Home » Posts tagged 'Westminster Confession of Faith'

Tag Archives: Westminster Confession of Faith

Recent Posts

INDEX FOR WHAT IS TRUTH

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Five)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three     Part Four The views on the preservation of scripture in 1.8 of the Westminster Confession of Faith didn’t start there.  They represented the historic doctrine of preservation.  It didn’t stop there either.  Chapter one of the Second London Baptist Confession of Faith on the “Holy Scriptures” […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Four)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three Westminster Confession of Faith 1.8 in the section on the Holy Scriptures reads: The Old Testament in Hebrew (which was the native language of the people of God of old), and the New Testament in Greek (which, at the time of the writing of it, was most […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Three)

Part One     Part Two Why a Journal Article on This? Why do modern textual criticism and multiple contemporary version advocates want to read a novel message into the writings of members of the Westminster Assembly of the 17th century?  It’s a big enough deal that they include their argument in the Journal for the […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Two)

Part One Cherry Picking Quotes Instead of Showing Direct Evidence Zachary Cole apparently presented his paper, “Providential Preservation of Scripture and Textual Criticism in the Sermons of Westminster Divines” (68.3 (2025): 405–23), in a late 2025 edition of JETS at a recent meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society.  I don’t want to misrepresent him.  His […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly

True doctrine comes from scripture.  It doesn’t come from consensus and so-called science.  The first question about the correct position on the preservation of the Bible should be, “What does the Bible say about its own preservation?”  Armed with what God’s Word says about itself, one considers all related materials. Through history men made errors […]

Continue Reading →

New List of Reasons for Maximum Certainty for the New Testament Text (Part 3)

ANSWERING AGAIN THE “WHAT TR?” QUESTION Part One     Part Two 1.  God Inspired Specific, Exact Words, and All of Them. 2.  After God Inspired, Inscripturated, or Gave His Words, All of Them, to His People through His Institutions, He Kept Preserving Each of Them and All of Them According to His Promises of Preservation. […]

Continue Reading →

THE MOOD IS NOT THE PROBLEM IN MOSCOW, IDAHO (part three)

PART ONE     PART TWO Tucker Interview After already publishing parts one and two in this series, Tucker Carlson teased an interview with Douglas Wilson.  This is a boon for he and his brand.  Immediately Wilson wrote a post to welcome the Tucker audience with links to his numerous ventures.  This gives even greater importance […]

Continue Reading →

THE MOOD IS NOT THE PROBLEM IN MOSCOW, IDAHO (part two)

PART ONE Over a decade ago I read a book by Douglas Wilson, that described a philosophy for his writing, represented in the title:  A Serrated Edge.  His and the Moscow, Idaho mood is portrayed by a serrated edge and the use of satire.  Let me again announce that I accept Wilsonian written serration.  It’s […]

Continue Reading →

What About the Accusation of So-Called “Mystical Explanation” or “Omniscience” Against a Perfect Original Language Preservation of Scripture?

A New Attack on Verbal Plenary Preservation of Scripture Ross-White Debate After the Ross-White debate, I saw one particular regular attack on the biblical and historical doctrine of the preservation of scripture.  This is the perfect or verbal plenary preservation of the original language text of the Bible.  Critical text advocates, who deny that doctrine, […]

Continue Reading →

The Conflicting, Perplexing Calvinistic Doctrine of Free Will (Part Three)

Part One     Part Two Part of the confidence and tone of certainty about predetermination and free will seems to come from ambiguity that conflicts and perplexes.  A Calvinist will talk to you with a look of absolute conviction.  It’s as if he’s bluffing.  He knows something you don’t know and you can’t see.  You’re […]

Continue Reading →

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Pages

Recent Comments

Archives

Meta