Home » Posts tagged 'Palestinians'

Tag Archives: Palestinians

The New Rising Hatred Against Israel in the United States

Jews are a relatively small group of people compared to the whole world.  Israel is a tiny, little nation.  They are a couple of gnats landing on a large person.  Proportionally the Jews and Israel receive a very big, gigantic reaction from the rest of the world.

Admittedly, I notice the Jews every day even though almost all of my days now I speak to none, not a single Jew.  I don’t have to go out of my way to ignore Jews.  None live where I am.

On the other hand, during my time in California, on average Jews were more hostile to me than any other people.  When I came to a door and saw a mezuzah shema (mezuzah means “doorposts”) on the doorpost, that meant a tough, very difficult situation was coming about 100 percent of the time.  I want to have a good conversation with a Jewish person and it is very disappointing that most Jews treat someone like myself, who loves them, worse than anybody.

Even with the very poor treatment, I support Jews and Israel.  My wife and I go out of our way to befriend Jewish people.  I even understand their hostility.  It isn’t merited, but it is understandable.

Why Israel and the Jews?

Maybe you have a hard time comprehending why so many people, especially young ones, right now are opposing Israel and the Jews.  These are harsh and even dangerous times.  It is widespread and many times violent.  Maybe even stranger, Jews themselves are part of the opposition.  Quite often the stories or the narratives contradict.  The two or more sides or factions tell clashing stories.

My main point of writing this post is to answer why so much hatred for the Jews and for Israel,  What could this be?  What causes this?  Here it is and not necessarily in this order:  The most prevalent reasons, I think, I will present at and toward the end, not the beginning.

Contrasting Theologies

Supercessionism

One, differing and contradictory theological positions cause the hatred.  Many Jews don’t participate in the theology that brings the incendiary treatment of them.  They don’t believe anything, but it doesn’t make any difference.  This as a section could be a very long explanation and discussion, almost an entire book.

I don’t think theology figures the degree of hatred that explains the present reaction to Israel and the Jews.  Those who see Israel replaced by the church, called supercessionists, don’t hate Israel because of that usually.  They aren’t still blaming the Jews for crucifying Jesus.  Some Jews may think this engenders hot passion, but most people, even if they’re supercessionists, don’t care about this.  They aren’t going to do what we see happening, just because of this theology.  These people haven’t even heard of supercessionism.

Supercessionism could describe a theological position that forms a premise for violent activity against the Jews, but it doesn’t provide the main impetus for hostile activity against them.  It can provide a kind of positional justification, but not the reason.  I remember getting slapped in the face by a Sophomore, when I was a Freshman in high school, while on a field trip, looking at leaves for Biology class.  When I asked him why, he said, “Because I wanted to.”  Several reasons contributed to the slap I took from him.

Allegorization

The supercessionist allegorizes scripture.  He can twist scripture by not taking it literally.  Dozens or hundreds of positions arise from spiritualizing what God’s Words say.

A moderated form of supercessionism exists that supports Israel and the Jews.  Those who take the attenuated position will support Israel, despite their Roman Catholic or Protestant ecclesiology.  If someone is going to allegorize scripture, then he can take the direction of supporting Israel, despite thinking that God replaced Israel with the church.

Envy

Two, many unbelievers are flat-out envious of the Jews.  They see Jews and Israel as a privileged caste.  They’re jealous.  On average they’re rich and successful by the world’s standard.  Jealousy likes people losing what they have.  Few to none are jealous of the Palestinians.

Satan’s Hate

Three, Satan hates Israel.  This hatred manifests itself in Genesis 3 with the serpent bruising the seed of the woman.  Sure, the seed is Jesus, but one cannot separate Jesus from the descendants of the woman and of Abraham.  Satan gladly attempts sticking his thumb in God’s eye with the crushing of Israel and the Jews.

End Times

Four, we’re getting closer to the end.  Let’s say that the future time when enemy nations surround Israel is December.  The rising hatred of nations against the Jews is August.  You’ve got to get to August to get to December.  I’m not saying actual August and December, but a metaphor, like Thanksgiving coming before Christmas.

God’s Judgment

Five, God will bring more judgment on Israel.  This goes back to Daniel 11-12.  Israel didn’t want to go back to the land to rebuild the temple and the walls.  They felt comfortable staying in captivity   Yes, those people cried for the blame for Jesus’ death.  The rest of history would give regular chastisement to Israel and the Jews.  It would never be easy.

God is working His plan.with Israel to get the nation to the place where the enemies surround them.  Now supportive nations like the United States hold back natural and supernatural world rejection of the Jews and Israel.  More of that protection disappears, emboldening the opposition.

Woke Philosophy

Six, a woke philosophy dominates the education system.  It’s a kind of zero sum game.  Israel grabs and gets, and because it does, these other nations starve and diminish.  It’s got a racial component to the darker skinned Palestinians.  And there is a class warfare piece to it.  Israel is upper class, getting favored status.

The idea too is that an international money cabal, led by the Jews, money grubbing and hungry, leaves other people without the privilege.  The university types see themselves as with some revelatory enlightenment.  They see through the deceit into the Jews.  Jewish people join these in this, feeling ashamed to be a Jew.  This is the main narrative being pushed to result in the widespread Jew and Israel hating.

A religious component enters from the Palestinian or Hamas, that accompanies the class envy.  What they think is a true religion, Islam, Judaism discredits it.  Their anger becomes its own self-fulfilling prophecy.  And yet it hasn’t worked.  Powerful nations try to annihilate the Jews and yet they go down in flames.

God Still Has a Plan for Israel

The Abraham and Davidic Covenants are still intact.  They are operational.  God still has a plan for Israel.  Those who attack Israel do so against a warning from God.  These nations haven’t been blessed and won’t, because they won’t accept these promises God made.  They should favor God with favor for Israel, even if they don’t like what Israel believes and does.

Israel is not a threat to the world.  Overall Israel provides great blessing to the world.  I’m not saying Israel is saved.  They will be.  God will save Israel.  In the meantime, we should hope Israel thrives.

Democrats Most Astonishing Hate of Democracy

The Symbol of the Reichstag in Germany

A pivotal moment in Hitler’s rise in Germany came from the Nazi burning of the Reichstag.  They started the fire, put it out, and then blamed it on the Communists.  Democrats in the United States steal this act in a campaign to destroy democracy.  The Nazis convinced a large portion of the German population that the Communists burned down their Parliament building.  Even their courts wouldn’t disagree.

The Democrats, which have the related word “democracy” imbedded in their name, similarly point the finger at Trump as an authoritarian or totalitarian.  His policies looked and still look exponentially more democratic than the finger pointers.  He would like the government out of most of the business of Americans.  Evidence abounds for this, but let me first take a small step back.

Democracy

The United States isn’t a democracy.  James Madison in Numbers 10 and 14 of the Federalist Papers makes this point quite well.  But let’s set that aside for now.

For the sake of argument, let’s say that a Constitutional Republic is a form of democracy.  A website called “Principles of Democracy” writes:

Freedom of speech and expression, especially about political and other public issues, is the lifeblood of any democracy. Democratic governments do not control the content of most written and verbal speech. Thus democracies are usually filled with many voices expressing different or even contrary ideas and opinions.

Citizens and their elected representatives recognize that democracy depends upon the widest possible access to uncensored ideas, data, and opinions. For a free people to govern themselves, they must be free to express themselves — openly, publicly, and repeatedly; in speech and in writing.

Freedom of Speech and Democracy

Wikipedia for “Freedom of Speech” reads:

Freedom of speech is understood to be fundamental in a democracy.

Democrats censor their opposition more than anyone and with unending examples.  They are similar to the presence of Islam in any country.  While Moslems are in a small minority, they cry for human rights, but the moment they take charge with less than a majority, they eliminate unfavorable voices.

Oligarchy followed democracy in Greece.  Democrats control a vast majority of the public square in America.  I include in that schools, media, and even government.  They gladly censor opposing viewpoints.  The Democrat controlled institutions don’t allow the truth of the Bible.  Unless Christians privately fund their own museum, you won’t see a creation account in public.  Democrats label many biblical truths, “hate speech.”

Censorship

Democrats use both hard and soft censorship.  By hard censorship, I mean official and legal disallowance of a place and opportunity to speak.  It may be the loss of a job, because the Democrats don’t hear a statement of support for same sex activity.  That turns the non-speaker, who would like to say something against the activity but doesn’t, into enemy status.

By soft censorship, I mean an avalanche of public repudiation and ridicule until speakers do not receive opportunities to speak.  It’s also moderating who speaks.  The establishment offers a phony, a fraud, as the representative of the alternative point of view, who goes along with the official or permitted position.  Very little to nothing comes in a way of supporting the alternative position.

A historic label for soft censorship is the “kangaroo court.”  The J6 Committee is a good example of this, but they abound in every state in either blue states, districts, or regions.  They also exist in red areas with blue strongholds.  The committee cherry picks their own rubber stamps to represent opposition.  Opposition is actually major support with a fake label of opposition.  I would hope everyone knows this, but I’m afraid it fools just enough of the disengaged.

Other Examples

The J6 Committee parallels with the internet.  You read about the “algorhythms.”  The oligarchs of the tech industry force opposition or non-supportive speech into an uninhabited hinterland.  They are whole national forests of trees that fall and no one hears, so they don’t make a noise.  Only approved speech moves into a hearing zone.  Yes, people published something, but no one is reading, because no one is seeing.

The Hunter Biden laptop is a good example too.  I say these are just examples of what is now normal.  Any supportive tweet or internet entry of the laptop goes unseen, censored as disinformation.  The censorship itself is the disinformation, much like the Russian collusion operation.  I think this is the least of it though.  It’s a censorship industry.

The industry removes the bad news about the favored issue or person.  Right now, it has the ability to project a pro-Hamas experience, despite a relatively powerful coalition for Israel.  Pro-Palestinian protestors crowd the White House and knock down a protective fence with little coverage from the media.  The industry does not parallel or hearken to anything insurrectionist.

Massive Scale Elimination of Democratic Values

As I write on this subject, the most massive scale about which I speak is in education, where for years, the Bible, God, righteousness, and creation and the like are kept out of the massive state school complex even in red states.  No one can take a male headship position in anything close to a public square.  Can you imagine a professor at a major university who takes open biblical views?  It doesn’t happen except in private.  You must pay to hear the truth told.

I would agree that the Bill of Rights and especially the first amendment is the essence of democratic values.  When do you read anything from the left defending free speech anymore?  Democrats don’t write about their love for the first amendment. The closest is a totalitarian support of smut for small children in public schools and genderless bathrooms.  These are not about the protection of speech or opportunity to have a voice.

Pent-Up Voices

The J6 crowd came to a rally and then walked to the capital out of a long pent-up frustration of censorship.  Yes, better means of expression exist.  The high percentage of silencing from the left came to a logger head.  That group that day did wrong things.  This is not what-aboutism.  I see that day as the equivalent of throwing snow balls at the Old State House in Boston in 1770.  The censorship industry, I’m afraid, because of its reaction, has not seen the worst.

We could hope that people care enough to do something about the actual attack on democracy from the Democrat Party.  So far, I see it as a peaceful embrace of those who would allow free speech.  It seems most represented by an ability to oppose masks and vaccinations.  Still, do positions exist for scientists with an opposing view?  Are there safe places of employment in hospitals and in medical schools with an alternate view?  I’m saying this is just representative, because the worst relates to far more important issues of truth.

Democrats have a burning Reichstag type hatred of democracy.  The Nazis opposed burning the Reichstag.  But they burned it.  The Democrats don’t mind burning everything down to get their way.  They don’t care if you vote or not.  They don’t even want you able to say what they don’t want to hear.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives