Home » Posts tagged 'reality'

Tag Archives: reality

Two Approaches to Reality, One of Which Is True: Either Construing or Constructing Reality, Pt. 2

Part One

Only one reality exists.  That reality is transcendent.  It proceeds from God.  Men must receive that reality by faith, that is, they must receive what God says.  This does not ever contradict science.

The one reality is the truth, the goodness, and the beauty.  God wants men to construe that reality and receive it.  God’s truth is the truth, His goodness is the goodness, and His beauty is the beauty.

In his rebellion against God, man, speaking of mankind, constructs an alternative reality.  It isn’t reality.  As a noun, it’s a construct of reality.

Today people say that man constructs his own reality.  If man constructs all reality, then anyone can construct his own reality.  His truth is his truth, his goodness is his goodness, and his beauty is his beauty.

The rebellion of man proceeding from his sin nature authors a new reality.  He becomes God.  Rather than construing reality and receiving it, he constructs his own in rebellion against God.

As part of a growing rebellion against God others must receive a construction of reality and at least tolerate it.  This rejects the truth, goodness, and beauty for a human construct.  It validates man’s pride and lust.

Man will find out his constructions of realities  are all lies, as part of “the lie.”  The lie is the Satanic lie in rebellion against God, that takes on different forms or vessels, but with the same contents.  When I was young, Avon sold perfume in a variety of containers, all the same scent.

In the end, God will unveil or unmask the lie and all the individual lies.  They will all stand naked before His judgment.  God will not receive them.  He will say, Depart from me, and into eternal separation from Him.

Churches should bring God’s light to reality.  They should manifest reality, the truth, goodness, and beauty.  Instead, today churches associate with and accommodate the lie by receiving man’s construction of reality.  They even call this love, corrupting the love of God and their neighbor.

People today use the terminology, “alternative reality,” which speaks of fiction.  No one wants to hear that he believes in fiction, but he still assigns to his fiction a designation of reality.  He wants what he wants, so he calls it reality, when it isn’t.  This is a construct of reality.

Because in postmodernism all reality is a construct, then every reality should be tolerated.  This toleration is now love.  All reality is tolerated except for objective reality that has objective meaning.  This is transcendent reality.  All truth, goodness, and beauty comes from God, who is transcendent.  You can’t receive God and reject transcendent reality, which is to say, reject reality itself.

One of the lies of the lie is that someone has his reality in the gospel, while rejecting reality.  Does someone who rejects reality receive the gospel?  Can a gospel extricated from reality be the gospel?  Is its God, the God?  Is a God removed from reality the God of the gospel, the God who saves?

More To Come

Two Approaches to Reality, One of Which Is True: Either Construing or Constructing Reality

Let’s say that I’m on vacation to Turkey.  I want to look at Asia Minor and the geographical locations of the Apostle Paul’s churches there.  In addition I’m interested in Istanbul and the history of the Eastern Roman Empire.  While touring, I’m grabbed, a gunny sack pulled over my head, and thrown into the back of a dark cargo van.  The next thing I’m sitting on a metal chair in a crumbling urban brick building with a camera pointed at my face.

Moslem terrorists rip the sack off my head and through very bright light I see several swarthy, angry men each with AK-47s.  One of them puts a crumpled paper in my hand with English text, that says I must admit confess that as an American spy I reject the Republican form of government and pledge my allegiance to Allah.

I look up from the script my interrogators gave me and tell them that I can’t read this, because it isn’t true.  One of them punches the side of my head with the butt of his rifle and I see a flash of bright lights.  I shake out the cobwebs and everything looks blurry.  As my brain starts to clear again, I feel a stream of blood down the side of my head.  As everything starts to clear, I look at the script and reassess whether I might go ahead and read it.

What’s on the piece of paper isn’t true, even if the audience believes it.  The kidnappers constructed a reality.  It isn’t  true.  I don’t believe it.  I reject it.  Someone else wrote it.  Saying it or writing it more doesn’t make it any more true.  What they’ve constructed is not reality.  The language on the paper means to construct a new reality.

Maybe you’ve heard that perception is reality.  A person can create his own reality based on his perception, one which might not be true.  A person with perceptions will call it reality, when it isn’t.  This is a reality again of his own construction, perhaps based on his misconstruing his own reality.  Perception is reality, is not reality.  He could perceive reality, but his perception does not make it reality.  Very often it is not.  Even though it isn’t reality, he forms language to construct a reality as he perceives it.

Construct or Construe

A popular postmodern notion today is that people construct their own realities.  Reality is what people want it to be.  Therefore, they reject objective reality and/or objective meaning.

For the sake of discussion, I am saying that construing reality is describing reality as it is, as it really is.  Constructing reality describes reality as we want it to be.  God alone constructs reality outside of our own perception.  At most, we construe it.  If we truly construe reality, then we describe it as it is.  If we don’t like the reality God constructed, out of rebellion against him we might construct our own reality.  It still isn’t reality though.

Postmoderns say men constructed the patriarchy, that is, the patriarchy is a social construct.  They constructed the patriarchy using language.  They say language is powerful.  Language constructs reality.  Language also changes reality, so using language they construct a new reality, an egalitarian one.  Construction of a new, different reality starts with deconstruction of the old.  Then using language, they construct a new one.

The patriarchy is reality.  People’s job is to construe reality.  People might not like the patriarchy but that does not change the reality of patriarchy.  Since God constructs reality, reality is objective and, therefore, meaning is objective.  Our life only has meaning if it describes reality as it really is.  Someone construes reality only when he describes it or understands it as it really is.

Is patriarchy construing reality or constructing reality?  It construes reality.   It construes what God constructed.  Why do people then construct reality?  Objective reality, what we should call “the truth,” contradicts people’s lusts.  They then construct a reality that conforms to their lust and call it their own reality.  Also, they call it their truth.  They use language to construct their own reality.  This is why language becomes so important in secular institutions.  They reject God, leaving themselves to construct their own reality.

The Idolatry of Using Language to Construct a New Reality

In the beginning, God constructed reality out of language.  John 1:1-3 read:

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.  2 The same was in the beginning with God.  3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

The Word made all things.  With Him was not anything made that was made.  God alone did this or does this.  When a man constructs his own reality using language, it is a form of idolatry that proceeds from pride and lust.  Therefore, he worships and serves the creature rather than the Creator (cf. Romans 1:25).

Rejecting reality, that is, not describing it as it really is, also rejects God.  It is a more subtle and significant way to eliminate God or to dethrone Him.  God created everything for pleasure.  Man deconstructs reality and constructs his own reality for his own pleasure.

Scripture reveals the reality God constructed, using language.  God spoke the world into existence.  He upholds all things by the Word of His power.  God’s Words construct reality.

Those God created are responsible to construe reality based upon scripture.  No one is neutral.  When they don’t receive what God said, they will construct a new reality with their own language in defiance of God.

More to Come

Reality and Truth: Celebrity Conservatives Versus True Bible Believers

Perhaps you, like me, as a Christian, pay attention to certain celebrity conservatives, who take many of the same or similar viewpoints as you.  You know there are differences.  Where is the overlap?

In diagnosing a worldview, there are various components to understanding it, as some people have or might put it, to see the map of the world.  Some of them are knowledge, ethics, purpose, and epistemology, but among the others, I want to explore two of them, reality and truth, as they relate to celebrity conservatives versus true Bible believers.  In general, very often true Bible believers are interested in the celebrity conservatives without their being interested in them.  Part of their “fan base” are Christians, who listen to their podcasts and watch their shows.
One of the celebrity conservatives, Jordan Peterson, the famous PhD professor, author, and public intellectual and speaker from Canada, doesn’t even call himself a conservative.  Celebrity conservatives today might call themselves classic liberals (you can look up classical liberalism).  Maybe he really isn’t conservative, but you also shrink your audience if you call yourself one.  As well, “liberal” might mean you keep your job and other opportunities.  Peterson does resonate with true Bible believers and they listen to, watch, and read him.
When I write, celebrity conservatives, I’m especially saying, Peterson, Ben Shapiro, Charlie Kirk, Tucker Carlson, Laura Ingraham, Sean Hannity, the late Rush Limbaugh, Dennis Prager, and Candace Owens.  There are many others.  There is overlap between their worldviews and the worldview of a true Bible believer.
Before Covid hit and also before he had major health issues, my wife and I and another couple got tickets to hear Jordan Peterson in person in San Francisco, sponsored by the Independent Institute.  As I was listening to him, I enjoyed many things he was saying.  However, I knew he and I did not have the same worldview.  I was glad he could say what he did in public, but it wasn’t nearly enough for me either.  The celebrity conservatives like him are disappointing.
In the last week, I was thinking about the difference between the worldviews of celebrity conservatives and true Bible believers.  Even as I write this, I think about how a true Bible believer could even be a celebrity in our world.  I don’t think it’s possible.  The greater the celebrity status, the more you must be doing something wrong, and that includes evangelical leaders who have their own celebrity. They in part got there through capitulation and compromise.  Their greater celebrity doesn’t speak well.
The common ground in worldview, I believe, is that there is more proximity between celebrity conservatives and true Bible believers in their view of reality.  I would say that they both attempt to function according to reality, even if it means abandoning the truth.  The truth and reality do go together.  They overlap completely for a true Bible believer, but they don’t for celebrity conservatives.  Even actual reality and the reality of celebrity of conservatives don’t overlap identically.  To stay a celebrity, like everyone else who isn’t a true Bible believer, celebrity conservatives forsake actual reality and even more so, the truth.  Let me explain.
I want to use Jordan Peterson as an example.  Jesus either rose from the dead or He didn’t.  Jesus can’t be the greatest figure who ever lived if He wasn’t truth and He lied about the resurrection.  Peterson says that he’s not sure if he believes Christianity, but he tries to live like one.  He’s also saying, he’s not committing to the truth of the resurrection of Jesus Christ, while living like Jesus did resurrect from the dead.  He borrows a reality based upon the truth without actually believing the truth.  Other conservatives do that, and it’s easy to see.
The world we live in is the real world.  Celebrity conservatives more than the mainstream culture try to explain positions according to reality, even if they deny much of the truth or many truths, depending how you want to put that.  You may live a reality of Jesus and defend a life that fits His existence and deny the pivotal truth of His resurrection.  Peterson does that.
Complementarianism is the truth and celebrity conservatives borrow from a complementarian reality without the truth of complementarianism.  Gender fluidity proceeds from egalitarianism.  God designed men and women differently.  That’s the truth.  Celebrity conservatives deny complementarian truth while defending a complementarian reality.
Let me get more simple.  Whether you think he’s a conservative or not, let’s consider President Donald J. Trump as if he were a conservative.  Trump operates according to a certain Christian reality that results in Christian support, including from true Bible believers.  Trump thinks that one thing is better than another.  Certain behavior is wrong.  He believes that America as a standard of living better than other countries, which can be and should be protected at the border.  This is one of the most fundamental conservative beliefs and it is a reality that borrows from the truth.
Former President Trump doesn’t believe the truth, but he functions as though there is truth. He is a realist in that we must have standards.  Things won’t be better when we can’t discern the differences of one thing from another.  This is a reality according to a Christian worldview.  The truth is more important.  However, people who eject from reality are much further away from the truth. These either practical or positional nihilists must be rejected for something short of the truth, if that’s the choice.  The path to the truth won’t come through their relativism.  It can come through someone who at least embraces reality, even if it doesn’t mirror actual reality.
The answer for humanity is still the truth.  It isn’t the reality of celebrity conservatives.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives