Probing Christian Nationalism

The mainstream media now uses the words “Christian nationalism” as a political cudgel against Republicans.  Rob Reiner, the former “meathead” of Archie Bunker fame produced a documentary against his caricature of “Christian nationalism.”  The left labels new Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, a “Christian Nationalist.”  This last week, Politico writer, Heidi Przybyla, made news herself with this statement on television, attacking Christian Nationalism:

The thing that unites them as Christian nationalists, not Christians because Christian nationalists are very different, is that they believe that our rights as Americans and as all human beings do not come from any Earthly authority. They don’t come from Congress, from the Supreme Court, they come from God.  . . . The problem with that is that they are determining, men, are determining what God is telling them.

Apparently this is news on the left, that people believe that rights come from God.  This was, of course, found in the Declaration of Independence (1776) by the apparently Christian Nationalist, Thomas Jefferson:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Not long ago in 2018, professing conservative commentator, Jonah Goldberg, wrote something akin to Przybyla in National Review:

Let’s begin with some somewhat unusual assertions for these pages.

Capitalism is unnatural. Democracy is unnatural. Human rights are unnatural. God didn’t give us these things, or anything else. We stumbled into modernity accidentally, not by any divine plan.

Christian Discussion of Christian Nationalism

As much as the left picks Christian Nationalism as a talking point, Christians are discussing it.  Here are important books in the debate:

The Case for Christian Nationalism, by Stephen Wolfe

Christian Nationalism: A Biblical Guide For Taking Dominion And Discipling Nations, by Andrew Torba and Andrew Isker

Mere Christendom: The Case for Bringing Christianity Back into Modern Culture – Leading by Faith to Convert Secularism, by Douglas Wilson

Citizens & Exiles: Christian Faithfulness in God’s Two Kingdoms, by Scott Aniol

Also several have written many articles on Christian Nationalism, both pro and con.  I understand the rise of the terminology.  I’ve written posts here with a consideration of Christian Nationalism, but the very idea of consideration drew fierce opposition for even broaching the subject.  Never have I said I agreed with Christian Nationalism.  However, I have questions that did not and do not relate to the popularization of the concept of Christian Nationalism.

Basis For Considering Christian Nationalism

My questions and then thoughts, perhaps answers, arise from the following.

One

One, the first amendment of the Bill of Rights and to the United States Constitution guarantees religious freedom.  The first sentence of the Bill of Rights starts with this:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

Analysis sees two clauses: (1)  no establishment of state religion, and (2) free exercise of religion.  I contend there is already the establishment of a state religion and that free exercise is at least abridged.  The latter proceeds from the former.  I like saying, “If there is a state religion, then it matters which one.”  There is a state religion and it is against God, not even for God.  Everyone does already subjugate to the anti-God state religion.

Two

Two, if the United States functions according to God-given rights, then it should not ignore the one and true God.  All truth comes from God and it is a lie when the state will not acknowledge this.  Going back to number one, it is a religion that rejects this, not neutrality.

The vacuum from great desire not to establish state religion acquiesces to false state religion.  God is truth.  The Bible is truth.  The one God and His Word, the Bible, are not some tier of religion, which is separate from reality.  This is our Father’s world.  A nation cannot and will not function according to truth and laws without the acknowledgment of the true God.

Three

Three, God wants application of His Word to everything.  The Bible is sufficient.  God wants application of scripture to employment, to culture, to art, to government, yes, to everything and everywhere.  To occur, this must be open, welcome, and purposeful.  It should not be a process incessantly hidden or camouflaged, so as not to reveal its occurrence.  Let God be God.

Four

Four, free exercise requires openness in conversation about everything in God’s Word.  It requires quoting scripture like scripture is in fact authority.  This means saying, we’re going to do this because God wants us to.  God founded government.  It isn’t matter and motion.  Truly discussing rights, since they do come from God, requires including God in the discussion.

Opening the Can of Worms

I believe I can give more than the above four, but that’s enough to percolate thinking and expressing on this matter.  The closing of the Constitution of the United States does not mean the end of discussion on the Constitution.  It is not inspired.  It is not God’s Word.  Did it fail in the first amendment and really throughout the Constitution because of that failure?

Before the completion of the United State Constitution, Hamilton and Madison spent hundreds of pages discussing these ideas.  Did that yield a perfect masterpiece?  Is any kind of correction over?  Questioning it is not akin to challenging the Word of God.  I believe it is just the opposite.  The Bible requires someone to prove it and even go back to the drawing board.

More to Come