Part One

Proper Evaluation of History

God promised the preservation of scripture, but not the preservation of history.  Since God promised the preservation of scripture, He insures that with a high level of divine intervention.  The Bible says much about this.  Since God doesn’t promise to preserve history, we must judge history in a different way.  We must weigh it.

The history of the people and events of history differs in nature than the history of Christian doctrine.  Believers can open the Bible, which God preserved, and compare the history of Christian doctrine with what the Bible says.  Especially the doctrine found in what people call “the church fathers” diverges from biblical doctrine and practice.  Biblical doctrine and practice and the church fathers have many dissimilarities.

An important part of good historical evaluation is observing historical influences on beliefs, practices, and methods.  The Bible itself helps with this ability in a sufficient way.  Already in the first century, external factors affected what the church believed.  This is all over the New Testament.  Keeping false doctrine out of the church required and requires tremendous vigilance.

The Trajectory of External Influences on the Church

New Testament Times

If one just looked at an epistle like 1 Corinthians, chapter after chapter chronicle both external and internal influences on the church at Corinth.  People over emphasized the effect of baptism in chapter one.  They also devalued preaching as a method for what Paul calls “signs” and “wisdom.”  In chapter two, people were placing higher value on naturalism over supernaturalism.  Greek philosophy that denigrated the place of the physical body led to acceptance of sexual sin in chapters five and six.  The same kind of false teaching on the body led to mass denial of bodily resurrection in chapter fifteen.

One could keep moving through the entire New Testament and do something very similar to the samples of the previous paragraph.  God wants us to see how false doctrine and practice enters the church and then takes hold.  Revelation two and three chronicle seven churches and varied degrees of departure from the truth, even to the extent that the Laodicean church in Revelation three had already apostatized.  Jesus and John tell history as a warning with the seven churches about both the internal and external attacks.

The Roman Empire and Greek Philosophy

The persecution of the Roman Empire affected churches in the first century.  This parallels with anything and any place where persecution occurs.  People accommodate the pressure and change from biblical belief and practice.  The pressure of Sodom affected Lot and his family.  The world itself corrupted Demas (2 Timothy 4:10).

Many other external factors changed and change thinking.  This is why Paul warns against philosophies and traditions of men (Colossians 2:8).  Theologians like Origen invented their own subjective approach to interpretation of scripture.  Many others accepted then Origen’s way.  Some read so much Greek philosophy, available during the period of the church fathers, that they took on the thinking of the Greek philosophers.  Include Augustine among those.  Greek philosophy doesn’t mix with the Bible and improve it.  It corrupts it.

When Paul says “wisdom” in 1 Corinthians 1-2, he, like James in James 3:15, meant human wisdom, which could be intellectualism, naturalism, rationalism, or human reasoning.  The false teachers that Peter battled as seen in his second epistle judged according to their own reasoning, attempting to conform their theology to that.

Syncretism

An important term to understand is “syncretism.”  Wikipedia gets it right when it says in its entry on syncretism:

Syncretism is the practice of combining different beliefs and various schools of thought. Syncretism involves the merging or assimilation of several originally discrete traditions, especially in the theology and mythology of religion, thus asserting an underlying unity and allowing for an inclusive approach to other faiths.

People mix two different philosophies, ideas, concepts, or beliefs and out of the two becomes something brand new, a hybrid, which contrasts with the ones from which it came.  The false worship of Israel arose from syncretism, mixing Israel’s divine, scriptural worship with pagan or idolatrous worship practices.

Comparison with the True Church

The church doctrine and practice of the church fathers does not look like the church in the New Testament.  The church fathers represent a path that diverts from the true path of the New Testament churches.  As I wrote in part one, almost entirely they read as proto-Roman Catholic.  Roman Catholicism came from somewhere and this is easy to see.  It’s no wonder that for centuries Roman Catholicism did not want people to read the Bible on their own.  When they read it, they would see the differences.

It is easy to see in history what happened when people were reading the Bible and comparing it with Roman Catholicism.  People left Roman Catholicism.  They knew that wasn’t the truth.  Based on reading scripture, they separated from Roman Catholicism.  As well, true churches never joined that path in the first place.  True churches always existed and people joined with them who left Roman Catholicism based on reading or hearing scripture.  They also needed courage because Roman Catholicism through the years would kill them for disagreeing.

Roman Catholicism and the Church Fathers

Roman Catholicism preserved the church fathers.  They served Roman Catholic mission and goals.  Roman Catholicism uses the church fathers as their evidence of a historical trail.  Roman Catholic apologists point to the church fathers as evidence of the authority of the Roman Catholic Church.

The authority and military of the Roman Empire served Roman Catholicism.  The denomination itself took on qualities of an Empire and enforced the doctrine and practice.  Ultimately, it would not allow for challenge.  This produced an inauthentic history of a church.  It never was the church.   The Roman Catholic Church always was a pseudo-church, posing as one.  It keeps people fooled and strapped into false religion.  The church fathers offer a major contribution to the deceit and destruction.

Today evangelicals embrace the church fathers. They point to them as a part of their own history.  This supposes that God used Roman Catholicism to keep the truth.  It isn’t true and it doesn’t even make sense.  This doesn’t just provide a cover for the error.  It sends people down the wrong path.

The Example of Baptismal Regeneration

A good example of the deceit and danger of the church fathers relates to the teaching of baptismal regeneration.  The church fathers taught baptismal regeneration.  The Bible doesn’t teach that.  It teaches against it.  Roman Catholicism among other kinds of deeds and rituals requires baptism as a condition for salvation.  Protestants did not make a full turn from Roman Catholic doctrine with their acceptance of infant sprinkling.  This dovetailed with the Roman Catholic view that the church was the worldwide kingdom of God on earth.

In Matthew 16, Jesus told Peter that He was building His church on the gospel.  His church has a true gospel.  The church fathers undermined the gospel and the church that arose from that teaching was a false one.  It was Roman Catholicism and its state church.

More to Come