Home » Posts tagged 'reverence'

Tag Archives: reverence

Profaning the Name of the Lord: How Can or Do People Do It? (Part Two)

Part One

Moses meets the LORD in Exodus 3:1-6 and I’m stopping in verse 6:

1 Now Moses kept the flock of Jethro his father in law, the priest of Midian: and he led the flock to the backside of the desert, and came to the mountain of God, even to Horeb.
2 And the angel of the Lord appeared unto him in a flame of fire out of the midst of a bush: and he looked, and, behold, the bush burned with fire, and the bush was not consumed.
3 And Moses said, I will now turn aside, and see this great sight, why the bush is not burnt.
4 And when the Lord saw that he turned aside to see, God called unto him out of the midst of the bush, and said, Moses, Moses. And he said, Here am I.
5 And he said, Draw not nigh hither: put off thy shoes from off thy feet, for the place whereon thou standest is holy ground.
6 Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob. And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God.

Moses is in the special presence of God at the burning bush.  God said, “Here am I.”  So He’s there.  And then there God commands Moses to do something that would treat his proximity to God’s special presence as sacred.  God calls this place, “holy ground.”

Holy Ground and Reverence My Sanctuary

What makes the ground holy where Moses stands?  It is the nearness to the special presence of God.  God is there.  Moses knows it.

God gave Moses a symbolic means by which he could set apart this place where he stood, show it to be unique or majestic.  Moses could demonstrate respect to God through a physical act, one that had not as of yet been established as a signal of reverence. It wasn’t just in the heart where and how this occurred.  God expected and expects more.  Later in Leviticus 19:30, God says through Moses to the people of God, “Reverence my sanctuary.”  God doesn’t say how, assuming that they would understand how to obey this command.

A parallel elsewhere in the Old Testament for consecrating something is the truth of a “solemn assembly.”  God mandated solemnity for holy occasions, again implying the knowledge of an application.  By taking his shoes off, Moses could distinguish the occasion of meeting with God at the burning bush.  It made the circumstance a more solemn one.

Solemnity

People today do not, as a whole, like solemnity.  They want chipper, vivacious, bouncy, funny, and casual, informal, and laid back.  Silly most times is better than solemn.  I could give more descriptions of the variations of what people want that revolve around self-interest.  True reverence in most cases is not even an option any more.  It is a deal-breaker for attraction.  People are in fact put to sleep by solemnity, because it’s just boring to them.  In that sense, the people keeping something solemn lose their audience and ruin the meeting.

Music is a major component for promoting the opposite of solemnity and reverence.  Churches choose what people want, which corresponds more to the wants of a majority.  Scripture commands, “Abstain from fleshly lust,” and churches accommodate and promote fleshly lust with their music.  Music can express solemnity, majesty, and something sacred.  It distinguishes itself from the spirit of the age or what some today call a “vibe.”

The lack of reverence and solemnity trickles into many other various aspects of culture, which at one time did more to reflect on the nature of God.  Work places and educational institutions among other spheres of authority had dress codes.  The organization expected fulfilled standards for language and other forms of conduct.  I was recently watching a podcast in which the spokesman used “normalcy” to describe the way it once was, but generally no more.

Put Into Practice

I’ve been alive long enough to remember when opening the top button of the dress shirt signaled a drop in the solemnity of the occasion.  Someone had to keep his hair combed and completely orderly to communicate the proper respect.  Churches did not look like theaters.  No one would want this juxtaposition or association with the profane.  The architecture of a building needed a solemn or reverent appearance larger in scale than removing ones shoes, but in the realm of that ideal.

Weddings were a holy convocation.  This was a solemn covenant before God.  It was not an expression of personality, hipness, coolness, or popularity.  Plans revolved around the expression of God’s character or nature.  As an activity, it was kept distinct from something common, playful, or vulgar.  I’m using the wedding as an example so that you can imagine occasions and how they change in culture away from God.

Someone writing about the exact subject of this series, said the following in 2017:

Implicit in the rejection of the sacred is the idea that there should be no restraints for anything. It is unjust that there be anything set beyond the reach of others. It is wrong that anyone is recognized as being more than someone else.

Thus, in a society that has lost a notion of the sacred, no one stands out, no prizes are awarded, and disordered passions must never be held in check. Everyone must be equal, whatever the cost. There can be no sanctuary for any privileges. Nothing can be withheld from others. Rather, everything must be available to all.

The Separateness of God

God is High.  Required solemnity acknowledges the separateness of God.  To give Him His proper recognition, protocol must reflect His Highness.  This is setting Him apart.

The cherubim around the throne room of God without ceasing treat God with His deserved solemnity.  God requires this of these creatures, but He also reveals this scene in many places in the Bible (Ezekiel 1, Isaiah 6, Revelation 4-5).  He expects people to mimic this reality.  It’s not there in the Bible to ignore.  These heavenly creature use two sets of six wings to cover their faces and cover their feet (Isaiah 6:2).  This signifies reverence and humility, modesty and respect, ways to give God His proper due and treat Him with appropriate worthiness.

Scripture is replete with means of solemnity and reverence.  Either the opposite or some variation that diverts from this solemnity and reverence is then profaning.  Some kind of profaning occurs with the diminishing of reverence and solemnity.

More to Come

“They Will Reverence My Son”

In a story told by the Lord Jesus Christ during His earthly ministry, He said in Mark 12:6:

Having yet therefore one son, his wellbeloved, he sent him also last unto them, saying, They will reverence my son.

In the story, obviously this son is a representation of Jesus Christ Himself and so communicates the purpose of God the Father sending His Son to the earth:  “They will reverence my son.”  They don’t reverence the son in the story and this is why they deserve punishment.  Jesus says in verse 9:

What shall therefore the lord of the vineyard do? he will come and destroy the husbandmen, and will give the vineyard unto others.

The “lord of the vineyard” in the story represents God the Father.  I understand this to be a message to Israel, but it is one to anyone does not respond to the God the Son with reverence.  Should not all of us assume “reverence” is a necessary aspect of saving faith in the Lord Jesus Christ?
.The Greek word translated “reverence,” a verb, is entrepo, which according to BDAG means “to show deference to a person in recognition of special status,” including with that the following references:  Mattthew 21:37, Mark 12:6, Luke 18:2, 4, 20:13,m and Hebrews 12:9.  BDAG provides another translation of the word in other contexts, which means “to cause to turn (in shame), to shame.”  Examples given are 1 Corinthians 4:14, 2 Thessalonians 3:14, and Titus 2:8.
In the story Jesus told, the husbandmen should have been ashamed of themselves for what they did to the representatives of the lord, whom we know represent the Old Testament prophets.  Feeling shame can be a part of this reverence unto the Son.  Not reverencing the Son is not reverencing the Father.  This is how someone could take believing in God.  If someone does not believe in the Son, He does not believe in God.
How can someone reverence if there isn’t such a thing as reverence or no way to reverence?  Going along with the BDAG meaning “recognition of special status.”  How does someone recognize someone for having special status?  Is there a way to do that?  Is there a way not to do that?  A culture where nothing is sacred anymore won’t know how to reverence anything, let alone God.  This, of course, completely messes up its people’s values, because they won’t know how or whom to give special status.
Churches today very often do not reverence the Son with their music.  Their music isn’t sacred.  It is worldly, fleshly, and lustful.  The husbandmen thought the lord, the vineyard, the representatives in the story, and the Son were all about themselves.  Because of how important they thought they were, they couldn’t reverence the Son.
This reverence of the Son relates to repentance.  It relates to true faith in Jesus Christ.  When churches won’t reverence the Son, they are also undermining the gospel.  People cannot imagine or know the true Son of God, when churches do not treat Him with reverence.

The Place of Fear in a True Church and With True Worship

I’ve read recently, “Fear is not a virtue.”  A company called, American Virtue Clothing prints “Fear Is Not a Virtue” on its clothing.  Heather Delapi argues that “fear” isn’t found in the lists of virtues of scripture, hence is not a virtue.   The English word “fear” is found 385 times in the King James Version of the Bible.  I have read all of those verses, but I haven’t sorted through everyone of them to find how many times fear is rebuked or admonished and how many times it is extolled or commended.  There are both.Fear is a virtue.  No godly person lives without fear.  It is a necessity for pleasing God.  Just because it isn’t listed as fruit of the Spirit doesn’t mean that it isn’t a virtue.  It is dangerous and wrong to say it isn’t a virtue.  Why would I even write this?  I’ve taught through Acts all the way through once, and in great detail about halfway through the whole book about five times.  I’m teaching and preaching through it again right now as we evangelize and plant a church in Southern Oregon.  When Luke writes under the inspiration of God to describe the basics of the church of Jerusalem in that classic passage in Acts 2:41-47, he writes in Acts 2:43 an attitude of that first church:

And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders and signs were done by the apostles.

“Fear came upon every soul.”  This verse got my attention again on this subject, so I’m writing on it.  This same morning as I was preaching the end of the book of Acts, in Sunday School I started a short series on “The Detection and Correction of Doctrinal and Practical Error.”  In my introduction I quoted what Jesus said in Matthew 10:28 and elaborated about its part in that subject.

And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.

The word fear used by Jesus in the second half of the verse is an imperative.  Jesus commands us to “fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.”  At the same time, Jesus says “not to fear.”  The most important problem about “fear” is what you fear.  Everyone should fear, and not just God.  Some of the same people who say “fear is not a virtue” ironically “fear them which kill the body.”  Actually less than that, they fear the “influencers” in the world and then they don’t fear who they should fear, who the Bible says to fear.  They don’t want to fear them even though they fear the world in many obvious ways by how they act.  They fear the opinion of Black Lives Matter, fear the woke crowd, fear the absence of an apparent worldly style, or fear irrelevance according to the spirit of the age.The cure for a sinful fear is a righteous fear.  Many passages prove fear a virtue.  It’s a terrible hermeneutic and contradiction to biblical teaching to say and teach that fear is not a virtue.In Acts 2:43, fear characterized the Jerusalem church.  So also did love, but fear is the first listed.  Love isn’t mentioned at all in verses 41-47, but it’s described in the next three verses (vv. 44-46) in their communal living.  Fear comes first though.  It is the Greek word phobia.Acts 2:41-47 provide the basics of the first church.  Success of that first church, and as a template for all other churches since, depends upon fear.  In the Old Testament, a crucial theme of the Old Covenant was fear, especially represented by the three words: Hear and Fear.  God expected His people to hear what He said and to fear Him.  Sure, God wants other responses, but fear is non-negotiable.There is a trickle down from there.  People who do not fear God will not fear their parents, will not fear their husband, and will not fear their employer.  Now, you read that, and you think, fear shouldn’t be a part of leadership anywhere in the world.The chastening of the Lord in Hebrews 12 is for the purpose of what?  Man doesn’t want to be chastened, he fears it, so he changes in his behavior.  That’s why in Proverbs the fear of God is the beginning of wisdom.  On Mt. Sinai, when God gave the law, He showed Himself in a fearsome way with lightning and thunder.  When Ananias and Sapphira were killed by God, great fear fell upon people.  This was what God wanted.When Paul told Timothy that God hasn’t given us the spirit of fear, He meant like Jesus, fearing he who is able to destroy body.  Like Proverbs 29:25 says, the fear of man bringeth a snare.  “Be not afraid,” which is said so many times in the Bible, means “be not afraid of people, the enemies of God, those who criticize you to get you to stop believing and practicing the truth.”Anyone who tries to conflate fear of man with the fear of God and say that fear shouldn’t be a virtue is either very deceived or lying.  He shouldn’t be a teacher.  Ephesians 5:33 says to the wife that she should see that she reverences her husband.  That word “reverence” is the same word phobeia in Acts 2:43.  That word is found 93 times in the New Testament, so it is very common.  When Romans 13:3 says that ‘rulers are a terror to evil,’ that again is phobeia.  I’ve found that very often today professing Christians don’t respond to the terror to evil except with rejection, but they respond to the terror of being canceled by worldly or liberal friends.Ephesians 6:4 reads:  “Servants, be obedient to them that are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in singleness of your heart, as unto Christ.”  That’s right.  The boss needs to be feared too and trembling.  That seems even more extreme.  This is a fear that is a virtue, because it is a virtue again and again in scripture and there are many more places that teach this.Fundamental to acceptable worship is that it is reverent, which always relates to fear.  The creatures in the throne room of God are reverent.  There is always an atmosphere in the presence of the Holy God, even though it is more than that.  Psalm 40:3 says, “And he hath put a new song in my mouth, even praise unto our God: many shall see it, and fear, and shall trust in the LORD.”  The saving response of an unbeliever to the true and sincere worship of God’s people is fear.  Unbelievers see true biblical worship and they fear.  Fear goes along with keeping a place or an attitude of reverence to God.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives