Part One

The Providence of God

As the church passed down the original language text of the New Testament, men made copyist errors.  Preservation occurs through copying and then correcting the errors if they’re made.  It didn’t occur through textual criticism, critical literary theories about older and shorter readings.

God insured the perfect preservation of scripture.  He promised it.  Opponents of this belief mock it as mysticism and requiring human omniscience.  No one who believes God’s perfect preservation explains it this way.  In part one, I asserted that they depend on Divine providence as biblically and historically understood.  Providence isn’t mysticism.  I don’t hear providence from the critical text side, but that’s what believers assert.

Internal Testimony of the Holy Spirit

In addition to Divine Providence, true churches or genuine believers point to the internal testimony of the Holy Spirit.  This isn’t double inspiration.  This is the internal guidance of the Holy Spirit using the various means He does according to scripture.  This is an almost identical argument as for canonicity (see chapter 19 in Thou Shalt Keep Them).  This isn’t mysticism.

Ephesians 5:18 commands, “Be filled with the Spirit.”  A parallel text says (Col 3:16), “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly.”  Spirit-filling isn’t mysticism.  How does it occur that the Holy Spirit controls someone and that shows up as love, joy, peace, etc., the fruit of the Spirit?  True churches or genuine believers have never referred to Spirit filling as mystical.

James 1:5 says, “If any man lack wisdom, let him ask of God.”  Does God give wisdom?  Yes.  Is this mystical?  Is wisdom imparting omniscience to someone?  No and no.

The Apostle Paul says that the things of the Spirit of God are spiritually discerned (1 Corinthians 2:14).  God gives something to believers through the indwelling Holy Spirit to discern spiritual things.  This is not mysticism.  How does it show up?  They understand the Word of God.  Then they know how to apply scripture in given situations, the Holy Spirit providing insight.

Agreement of the Saints or Unity of the Spirit

Saints of the first century knew the books the Holy Spirit inspired and the ones He didn’t.  They copied the ones He inspired.  They received those as the Word of God.  The saints agreed on what the books and the words were.  They copied and distributed them.

The agreement of the saints or of true churches resulted in a multitude of almost identical copies.  As history passed the printing press era, they agreed or settled on the text of the Bible.  One could and should call the agreement, “the unity of the Spirit” (Ephesians 4:3).  What is that?

Every true believers possesses the Holy Spirit in him.  He guides, leads, reproves, teaches, etc.  The Holy Spirit will not on the inside of a believer lead, guide, or teach in a different way.  He won’t contradict Himself.  He is One.

The same Holy Spirit, Who inspired the Words of God, knows those Words still.  He does not need to reinspire Words.  Instead, He can direct His people to the correct one, when a copyist errs.  The churches for hundreds of years did not agree on the critical text.  That text did not make its way to God’s people.  They received the, well, received text.  They thought that the work of the Holy Spirit.

What I just wrote above is not mysticism.  It is what we read in scripture.  It is how we see the Holy Spirit work.  Providence and the inward testimony of the Holy Spirit fulfilled God’s promise of preservation.