Home » Posts tagged 'suffering'

Tag Archives: suffering

The Knotty Subject of Free Will: Do We Have It Or Is It an Illusion? (Part Two)

Part One

Free Will

When you read “free will,” you read two words, one of which is “will.”  “Will” is simple.  A mind is capable of choosing, like ordering a flavor of ice cream or reaching into the candy bowl for Snickers or Reeses.

There are layers here.  The will is the capability of the mind choosing, but a motive directs the will in its choice.  Many different factors may or can combine to bring someone to volition.  Scripture deals with them in several various instances.

The word “free” has to do with opportunity or power.  Someone can and has the opportunity to do what he wants.  The question arises, does anyone truly have the power and opportunity?  Is anyone really free in his will?

In part one, I see in scripture that the free will of man exists by the very use of the terminology “free will” in scripture.  What though goes into free will?

Concerns in the Subject of Free Will

From my vantage point, I see six main types of concerns in the subject of free will.  One, God created man, wants love from man, and man needs free will to love God.  Hence, God created man with free will.

Two, free will explains suffering.  God allowed men a choice to sin and the consequential curse that brings suffering to men.  Suffering isn’t God’s fault.  It’s ours.  This does not mean that God cannot allow suffering or deliver from suffering, but it rose from man’s sin.

Three, apparently if man has free will, then he becomes the deciding factor of salvation and God doesn’t then get the glory.  This assumes a salvation decision makes man’s salvation by works.  Scripture doesn’t read that way, but it’s a kind of logical argument for determinists.

Four, if man doesn’t have free will, then God determined sin and becomes the author of sin.  God is not the author of sin according to James 1:13.  His hatred of sin would also assume He’s not the author of sin.  God created beings with the potential to sin, but He didn’t create sin.

Five, the Bible does not at all read deterministic.  God is sovereign, but His sovereignty doesn’t contradict man’s free will.  The two do not contradict.  God does not cede His authority by allowing men to decide.

The Debilitation of the Sin Nature

Six, free will given to man by God is debilitated by the corruption of his sin nature, even as seen in 2 Peter 2:19:

While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption: for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage.

This bondage is so complete that Jesus says in John 15:5:

I am the vine, ye are the branches: He that abideth in me, and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without me ye can do nothing.

Without Jesus, man can do nothing.  This is also seen in 1 Corinthians 2:14:

But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

The Illusion of Free Will

Men are so darkened in their minds that they operate in bondage.  This speaks of the illusion of free will.  In Romans 8:8, Paul writes that man in the flesh “cannot please God.”  That doesn’t sound free, does it?  He cannot.  In the previous verse, “The carnal mind is enmity against God: for it is not subject to the law of God, neither indeed can be.”  The carnal mind cannot subject to the law of God.  That also does not sound free.

I hear today especially young people about their loss of free will.  They even consider this “loss” as a kind of deviance.  On the other hand, they consider the choice of sin to be free.  Sin isn’t freedom.  Jesus said in John 8:34:  “Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.”

Sin is not freedom.  It is bondage.  What I’m writing here is why the subject of free will is a knotty problem.  Their freedom is illusory.

Freedom comes from God.  The way out comes from God.  The grace of God allows free will.  God created man with free will, but sin brought bondage.  God’s grace brings freedom.

Satan deceives everyone and especially young people today, that they are free because they can choose evil.  That “choice” is an illusion.  The exhilaration of their choosing evil is part of the deception and bondage.  They find themselves in great peril in these chains of darkness.  And they don’t view their new Satanic religion as deviant.  It’s the same sociological pathology held by the opponents of Noah while he prepared the ark.

The Inclination of the Grace of God

On the subject of free will, confronting the knottiness, Jonathan Edwards distinguished between natural ability and moral ability.  Sin does not stop a man from making choices.  He makes them.  Because man can and does make choices, he has responsibility before God.

Even though he chooses, moral depravity chains a man to sinfulness.  Everything he does is ruined in some way, so that he makes no good choices even when he makes good choices.  That sounds contradictory, but he cannot please God and that makes everything bad.  Even when he’s trying to please God, his remaining rebellion and rejection of truth ruins those too.  That is the moral inability of Edwards.

Edwards contrasts with ancient theologian and heretic, Pelagius.  Pelagius saw inability as injustice, because God commanded man to obey.  If man couldn’t, then God was unjust.  God isn’t unjust, so man must be still good to a certain extent.  Pelagius depended on flawed logic like determinists also do.

God can hold man responsible for choices, because he has the ability to choose.  The freedom of choice, however, is an illusion to all except those who encounter the inclination of the grace of God.  God’s grace exerts its power in the means God chooses for the reality of free will.  The lost have free will in their natural ability and potential for moral ability, ability only experienced by true believers through the grace of God.  They are free indeed (John 8:36).

The Conflicting, Perplexing Calvinistic Doctrine of Free Will

As I started to write this post, I thought about whether I decided to write it or whether God predetermined my writing it.  After the smoke exited and cleared my ears, I started writing again.  Are my fingers typing on their own?

Okay, so here’s how it seems to me.  I’m just reporting.  I recently heard something about free will.  I’ve thought about it before.  I thought about it again.  Then I decided to write about it.  No one coerced me and no one prevented me.  I typed freely what I want on my keyboard.  I look forward to the day when I find out what really happened.
I believe God gave me the freedom to choose.  He gave me my will, so I have one and the freedom to use it.  I take responsibility for this writing, because it is mine.  No one made me do this.  No one stopped me from doing it.
At the same time, whatever truth I can know on free will comes from God in His Word.  No truth about free will can contradict another truth.  God does not contradict Himself.  He cannot lie.

The Calvinistic Doctrine of Free Will

The Calvinistic doctrine of free will conflicts and perplexes.  Calvinism says, sure, man is free.  He chooses what he wants to do, but he chooses to sin.  It is in his nature to sin.  He wants to sin.
Being depraved,  man possesses free will, but the will only to sin.  Calvinists say that will only to sin is free will.  That means he does not will salvation either.  He does not want God or righteousness.
Man can choose.  He doesn’t always sin.  He can choose paper instead of plastic.  Calvinists consider that a “natural” choice, the realm in which man does exist.  They also call this “secondary causation.”
On the other hand, other factors seem to come into play with Calvinism and free will.  Conflict and perplexity rise.  God knows everything, past, present, and future.  If He knows everything, then He also predetermines everything.  Man cannot do anything that God does not know.  Knowledge equals determination and Calvinists do not separate those.
Since God knows everything, He also wills everything.  If God wills everything, then God determines everything too.  Calvinists say the alternative to determinism is that God does not know the future, just all the possibilities of what might happen, or “open theism.”
If God determines everything, then He also determines sin and suffering.  God predetermines, determines, or ordains sin.  He’s got a purpose for sin according to His will.  God knows every sin, so He determines it all.  He determined sin, He determined Hell, and He determined to send most people to Hell.
God ordains suffering for sin.  You might say Adam and Eve sinned.  They did, but every man also sinned in Adam.  Every man deserves suffering for sin, starting in this life, ending in his death, and furthermore in his eternal punishment.
If man is not to go to Hell, he cannot choose not to go there.  He chooses only to go there, because his will is depraved.  If he chooses not to go there, God causes that.  He does that through irresistible grace.  God chooses who goes to Heaven.  God the Spirit regenerates those He chooses to receive the Lord God.  Then God keeps them.  He loses none of them.
People sometimes use the word “robot” to describe what seems like a lack of free will.  Calvinists say, men are not robots.  God’s sovereignty to Calvinists though means God determines everything.  It’s perplexing and conflicting that God determines everything, yet man is not a robot.
Everyone God does not choose to save those He chooses for Hell.  He chose them to Hell before their birth.  Knowledge is love.  Foreknowledge is knowing ahead of time.  Knowing ahead of time is loving ahead of time.  Loving is electing to save.  God does not love ahead of time those He also chooses not to save.  He chooses them for Hell.
On the other hand, if man chooses, then salvation is of man.  Man becomes the operative agent of salvation.  If it is not God working, then it is man working.   God is not sovereign.  Man is.  All combined, this conflicts and perplexes.

Does Calvinism Square With Scripture?

I can say I get it.  God is in charge.  He is in control.  For that to be true, I can’t have man choose.  He can’t be a decider.  That makes me more on God’s side, and I want to be on God’s side.  But is it true?  Does that really represent scripture?  I don’t see it for a number of reasons.  It is not how all the passages harmonize with one another.  If Calvinism represents scripture, then scripture itself conflicts and perplexes, and it just doesn’t.
When I say Calvinism conflicts and perplexes, I mean that Calvinism conflicts with the Bible and perplexes me over its seeming disharmony with scripture.  No truth will contradict other truth.  It must harmonize.  Passages must agree with each other.  The right explanation of every passage fits with the right explanation of all other passages.
I can’t expose all the conflict and perplexity with the Calvinistic doctrine of free will in one post or even two.  I agree with both some of what I read in Calvinism and some of what I read in other historical theological systems.  With whatever the Bible says, I concur.  I dissent with whatever differs with God’s Word.
Calvinism or even Reformed theology did not start with Genesis 1:1 or Genesis 50 or Isaiah 10 or Isaiah 40-48 or with the Apostle Paul and Ephesians 1:11.  If someone in the day those passages occurred read those passages, and he could have read Calvin, he would not read Calvin there.  Joseph and his brothers would not say that God meant them to do the evil they did.  God determined them to do evil.  Calvinism forces scripture into it.  It doesn’t harmonize all the passages.
Someone can fit Ephesians 1:11 into Calvinism, but then Ephesians 1:11 doesn’t fit the rest of scripture.  To fit Ephesians 1:11 into all of scripture, which it does, it must abandon Calvinism.
There are good things about Calvinism or Reformed theology.  I like them.  I like listening to their proponents on those things.  They are better than other men, other theologians.
Not only does Calvinism conflict and perplex related to scripture, but it conflicts with itself.  It is incoherent with the data of scripture, but now it is incoherent with historic Calvinism.  It’s as if Calvinism now allows God to determine modernism and pragmatism.  With the new Calvinist, God uses modernism and Calvinism for good, justifying the two when it is convenient for the Calvinist without regard of his free will.
For instance, God determines Daniel Wallace looking for manuscript and James White practicing textual criticism and judging textual variants according to humanly designed standards.  God determines contemporary Christian rockers or rappers to increase church attendance.  They mold God’s sovereignty to fit man’s purposes.
(To Be Continued)

How Jesus Relates Persecution to the Gospel in the Sermon on the Mount and His Example to Us In Doing So

In what is called “the Sermon on the Mount” in Matthew 5-7, Jesus preaches salvation to a Jewish crowd of people and pulls down with supernatural wisdom and authority their unique strongholds.  For instance, in the very first statement, one of the Beatitudes, He says, “Blessed are the poor in spirit: for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”  The Jews didn’t see themselves as spiritually poor, but spiritually wealthy.  They were by rights, God’s chosen people.  Of course, they were already “blessed” through the Abrahamic covenant, and even in their own eyes, the Mosaic covenant, according to the Deuteronomic code.  None of their thinking was true on this, so Jesus eviscerated it in the Sermon.

Another Jewish thought is “the kingdom.”  They would have considered themselves already the beneficiaries of the kingdom through the Davidic covenant.  “Heaven” is the abode of God and they saw themselves as the children of God, so wherever God was, they would be, even as God resided in the tabernacle through the wilderness.  Jesus confronts their wrong thinking when he shows the rich man is in Hell, not in heaven in Luke 16.  None of this, the kingdom or heaven, was theirs, however, unless they were poor in spirit, which meant that they acquiesced to their own spiritual poverty, that they really were lacking and in dire need.  They needed to do what the Apostle Paul did and count their own spirituality as loss and as dung for them to win Christ or find themselves under the reign of the Messiah in His kingdom with all its promised blessings.

The Jews already saw themselves as sadly and badly not receiving their just desserts, their appropriate reward.  According to their own assessment, they were persecuted by the Romans as they had been by many other various empires previously.  This would fly in the face of being a blessed people and a kingdom people.  It was an unacceptable circumstance that should be turned around and would be reversed by a true Messiah.  That’s not what Jesus said though.

Just like the people in the kingdom of heaven would be first poor in spirit, they would also be persecuted for righteousness sake (Matthew 5:10).  Persecution is the guaranteed cost of a truly saved person and Jesus frontloads this in His gospel presentation in Matthew 5:10-12.  As people enter into true salvation through Jesus Christ, they need to expect persecution.  They need to count the cost.  Jesus said in Luke 9:23, that if any man will come after him, let him take up his cross daily.  Jesus issues that understanding right up front to those who might receive the kingdom.  It’s a narrow road with few on it.

Churches today do not give their targets for attendance or membership the impression that they will suffer or be persecuted by joining up.  That’s a way to shrink the numbers.  However, it is the method of Jesus.  He included that in His gospel presentation and more than once.  Do not expect to have it easy if you’re a Christian, and that’s not why you’re receiving Christ, for what you’ll receive in time, because that’s going to be persecution.  Very likely why less are truly converted today is because they do not see the Christian life as worth suffering for.  They would choose a Christianity full of pleasure, but not the one with guaranteed pain, so they reject genuine Christianity for the placebo.  Churches offer the placebo, because that’s what people want.  Then the entire program of the church revolves around various pleasures, especially for the young people.

The Jews thought they were persecuted already, but they were were persecuted for unrighteousness.  Daniel prophecies why Israel would be dominated by the Romans.  He was downhearted by the lack of enthusiasm for God among the captives in Babylon, comfortable to just stay and not return to the land for true worship of God.  They would keep being chastised because of their faithlessness and then they took that as persecution.  Actual persecution is for righteousness and not unrighteousness.  Just because the Jews of Jesus’ day were suffering didn’t mean they were persecuted and neither did it mean they had a future kingdom for them.  No, that kingdom was only for those persecuted for righteousness.

People in the future kingdom do not fit into the present one, the kingdom of this world.  The people under the future reign of Jesus are those who want a present reign of Jesus.  People who want Him to be king in the future have got to want Him to be king in the present.  Those over whom Jesus reigns will be persecuted. They will not fit in. They will be despised, reviled, and accused falsely by men.  That will be the norm for those following Jesus Christ into the kingdom and He wants them to know that right up front.

Jesus isn’t going to take away persecution in the short term.  He offers the future kingdom as a motivation for present rejoicing.  The basis for being exceeding glad now is the reward in heaven for all eternity.  There is a lack of joy in churches and in professing Christian families because of something far less than persecution.  The church and family members are not getting their way and they don’t like the discomfort now.  They expect to be treated better and have their rights protected.  When they get hard preaching from scripture they become easily offended.  When they are required to live like a Christian, they are put off and threaten to quit, if not just to find another church where they’ll be treated like they want.

Professing Christians aren’t looking for a church where they will suffer.  They are looking for a place of creature comforts with lots of friends.  This is not what Jesus told true believers to expect.  He told them just the opposite and He included it in His gospel presentation.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives