is more than a quantity of life, but a quality of life.  The epistle of 1 John says the life of God indwells the done one (1 John 1:1,2, 5:11), what Peter described as partaking of the Divine nature (2 Peter 1:4).

Very often, modern purveyors of “done” mean, even if for only practical purposes, their salvation is all set regardless if they practice sin as a lifestyle.  Any hint that a life is going to change and salvation means “do” and not “done.”  As a consequence of this false view, he becomes cemented in sinning, because he sin with no repercussions.

The apparent, albeit wrong, alternative to “done” says receive salvation through Christ’s death after trying to be a good person and living a righteous life.  A biblical alternative is that salvation isn’t done until the believer is glorified, and when his salvation is truly done, Christ indwells Him and continues saving him.  When God doesn’t indwell someone and transform him, he can only still “do,” except in a dangerous way, fooled in thinking the Lord saved him, when He hasn’t.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives