Home » Posts tagged 'textus receptus'
Tag Archives: textus receptus
The Prevarication of Mark Ward with Wes Huff on the Textus Receptus (part three)
Part One Part Two In the last part of an interview with Mark Ward, Wes Huff asked about Textus Receptus versus Critical Text. Ward went off on a four minute rant that I dissect so far in two parts, where I include a transcript of what He said. I’m going to provide only the […]
The Prevarication of Mark Ward with Wes Huff on the Textus Receptus (part two)
Part One Wes Huff interviewed Mark Ward on his podcast, taking on the subject: “Issues with English Bible Translation.” I’m not going to deal with any aspect of the video except for the subject of the underlying text of the English Bible. Huff brought up the issue and asked Mark Ward a question about it. […]
The Prevarication of Mark Ward with Wes Huff on the Textus Receptus
Mark Ward appeared with Wes Huff on his podcast and deceived the audience about whom he labels, “Textus Receptus Only.” Wes Huff was an accomplice and cooperated with the deception. Neither steelman their opposition. Ward never does. They prevaricate and fool their audience. Never once do they refer to the biblical and historical doctrine of […]
Answering the “Cultish” Wes Huff Podcast on King James Only (Part One)
Cultish from Apologia Studios Shortly after Wes Huff appeared on Joe Rogan, he came on a podcast, which affiliates with Apologia Studios, called “Cultish.” The men who do this show are also trying to become viewer or listener funded. In other words, they think they should go full time doing what they do. Their show […]
From the Work of Beza in 1598 to Modern Skepticism and the Greek New Testament
F. H. A. Scrivener showed 190 differences between his printed text, representing the underlying text of the King James Version, and that of Theodore Beza‘s printed edition in 1598. This was eighty-two years after the first printed edition of the Textus Receptus (TR) in 1516 and thirteen years before the publication of the King James […]
What Is the “False Doctrine” of Only One Text of the Bible? (Part Five)
Part One Part Two Part Three Part Four So, no apology is necessary for saying there’s one Bible. Why? There’s one Bible. Is that Bible the King James Version? It is the underlying text. I recently heard someone say, the underlying text for the King James Version text didn’t happen until 1881. […]
The Textual Pope Theory of Mark Ward
Hypothetical Manuscript Finds In his last video, Mark Ward again clarifies his viewpoint of a doctrine of preservation of scripture. He makes up this position out of sheer cloth. As a case study, he imagines an ancient New Testament manuscript discovered at Pompeii that helps swing textual critics’ opinion toward one word in one verse […]
Answering Mark Ward’s Last Attack on Preservation of Scripture (part two)
Part One Modern Textual Criticism In a recent video, Mark Ward again attacked the biblical and historical position on the preservation of scripture. He’ll surely have or find people who will support him. They use modern versions and many of them don’t understand the issue. He helps them stay in the dark on this. Ward […]
Recent Comments