Home » Posts tagged 'Israel'

Tag Archives: Israel

The New Rising Hatred Against Israel in the United States

Jews are a relatively small group of people compared to the whole world.  Israel is a tiny, little nation.  They are a couple of gnats landing on a large person.  Proportionally the Jews and Israel receive a very big, gigantic reaction from the rest of the world.

Admittedly, I notice the Jews every day even though almost all of my days now I speak to none, not a single Jew.  I don’t have to go out of my way to ignore Jews.  None live where I am.

On the other hand, during my time in California, on average Jews were more hostile to me than any other people.  When I came to a door and saw a mezuzah shema (mezuzah means “doorposts”) on the doorpost, that meant a tough, very difficult situation was coming about 100 percent of the time.  I want to have a good conversation with a Jewish person and it is very disappointing that most Jews treat someone like myself, who loves them, worse than anybody.

Even with the very poor treatment, I support Jews and Israel.  My wife and I go out of our way to befriend Jewish people.  I even understand their hostility.  It isn’t merited, but it is understandable.

Why Israel and the Jews?

Maybe you have a hard time comprehending why so many people, especially young ones, right now are opposing Israel and the Jews.  These are harsh and even dangerous times.  It is widespread and many times violent.  Maybe even stranger, Jews themselves are part of the opposition.  Quite often the stories or the narratives contradict.  The two or more sides or factions tell clashing stories.

My main point of writing this post is to answer why so much hatred for the Jews and for Israel,  What could this be?  What causes this?  Here it is and not necessarily in this order:  The most prevalent reasons, I think, I will present at and toward the end, not the beginning.

Contrasting Theologies

Supercessionism

One, differing and contradictory theological positions cause the hatred.  Many Jews don’t participate in the theology that brings the incendiary treatment of them.  They don’t believe anything, but it doesn’t make any difference.  This as a section could be a very long explanation and discussion, almost an entire book.

I don’t think theology figures the degree of hatred that explains the present reaction to Israel and the Jews.  Those who see Israel replaced by the church, called supercessionists, don’t hate Israel because of that usually.  They aren’t still blaming the Jews for crucifying Jesus.  Some Jews may think this engenders hot passion, but most people, even if they’re supercessionists, don’t care about this.  They aren’t going to do what we see happening, just because of this theology.  These people haven’t even heard of supercessionism.

Supercessionism could describe a theological position that forms a premise for violent activity against the Jews, but it doesn’t provide the main impetus for hostile activity against them.  It can provide a kind of positional justification, but not the reason.  I remember getting slapped in the face by a Sophomore, when I was a Freshman in high school, while on a field trip, looking at leaves for Biology class.  When I asked him why, he said, “Because I wanted to.”  Several reasons contributed to the slap I took from him.

Allegorization

The supercessionist allegorizes scripture.  He can twist scripture by not taking it literally.  Dozens or hundreds of positions arise from spiritualizing what God’s Words say.

A moderated form of supercessionism exists that supports Israel and the Jews.  Those who take the attenuated position will support Israel, despite their Roman Catholic or Protestant ecclesiology.  If someone is going to allegorize scripture, then he can take the direction of supporting Israel, despite thinking that God replaced Israel with the church.

Envy

Two, many unbelievers are flat-out envious of the Jews.  They see Jews and Israel as a privileged caste.  They’re jealous.  On average they’re rich and successful by the world’s standard.  Jealousy likes people losing what they have.  Few to none are jealous of the Palestinians.

Satan’s Hate

Three, Satan hates Israel.  This hatred manifests itself in Genesis 3 with the serpent bruising the seed of the woman.  Sure, the seed is Jesus, but one cannot separate Jesus from the descendants of the woman and of Abraham.  Satan gladly attempts sticking his thumb in God’s eye with the crushing of Israel and the Jews.

End Times

Four, we’re getting closer to the end.  Let’s say that the future time when enemy nations surround Israel is December.  The rising hatred of nations against the Jews is August.  You’ve got to get to August to get to December.  I’m not saying actual August and December, but a metaphor, like Thanksgiving coming before Christmas.

God’s Judgment

Five, God will bring more judgment on Israel.  This goes back to Daniel 11-12.  Israel didn’t want to go back to the land to rebuild the temple and the walls.  They felt comfortable staying in captivity   Yes, those people cried for the blame for Jesus’ death.  The rest of history would give regular chastisement to Israel and the Jews.  It would never be easy.

God is working His plan.with Israel to get the nation to the place where the enemies surround them.  Now supportive nations like the United States hold back natural and supernatural world rejection of the Jews and Israel.  More of that protection disappears, emboldening the opposition.

Woke Philosophy

Six, a woke philosophy dominates the education system.  It’s a kind of zero sum game.  Israel grabs and gets, and because it does, these other nations starve and diminish.  It’s got a racial component to the darker skinned Palestinians.  And there is a class warfare piece to it.  Israel is upper class, getting favored status.

The idea too is that an international money cabal, led by the Jews, money grubbing and hungry, leaves other people without the privilege.  The university types see themselves as with some revelatory enlightenment.  They see through the deceit into the Jews.  Jewish people join these in this, feeling ashamed to be a Jew.  This is the main narrative being pushed to result in the widespread Jew and Israel hating.

A religious component enters from the Palestinian or Hamas, that accompanies the class envy.  What they think is a true religion, Islam, Judaism discredits it.  Their anger becomes its own self-fulfilling prophecy.  And yet it hasn’t worked.  Powerful nations try to annihilate the Jews and yet they go down in flames.

God Still Has a Plan for Israel

The Abraham and Davidic Covenants are still intact.  They are operational.  God still has a plan for Israel.  Those who attack Israel do so against a warning from God.  These nations haven’t been blessed and won’t, because they won’t accept these promises God made.  They should favor God with favor for Israel, even if they don’t like what Israel believes and does.

Israel is not a threat to the world.  Overall Israel provides great blessing to the world.  I’m not saying Israel is saved.  They will be.  God will save Israel.  In the meantime, we should hope Israel thrives.

Democrats Most Astonishing Hate of Democracy

The Symbol of the Reichstag in Germany

A pivotal moment in Hitler’s rise in Germany came from the Nazi burning of the Reichstag.  They started the fire, put it out, and then blamed it on the Communists.  Democrats in the United States steal this act in a campaign to destroy democracy.  The Nazis convinced a large portion of the German population that the Communists burned down their Parliament building.  Even their courts wouldn’t disagree.

The Democrats, which have the related word “democracy” imbedded in their name, similarly point the finger at Trump as an authoritarian or totalitarian.  His policies looked and still look exponentially more democratic than the finger pointers.  He would like the government out of most of the business of Americans.  Evidence abounds for this, but let me first take a small step back.

Democracy

The United States isn’t a democracy.  James Madison in Numbers 10 and 14 of the Federalist Papers makes this point quite well.  But let’s set that aside for now.

For the sake of argument, let’s say that a Constitutional Republic is a form of democracy.  A website called “Principles of Democracy” writes:

Freedom of speech and expression, especially about political and other public issues, is the lifeblood of any democracy. Democratic governments do not control the content of most written and verbal speech. Thus democracies are usually filled with many voices expressing different or even contrary ideas and opinions.

Citizens and their elected representatives recognize that democracy depends upon the widest possible access to uncensored ideas, data, and opinions. For a free people to govern themselves, they must be free to express themselves — openly, publicly, and repeatedly; in speech and in writing.

Freedom of Speech and Democracy

Wikipedia for “Freedom of Speech” reads:

Freedom of speech is understood to be fundamental in a democracy.

Democrats censor their opposition more than anyone and with unending examples.  They are similar to the presence of Islam in any country.  While Moslems are in a small minority, they cry for human rights, but the moment they take charge with less than a majority, they eliminate unfavorable voices.

Oligarchy followed democracy in Greece.  Democrats control a vast majority of the public square in America.  I include in that schools, media, and even government.  They gladly censor opposing viewpoints.  The Democrat controlled institutions don’t allow the truth of the Bible.  Unless Christians privately fund their own museum, you won’t see a creation account in public.  Democrats label many biblical truths, “hate speech.”

Censorship

Democrats use both hard and soft censorship.  By hard censorship, I mean official and legal disallowance of a place and opportunity to speak.  It may be the loss of a job, because the Democrats don’t hear a statement of support for same sex activity.  That turns the non-speaker, who would like to say something against the activity but doesn’t, into enemy status.

By soft censorship, I mean an avalanche of public repudiation and ridicule until speakers do not receive opportunities to speak.  It’s also moderating who speaks.  The establishment offers a phony, a fraud, as the representative of the alternative point of view, who goes along with the official or permitted position.  Very little to nothing comes in a way of supporting the alternative position.

A historic label for soft censorship is the “kangaroo court.”  The J6 Committee is a good example of this, but they abound in every state in either blue states, districts, or regions.  They also exist in red areas with blue strongholds.  The committee cherry picks their own rubber stamps to represent opposition.  Opposition is actually major support with a fake label of opposition.  I would hope everyone knows this, but I’m afraid it fools just enough of the disengaged.

Other Examples

The J6 Committee parallels with the internet.  You read about the “algorhythms.”  The oligarchs of the tech industry force opposition or non-supportive speech into an uninhabited hinterland.  They are whole national forests of trees that fall and no one hears, so they don’t make a noise.  Only approved speech moves into a hearing zone.  Yes, people published something, but no one is reading, because no one is seeing.

The Hunter Biden laptop is a good example too.  I say these are just examples of what is now normal.  Any supportive tweet or internet entry of the laptop goes unseen, censored as disinformation.  The censorship itself is the disinformation, much like the Russian collusion operation.  I think this is the least of it though.  It’s a censorship industry.

The industry removes the bad news about the favored issue or person.  Right now, it has the ability to project a pro-Hamas experience, despite a relatively powerful coalition for Israel.  Pro-Palestinian protestors crowd the White House and knock down a protective fence with little coverage from the media.  The industry does not parallel or hearken to anything insurrectionist.

Massive Scale Elimination of Democratic Values

As I write on this subject, the most massive scale about which I speak is in education, where for years, the Bible, God, righteousness, and creation and the like are kept out of the massive state school complex even in red states.  No one can take a male headship position in anything close to a public square.  Can you imagine a professor at a major university who takes open biblical views?  It doesn’t happen except in private.  You must pay to hear the truth told.

I would agree that the Bill of Rights and especially the first amendment is the essence of democratic values.  When do you read anything from the left defending free speech anymore?  Democrats don’t write about their love for the first amendment. The closest is a totalitarian support of smut for small children in public schools and genderless bathrooms.  These are not about the protection of speech or opportunity to have a voice.

Pent-Up Voices

The J6 crowd came to a rally and then walked to the capital out of a long pent-up frustration of censorship.  Yes, better means of expression exist.  The high percentage of silencing from the left came to a logger head.  That group that day did wrong things.  This is not what-aboutism.  I see that day as the equivalent of throwing snow balls at the Old State House in Boston in 1770.  The censorship industry, I’m afraid, because of its reaction, has not seen the worst.

We could hope that people care enough to do something about the actual attack on democracy from the Democrat Party.  So far, I see it as a peaceful embrace of those who would allow free speech.  It seems most represented by an ability to oppose masks and vaccinations.  Still, do positions exist for scientists with an opposing view?  Are there safe places of employment in hospitals and in medical schools with an alternate view?  I’m saying this is just representative, because the worst relates to far more important issues of truth.

Democrats have a burning Reichstag type hatred of democracy.  The Nazis opposed burning the Reichstag.  But they burned it.  The Democrats don’t mind burning everything down to get their way.  They don’t care if you vote or not.  They don’t even want you able to say what they don’t want to hear.

My Take on the Complicated World Scene That Includes Ukraine, Russia, and Israel (part four)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three

What Is the Greatest Danger?

A good question to ask when evaluating United States domestic and foreign policy is “what is the greatest danger to the country?”  When I grew up during the Cold War, the Soviet Union was a monumental threat to the security of the United States.  If you are close to my age, maybe you remember the power of the Soviet military.

I remember hearing the idea that the Soviets would fly the hammer and sickle over the U. S. capital in 1976.  At that time, almost half of the world’s land mass was communist.  It was an amazing time when the government changed in Eastern bloc countries and they opened up in the late 1980s.  With the fall of the iron curtain, suddenly the United States became the sole superpower. Communist dictators were everywhere all over the world from the moment of my birth in 1962 to the tearing down of the Berlin wall on November 9, 1989.  Putin and Xi are barely dictators today compared to those in the Cold War.

Terrorism

A transition began in the 1980s from international communism to Islamic terrorism.  Terrorists would not defeat and take over the United States, but they would cause terror and chaos to free countries.  My earliest inkling was the Iranian hostage crisis of 1979, the bombing of a Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983,then the bomb under the World Trade center in 1993, and finally the culmination with terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001.

Terrorist attacks are still a threat, especially as long as someone could deliver a nuclear device into a major U. S. city.  Conventional deterrence will not stop nuclear attack motivated by jihad, like the stalemate of mutually assured destruction.  One of these random nuclear attacks still poses great danger, especially crossing the Southern border.  From a sheer military risk, I still see this as the single greatest, immediate peril to national security.

China

Besides another major terrorist attack, I don’t see any great danger to the United States from a foreign country.  China is the biggest threat, but in my opinion China shows no short term aspirations to invade our shores.  The biggest danger by far isn’t foreign, but domestic.  Every failing foreign policy relates to the internal corruption of the United States.  I’m not saying Putin is better than the Democrat Party, but the latter is far worse for the United States than him.

In my childhood, Democrats supported Communists in Latin America.  Bernie Sanders took his honeymoon in Cuba.  They still lean socialist, even as seen in their support of the Palestinians and leftists in Israel.

The Left, the Democrat Party, and “Democracy”

In 2008 California passed Proposition 8, changing the California constitution on marriage, defining it between a man and a woman.  Immediately upon it becoming law, San Francisco mayor (now governor) Gavin Newsome ramped up same sex marriage in city hall.  No one said anything about democracy.  No Democrat says anything about democracy with violations of immigration law and sanctuary cities.  When they challenge elections, they say nothing about threats to democracy.  Much more could be said about who really opposes democracy and freedom in the United States.

I don’t support the Russian invasion of Ukraine.  I believe, however, that Russia saw the expansion of NATO as an existential threat.  This was part of its agreement at the end of the Cold War.  Will funding Ukraine end the war against Russia and will it turn Russia into a kind of long term partner, no longer a threat to American security?  American meddling all over the world looks like it does more to hurt than help.  The present government opposes truly democratic movements, such as what we have seen in Argentina, the Netherlands, and Italy most recently.  Meanwhile, the United States is spread so thin that it hurts the American economy and security at home.

Changes are occurring elsewhere, difficult to interpret.  They are framed by the establishment, mainstream media in the United States as anti-democratic.  This is in the same spirit that antifa is anti-fascist, and antiracism is anti-racism.  These are propaganda tools, it seems.  Changes have occurred in Poland and Hungary that are called anti-democratic.  California would call Florida, “anti-democratic,” because of decreasing abortion and banning pornography in the schools.  The present administration pressures African countries to legalize same sex marriage.

Our Own House In Order

A stronger, more cohesive alliance with Russia, China, and Iran also supports an anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian coalition in the Middle East.  This hearkens to possible future events in fulfillment of prophecy unlike what I’ve seen in my lifetime.

Many Americans do not trust the Democrat apparatchiks at work in Ukraine or in Israel.  These are the same characters who supported billions of dollars to Iran.  The Biden family also received millions of dollars for peddling influence in Ukraine.  The United States needs to get its own house in order.  Then it will be better prepared to exert itself elsewhere.

My Take on the Complicated World Scene That Includes Ukraine, Russia, and Israel (part two)

Part One

Israel-Palestinian Conflict

From a biblical viewpoint, the Israel-Palestinian conflict started when Abraham sinned with Hagar, who bore Ishmael.  Ishmael fathers the Arab people and Isaac the Jewish.  Complicating this further, 93% of Arabs are Muslim of some kind.  Itamar Marcus and Barbara Crook in “Kill a Jew – Go to Heaven: The Perception of the Jew in Palestinian Society,” published in Jewish Political Studies Review 17:3-4 (Fall 2005), write:

The Palestinian religious, academic, and political elites teach an ideology of virulent hatred of Jews. The killing of Jews is presented both as a religious obligation and as necessary self-defense for all humankind.

This assessment of the Jews among Arabs or Muslims goes back centuries before the Zionist movement ever began.

No Jews live in Gaza.  Two sides dispute Jewish settlement in the West Bank.  There are 144 Jewish settlements in the West Bank.  Neither a majority of Palestinians or Jews back a two state solution with the addition of the creation of a separate Palestinian state.  Half of Jews desire complete expelling of Palestinians from Israel — that doesn’t include Gaza or the West Bank.  75% of Palestinians want the annihilation of Israel.  A large majority of all Palestinians support Hamas.

Having traveled to Israel and in the Jewish and Palestinian territories, it’s very tense there.  It cannot work like it is.  The Jews need a place of their own.  A two state solution will never succeed for obvious reasons.  Very good arguments say that Israel should have all the land and the Palestinians find someplace else to live with Arab people.  Jews should have their own, safe country.

Israel and the Land

Americans would never tolerate what the Jews do in Israel.  A certain psychology for the Jews not only allows them to concede to their conditions, but also causes many Jews to advocate for the Palestinians.  Many Jews lay a lot of blame on their own people for their problems.  I do feel for Israel because of the deep hatred from so many across the world for the Jews.

God still has a plan for Israel.  Even if Israel does not own the whole Holy Land, they continue possessing a right to it, based upon scripture.  God gave Israel the land, which is why it is called, “the Promised Land.”  This supports Israel’s statehood, its formal establishment, and perpetuation.  Palestine never had statehood.  It didn’t announce it’s own statehood until 1988.  The Palestinian territories are not recognized by the US, France, or the UK as a state.  At least four Palestinian organizations are designated as terrorist on the United States list, including Hamas.

My assessment of Israel is not some carte blanch acceptance of the policies of Israel.  I still pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States with its rampant ungodliness.  Support for Israel acknowledges God and the truth of scripture.

Two Wars

Because of world politics, the war in Israel associates with the one in Ukraine.  Some of the same characters appear in different roles in both conflicts.  I attribute both wars to the Biden administration in the United States.  Neither would have occurred with Trump as president of the United States.  Many would agree with that, less that would say it in public, but I also want to explain why I think it’s true.

More to Come

My Take on the Complicated World Scene That Includes Ukraine, Russia, and Israel

Division Over Israel

What’s going on in foreign policy in the world is one of the most interesting variations of division that I’ve seen in my lifetime.  Positions divide normal allies and unify former enemies.  It’s a challenge even in theological circles with diverse interpretations of biblical prophecy.  The event of October 7, 2023 with the brutal attack by Hamas on Israel also ratchets up emotions, making it more difficult to discuss.

When someone becomes settled, what I like to call “concrete,” in his position, he might take disagreement personally.  Maybe very personally.  It’s tough to talk issues when emotions run so high.  Maybe you’ve seen various podcasts with arguments between an Israeli and a Palestinian.  Heated doesn’t represent how hot the temperature gets.  I’ve noticed very often, between school yard taunts and name calls, the same repeated accusations from both sides.

Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, and the Democrat Party

Perhaps you heard about the skirmish now between Ben Shapiro and Candace Owens.  The co-founder of Daily Wire called his employee an “absolute disgrace,” caught on video in a private meeting and went viral.  She then sits down to comment to Tucker Carlson in an explosive interview.  Shapiro has done very angry high energy rants about the expressed position of Carlson.  I couldn’t possibly list every prominent ongoing debate, there are so many.

One can witness the variated division between the remaining Republican presidential candidates.  A divide also exists among Democrats between university-type leftists, Pro-Palestinian, and traditional Democrat Pro-Israel stances, especially represented by Senator Chuck Schumer and others.

The Animosity Toward Israel

Hatred of Israel across the world validates biblical prophecy.  Despite propaganda-like support from Hollywood and in the mainstream media for the Jews and against genocidal treatment, hatred reaches a recent high everywhere.  Based on its mere size, Israel would not deserve or receive this animosity, yet it does.  Why and how?   Two reasons.

One, Satan opposes Israel still.  He wants to throw a wrench into the ongoing plan of God in the world.  He has strong influence on the easily manipulated lost nations and their leaders.  Two, God still fulfills prophecy with chastisement of Israel.  Israel does not have a statute of limitations on God’s reprimands.  I wish for open eyes for Israel, although I don’t expect it.  Yet, God still isn’t done with Israel; hence the continued discipline.

As an example of division, many reading this nod “no” in strong opposition to what I write here.  Many both amillennialists and postmillennialists see God done with Israel, replaced by the church.  When I say “church,” I mean their version of God’s kingdom on earth, made up of Christendom.  They see Israel as an unbelieving, rebellious people, who deserves no special favor against the Arabs in Palestine.

Candace Owens, who professes Christianity, married a Roman Catholic.  Maybe she leans that way now.  She can find support from Reformed evangelicals with a similar view of the world.  You look at the history of Roman Catholicism and even the European Protestant state churches, and you see historical anti-semitism.  Tucker Carlson grew up Episcopalian and he seems right now to return to some version of Christian nationalism, as seen in his interviews of foreign Christian nationalists.  I see Vladimir Putin himself a kind of Christian nationalist, more interested in the survival of his nation and culture.

Jewish Anger toward Hamas and Palestine

What I’m writing in this post would require book or dissertation level analysis.  I’m not going to write that, even though it’s an interest.

I understand Shapiro’s anger.  Hamas killed 1,500 Israelites and took 240 hostages.  The United States is 33 times the population of Israel and had 3,000 killed on 9-11.  That means this is at least fifteen times worse, and it’s almost immeasurable with the way Hamas did it.

Remove the religious and ethnic component, and even as an international incident, if Israel acts like any other nation, it would react more harsh than it even is acting.  When I hear Shapiro defend Israel’s reaction, I agree with him.  I’ve heard both sides of the argument in all their iterations and I support Israel’s argument.  The United States should just let Israel do its thing and not get in the way.  I would advocate for U.S. backing and support if international escalation occurred from prominent Israeli enemies like Iran.

Varied Points of View, Yet Still Supporting Israel

Support without Foreign Aid

On the other hand, I like the idea of not sending money to Israel.  I’m in the proto-Republican anti-intervention, quasi-isolationist camp.  This is more in the realm of a fresh realization of the Monroe doctrine.  The United States solidifies its own security and borders, solves its own very serious problems first.  It follows the Pauline view of bearing your own burdens before you bear those of others.

As a companion to everything else, I like firming up freedom of speech.  Some of this relates to a reaction to January 6 compared to Antifa and BLM riots and the denial of a rigged 2020 election and the denial of 2016 election seen in the Russian Hoax and Hunter Biden laptop.  I understand the concerns over any even questioning of Israel policy as anti-semitic.  White people in the United States, Israel supporters, have felt left out of the concern over racism from American Jews in comparison with silence over Antifa and BLM.  Apparent first amendment supporters should allow free expression of these inconsistencies without pulling an anti-semitism card.

Democrat support of Israel comes with obvious strings attached.  American money brings American supervision or control.  When  America attacked Iraq after 911, relatively little criticism came for collateral damage, death of innocent civilians.  This is the cost of war for American retaliation.  Hamas uses children as human shields and Israel must pause its offensive, perhaps leaving Hamas intact.  The United States should consider not sending monetary support and just allowing Israel free reign on its own security.  American Democrat politics affect Israeli security, bouncing Israel around like a political volleyball.

Hatred from Jews for their Own Supporters

It is tough to bridge historical support of Israel with the typical woke politics among Jews in the United States and Israel.  Almost 50% of Jews in Israel self-identify as secular.  They support same sex marriage and other forms of moral perversion, not operating according to objective truth.  62 percent of the 7.6 million Jews in the United States are secular.  79% voted Democrat in the 2018 midterm elections.

Pew Research did a study on American Jews in 2020 and 81 percent of Orthodox Jews supported Trump.  On the other hand, the same study said 73% of all Jews opposed Trump.  This describes the difference between a secular and religious Jew in the United States.  Recently, secular Jew Barbara Streisand complained that she would not live in the United States if Donald Trump became president again.  She would move to England — you know, the place where 300,000 pro-Hamas protestors recently gathered on the streets of London against Israel.

Shapiro himself sometimes plays, I believe, to the secular Jew.  Perhaps a form of self-preservation innate from hundreds of years of persecution explains.  As a professing Orthodox Jew, attaching himself to the Old Testament in a prominent way, he uses profane language and tells dirty jokes in public. Then when an Owens or Tucker, whom I would see as supporters of Israel, albeit in a lesser way, he reacts in a ballistic manner.  When questioned on Trump in a secular crowd, he throws Trump under the bus in a harsher way than he would George Soros or Bill Maher.

Support of Israel and Milquetoast Response

Part of the Abrahamic Covenant, which is still intact, is that God promised He would bless people that bless Israel.  Among other reasons, that explains a strong support of Israel in the United States, including welcoming those 7.6 million Jews in the United States.  A majority of those Jews have been sharply antagonistic with their chief supporters, many expressing intense hatred for them.  This communicates the peculiar situation this issue provides.  You can greatly dislike the Jewish worldview while really loving and bestowing support for Jews and Israel.

No group provides as sharp and hateful rhetoric toward Christians in the United States like Jews do.  Israel’s protection in the Middle East greatly depends on this group of people mainly hated by Jews in the United States.  In a personal way, I’ve received no greater disrespect than I have from Jews and on many different occasions.  I’ve never treated a Jew in a bad way, always in a loving way.  A small percentage of the Jews I’ve known return that favor.  Of course, they might explain that they don’t like the reason why we love them so much.

Many forms of contradiction occur over the issue of Israel and Palestine.  A Jew easily can confuse a Catholic from a Protestant from an Evangelical.  Even on this blog, in the comment section some attack Israel for Christian reasons while we defend Israel for Christian reasons.  They both can’t be right, yet they both exist.

More to Come

Israel & Hamas: Just War vs. Pure Evil & the United States

As blog readers surely know, on October 7 thousands of Hamas terrorists invaded Israel and butchered and tortured many helpless Israeli citizens.  On the holiest day of the Jewish calendar, they did things like the following:

A young boy and girl, 6 and 8 years old, and their parents were around the breakfast table. The father’s eye was gouged out in front of his kids. The mother’s breast was cut off, the girl’s foot amputated, and the boy’s fingers cut off before they were executed. And then their executioners sat down and had a meal.

In total, around 1,400 Israelis have been murdered by Hamas, and more than 4,500 injured. It was Israel’s 9-11.

In response, Israel invaded Gaza, intending to overthrow Hamas.  Israel told civilians to leave the northern area ahead of time–but Hamas told them not to leave, and was turning people back into the war zone.  (Did Hamas give early warning to Jewish civilians before launching their unprovoked attack? Hmm.)  Hamas deliberately puts people in Gaza in harms way so that they can be killed, and then Israel can be blamed.  Hamas’ main headquarters is underneath Gaza’s main hospital because Hamas knows that Israel respects human life, while they do not.

What are some things we can learn from this war?

1.) It is a just war for Israel.  Anyone who recognizes that God blesses those who bless Israel (Genesis 12:3) should automatically be biased in Israel’s favor in a situation like this one, but even if one very foolishly rejects God’s Word, anyone with half a brain can see which side is right in this war.

2.) Hamas is acting like faithful Muslims should act.  They are obeying the god of Islam, who told them: “slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them, and prepare for them each ambush” (Quran 9:5).  The Quran is full of open-ended commands to violently kill people, and Muhammad was a bloodthirsty murderer, as one can clearly see if one reads his biography.

3.) Not just Hamas, but Muslims in general have an anti-Jew problem, because of their religion.  Is every Muslim anti-Jewish? No–many Muslims do not care about their religion, just like many Roman Catholics don’t care what the Bible says or the Pope decrees.  But the Muslims that do care about their religion are anti-Israel.  Why is Rashida Tliab advocating and defending genocide of the Jews? Her district is full of Muslim immigrants.  Islam in America–like Islam everywhere that it is true Islam–is violent and bloodthirsty, which is why the most dangerous evangelistic endeavour I ever had, where I was closest to being killed, was not at various Gay Pride parades, but in the American heartland politely and respectfully passing out the evangelistic work The Testimony of the Quran to Muslims. A majority of American Muslims are at least partially in favor of the brutal murders that Hamas committed on October 7, and around 40% of them approve the terrorist leader of Hamas.  Imagine if 40% of any other demographic were in favor of terrorism.  The people in Gaza voted in Hamas.  Now since that vote there have been no other elections, since Islam is against democracy and in favor of dictatorship.  There are no free and fair elections under Sharia law.  But when the Muslims in Gaza had a chance to vote, Hamas won.

4.) Because the left is anti-Bible, and because Joe Biden needs Muslim votes in swing states like Michigan to win reelection, the Democrat party is becoming more and more anti-Jewish. Calling on Israel for a ceasefire is absolutely bonkers.  More Jews were killed in a single day than at any time since the Holocaust, but Biden calling on $100 million in aid to the Muslims in Gaza and the West Bank for “humanitarian” purposes is about what the Babylon Bee described it as, and the money is certain to be diverted to support terrorism.  Would we have been fine with calling for a ceasefire after 9-11 and then giving “humanitarian” aid to the Taliban and Al Qaeda?  Biden should be calling on Israel to utterly obliterate Hamas.  Hamas should immediately release all American hostages and all other hostages.  Anyone who actually cares about the people in Gaza not getting killed should want Hamas overthrown as soon as possible.

5.) Because the mainstream media is dominated by the left, all kinds of false equivalencies are made between Israel’s just war and Hamas’s unjust murders.  Inflated numbers of casualties in Gaza are repeated by major press organizations from figures spoon-fed to them by Hamas itself.  Of course, Islam allows Muslims to lie.  Reporters in Gaza can either repeat what Hamas tells them to report or they can get tortured and killed themselves, or at the very least get kicked out of the territory.  How many Jewish reporters do you think are on the ground in Gaza getting information? Oh yes, the same number as the number of Jews who live in Gaza–zero–while in Israel Muslims are around 20% of the population and have equal rights (yes, the freest place for Muslims in the Middle East is in Israel).  And even though Israel is the freest place in the Middle East for Muslim Arabs, usually only around 33% of Arab Israeli citizens oppose Hamas, and the large majority oppose Israel’s defending itself; immediately after this butchery of Israelis–including Arab Muslim ones–23% of Arab Israelis still do not oppose Hamas, while 33% oppose Israel defending itself even while the blood of their murdered and tortured fellow citizens is barely dry.  Israel is pressured to stop fighting because its terrorist, true Muslim opponents in Hamas want as many of their own civilians killed as possible. (If you want information about Israel that is free from anti-Jewish bias, please check out FLAME: Facts and Logic about the Middle East, and consider their newsletter. They are a Jewish, not a Christian organization.)  The mainstream media are very, very worried about the the three Nazis that are left joining with the 17 KKK members in the country holding a demonstration somewhere that has thousands of counter-protesters, but a blind eye is turned to the vast multitude of American Muslims who are actually in favor of killing the Jews.

6.) The fact that this is a just war for Israel does not mean that Israel is a righteous country. The vast majority of Jews reject and hate their Messiah, the Lord Jesus. Jews from all over the world are allowed to immigrate to Israel, but Jews who believe Jesus is the Messiah are not allowed in.  Tel Aviv is considered one of the most gay friendly cities in the world, despite the clear statements in the Old Testament about the abomination of sodomy. Moses in Deuteronomy 28 describes exactly what Israel has faced for the last 2,000 years since “all the people … said, His blood be on us, and on our children” (Matthew 27:25):

 

And thy life shall hang in doubt before thee; and thou shalt fear day and night, and shalt have none assurance of thy life: In the morning thou shalt say, Would God it were even! and at even thou shalt say, Would God it were morning! for the fear of thine heart wherewith thou shalt fear, and for the sight of thine eyes which thou shalt see. (Deuteronomy 28:66-67)

 

Israel is not going to have peace, not only because the nation is surrounded by Muslims who hate Jews like the Quran tells them to do, but because the curses of Deuteronomy are upon them, and will continue on them until they repent and believe on their Messiah, the Lord Jesus.

 

7.) As individual Christians and churches, the best thing we can do is preach the gospel to every creature.  Love and preach the gospel to the Jews and send evangelists to them.  Love and preach the gospel to the Muslims and send evangelists to them. How well equipped are you to evangelize Jews?  How about Muslims?  Do you have tracts for these two specific false religions?  Love your neighbor as yourself.  How well would you want a Christian to be equipped to speak to you if you were lost in one of these false beliefs?

 

8.) From a public policy perspective, the United States should support Israel because God has sworn in the Abrahamic Covenant that He would bless those that bless Israel, something repeated throughout the Old Testament.  God used Babylon to punish His rebellious people centuries ago, and He uses Islam to punish them today, but woe to the Babylonians and to the Muslims who attacked the Jews!  If someone says we give Israel too much foreign aid and we can’t afford it, he is consistent if he is also aware that foreign aid to all countries is less than 1% of the federal budget and is also in favor of the kind of drastic entitlement reform that could actually save us from defaulting on our national debt.  If he doesn’t want to either abolish or drastically reform Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid, but is very indignant about foreign aid to Israel (most of which, for weapons, goes to American companies), his position is not very consistent.  Once someone is a citizen here, he has freedom of religion and speech.  He is free to be a fool and put on a white hoodie and burn crosses.  He is free to be a fool and chant “From the river to the sea” and so call for genocide of Jews. But we should let as few of these people immigrate here as possible.  Muslims who actually believe in Islam should not be let into the country, and those non-citizens who believe in Islam’s teachings about jihad should be deported.  Furthermore, we need to recognize that, like Muhammad, modern faithful Muslims respect power, not truth.  When Muhammad was powerful, he killed the non-Muslims; when he was weak, he advocated religious tolerance.  If we want to deter terrorism and want there to be more peace, and less war, then Israel should be allowed to enact a ferocious response on Hamas that will discourage the Muslims who surround Israel from acting upon their religion’s murderous and anti-Jewish teachings.

 

By the way, Russia is also guilty of awful war crimes in Ukraine. (Did you know Ukraine has the second largest number of Baptists of any European country–only less than the UK?)  Deterring Russia means letting the Ukrainians defend themselves.  Ronald Reagan, in God’s good providence, won the Cold War by helping to arm those who fought the Russians when they were invading.  We should balance the budget and pay off our national debt by fixing entitlements, and that can be done while, without putting any Americans on the front lines to fight, we send weapons to an imperfect but pro-Western nation with freedom of religion that the Russians decided to butcher the citizens of in their cruel, unjustified, barbaric, and wicked invasion.

Eschatology and Political Activism from the Right and the Left

Living in the Last Days

If you travel in evangelical circles, you might hear language especially today that says, “We’re living in the last days.”  Those words, “last days,” occur eight times in the King James Version.  These are two prominent usages:

2 Timothy 3:1, “This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come.”

2 Peter 3:3, :”Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts.”

“Last days” in the Bible is not very specific.  When the Apostle Peter uses the words in his sermon on the Day of Pentecost, he refers them to a partial fulfillment now over 2,000 years ago:

Acts 2:17, “And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams.”

The phrase, “living in the last days,” did not start appearing in written material until the middle of the nineteenth century, when men would write something like the following:

There are features of the last days of the last times, and they are characteristic of these days and these times; we are therefore, living in the last days of the last times, and, consequently, expect the speedy appearance of the coming of the Son of Man.

This was from an article, “Elements of Prophetical Interpretation,” by J. W. Brooks in a book, The Literalist, published in 1841.  As popularly used, most refer these “last days” to a seemingly very short time before the rapture from the earth of the saints.

A Vision of the Reign of God on Earth

Many, many and from various factions oppose the literal approach to biblical prophecy and that everyone presently abides in the last days as such.  They reject the concept that the world will degenerate until the return of Christ.  If that be the case, political activism is of little point.  On the other hand, if persistent human effort might bring the reign of God on earth, then reasons exist for lobbying, campaigning, protesting — violent or non-violent, community organizing, and political action.

Early Roman Catholicism by envisioning the church as New Testament Israel also saw the church as the kingdom of God on earth.  Instead of circumcision as the entrance requirement to the kingdom, water baptism became that, a New Testament circumcision.  A false form of millennialism, this position says the church is already God’s kingdom with a view toward its ultimate perfection on earth.  Roman Catholic theologian Augustine in AD413 wrote in his City of God:

The Church is already now the kingdom of Christ and the kingdom of heaven.  Accordingly, even now His saints reign with Him. . . . It is then of this kingdom militant, in which conflict with the enemy is still maintained, and war carried on with warring lusts, or government laid upon them as they yield, until we come to that most peaceful kingdom in which we shall reign without an enemy.

Spiritualizing Old Testament Israel and finding in its Old Testament prophecies a fulfillment in the New Testament church subscribes to advocation of positions of power for realizing God’s kingdom on earth.  According to this eschatological position, the church inherits Old Testament mandates for domination over the earth.

Postmillennial Liberation and Dominion Theologies

Mirroring Viewpoints

The left and the right both compete for power with the divine charge of liberation on the left and dominion on the right.  These two mirroring viewpoints easily find support for the replacement of Israel.  This might also adapt into justifiable eradication with an underlying disposition of antisemitism.  Both acquire their ordination from a form of postmillennialism and a hermeneutic of spiritualization and allegorization, the latter the rationalization for Roman Catholicism.

The left and the right become strange bedfellows with relationship to Israel under the same umbrella of eschatology.  Palestinian Liberation Theology buttresses a decolonization theme and advocates Palestinian freedom “from the river to the sea.”  Thomas Ice writes then concerning postmillennial reconstructionism:

The danger lies in their misunderstanding of God’s plan concerning the future of the nation Israel. Reconstructionists advocate the replacement of Old Testament Israel with the church, often called the “New Israel.” They believe that Israel does not have a future different from any other nation.

Corrupted Views of Israel

Ice continues:

While Reconstructionists do believe that individual Jews will be converted to Christ in mass in the future, almost none of them believe that national Israel has a future and thus the Church has completely taken over the promises of national Israel. In contrast to the eventual faithfulness and empowerment by the Holy Spirit of the Church, Reconstructionist David Chilton said that “ethnic Israel was excommunicated for its apostasy and will never again be God’s Kingdom.”

John MacArthur also tied together these two theological ideologies, saying:

There is another kind of theology that’s existing today, it’s called Liberation Theology. It is a form of theology that says that the church is to take dominion over the institutions of the world. That’s another form of dominion theology or kingdom theology. And what it basically says is that the church’s mandate is to take over the institutions of the world. That’s the liberation theology side. And what dominion theology says is that we are to take over the powers of darkness.

Dovetailing of Leftist and Rightist Values

Harvey Cox writes in an article in The Atlantic:

By far the most striking discovery I made . . . was the remarkable similarity between the rhetoric . . . of liberation theology. Both (postmillennial dominion theology and liberation theology) focus on continuing the ministry and work of Jesus. Both place the concept of the Kingdom of God, albeit interpreted quite differently, at the center of their respective theologies.

Leftist and rightist values dovetail around eschatological belief.  Neither provide a true and real solution for the present or for the future.  Instead of depending on a plain reading of the text of scripture, they spiritualize it and read into it a false vision of the future.  This then reflects on a relationship with Israel.

Judaizers followed the Apostle Paul into his churches after his first missionary journey and attempted to turn the churches of Galatia into a form of New Testament Israel.  They removed required distinctions between the church and Israel to make the church into Israel.  This confused the real solution for man’s problems found only in Jesus Christ.  It corrupted the church.  A kind of Judaizing continues perverting the church through its insidious false eschatological vision for the world.  In so doing, it also assaults Israel and annuls the promises God will still fulfill for this chosen nation.

Israel through a Biblical Lens

A Biblical Lens to See Israel

Everyone should look at everything through a biblical lens.  God’s Word is truth.  I hear people make assessments of Israel without any reference to what the Bible says.  On the other hand, some overshoot and use Israel as their prophetic pin cushion.

I see two perspectives to organize appraisal of Israel.  One, treat Israel as the consummation of the Abrahamic Covenant, promises still unfulfilled.  Two, reckon Israel according to biblical principles like any other nation.

God’s Promises to Israel

Romans 9-11

For number one, in Romans 11:1, the Apostle Paul asks a rhetorical question:

I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin.

Answer.  No.  Why even ask the question?  Israel as a nation doesn’t believe (Romans 9).  It’s Israel’s fault (Romans 10).   Paul gives the answer in the strongest possible negative:  “God forbid.”

Old Testament Teaching

“God forbid” corresponds to Old Testament teaching:

Psalm 94:14, “For the LORD will not cast off his people, neither will he forsake his inheritance.”

1 Samuel 12:22, “For the LORD will not forsake his people for his great name’s sake: because it hath pleased the LORD to make you his people.”

Psalm 89:31-37 describes Israel with her unbelief, disobedience, and then God’s faithful implementation of His unilateral covenant:

31 If they break my statutes, and keep not my commandments;

32 Then will I visit their transgression with the rod, and their iniquity with stripes.

33 Nevertheless my lovingkindness will I not utterly take from him, nor suffer my faithfulness to fail.

34 My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips.

35 Once have I sworn by my holiness that I will not lie unto David.

36 His seed shall endure for ever, and his throne as the sun before me.

37 It shall be established for ever as the moon, and as a faithful witness in heaven.

The Old Testament says much more, making the same point and in different ways.  God set aside Israel in a deliberate, limited way for His ultimate ends.  When you look at Israel in the Middle East, you should understand that God has a plan for her still.

Biblical Principles for Judging Nations

For number two, Israel is a nation.  According to biblical principles, God instituted nations.  He also expects believers to judge between nations based on His Word and support a better nation or culture over another one based on those principles.   We should do that with the United States too.

God separated men into distinct lands to preserve the good against the evil.  It is not a cookie cutter clarity in these divisions as we analyze.  I’ve been to Israel and I saw what was good and bad there.  Even without the promises of God to Israel, Israel deserves the land.  She is not beyond criticism, but she is exponentially better than the nations surrounding her.

Based on an accurate view of history, Zionism is historical.  According to the Bible, it is biblical.  In a philosophical way, Israel better represents the nationalistic purpose of God.  Arab’s having lived on that land for centuries doesn’t negate Israel, any more than American Indians negate the United States.

At the same time, I can see the tribulation of Hamas upon Israel a possible means to God’s ends.  It is not a sign, as some people characterize it.  The signs are to come like Christmas is coming.  For Christmas to come, Thanksgiving must first arrive.  Occurrences before actual signs could lead to those signs like Thanksgiving leads to Christmas.

God and the Bible Are Dispensational (Part Six)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three     Part Four     Part Five

History

One of the biggest criticisms aimed at dispensationalism is the scant historical evidence for this system of interpretation.  Opponents call John Nelson Darby, 19th century Anglican clergy member from Ireland, the founder of dispensationalism. They say then the early 20th century evangelical Bible teacher, C. I. Scofield, popularized it in the notes of his Scofield Reference Bible.

If dispensationalism originated in the 19th century, I would find that troublesome.  Yet, it’s not how I explain the history of dispensationalism.  God intended literal interpretation of the Bible, which is premillennial.  You can read that in the Bible itself.  For that reason, I say that premillennialism started with the apostles.  From there, you can read their influence on several early patristic writers.  Irenaeus reports that Papias (AD 60-130) said that “there will be a millennium after the resurrection from the dead, when the personal reign of Christ will be established on this earth.”

Systematization of Interpretation

Darby among others systematized premillennialism and a literal interpretation of scripture.  Scofield and others picked up his mantle with their explanation. This could easily have been a counter to the systematization of amillennialism by covenant theology.  The system of covenant theology preceded the system of dispensationalism, but premillennialism precedes amillennialism.  Scripture doesn’t provide a system.   However it is premillennial.

In the first century, no one spiritualized the Bible as a type of interpretation.  A literal interpretation was the intention of Jesus and the Apostles.  That’s what they did.  Spiritualization, the warp and woof of covenant theology, didn’t occur until Roman Catholicism said that the church fulfilled Old Testament Israel.

Seven Dispensations?

Scofield introduced seven dispensations.  I can agree with his seven divisions of the Bible and history.  However, I would not characterize, explain, or label them the same as he did.  One might add a few more divisions for clarity.  As I wrote earlier, dispensations indicate the continuity and discontinuity of the workings of God in His world.

God Himself doesn’t change.  That is continuity.  Both out of His love and justice, He works in different manners during different periods.  That is discontinuity.

As a description, I don’t like “age of grace,” speaking of the era in which we now live.  Salvation always came and comes by grace.  What Scofield called the age of grace, like others, I would call, the church age.  God worked through Israel in the Old Testament age and in the church in the New Testament one, the latter from Christ to the rapture.

Bad Dispensationalism

Just because someone is a dispensationalist does not guarantee correct belief and practice or even right exegesis of passages.  Dallas Theological Seminary probably did more to spread the system of dispensationalism than any other institution.  It also though disseminated a weak or false gospel and doctrine of sanctification.

Dallas for the most part produced the free grace crowd that cheapens and distorts grace.  This poses as a dispensationalist view because of its source.  Cheap grace bled into independent fundamental Baptists and their anti-repentance and non-lordship teaching.  They became more enamored with the soteriology of the free-gracers than historic Baptists.  This fit nicely with their pragmatic church growth philosophy, pretending to be revival and the power of God.

Longtime president of Dallas, Lewis Sperry Chafer affected many with his eight volume Systematic Theology.  He took his dispensationalism to an extreme, perhaps in reaction to covenant theology.  He pushed his discontinuity too far.  Chafer presented salvation by works in the Old Testament and by grace through faith in the New.  He took Jesus’ teaching in the Sermon on the Mount and applied it to Jews in the Millennial Kingdom.

Holding and Teaching a Right Interpretation of Scripture

Whatever bad influence Dallas had with classic dispensationalism, it does worse in recent many years.  It doesn’t require dispensationalism of its faculty.  Instead, it uses its clout to sway people away from inerrancy.  Dallas once pumped out serious eschatology to build a pretribulational, premillennial belief in church leaders and their churches.  Now it doesn’t care if you’re premill, amill, or postmill, promoting unity with any aberrant position of eschatology.

Biblical churches and pastors must preach and train in a literal interpretation of scripture.  Spiritualization and allegorization are easy ways to conform the Bible to whatever someone wants it to say.  Easily, the woke churches use the Bible to teach their critical race theory, employing these means.  The Words are God’s Words, but what comes out in the teaching are man’s words.  Satan was fine using the Word of God to teach his will (Genesis 3, Matthew 4).

Churches need evangelization, preaching a true gospel.  They also must make disciples, teaching new converts to rightly divide the Word of Truth.  This requires teaching them a literal, grammatical-historical, dispensational interpretation of scripture.  God and the Bible are dispensational.

God and the Bible Are Dispensational (Part Four)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three

Covenant Theology

I hope it seems too convenient to you that men think and say they have a secret system of interpretation.  They apply the unique lemon juice to the Bible and the invisible ink comes to the surface.  God didn’t write that book.  The one He wrote, we can understand as a child (2 Timothy 3:15).  Scripture presents no peculiar scheme for deciphering what the Bible says.

Covenant Theology depends on speculation and human ingenuity to find a hidden meaning of scripture.  The subjectivity of it allows someone to see something others don’t, giving the impression of an extraordinary insight for an exclusive few.  You might read what they say they see in scripture and you don’t see it.  It is not apparent.  Only with their key to understanding, the developed system or code, can you grasp how they got there.

A literal interpretation, a true version of dispensationalism, is true.  Covenant Theology is false.  The Bible is not an opaque book that keeps you guessing.  It isn’t fine having several spiritualized, very personal interpretations.  Could we not just call them “private interpretations” (2 Peter 1:20-21), because they are so individualized?

Subjective and Strange

Someone could dedicate a whole book to the strange interpretations of Covenant Theology.  You can read many of these in their advocates’ commentaries and hear them in their preaching.  I was listening to a presentation a little while ago by well-known Covenant Theologian Kim Riddlebarger (I do love his last name).  He said he was doing a series through the Old Testament book of Joshua, a book which he said was an obvious explanation of God’s future judgment of the world.  Have you heard this kind of preaching?

The book of Joshua doesn’t address endtime judgment.  The conquest of the land testifies to God’s will for His covenant people, Israel.  God required the conquest.  The refusal of a former generation manifested its unbelief.  Joshua led toward faithful obedience of Israel to God’s directive.

I heard John MacArthur provide a brief critique of Covenant Theology, and he gave an example of a Westminster Seminary professor’s preaching.  The man used Isaiah 9:6-7, the part about the government upon the Messiah’s shoulders, to say this was turning over the government of your own life to Jesus.  He made a spiritual interpretation, not connecting it at all to the future, real kingdom of Jesus Christ.  How would anyone think that passage meant future New Testament Christians and their relationship to the Lord?

Contrast with Literal Interpretation

If you pick up the Old Testament and start reading it, early on you get to a point of a real nation Israel.  National, ethnic Israel dominates the Old Testament as a subject matter.  Covenant Theology directs one to read church in a spiritualized way into Old Testament references of Israel.

God makes many promises to Israel.  Will God fulfill the promises He made that are not yet fulfilled?  Yes.  If you never read the Old Testament, and you picked it up to read without having read the New Testament, you could understand what I’m saying here.  This is dispensationalism.

Attraction of Covenant Theology

What for covenant theologians, the main opponents of a literal reading of scripture, makes their system to them so attractive?  I see three reasons.

One, Covenant Theology says that it examines New Testament usage of the Old Testament as an interpretational model.  Two, Covenant Theology accentuates continuity or unity of the Old and New Testaments.  It finds this overt, extreme continuity with its interpretational grid.  Three, Covenant Theology leans on caricatures, exaggerations, and extreme examples of dispensationalism.

Some proponents of dispensationalism provide negative fodder for Covenant Theologians.  The latter use these bad examples from the system of dispensationalism and apply them to the whole.  The extremes do not debunk a literal reading of scripture.

More to Come 

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives