Home » Posts tagged 'woke'

Tag Archives: woke

Zero Social Gospel in the Parable of the Sheep and the Goats

The True Interpretation of Matthew 25:31-46 Totally Debunks Its Eisegetical Use for a False Social Gospel

Scripture presents one gospel and only one.  A big part of Satan’s plan is confusing the true gospel, adding, taking away, and perverting it.  in the last two hundred years uniquely in American history, cults and false religion concoct many false gospels to deceive many.  Theologians and historians call one of these perversions, “the social gospel.”  Like adding “social” to justice corrupts justice, adding “social” to gospel corrupts the gospel.

Some of you might know that the social gospel took hold in the late 19th and early 20th centuries in the United States, destroying churches, denominations, and other religious institutions.  Like a plague, the disappearance of the host also eliminated the disease.  Now the scourge of the social gospel reenters early 21st century American churches, denominations, and religious institutions.  The most familiar label for this old heresy today is “woke.”  Religious entities that embrace the social gospel have become woke, which usually means they also deny the one and only true saving gospel.

The advocates of the social gospel allegorize scripture.  They spiritualize it to pour in their preferred message.  It’s not what God said.  Out of this very subjective hermeneutic, they buttress their theory with innovative eschatology.  The woke social gospel arises very often from some form of a termed, “liberation theology.”  It is a kind of amillennialism that speculates a kingdom of a Jesus through leftist ideology.

Confusing Matthew 25:31-46

A social gospel uses Matthew 25:31-46 as a biblical proof text, especially focusing on verses 35 to 41:

35 For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in:

36 Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.

37 Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink?

38 When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?

39 Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?

40 And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

41 Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.

Taking this passage according to leftist dogma, Jesus dooms those who do not take care of the “needy” (meant in a very social way), definitely confusing the gospel as salvation by works.  Confused audience members then ask, “What is the gospel?”  Before, they thought it was justification by grace alone through faith alone and yet this seems, taken out of context, to require a degree of good works or action toward the most needy in society.  That message would contradict what the Apostle Paul taught in Romans and Galatians and so confusion to some first introduced to a social gospel.

Social Gospel Proponents

Wrong Approach

This section of scripture (Matthew 25:31-46) is called “the parable of the sheep and the goats” in a larger passage in Matthew 24-25, called the Olivet Discourse.  Social gospel proponents don’t usually bother with context for this passage, which undoes what they say it means.  If it does mean what they say it does, it would contradict what Jesus Himself said was the gospel all through the first four books of the New Testament.  The New Covenant would sound almost identical to the Old Covenant.

Just to see how prevalent the social gospel take on Matthew 25:31-46, I asked Artificial Intelligence a true application of this passage, and it answered this:

The Parable of the Sheep and the Goats, found in Matthew 25:31-46, holds significant implications for believers in understanding how their faith should manifest in their actions towards others. The core message of this parable is that true followers of Christ will demonstrate their faith through acts of kindness, compassion, and service to those in need. The parable emphasizes the importance of living out one’s faith by caring for the marginalized, vulnerable, and disadvantaged members of society.

Nature of a Counterfeit

AI said nothing about the point of the Olivet Discourse, its audience, the disciples’ questions that they asked Jesus, its timing, and the overall point conveyed by Jesus with His teaching.  Is the AI answer true though?  No, it isn’t.

There is a small bit of truth in the answer by Artificial Intelligence, enough to deceive people in what Jesus said. Truth in false statements provide cover or deniability.  It’s especially effective at fooling people already conditioned by an immersion of leftist education.  They become easy marks for such conmen. Some of what Satan said to Eve in the Garden was true, but overall what he said to her was very false.  A counterfeit by nature contains some truth in order to fool its recipients.

What Is Matthew 25:31-46 About?

So what is Matthew 25:31-46 about?  The Olivet Discourse of Jesus (from the Mount of Olives) answers questions His disciples asked at the beginning in Matthew 24:3:  “Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your coming and of the close of the age?”

Six Parables

In answering Jesus’ questions, He tells six parables:

  1. Fig Tree (Matthew 24:32-35, Mark 13:28-31, Luke 21:29-33)
  2. Faithful and Wise Servant (Matthew 24:45-51, Luke 12:42-48)
  3. The Pharisee and the Tax Collector (Luke 18:9-14)
  4. Ten Virgins (Matthew 25:1-13)
  5. The Talent (Matthew 25:14-30, Luke 19:11-27)
  6. The Sheep and the Goats (Matthew 25:31-46)

I’m going to hop straight to the last one, the one especially used by the false teachers of the social gospel.

Introduction

In Matthew 25:31-46, Jesus speaks about the final judgment where He separates the righteous from the wicked, likening it to a shepherd separating sheep from goats.  His words apply specifically to those living at the end of the seven year tribulation period right before His second coming and the close of the age.  He provides this as a continuation of His answer to the disciples’ questions in 24:3.  The parable depicts the judgment that will occur at the end times when Christ returns.

Verses 31-34

31

This parable of Jesus starts with His words in verse 31:  “When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory.”  This talks about a specific time in the future:  the end of the tribulation period on earth when Jesus comes back and He sits on His throne in Jerusalem.  It speaks of a particular judgment of a particular people, not everyone who ever lived.  “The Son of man” is a title of Jesus, of the Messiah, from Daniel 7:13:

I saw in the night visions, and, behold,, one like the Son of man came with the clouds of heaven, and came to the Ancient of days, and they brought him near before him.

This is Messianic about the coming of the Messiah, and the people in that day would have known that.

32

The next verse (32) says:  “And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats.”  With this judgment of the Lord Jesus Christ, He will gather all the people of the surviving nations before Him for this judgment.  Bible teachers call this judgment, “the judgment of nations.”  It isn’t the Bema Seat judgment or the Great White Throne judgment, which come at different times.  The separation of the sheep from the goats is “the judgment of nations.”

33-34

Jesus identifies the sheep in verses 33-34:

And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left. Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.

Salvation is the blessing of God’s new covenant upon His people.  It reminds of what Paul wrote about David in Romans 4:6:

Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works.

Blessedness comes by faith alone, not at all by works.  Galatians asserts that blessing comes through God’s promise, not by deeds.  The Apostle Paul again writes in Galatians 3:9-10:

So then, those who are of faith are blessed along with Abraham, the man of faith.  For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: for it is written, Cursed is every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.

Blessed by Faith

Being blessed, you can see, comes by faith.  If it were by works, it requires continuing in all things which are written in the book of the law to do them.  When Jesus talks about the “blessed” in Matthew 25:34, He speaks of saved people, already justified by faith.  Many Jews will be converted in the tribulation.  We know this.  They can fulfill the Old Covenant by faith in Jesus Christ, because then He works in them both to will and do of His good pleasure (Philippians 2:13).  This isn’t sinless perfection, but the fruit of justification that produces a habit or lifestyle of righteousness.

Further Marker of True Sheep

The last part of Matthew 25:34 gives another cue for the identity of the sheep.  They inherit the kingdom prepared for them from the foundation of the world.  Jesus elected them based upon His foreknowledge before time (Eph 1:4, 1 Pet 1:2).  No one has even done any good works for anyone before the foundation of the world, which shows that the salvation is all of God, that is, by grace.  The sheep also inherit the kingdom, which is for sons.  How does someone become a son?  He becomes a child of God by faith (John 1:12).

If you preach that God saves someone by His works, you are preaching a false gospel.  Paul says that anyone who adds works to grace, ‘let him be accursed’ (Gal 1:6, 9).  That’s a false gospel.  The social gospel is a false gospel.  It doesn’t present a true, biblical view of the kingdom of Jesus Christ, and out of that falsity, it proclaims a false gospel of works.

According to the social gospel, men who fall short of the glory of God bring in a spiritualized kingdom through social efforts.  Those preaching a social gospel leave men dead in their sins and very often twice the children of hell they once were.  This also both adds and takes away from what Jesus said and taught.  It corrupts what men should think about the promises of God and the kingdom still coming for saved people on earth.

More to Come

Are These Really Uniquely Dark Times Today?

A Debate About Whether Times Really Are Dark

A very high percentage of people with whom I speak agree with deep decline of the United States.  I ask many people the question, “Do you think the country is in decline?”  Very few say “no.”  Two different men touched on this subject in recent days, and I want to comment on their conclusions.

First, Kevin Schaal, president of the FBFI, wrote, “Wars and Rumors of Wars,” beginning the post with “we live in dark days.”  Second, Aaron Blumer, owner of fundamentalist website SharperIron, wrote in criticism of Schaal’s introduction with “Do We Live In Dark Times?”  First, Kevin Schaal, second, Aaron Blumer, and now I will write my thoughts addressing the question, “Are these really uniquely dark times?”

Maybe Not Any Darker?

From what I read, the older people in succeeding generations in the past complained about decline from a previous generation to theirs.  The new generation changes.  The former generation interprets this as decline.  Some would say this happens again and again.  Some would say what’s happening right now is just more of the same.  Is this true?  Blumer says it’s not much different and maybe better based on certain data.  At least in his introduction, Schaal says, No, these are uniquely bad times, enough to call them “dark.”

Blumer contends there have always been bad times.  He says this trend goes back to the beginning.  Job, Jesus, Paul, and Peter talk about dark days then and into the future, Blumer writes.  He also bemoans how leaders feed the anxieties already inundating the news media.

Preliminary to Christ’s Return?

I don’t think Kevin Schaal was feeding anxiety.  He was saying recent world events seemed tell-tale as something preliminary to the coming of Jesus Christ.  For a Christian, that doesn’t cause anxiety, but joy or happiness.

Mainly Schaal pointed to wars:  Ukraine, Israel, rumors of possible war in Taiwan, and maybe something bigger in the Middle East with Iran.  These are the dark times to which he referred, pointing to them as a warm-up for the seven year tribulation on earth.  Maybe Blumer totally missed Schaal’s point.  I believe Schaal thinks the catching up of the saints with Christ in the clouds, the rapture, precedes the second coming of Christ by seven years.

Yes, Darker Than Ever

When I talk to people out in the world, I too talk about uniquely dark times.  Based on the way true Christians judge the world, this world is darker than ever.  The United States, the greatest light for the Lord in recent world history, is as spiritually and morally bankrupt as ever.  It is the worst by far based on every way you can judge.

In the 1980s William Bennett published his Index of Leading Cultural Indicators.  Using accurate data, he reported the measurement of the downgrade in every cultural area.  At that time, there was little to no positive presentation of homosexuality in the media.  Now it is rampant and normalized.  It’s worse than that.  Conservative homosexuals now stand as leading spokesman against woke transgenderism.  There is a steep decline in this country and nothing indicating that we’re coming back.

Apatheism and the Start of a Turnaround

I’ve never seen greater ignorance of the gospel in places once considered the Bible belt.  Atheism has grown, but it’s not just that.  It’s what someone rightfully calls “apatheism.”  Apatheism might be worse than atheism.  It’s at least atheism from the neck down but in greater numbers by far than actual atheism.

When I preach and serve, I don’t act like we can’t come out of the present cold or lukewarm spiritual condition today.  I behave like we can see this all turn around.  Do I think it will turn around?  No.  But if it is, it will start with me, then my church, then my community and my county.  I’m not thinking of something as big as a nation changing.  Let’s start with our church and then our neighborhood.

Answers for Both the Rise and the Threat of Suicide

Between 1999 and 2019, suicide rose 35.2% in the United States.  Also according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) WISQARS Leading Causes of Death Reports, in 2019:

  • Suicide was the tenth leading cause of death overall in the U.S., claiming 47,500 lives.
  • Suicide was the second leading cause of death for those age 10 to 34, and fourth for 35 to 44.
  • Suicides (47,511) more than doubled homicides (19,141) in the U.S.

Apparently China has a much higher suicide rate, something like 22 out of 100,000 in China to 16 out of 100,000 in the U.S.  The United States is climbing there.  It was at 9 in 1999.  China hired an evangelical pastor I know to provide a curriculum to prevent suicides.  It didn’t have answers in its own worldview.  China still won’t allow the Bible, but so helpless to stop the suicides in its young people, it permits a presentation that offers principles without the scripture references.

I talked to a believing Delta airline pilot.  He faces great pressure to capitulate to woke philosophy with a threat of cancellation.  Co-workers use the woke system to attempt to entrap the non-woke for firing.  It reminded him of what occurred as an Air Force officer, when the leadership found itself facing multiplying suicides among officers and enlisted.  The top men called bullying the cause and softness the remedy.

People hear more now with the internet, so they know more.  They hear more about suicide and those threatening it.  Statistics though show the percentages rising.  This isn’t just greater information.  It’s real.  What is happening?

First, contentment and joy come from internal spiritual strength.  God gives peace and satisfaction.  Jesus said in John 14:27 and 16:33:

Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid.

These things I have spoken unto you, that in me ye might have peace. In the world ye shall have tribulation: but be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.

On the contrary, Isaiah wrote in 48:22 and 57:21:

There is no peace, saith the LORD, unto the wicked.

There is no peace, saith my God, to the wicked.

Likewise, he wrote in 59:8:

The way of peace they know not; and there is no judgment in their goings: they have made them crooked paths: whosoever goeth therein shall not know peace.

The things of the world and superficial pleasures will not fill inner longing.  Only God will.

No one can put a bandaid over a spiritual problem and expect it to work.  The world offers bandaids.  A standing in God’s grace will ward off suicidal ideations.  John describes this as overcoming the world.  Satan and the world system tend toward death.  God gives abundant life, which safeguards against this bad thinking.

With God as his highest value, a believer soaks in satisfaction.  He does not look for or need the approval of social media.  He finds pleasure in the will of God, not moved by worldly fads and popular notions.

Second, a death culture promulgates suicide.  China is a death culture.  The United States has become one.  A death culture proceeds from at least two related causes.   One, untethered from God it devalues His gift of life.  The righteousness of God protects the right to live.  Abortion manifests the divide from God.  Two, taking life strikes at the image of God.  A society that values God renders to Him the things that are His.  A life is not man’s to take.

Third, the victim mentality justifies suicide.  Eve was not a victim, but Satan got her thinking that way.  This justified what she did.  It brought forth death.  God through Ezekiel denounces this mentality in Israel (Ezekiel 18:1-4, 25-32).  The children said their teeth were set on edge because their fathers ate sour grapes.

A rudiment of wokeness is someone else made me a victim.  Satan perpetuates this lie, because he wants people to kill themselves.  His marks sink down into self-pity under false delusions.  Instead of exposing this lie, other professing victims bolster it, reinforcing their victimhood.  Among others, this lie feeds the popularity of the left in the United States.  The left shrivels and disappears without victim mentality.

Short of suicide, people look for solace in drugs, alcohol, and worldly lust.  Not everyone kills themselves, but they still live in a sad, dark existence, attempting to keep their head above water.  Solomon said this world is vanity and vexation of spirit, so that the answer is not below the sun, but above it.  Find peace in God, His truth and goodness.

I hope for less suicide and the threat of it.  Under the temptation, God provides the way of escape.  The answer is in Him.  Everything else is a placebo for temporal inoculation, but it will not stop the spread of suicide.

The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, Postmodernism, and Critical Theory

People in general don’t want to be told what to do.  This arises from the sin nature of mankind, a cursed rebellion passed down from Adam.  So people won’t have to do what an authority tells them, they disparage the credibility of it.  They especially attack God in diverse manners so He won’t hinder or impede what they want.

Premodernism, Modernism, Postmodernism, Critical Theory, and Epistemology

The premoderns, even if some did not view themselves or the world correctly, related everything to God.  Truth was objective.  They knew truth either by natural or special revelation of God.  If God said it, it was true, no matter what their opinion.  Many invented various means to deal with their own contradictions, but God remained God.

Modernism then arose and said revelation wasn’t suitable for knowledge.   Modernists could point to distinctions between religions and denominations and the wars fought over them.  Knowledge instead came through scientific testing, man’s observations, consequently elevating man above God.   Man could now do what he wanted because he changed the standard for knowledge.  Faith for sure wasn’t good enough.   With modernism, faith might make you feel good, but you proved something in naturalistic fashion to say you know it.   Modernism then trampled the twentieth century, producing devastation, unsuccessful with its so-called knowledge.

Premoderns had an objective basis for knowledge, revelation from God.  Moderns too, even if it wasn’t valid, had human reasoning, what they called “empirical proof.”  Postmoderns neither believed or liked scripture or empiricism.  This related to authority, whether God or government or parents, or whatever.  No one should be able to tell somebody else what to do, which is to conform them to your truth or your reality.  No one has proof.  Institutions use language to construct power.

Postmodernism judged modernism a failure, pointing to wars, the American Indians and institutional bias, bigotry, and injustice.  Since modernism constructed itself by power and language, a postmodernist possesses his own knowledge of good and evil, his own truth, by which to construct his own reality.  No one will any more control him with power and language.

Critical theory proceeds from postmodernism, but is ironically constructed to sound like modernism. It’s not a theory.  Theory is by definition supposed to be rational and associated with observations backed by data.  Critical theory criticizes, but it isn’t a theory, rather a desire.  People desire to do what they want and don’t want someone telling them what to do, so they deconstruct the language to serve their desires and change the outcome.  In the United States especially, theorists criticize white males, those who constructed language and power for their own advantage.  According to their theories, white men kept down women, all the other races, and sexual preferences.

The postmodernism behind critical theory procures its knowledge with total subjectivity.  Those proficient in theory based on their own divination know what’s good and evil, making them woke to this secret knowledge.  They have eaten of the tree.  White men are evil.  The patriarchy is evil.  Anyone contesting gender fluidity and trangenderism is evil.

Epistemology is a field of study that explores and judges how we know what we know and whether we really know it, that it is in fact knowledge.  What is a sufficient source of knowledge?  You can say you know, but do you really know?  The Bible uses the term “know” and “knowledge” a lot.  Biblical knowledge is certain, because God reveals it.  You receive knowledge when you learn what God says.  You can’t say the same thing about what you experience or feel.

The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil

In Genesis 2 (vv. 9, 17), what was the tree of the knowledge of good and evil?  In the same context, Genesis 3:5-7 say:

 5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods,, knowing good and evil. 6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. 7 And the eyes of them both were opened, and they knew that they were naked; and they sewed fig leaves together, and made themselves aprons.

If Adam and Eve depended on what God knew, they would not have eaten of the forbidden tree.  Instead they trusted their own knowledge.  The tree wasn’t the tree of the knowledge of good.  God provided that knowledge.  Just listen to Him.  Eating of the tree brought the knowledge of evil.  The knowledge of evil, what someone might call, carnal knowledge, reminds me of three verses in the New Testament.

1 Corinthians 5:1, It is reported commonly that there is fornication among you, and such fornication as is not so much as named among the Gentiles, that one should have his father’s wife.

Ephesians 5:3, But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints.

Romans 16:19, For your obedience is come abroad unto all men. I am glad therefore on your behalf: but yet I would have you wise unto that which is good, and simple concerning evil.

God discourages the increase of the knowledge of evil.  Do not become curious with evil.   Upon eating, however, Adam and Eve, ceased their simplicity concerning evil (Rom 16:19).  God forewarns the knowledge of evil and we need no other basis for the knowledge of good other than God.  God is good.  All goodness comes from above (James 1:17).
Carnal Knowledge
Critical theory posits a special knowledge, like that of the gnostic.  What the theorist knows now is evil, because he stopped listening to God as a basis for what he does.  He doesn’t want to do what God tells him to do.  He wants to do what he wants and now with an objective basis for his knowledge, his theory.  Like James wrote, temptation occurs when lust draws us away and entices us.  Rather than knowledge or truth, critical theory is lust, like what Adam and Eve had in the garden.
When someone does what he wants, he now has experiential knowledge of that thing, something like carnal knowledge.  He functions according to his own lust, his own feelings.  He’s being true to himself, so true by his own presupposition.  His truth is his truth.  He’s authentic.  He listens to his music.  He eats what he wants, drinks what he wants, watches what he wants.  A man wears a dress because he wants to wear it.  She pierces herself wherever and with whatever she wants and lies with another woman if it’s what she wants, if she’s being true to herself.  This clashes with God, but God is only a construct anyway of a white patriarchy for the purpose of power.
The person who knows evil is a person of the world, doing what he wants, experiencing it all for himself.  Maybe his parents said, no.  They’ve warned, if sinners entice thee, consent thou not.  He is wise unto that which is evil, which is impressive in this world.  He has a worldly vocabulary that conforms to how he wants to talk.  It’s not profanity any more.  That was all just a construct.  It’s authentic speech, art imitating life and life imitating art.  It’s like the pursuit of Solomon without God — altogether vanity and vexation of spirit.
That the knowledge of evil makes one wise is a lie of temptation.  Critical theory standardizes lies and turns them into a curriculum.  Someone can claim an expertise, become a licensed operator of these lies.  Theorists don’t just condone the lies, but institutionalize them.
Eve saw the fruit of the tree.  It was good.  It would make her wise.  This was critical theory.  She was now woke.  No one constructs his own reality. The effects of her eating was reality, was true, and both Adam and Eve dealt with those consequences.  Every man will face that.  In the end, the theories, that aren’t even theories, won’t make any difference before a holy God.  All theorists will stand before God and understand with impeccable clarity the objectivity of truth, not constructed by man, but revealed by God.  Best for everyone that they do not wait until then, but start listening to Him now as their source of knowledge.

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives