Home » Posts tagged 'practice'

Tag Archives: practice

Changes in Personal Belief and the Effects on Relationships (part one)

Growth and Change

No one comes into this world knowing every doctrine of scripture.  For someone to grow in grace and knowledge, he will change in his personal belief.  He could go either way, better or worse.  A person won’t remain static.  Growth requires making good changes and avoiding bad ones.

Like anyone else, I have a story of change in personal belief.  I have often told people that I changed on eight to ten biblical doctrines or issues of various significance through the years.  No one should change from something right to something wrong.  I always believed I was moving from wrong to right, but not everyone agreed with that.

Adding and Subtracting

God says, don’t take away from or add to scripture.  Both directions are bad, subtracting and adding.  Furthermore, someone doesn’t do better if he takes every doctrine or issue to the most strict or extreme place that he could.

In the Garden of Eden, Eve said the following in Genesis 3:2-3 to the serpent:

We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:  But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

God had said the following in Genesis 2:17:

But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.

When you read the two statements, you can see that Eve added to what God said.  God said nothing about touching the fruit of the tree.  Yet, Eve did.  She took an even more extreme position than God, which was wrong.

Almost every change I ever made in belief or practice, I moved in a stronger, more strict or conservative direction.  Certain other Christians opposed some of those changes.  In a most recent change, that developed over a number of years, I loosened in my belief or practice.  I see liberty on something where I once saw regulation.  Those accustomed to my rightward movement saw this as inconsistent.

Precipitating Change

In every instance I changed, some event precipitated the change.  Very often I changed while preaching or teaching a series through a particular book.  Sometimes I was faced with a situation that I had never encountered.  I had to make a decision.

In all my years of pastoring, that I know, I have never believed and practiced in an identical way with any other church.  I know of no Baptist church that is identical to another in its belief and practice.   Beliefs and practices might be close to the same, but with slight variation.

Here at this blog, Thomas Ross and I don’t believe or practice exactly the same.  We have differences.  We’re very close, but not the same.  Some of you readers have read our debates here and elsewhere.  Nonetheless, we still partner on this blog.

Through the years, our church still fellowshipped with other churches even with the differences we had.  It’s usually not easy to clash with another church on doctrinal and practical differences.  Even interpretational differences might bring conflict between believers or churches.  Almost everyone thinks they’re right.

Reasons for Change and Differences

When I change, why believe or practice different than before?  Why do Bible believing and practicing churches still have some differences with each other in doctrine and practice?

Direct Statements, Plain Inferences

Differences in belief and practice start with variated understanding of either direct statements of scripture or of the plain inferences from direct statements in the Bible.  Not every teaching of the Bible comes from a direct statement.  Some comes from a combination of direct statements and plain inferences.  In general I haven’t changed in my adult life on anything in a category of direct statements or plain inferences from scripture.

When I say direct statements and plain inferences, I also say that these proceed from only a grammatical, historical interpretation of scripture.  Direct statements and plain inferences come from the actual meaning of the words of scripture in their context.  I also consider the laws for the usage of those words, their syntax, and their meaning in their textual and historical context.

I take a stronger position on repentance and Lordship than I did forty years ago.  In the past, I never denied that teaching.  However, like every other doctrine and practice proceeding from direct statement and plain inference from direct statements, I grew in my grasp and conviction.

A Series of Overlapping Statements and Inferences

Some doctrines and practices proceed from a series of overlapping statements and inferences in the Bible.  When you read all of the passages combined, you will come to certain conclusions that are also your beliefs and practices.  The nation Israel, one third of its total number of people according to Zechariah, will receive Christ as the Messiah during the seven year tribulation period.  Nations will surround her and at this juncture, Israel will repent with a confession such as Isaiah 53.  God will save Israel.

I get my belief about the event of the salvation of Israel from conclusions arising from a series of overlapping statements and inferences in scripture.  Furthermore, almost every belief and practice, comes from both the interpretation and the application of scripture.  Application almost always depends on the reality of certain self-evident truths, assumed by God.  God expects us to apply what He said.  Man lives by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.

Separating Differences

Many professing believers take what I call, unscriptural positions.  Differences occur between believers and churches when one or more veer away from the teaching of the Bible.  They might do that for many reasons.  Some of them are just personal.  An individual believer or a church leader may have a personal issue with someone.  People might not like the way someone treated them or others with whom they fellowship.

Differences between churches may not be doctrinal or practical, but personal or political.  They fellowship with others with different doctrine or practice, even with the same differences as someone with whom they won’t.  Their decisions about relationship relate to hurt feelings or bruised egos.  They won’t reconcile, forgive, or seek mediation because of pride.  They wait for the other party to initiate reconciliation, and even if it does, they reject reconciliation or mediation.  True churches separate, but scripture teaches constructive reasons, not personal or political ones.

More to Come

The Detection and Correction of Doctrinal and Practical Error, pt. 2

 Part One

In the first post in this series, I started with the motivation for detecting and correcting doctrinal and practical error.  It needs to happen, but it won’t happen if you don’t know something’s wrong.  If you know something’s wrong, it’s probably because you know what’s right, so you also know the correction.  Scripture is clear that detection must occur.  The Apostle Paul in 1 Thessalonians 5:21-22 writes this:

21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. 22 Abstain from all appearance of evil.

There are three commands in these two verses and they all relate to this subject.  The first part is most important, because you can’t obey the other two without obeying the first one.  First you prove everything, which is to test everything, the Greek word, dokimazo, which is a metallurgical term.  Metals are tested for impurity and then purified.

I like to call the “testing,” “keeping my grid up.”  The grid portrays a kind of mesh that catches error.  Error can’t get through.  The grid represents some kind of criteria by which judgment is made.  Why would I think this “proving” relates to doctrinal or practical error?  The flow of the chapter indicates it, considering the previous verse, which says, “Despise not prophesyings.”  Prophesying or preaching, forthtelling of the Word of God, should not be despised.  It should be proved though.  It presents a balance for the listening to preaching.

Once something has been proven or tested, if you don’t despise it to begin with, you will hold fast that which is good.  Paul starts with the positive.  True doctrine and practice should be embraced.  It reminds me of the part of 1 Corinthians 13, “Love rejoiceth in the truth.”  “Good” is morally good.

The second command is what someone does with doctrinal and practical error.  He abstains from it.  The language is “all appearance of evil,” and “appearance” is not something that looks like something or appears like it.  The Greek word and the English word mean “form.”  It’s simple.  “Abstain from all form of evil.”  “Evil” is the opposite of “good,” so morally bad or wicked.

The Apostle Paul commands the members of the church at Thessalonica to do what this series is about.  Doctrinal and practical error is not good.  It is evil.  It first must be detected by having the grid up.  The good must be embraced and the evil jettisoned.

What is the standard for detection and correction?  Jesus in Matthew 22:29 said, “Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures.”  Error comes from not knowing the scriptures, according to Jesus.  The standard for detection and correction is scripture, and that is the grid that is kept up in order to prove all things.  When Paul spoke about the error in Jerusalem in Acts 13:27, he said the reason was that they knew not the voices of the prophets that they read every Sabbath.  In 2 Peter 3:16, Peter says that error comes when unstable and ignorant men wrest the scriptures to their own destruction.

The Detection and Correction of Doctrinal and Practical Error

Not meant as an understatement, detection and correction of the coronavirus has become serious to the whole world and the nation.  I don’t remember anything treated as importantly in my lifetime.  Coronavirus kills the body.  It doesn’t kill everybody or even necessarily a large percentage of those who get it, but the fear of it is that it destroys the body.  The importance of detecting it and correcting the coronavirus relates to its killing people’s bodies.  The Lord Jesus said the following in Matthew 10:28:

And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

With eternal knowledge, which includes eternity past all through eternity future, the Lord Jesus can judge with perfection what to fear.  Jesus says that we should fear the one who can destroy body and soul more than the one who can destroy just body.  The detection of that which can destroy both body and soul in hell forever is far more important than the one who can destroy just body.  With this contrast Jesus reveals the truth about the priority of detecting and correcting doctrinal and practical error.  Even though people do not treat it as such, there is so much more at stake with it.People stress personal protective equipment.  When the virus first started its spread, there was a shortage on this, and it was a big deal to have it for obvious reasons.  It was very important to protect people.  The virus kills.  But it only kills body.  Doctrinal error specially, which is also practical, is more important to detect and stop or correct.  Much doctrinal error and a diverse, large variety of it, is enough at least to destroy both body and soul in hell forever.  Forever.  This is very serious.  If Jesus says it is this serious, it is this serious.  Destruction of body and soul forever blows away mere destruction of body.  Jesus said in Mark 9:47 it would be better to pluck out your eye and enter into the kingdom than having two eyes to be cast into hell fire.False teachers (Matthew 7:15) are the first reason people take the broad road to destruction.  They aren’t pointing to the narrow road with their false teaching, but to the broad road that leads to destruction (Matthew 7:13-14).   Jesus says they’re wolves in sheep’s clothing and they want to destroy sheep, obviously by destroying their souls with all sorts of what 2 Peter 2:1 calls, “damnable heresies.”  Jude 1:11 calls this destruction of the soul, perishing in the gainsaying of Korah, which in the next chapter of 2 Peter (3:17), Peter speaks of those who will fall from their steadfastness, being led away with the error of the wicked.Those who save those from the damnable teaching of false teachers, James says convert from the error of their way and save their souls from death (5:20).  Paul says in 1 Timothy 4:16 says that by taking heed unto true doctrine, they will save themselves and those who hear them.  Those who abide not in the doctrine of Christ, John says they have not God (2 John 1:9).  In some cases, believers are deceived through the false teaching of false prophets, which is enough to distract them from service or at least effective service (1 Cor 15:33, Col 2:9).The detection and correction of doctrinal and practical error has eternal ramifications for the souls of men.  An error in need of detection and correction from the onset is one of proportion, when the fear of him who can destroy only body extinguishes or overshadows the fear of Him Who can destroy both body and soul in hell forever.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives