Home » Posts tagged 'Romans 1'

Tag Archives: Romans 1

What Is the “Mind Virus” Of Which Elon Musk Alludes?

Elon Musk and the Mind Virus

Civilizational Threat

Not until very recently did I hear the terminology, “mind virus,” and it came from Elon Musk (the wealthiest man in the world) in various podcast interviews.  In a few of those by various individuals, he talks about the “mind virus” as a civilizational threat.  When asked why he bought Twitter (now X), even though it was an apparently very bad investment, he explains that he did it to ward away again, “civilizational threat.”  He saw a particular mind virus, which took the world in a trajectory that he assessed would result in the destruction of humanity.  His purchase of X would push that back for a time, Musk surmised.

Elon Musk could be right, depending on what the real “mind virus” is.   The terminology hearkens to a biblical truth that gets at the crux of the real problem in the world. The actual mind virus is not, however, we know, the same one of which he speaks, based on scripture.  Yet, mind virus as a concept, I would agree, depending on its definition, is the greatest civilizational threat.

Richard Dawkins and “Viruses of the Mind”

It seems that the words “mind virus” originated with Richard Dawkins with a 1991 article, entitled, “Viruses of the Mind,” originally delivered as a lecture.  Others that then used the terminology equated a similar concept.  Dawkins saw religious faith as the chief mind virus, but really faith itself, people with which he calls “faith sufferers.”  His point, albeit very false, was that faith bypassed evidence, so it mainly blocked or impeded evidence.

In most recent times, maybe the most common usage of “mind virus” refers to the technical terminology, “woke mind virus.”  Googling those three exact words brought me 123,000 hits.  This seems to be where we’ve settled in the realm of “mind virus.’  “Woke mind virus.”  References to “mind virus” now mean “woke mind virus.”

Meaning of Woke Mind Virus

Musk’s Definition

At the top of a google search is an article at Rolling Stone, titled, “Elon Musk and Bill Maher Fear the ‘Woke Mind Virus’.”  When asked, Musk defined this virus as “anything anti-meritocratic and that results In the suppression of free speech.”  He said the main cause of it is “the amount of indoctrination that’s happening in schools and universities.”  One man, I think, accurately described the woke mind virus with the following quote by G. K. Chesterton:

We shall soon be in a world in which a man may be howled down for saying that two and two make four, in which furious party cries will be raised against anybody who says that cows have horns, in which people will persecute the heresy of calling a triangle a three-sided figure, and hang a man for maddening mob with the news that grass is green.

Some of that to which Musk refers is what I also believe is the mind virus, including in his assessment of Netflix.  Commenting on the hemorrhaging of Netflix subscriptions, Musk said Netflix was “unwatchable” because of its “woke mind virus.”

The Real Woke Mind Virus

“Woke” became contemporary terminology to describe a state of totally subjective enlightenment, untethered to objective reality.  Someone woke is awake to something probably invisible to almost everyone.  An apparent woke person can see someone is a racist like a Geiger counter picking up radioactivity.  No evidence of racism is necessary.  His inner Geiger counter detects racism; therefore, it must be there.  A woke practitioner also sees more than two sexes and even fluidity in gender identity, where someone can label himself a woman, when he is a man, even depending on the day of the week.

A Reprobate Mind

What Musk called the “woke mind virus” is what Romans 1:28 calls “a reprobate mind,” that does not “like to retain God in [its] knowledge.”  Concerning the same, 2 Timothy 3:8 says, “these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith.”  It’s what 2 Thessalonians 2:11 calls a “strong delusion.”  In modern vernacular, someone infected with the woke mind virus is delusional.  2 Corinthians 3:14 and 4:4 say these people’s minds are blinded, so that they cannot see the light of God’s truth.

Musk himself rejects the light of the gospel.  He considers the earth billions of years old and that man emerged from naturalistic evolutionary processes.  Musk also contends that an extinction event for earth is inevitable.  He says, “An extinction event is inevitable and we’re increasingly doing ourselves in.”

Public schools keep teaching lies of the most fundamental and foundational nature.  These lies are the root that poison every fruit on the entire tree.  They are what Paul calls, “imaginations that exalt themselves against the knowledge of God” (2 Corinthians 10:5).  These ways that seem right unto man, Solomon says are the ways of death (Proverbs 14:12).

Prevenient Grace

How do Musk and other’s like him, themselves deluded, correctly identify the woke mind virus? In a default manner, God gives every human “the law written in their hearts” (Romans 2:15).  The same verse says, “the conscience also bearing witness.”  In the previous chapter, the Apostle Paul writes in Romans 1:19:  “Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them.”  C. H. Spurgeon said in a sermon entitled, Prevenient Grace, preached:

PREVENIENT GRACE, or the grace which comes before regeneration and conversion. I think we sometimes overlook it. We do not attach enough importance to the grace of God in its dealings with men before He actually brings them to Himself. Paul says that God had designs of love towards him even before he had called him out of the dead world into spiritual life.

That grace doesn’t end in salvation for everyone, as seen in Romans 1:18.  Even though they know God through many general means, men still suppress the truth in their unrighteousness.  As a result, they become “vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened” (Romans 1:21).  This is another description of the “woke mind virus.”

The virus also creeps into churches.  Churches accommodate the world system.  They subjugate themselves to conventional wisdom, what James 3:15 calls “wisdom [that] descendeth not from above, earthly, sensual, devilish.”  These are what the Apostle Paul calls in 1 Corinthians 2:13, “the words which man’s wisdom teacheth.”    He also calls it “the carnal mind [that] is enmity against God” (Romans 8:7).

The True Woke Mind Virus

Musk doesn’t know or understand the true woke mind virus.  Yes, the god of this world deludes most men, including Musk, and God turns them over to a reprobate mind.  They are bewitched like the Galatians, “that they should not obey the truth” (Galatians 3:1).

The only escape from the woke mind virus is what Paul calls ‘the law of the mind’ (Romans 7:23).  This is akin to replacing the “heart of stone” with a “heart of flesh” (Ezekiel 11:19, 36:26).  With this change of nature, man can and will think characteristically how God wants him to think.  This is the only true and real cure for the woke mind virus.  God can and will deliver through the Lord Jesus Christ.  Paul writes (Romans 7:25):

I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. So then with the mind I myself serve the law of God.

The Experience of Divine Hiddenness

Is God Hidden?

Is God hidden?  Yes and No.  God doesn’t hide Himself.  In people’s experience, He remains hidden.  That doesn’t mean He is in fact hidden.  They experience Divine hiddenness.

In scripture, people experience Divine hiddenness.  Job said to God (13:24):

Wherefore hidest thou thy face, and holdest me for thine enemy?

The Psalmist says in Psalm 10:1:

Why standest thou afar off, O LORD? why hidest thou thyself in times of trouble?

Unbelievers claim the hiddeness of God in Isaiah 45:15:

Verily thou art a God that hidest thyself, O God of Israel, the Saviour.

God Himself says that people say He hides Himself.  They are Egyptians, Ethiopeans, and Sabeans (Isaiah 45:14).  This isn’t new at all.

Argument for Atheists

Divine hiddenness is a hot new argument for atheists.  It shows up in the most recent material of philosophical atheism:

However, “divine hiddenness” refers to something else in recent philosophical literature, especially since the publication of J.L. Schellenberg’s landmark book, Divine Hiddenness and Human Reason (1993). In this context, it refers to alleged facts about the absence of belief in God’s existence, on the basis of which one might think there is no God.

For example, Schellenberg argues that, since there are nonbelievers who are capable of a personal relationship with God and who do not resist it, there is no perfectly loving God, while Stephen Maitzen argues that naturalism better explains the “demographics” of nonbelief than theism and Jason Marsh argues that naturalism better explains “natural nonbelief” than theism. Understood in this way, divine hiddenness constitutes putative evidence for atheism.

Some people do not recognize the existence of God and they use as their basis the reason that God hides Himself from them.  Others acknowledge God exists, but He does not appear to them in their estimation enough for them to believe.  They live like He doesn’t exist.

The Crown Performance

People require God to give them, what I call, the “crown performance.”  They expect God to come to them like a traveling minstrel.  They hold Him hostage.  If He will not provide the necessary experience they require, they will not believe in Him.  What I’m describing is unbelief.  Unbelief requires more and then more revelation from God.

As an argument, Divine hiddenness contrasts with the sovereignty of God.  Men become sovereign.  If God does not accede to however unbelievers expect Him to appear, they can ghost Him.  God must obey their chosen methodology, because they are ultimately in charge.  It exalts their intellect, which is too lofty to accept God’s kind of evidence.  He’ll just have to do better, if they will acquiesce to Him.

Those who embrace the hiddenness of God set the terms for God’s revelation.  He must accede to their expectations.  If not, they justify their unbelief with hiddenness.

Sincerely Seeking?

Many of those who use Divine hiddenness as their reasoning for unbelief proclaim their own sincerity.  They really want God.  These unbelievers truly seek for Him, based on their own testimonies.  If He would give them but a glimpse, a brief flash of light from Him, they would believe.

God says, I’m not going to hide.  I’m revealing myself to everyone (Rom 1:19-21).  It’s not that people can’t know God.  They refuse the means by which He reveals Himself.  Rather than receive His revelation of Himself in the manner He gives it, they want something else.

Unbelief makes excuses for not believing.  To the unwillingness to receive what God shows of Himself, Jesus says in Matthew 12:39:

An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it.

Then He says it in Matthew 16:4:

A wicked and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given unto it.

The gospels record this teaching of Jesus again in other places (Mark 8:12, Luke 11:29).  A sign points to the reality of God’s existence.

God Wants Relationship, Not Mere Acknowledgement

On Divine hiddenness, I wrote earlier this year:

People may not use this exact language, but in essence they very often ask a question concerning God, “Why is God so hidden?” God could have made more evident His existence and the truth of Christianity. He could make his existence as plain as anything. First though, scripture doesn’t read like God tries to persuade belief in His existence. No, God manifests Himself toward free reception of a saving, love relationship with Himself.

God knows the evidence sufficient for people with open minds and hearts. If you seek Him while He may be found, He will be found (Isaiah 55:6-7). But that means you want Him. This is your first act of worship of God, an offering of your soul to Him. This is more than mere acknowledgment of His existence, like the demons (James 2:19).

Faith in God’s love and knowledge acquiesces to the superiority of His ways. He displays His goodness and mercy in the way He reveals Himself. First, God uses it to bring the most people to Himself and, second, He leaves suitable ambiguity against hardening hearts toward Him. God does not force lost men to believe. He gives ample time and opportunity to encounter the dramatic, true story of Jesus’ sacrifice on the cross and His glorious resurrection and ascension. The foolishness of God is wiser than men, His weakness stronger than them.

A big difference exists between God hiding Himself and His revealing Himself in an unsuitable way to an unbeliever.  Just because someone says he’s sincere in his seeking doesn’t mean he is.  God judges that sincerity by His Word and that professing seeker falls short.

What Is Atheism?

According to the Bible, no one is an atheist.   Proverbs 14:1 reports that a fool says in his heart that there is no God, but that doesn’t mean he believes it.  Romans 1:18 says he knows God and suppresses that knowledge.  So atheism is not someone believing there isn’t a God.  Atheism is living like there isn’t a God.  Many more people do that than the typical polls show.  In other words, on the atheist front, we’re in worse shape than you think.

Someone just wrote about this at the Big Think, entitled, “Atheism is not as rare or as rational as you think.”  Will Gervais in the article makes at least the point in my first paragraph here, and even more.  The Bible says this, so it must be true, but I find it by experience.

As I write this on a Saturday after out evangelizing for a couple of hours, I talked to an “atheist” today, who graduated from Vanderbilt, and he is affiliated with Weber State here.  He announced he was not interested, because he is an atheist.   He also said he did not want to argue at his door, but he did talk awhile, which is very often the case with “atheists.”

I asked the “atheist” if he thought, all this around us came about by accident.  I find no one wants to say, yes, to that, because they know it isn’t true, which means they aren’t atheists.  Then he said with a bit of a smirk, that after the Big Bang happened, everything came out of that.

The Big Bang is apparently a throw-down, trumping all else.  In fact, a Big Bang says there is a beginning.  It doesn’t help an atheist to stay that way, if he believes in a beginning.  Some kind of explosion though still will not explain the amazing complexity all around.  I didn’t bring that up, because I assessed that it would end the conversation.  I took the tack, as I often do, that air, plants growing, all these did not come by accident, but people take these, and as Romans 1:21 says, are unthankful.  These are atheists.  God exists.  They’re just unthankful He does.

An atheist is someone who doesn’t want a God.  He has one.  He just denies it.  An atheist tries to block God out in part by saying he’s an atheist.  He knows he’s wrong.

Gervais portrays many atheists, and it’s true, as appraising themselves as intellectually gifted individuals.  Their position is intellectually bankrupt.  They reject the truth based on their own lust (2 Peter 2-3).

Many atheists will say that those who carefully weigh things do it with science, all natural criteria, which is very intellectual, really Ivy League.  No.  The world did not appear and has not been sustained by merely natural means.

In his piece, Gervais uses science to show how professing atheists are stupid.  Stupid is another word for “fool,” which bring us back to Psalm 14:1 again.  The fool says he’s an atheist.  He’s not being smart.

Since every atheist just denies God against his own knowledge, who are the real atheists?  They live like God doesn’t exist.  I think we could go further than that.  They form a god, which allows them to live like that want.  Evangelicalism is full of atheism.  They deny the true God because they don’t like His requirements or expectations, which are against how they want to live.  They’re worshiping themselves as Romans 1:25 says, and yet they say they worship God or follow God’s ways.

If atheism is denying the one, true God, there are far, far more atheists than any of us can give a percentage.

How Does Natural Law Work in and for Evangelism of the Lost?

Romans 1:18-21 read:

18 For the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who hold the truth in unrighteousness; 19 Because that which may be known of God is manifest in them; for God hath shewed it unto them. 20 For the invisible things of him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse: 21 Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.

I’m assuming a lot of you readers know these verses.  According to them though, based on what people know, they will be judged rightly by God, because what they know means that they are without excuse.  At the same time, people are not going to experience the wrath of God’s judgment because of ignoring information, but because of ignoring law.  When they knew God, they didn’t glorify Him as God and were not thankful unto Him.  Glorifying God as God is represented by various prescriptions, which are laws.  This knowledge isn’t a mere bunch of facts.  Bare acknowledgement of God’s existence isn’t sufficient to avoid the wrath of God.  The judgment and wrath of God is justice for disobeying natural law.

Natural law relates to the theological terminology, general revelation.  “General” is general in audience, that is, everyone knows it, so everyone is responsible for these laws.  Knowing God and glorifying Him as God in Romans 1 means knowing these laws to the extent that someone is responsible for obeying them.  They relate to the revelation of God, so according to His nature.  No one has an excuse for not knowing these.  They’re natural to know.  All men are responsible for them.

In my assessment, the natural laws are those most denied, and against which men are most rebellious.  On the other hand, men like what they consider to be their natural rights, like what Thomas Jefferson’s Declaration of Independence mentions at the beginning:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

He uses the language, “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” “truths to be self-evident,” and “endowed by their Creator.”  Natural laws are self-evident truths.

Men know natural laws. They’re natural to them, so to deny them, they are at their most rebellious.  The Apostle Paul talks about some of them later in chapter 1.  They rebel against God’s natural order, because it clashes with what they want.  It’s natural that the woman is the weaker vessel, and women very often don’t want to hear that.  The natural order of two parents and children obeying their parents is repulsive to children.

When people think of the Declaration, they especially think, “all men are created equal.”  They focus on the word, “equal.”  Most often, however, I’ve noticed that they ignore the first four words, “all men are created.”  It is self-evident that “all men are created.” Equal, yes, but it is self-evident that man is created by God.  To Jefferson, creation of man carried with it more than sheer existence.  With God as Creator, He s also Lawgiver and then Judge.

I’ve found when evangelizing lost people that they will still act like they don’t know certain things. Since Romans 1 says they really do know, I assume they do.  This is presuppositionalism.  I presuppose people know what is natural to know.  Many of those things people say they don’t know, they rely on for enjoying their lives, which is why Jefferson uses “Life, Liberty, and Pursuit of Happiness.”  People like those things and yet they act as though they’ve somehow received them by accident.  This is the part in Romans 1:19, “who hold the truth in unrighteousness.”  As many of you know, it means they suppress the truth.  The way I put it is that the problem is not intellectual, but volitional.

Romans 1:18-22 assure what is already known by everyone.  I’m saying, you know that everyone knows what Romans 1:18-22 say because those verses say they do.  People can act like they don’t know, but you know that they do, so that you don’t believe that they don’t know.  God says they do know, so they do know.

If someone is suppressing the truth, that means he knows and he is rebelling against what he knows.  In evangelism, you expose the lost on his rebellion.  How do you do that?

When I encounter someone who says he is a scientist, a professing atheist, too uncertain, or just not sure because he says he’s not gotten enough proof, I rely on natural law.  I refer to a number of different examples.  “When you look out there at the vast and intricate world, does that look like it all came about by accident?”

I haven’t found anyone who likes to be characterized as thinking or believing that everything came about by accident, but if this world isn’t an accident, then it is design.  People know this is design.  Scripture says, according to the way I like to put it, that they don’t want to have a boss.  The Designer would be their Boss.  They like having their own way, which you can read in the rest of Romans 1 and in 2 Peter.  2 Peter 3 says these scoffers are walking after their own lust.

I continue.  “Everything out there is so complex.  So many occurrences have to be going right at one time, that it is mathematically impossible to be an accident.  It looks like design.  Four or five hundred different circumstances need to be going right for us to even survive.  If just one of those hundreds does not go exactly right, we couldn’t survive.  This can’t be an accident.  The human body itself is so complicated, the human eye, speech, the operation of the brain, the circulatory system, our heart beat, so many that have to be functioning in just a certain way at one time.  And that’s just to survive.”

Romans 1:21 says, “Neither were thankful.”  “So we breathe God’s air, eat the food that comes from a seed growing from the ground, enjoy all of the good things all around on this earth, use all of that, and then just ignore Him.”  This is when you can turn to scripture to point rebellion out.  “Romans 1 says that everyone already knows all this and rather than worship and serve the Creator, they serve the creature.  It describes this as not being thankful, being unwilling to give the credit to God, because that acknowledgement would carry with it responsibility.  Next chapter, Romans 2, says the goodness of God leads us to repentance.”

The statement of what people know, natural law, aligns with what is written by God in men’s hearts as a default position (Romans 2:15).  Pointing out natural law strikes a cord in men’s hearts, their conscience then also bearing witness (v. 15).  They feel guilty because of their ungratefulness.

Then I may say, “What we see occurring out in the world also aligns with the Bible.  The history of the world reflects what we see there.  There is a God, we are here because of Him, He has put us here for a particular purpose, we are responsible to Him, and we are going to meet Him someday.  This is what the gospel is about.  God is just, but He also loves us, and the good news is that He wants us to save us.  However, we really do need to be saved.”

Since the problem is not an intellectual one, the solution is supernatural.  The volition, the will of a person, must be dealt with scripture.  The Bible is powerful (Hebrews 4:12) and a spiritual weapon to pull down the strongholds in people’s minds (2 Corinthians 10:4).

The approach I’m giving you is biblical.  It’s what the Apostle Paul did in Acts 17.  It doesn’t mean that it will result in your audience either listening or being converted, but it gives people an opportunity, which is what you want.  It might be too late for most.  You don’t know.  More than ever, we’re living in an age in which natural law is a necessity in an evangelism approach.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives