People in general don’t want to be told what to do.  This arises from the sin nature of mankind, a cursed rebellion passed down from Adam.  So people won’t have to do what an authority tells them, they disparage the credibility of it.  They especially attack God in diverse manners so He won’t hinder or impede what they want.

Premodernism, Modernism, Postmodernism, Critical Theory, and Epistemology

The premoderns, even if some did not view themselves or the world correctly, related everything to God.  Truth was objective.  They knew truth either by natural or special revelation of God.  If God said it, it was true, no matter what their opinion.  Many invented various means to deal with their own contradictions, but God remained God.

Modernism then arose and said revelation wasn’t suitable for knowledge.   Modernists could point to distinctions between religions and denominations and the wars fought over them.  Knowledge instead came through scientific testing, man’s observations, consequently elevating man above God.   Man could now do what he wanted because he changed the standard for knowledge.  Faith for sure wasn’t good enough.   With modernism, faith might make you feel good, but you proved something in naturalistic fashion to say you know it.   Modernism then trampled the twentieth century, producing devastation, unsuccessful with its so-called knowledge.

Premoderns had an objective basis for knowledge, revelation from God.  Moderns too, even if it wasn’t valid, had human reasoning, what they called “empirical proof.”  Postmoderns neither believed or liked scripture or empiricism.  This related to authority, whether God or government or parents, or whatever.  No one should be able to tell somebody else what to do, which is to conform them to your truth or your reality.  No one has proof.  Institutions use language to construct power.

Postmodernism judged modernism a failure, pointing to wars, the American Indians and institutional bias, bigotry, and injustice.  Since modernism constructed itself by power and language, a postmodernist possesses his own knowledge of good and evil, his own truth, by which to construct his own reality.  No one will any more control him with power and language.

Critical theory proceeds from postmodernism, but is ironically constructed to sound like modernism. It’s not a theory.  Theory is by definition supposed to be rational and associated with observations backed by data.  Critical theory criticizes, but it isn’t a theory, rather a desire.  People desire to do what they want and don’t want someone telling them what to do, so they deconstruct the language to serve their desires and change the outcome.  In the United States especially, theorists criticize white males, those who constructed language and power for their own advantage.  According to their theories, white men kept down women, all the other races, and sexual preferences.

The postmodernism behind critical theory procures its knowledge with total subjectivity.  Those proficient in theory based on their own divination know what’s good and evil, making them woke to this secret knowledge.  They have eaten of the tree.  White men are evil.  The patriarchy is evil.  Anyone contesting gender fluidity and trangenderism is evil.

Epistemology is a field of study that explores and judges how we know what we know and whether we really know it, that it is in fact knowledge.  What is a sufficient source of knowledge?  You can say you know, but do you really know?  The Bible uses the term “know” and “knowledge” a lot.  Biblical knowledge is certain, because God reveals it.  You receive knowledge when you learn what God says.  You can’t say the same thing about what you experience or feel.

The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil

In Genesis 2 (vv. 9, 17), what was the tree of the knowledge of good and evil?  In the same context, Genesis 3:5-7 say:

 5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods,, knowing good and evil. 6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. 7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

If Adam and Eve depended on what God knew, they would not have eaten of the forbidden tree.  Instead they trusted their own knowledge.  The tree wasn’t the tree of the knowledge of good.  God provided that knowledge.  Just listen to Him.  Eating of the tree brought the knowledge of evil.  The knowledge of evil, what someone might call, carnal knowledge, reminds me of three verses in the New Testament.

1 Corinthians 5:1, It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father’s wife.

Ephesians 5:3, But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints.

Romans 16:19, For your obedience is come abroad unto all men. I am glad therefore on your behalf: but yet I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil.