Worth Your Salt
When taking the opportunity to portray true Christian identity, Jesus used salt and light in Matthew 5:13-16. Through these two metaphors, He painted a picture of the expected nature of a genuine believer. In so doing, Jesus adhered to His original representation of salvation in the beatitudes (verses 3-12) and invoked the association with the Word of God (verses 17-20).
Salt can and will retard corruption and enhance taste if it retains its fundamental characteristic of saltiness. Salt without saltiness is worthless. Jesus said, “Ye are salt.” Specific people are salt, those who have saltiness. Very often scripture portrays unbelievers as worthless. They aren’t functioning according to the image of God in which He created man. They are like the branches of John 15, bearing no fruit and so thrown into the fire. They are worthless branches.
At the time Jesus spoke, salt was of great value. Roman soldiers were paid in salt, which pay meant they operated in a competent way. They were worth their salt.
The blessed man, one with the ultimate fulfillment of true salvation and receives the kingdom of heaven, is persecuted for righteousness’ sake. The righteousness stands up to and contrasts and conflicts with evil. This is being salt. A true believer’s righteousness will clash with false doctrine and practice. He’s not salt if he doesn’t.
The standard for the genuine believer’s conflict to retard corruption is scripture. The true believer lives according to and propagates the Word of God. Scripture manifests the nature of God. To take on the nature of God, the true believer retards decay by detecting and correcting false doctrine and practice according to the Word of God.
The nature of the world conflicts with the nature of God. This results in persecution. Rather than succumb to the pressure of that persecution, the true believer will continue as salt, retarding the corruption. This doesn’t occur by destroying the law, but by fulfilling it, every jot and tittle (verses 17-18). The genuine believe retains saltiness in the face of persecution. It’s his nature and that won’t change with opposition, a characteristic Jesus front loads in His description of salvation.
The opposition to darkness isn’t selective. It’s every jot and tittle. As Jesus continues, it is teaching not just the “essentials,” but even the least of God’s commandments. The righteousness of true Christianity supercedes the righteousness of the Pharisees. It doesn’t dumb down righteousness to a standard that can be kept by men. This is the salt losing its saltiness and becoming worthless.
Churches today are becoming worthless at retarding the unrighteousness of the world, because they are not standing up for righteousness. They stand up for selective or relative righteousness, not every jot or tittle. They are ashamed of many points of scripture and refuse to be salt where Christianity most clashes with the world. They are not worth their salt.
Romans 5:1 As a Consideration for Taking a Scriptural Position on the Preservation of Scripture
The Apostle Peter in 2 Peter 1 shows that attack on the authority of scripture is a major explanation or reason for apostasy. The authority of scripture proceeds from the supernatural nature of the Bible. It is inspired by God and then preserved by God. When someone attacks scripture, the first wave is that it was only written by men and the second, that it isn’t preserved. Leading away from a doctrine of preservation is evacuating divine and supernatural preservation for something naturalistic.I received an advertisement for the Center of the Study of New Testament Manuscripts, written by Daniel Wallace, and it read like a bit of a cliffhanger, using a manuscript presently residing for view at the National Museum of the Bible in Washington, DC, the oldest known, surviving hand copy of Romans 5:1. He writes:
Among the many ancient treasures held by The Museum of the Bible in Washington, DC, there is a tattered fragment of parchment containing the oldest known text of Romans 5:1. Most modern translations render the verse, “Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” Some scholars believe, however, that the underlined portion should read, “let us have peace,” because many of the best manuscripts do, indeed, bear this text.In biblical Greek, the difference comes down to a single letter within a single word. And the difference of that one letter makes all the difference.The manuscript fragment in Washington, known to scholars as GA 0220, is dated to the 3rd century (between AD 200 and 300.) Unfortunately, the critical letter in question has been obscured by a fold in the parchment and a hole in the very worst place. Nevertheless, traces of the letter appear to remain, and we believe that our high-resolution, multispectral imaging equipment can reveal the truth.
PATAS debate video updated and improved
The PATAS (Philippine ATheism, Agnosticism, and Secularism [Society]) debate video about which I wrote a post recently has been improved–the audio is now substantially better and some other improvements have been introduced. If some of the sound issues kept you from watching or sharing the debate before, perhaps you can do it now. Feel free also to “like” the video on YouTube, post a comment, and share it with others. I would be very happy if people in the Philippines, and elsewhere, find this debate if they are considering atheism or agnosticism.
Click here to watch the improved Ross-Maisonet debate, “Does History Validate the Accuracy of the New Testament Gospels?”
Also, the older and lower quality video has been taken down, so if you linked to or embedded the older version on social media, other websites, etc., please update your links to the newest version.
–TDR
John Evincing Jesus as the Christ
The gospel of John is good going word by word and verse by verse in great detail, doing a three year series. I’ve done that twice, the second time, twice as slow as the first. John is also very good reading it straight through as if it were a gospel tract. This can be a good reason that churches often hand out copies of John and Romans as an evangelistic tool. I don’t know how many people would actually read those two, who’ve been handed them, but if they did, they’re powerful as a testimony to salvation.
I’ve mentioned that I’m reading through the Bible twice this year, and I read through half of John today as part of my first time through. It’s easy math to think that you can read John through in seven days at three chapters a day. Perhaps read it through in two days and see the difference in that too.
I wouldn’t say John isn’t the life of Christ, but it isn’t exactly biographical either. It goes in chronological order, but it reads like an evangelist persuading someone to be saved. That’s what John says he is doing at the end of the book (John 20:30-31):
30 And many other signs truly did Jesus in the presence of his disciples, which are not written in this book: 31 But these are written, that ye might believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God; and that believing ye might have life through his name.
To have eternal life, John says we must believe that Jesus is the Christ. You can be saved by believing in Jesus Christ, but believing in Jesus Christ is believing that Jesus is the Christ. The Christ is the Messiah, that prophesied Savior of the Old Testament, fulfilled in the New Testament, the One Who came the first time to suffer and die and raise from the dead, and the second time as a glorified, conquering Judge and King to transform the earth and rule it. You must believe Jesus, that historic figure, the One Who Already came, is also that second figure, which would mean that your future is wrapped up in Him.
John picks out material in the life of Christ — this is, of course, all under the inspiration of God — that will give evidence and persuade that Jesus is that Person, so that you can and will want to receive Him as the Christ. For those who say that repentance is not in John, believing that Jesus is the Christ is repentance. You have repented if you believe that Jesus is the Christ. I didn’t say intellectually assent that Jesus is the Christ or pray a prayer, but believe that Jesus is the Christ. This isn’t asking someone into your heart or even asking someone to save you in a way that you keep on the same path you were before. No, you know your way is changing if you believe what John writes in his gospel.
This last week I twice ate at an Arab or Middle Eastern restaurant in Detroit. It was authentic. You look around and everyone around is Arab and there is Moslem dress on the ladies. It’s like a foreign country. The first meal was the sample platter. This had quite a few of the standard classics in that genre of cuisine, using the names in the original language. That plate, which fed all five adults at the table, gave you a good idea about the food, whether you liked it and what you liked. John gives the sample platter. If you can’t receive John’s testimony of Jesus as the Christ, you aren’t going to believe that Jesus is the Christ.
John writes with authority. If what he writes is true, and it is, you better do something about Jesus Christ. You can’t be neutral. You can’t just enjoy the story and appreciate what a good man Jesus was. It doesn’t read like that at all. A lot of John are long passages of Jesus teaching in Jerusalem on various occasions. Peppered among these are various miracles of different sorts that confirm His teachings.
Before John ever presents the multitude of testimony, he pronounces how and why with outright statements of the identity of Jesus. He will do and teach these things, because He is the God the Son with the same attributes of God. He preexisted before time and created the world. If you believe John’s opening salvo, everything is downhill from there, much like if someone believes the first verse of the Bible.
Everything of Jesus was coordinated from above with His fulfilling Divine plan and purpose to perfection, including the foreordination of the forerunner, John the Baptist, who also then testified to Jesus. His initial followers recognized He was the Christ in accordance with their knowledge of the Old Testament. Then Jesus’ works evince this reality with the miracle at Cana and His cleansing of the temple. An unbelieving religious leader and teacher was challenged by what He saw personally and Jesus’ preaching to Him in John 3 reads of an extraordinary presentation of His role as Savior. John ends the third chapter by saying this (v. 36):
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him.
Jesus is the Christ.
New Testament scholars and historians acknowledge the validity, truthfulness, and authority of the events of the New Testament. They question the supernaturalness of the New Testament, but that’s what John is all about. Jesus wasn’t just a man. He was a man, but He was also God. His teaching wasn’t only Jewish either, even seen in John 4 with the Samaritan woman. Samaritan salvation was also of Jesus Christ. Using the water of the well as an analogy, Jesus said in verse 13-14:
13 Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again: 14 But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.
“Drinketh” of verse 13 is present tense and “drinketh” of verse 14 is aorist. Continue drinking and drinking this water and you’ll thirst again, but I give a water, that if someone drinks it one time, He will never thirst again in the strongest possible negation of thirst. Jesus is the source of everlasting life for everyone and once someone has it, he can never lose it.
Next chapter in John 5, Jesus heals the impotent man. Jesus can because He is the Christ. He did it on the Sabbath and He explains, verse 17: “My Father worketh hitherto, and I work.” The Father never stops working, even on the Sabbath, because the whole world is upheld by Him. Because His Son, Jesus, is also God, He also must always be working. And then in verses 22-24:
22 For the Father judgeth no man, but hath committed all judgment unto the Son: 23 That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father. He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father which hath sent him. 24 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation; but is passed from death unto life.
All judgment is committed to Jesus. He is the Christ. The Son is to be honored as the Father is honored. Eternal life is dependent upon hearing and believing the word of Jesus.
In John 6, Jesus feeds the 5,000 and He says this afterwards in verse 35, “I am the bread of life: he that cometh to me shall never hunger; and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.”
The whole book keeps going like this. It doesn’t let down. One particular repeated manifestation of Jesus as the Christ are statements like what Jesus said in verse 35, “I am the bread of life.” They’ve been called the “I am” statements. In John 8:58, Jesus says, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am.” “I am” points to God’s introduction to Moses as “I am” in Exodus 3:14:
And God said unto Moses, I AM THAT I AM: and he said, Thus shalt thou say unto the children of Israel, I AM hath sent me unto you.
Every chapter of John evinces Jesus as the Christ from beginning to end.
Power Comes from Somewhere
When you turn on your lights or your appliance and open your refrigerator and see it working, you know that power comes from somewhere. It didn’t just happen. Your heart is beating, the power for that comes from somewhere. You look up and see a burning sun. The power for that sun comes from somewhere. Nuclear, gravitational, and chemical energy all come from someplace. They have their start somewhere.
We all need power. Our body is burning energy, our brains are using it, our heart needs it, and every other creature does too. It’s there. People are but dust. Power holds this dust together in a complex and functioning form.
The Big Bang Theory supposedly explains the origin of matter, but the explosion could not have occurred without energy. Senior writer and editor of Quanta Magazine, Natalie Wolchover, wrote on June 6, 2019:
The Big Bang theory . . . . pioneered 50 years before Hawking’s lecture by the Belgian physicist and Catholic priest Georges Lemaître, who later served as president of the Vatican’s academy of sciences — rewinds the expansion of the universe back to a hot, dense bundle of energy. But where did the initial energy come from?
The Big Bang theory had other problems. Physicists understood that an expanding bundle of energy would grow into a crumpled mess rather than the huge, smooth cosmos that modern astronomers observe.
Men guess, but they don’t have an answer to the origin of energy or power.
The English word “power” is found 272 times in the King James Version. The first time the English word appears, it is koah, and it refers to God’s strength, ability, might, and force. That Hebrew word is used 126 times. The first is used of God in Exodus 15:6, “Thy right hand, O LORD, is become glorious in power: thy right hand, O LORD, hath dashed in pieces the enemy.” Another one is Exodus 32:11, “And Moses besought the LORD his God, and said, LORD, why doth thy wrath wax hot against thy people, which thou hast brought forth out of the land of Egypt with great power, and with a mighty hand?” A lot of the usages of koah are like that one.
Another Hebrew word translated power in 1 Chronicles 29:11 is gebera, the verse reading: “Thine, O LORD, is the greatness, and the power, and the glory, and the victory, and the majesty: for all that is in the heaven and in the earth is thine; thine is the kingdom, O LORD, and thou art exalted as head above all.” That word is used 61 times in the Old Testament with another example, Psalm 21:13, “Be thou exalted, LORD, in thine own strength: so will we sing and praise thy power.”
The New Testament uses mainly two Greek words, which are translated “power” in the King James Version. Matthew 6:13 reads:
And lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil: For thine is the kingdom, and the power, and the glory, for ever. Amen.
“Power” here comes from dunamis. The English “dynamite” comes from dunamis, which BDAG, the foremost Greek New Testament lexicon, says means:
potential for functioning in some way, power, might, strength, force, capability
That Greek word is used 120 times in the New Testament. The very next usage of “power” in the New Testament is in Matthew 9:6:
But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house.
1. a state of control over something, freedom of choice, right2. potential or resource to command, control, or govern, capability, might, power
1 Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers. For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God. 2 Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the power? do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same:
James 4:12, There is one lawgiver, who is able to save and to destroy: who art thou that judgest another?Matthew 10:28, And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
The Fine-Tuning Argument, to be abbreviated by FTA in what follows, claims that the present Universe (including the laws that govern it and the initial conditions from which it has evolved) permits life only because these laws and conditions take a very special form, small changes in which would make life impossible.
Improved Evangelistic Bible Study #3 Is Now Available!
I am happy to report that a version of evangelistic Bible study #3, “What Does God Want From Me?” which covers God’s law and the penalty of sin to awaken or convict a lost sinner, is now available in an improved version. It is now nicely in color with good looking pictures and other features that make it more physically appealing than it was previously. Studies #1 and #2 in this “prettified” format are also available. Studies #4-7 are being worked on and, Lord willing, will become available in the not-to-distant future.
Please note as well that video files of the studies being taught are also being made available–#1-5 are currently live, and the videos for #6-7 are in the list of things to get done. We would appreciate prayer for helpers with the video projects.
You can watch Bible studies #1-5 or download the “prettified” studies #1-3, as well as the older versions of #4-7, at the page here:
Foundational Bible Studies
as well as viewing them on YouTube here. Feel free to “like” them, post a comment on the YouTube channel, or share them on social media (if you are on social media, I am not on it) as these things help other people find and watch the studies.
If you wish to personalize these resources by adding your church address to them, you can also do that by accessing MS Word files of the evangelistic Bible studies at the All Content page here.
–TDR
My Conversations with Numerous Exvangelicals
Memorial Day and Memorials, Their Scriptural Importance
By dictionary definition, a memorial is something established to remind people of a person or event. The last Monday of May is Memorial Day in the United States, a federal holiday for honoring and mourning those who have died in the performance of their military duties while serving in the United States Armed Forces. The dedication of a certain day as a memorial began with spontaneous memorials in the middle of the 19th century at the tombstones of American soldiers, who fell in battle. Women decorated these stones as a way to honor these who had died. Then it turned into an annual day to decorate these tombstones.A unique day to remind people of the sacrifice of American soldiers started out as “Decoration Day.” By 1890, every northern state celebrated this as a holiday. Not until 1971, however, did Congress designate the day in May as a national holiday, and called it “Memorial Day.”I like visiting memorials. The best ones in the United States are in Washington DC, including the fairly recent and gigantic World War 2 Memorial. Everyone knows about the Jefferson and Lincoln Memorials. The Alamo is a memorial. A memorial stands in Hawaii for the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor. Memorials dot Civil War and Revolutionary War battlefields, and now a big one sits in New York City for those who died on 9/11/2001.The most moving memorial for me was the American Cemetery near Omaha Beach in Normandy, France. I wept again and again. The cemetery staff there did a great job telling the story. I felt thankful to be an American and for the men buried there.The idea of memorial comes from God though. We should use symbols, days, statues, and now what are actually called “memorials” to remember what is very important, not to be forgotten, and use them to motivate us. The Lord’s Table is a memorial. The bread and the cup remind a church of the body and blood of Christ, His substitutionary and sacrificial death on the cross.The word “memorial” is found 32 times in the King James Version. It’s mainly translating a Hebrew word in the Old Testament, tsekaron, found 24 times and means “remembrance.” A Greek word, mnemosunon, meaning, “memory” and translated “memorial,” occurs three times in the New Testament. God exalts the practice of making a special day, display, or monument in honor of something for the purpose of remembering. God wants remembrance.In Exodus 12:14, the memorial is a day. In Exodus 17:14, it’s a book. In Exodus 28:12, they are the stones on the garment of the priest. In several Old Testament references, it is the actual offering in the sacrificial system, for instance, the flour cast on the altar by the priest in the sin offering is a “memorial.” Stones were set out in Joshua 4:7 as a memorial of God’s dividing the River Jordan for the dry land crossing into Canaan. The feast of Purim starts as a memorial to remember the salvation of Israel in Esther 9:28.Remembering is helpful. It’s required. I’m not saying we should try to remember wrong things or discouraging things. We can remember what God has done, our parents have done, and what other godly people have done to give us strength and motivation. Remembering the right things renews the mind in a transformational way. It can lead to a life of praise and thanks. This Memorial Day, let’s all remember.
PATAS, Philippine Atheism, Agnosticism, and Secularism (Society) Debate live: Does History Validate the Accuracy of the New Testament Gospels? Ross / Maisonet
I am pleased to inform What is Truth? readers that the Thomas Ross – Benjamin Maisonet debate, “Does History Validate the Accuracy of the New Testament Gospels?” is now live and can be watched on YouTube.
Click here to watch the Ross-Maisonet debate, “Does History Validate the Accuracy of the New Testament Gospels?”
The debate took place in Manila, Philippines, in 2019, where I was teaching a class on the preservation of Scripture and preaching for Bro Billy Hardecker of Mt. Zion Baptist Mission in Manila, but issues with the audio and video lining up kept the debate from going live until now. The quality is still not absolutely amazing, but considering the non-first-world setting and the equipment used, I am thankful for the quality that is present. Mr. Maisonet was (and I assume still is) the president of the Philippine Atheism, Agnosticism, and Secularism (Society), or PATAS. He told me that he replaced the previous president because that person had been stealing money from the organization. Atheism and agnosticism are much less common in the Philippines than they are in the United States, which may be one reason that the president of PATAS was born in the United States and moved to the Philippines. In any case, Mr. Maisonet, as the president of PATAS, was a good representative of atheism in the Philippines. He made the sort of popular-level arguments that one will run across in personal evangelism, rather than the more scholarly type of arguments against the accuracy of the New Testament made by Islamic apologists such as Shabir Ally. I confess that I did not find his argumentation particularly convincing, but he seems to have thought he made a good case, and I will allow those who watch the debate to evaluate what was said based on facts and logic in God’s world.
The PATAS debate was set up at short notice, so I employed a lot of the material from my debate with Dr. Ally on “The New Testament Picture of Jesus: Is It Accurate?” which is also in my study on evidence for the New Testament from archaeology, prophecy, and history. In my view, which is admittedly biased in favor of God and His Word, the arguments made for the historicity of the New Testament have now stood up well against both Muslim and atheist apologists.
Feel free to subscribe to my KJB1611 YouTube channel,”like” and comment on the debate, and share it with others, if you believe it deserves it. Also, if you would be interested in sponsoring a debate with a non-Christian philosophy or a pseudo-Christian cult, please contact my church.
–TDR
If “Drinking Any Amount of Alcohol Causes Damage to the Brain,” Is It Permissible for True Believers to Drink Alcohol?
It doesn’t make sense for anyone to drink something that causes damage to the brain. A new study says that drinking any amount of alcohol, even one drink, causes damage to the brain. Both CNN and Fox News reported this. It was an Oxford University study using 25,378 participants. Knowing what alcohol is and how it affects the body, this news doesn’t surprise me. It deprives brain cells of oxygen and they die. This is something people already knew, but it is has been released now as a scientific study.
I already believe the Bible, especially in Proverbs 23, teaches against alcohol consumption or what has been called the teetotalling position, the prohibition of alcohol. I wrote a five part series on it (first, second, third, fourth, and fifth). I show that prohibition of alcohol is a historic and biblical position. This recent study adds another layer, because the Bible would argue that it is wrong to destroy your body and especially your brain or your mind. Indeed, “the mind is a terrible thing to waste.” It would seem that you could not love God with your mind by damaging your mind. Those two thoughts are in contradiction to one another.
An online Christian forum linked to this above article and I was interested in how pro-alcohol professing Christians would deal with it. It seems insurmountable. Proverbs 23 says alcohol is destructive so that someone would be better never even to look at it. This is God’s will. So what were the arguments against the article?
One, the study wasn’t “peer reviewed” yet. The study had been done and yielded it’s results, but apparently peers had not yet offered their review before the study showed up in public. There is a dedication to alcohol among some professing Christians that becomes desperation when they might be required to stop drinking. What hypothetical scientific peers might say is that there is a safe or acceptable level of brain tissue loss. Imagine that conversation.
“This s going to destroy some of your brain tissue if you drink it.” “How much will I lose with one drink? Two?” “Oh, only that amount? Well, that’s a safe and acceptable loss of brains that I will never get back again, so give me that drink.”
So, more study needs to be done to find out what acceptable brain tissue loss is. I know that when we cut our fingernails, they grow back. When we destroy brain cells, do we get those back? In the end, it is the pleasurable feeling of destroying brain cells with alcohol versus the loss of that pleasure. What should a Christian do? I think we all know that a Christian disobeys God by destroying brain cells or brain tissue. The body is the temple of the Holy Spirit and destroying brain tissue with alcohol moves to an unacceptable level of harm to the temple of the Holy Spirit (cf. 1 Corinthians 6:19-20).
The other argument was a related argument to the first one, that is, drinking is a calculated risk like “climbing a mountain, exploring a cave, snow or water skiing, scuba diving, buying bitcoin, investing in a stock, driving a motorcycle, seeing how fast your car can go (100 mph plus), ice skating, or driving on a frozen lake.” He included drinking alcohol as parallel to everything else in that list.
Scripture teaches that believers should not tempt God by taking risks, the example of Satan in Matthew 4, tempting Jesus to jump off the pinnacle of the temple. This is not of faith. It’s true that anyone could die doing almost anything, that breathing causes cancer and someone crossing the road could get hit by a car. Alcohol does damage brain tissue. That’s not a calculation according to this study. It’s 100 out of 100. You are destroying your brain. None of the examples of activities in the previous paragraph guarantee destruction. There is an argument for calculating risk, I agree, taking the safer route if possible, but alcohol isn’t safe, so this argument doesn’t work.
There is more to an argument against alcohol. When you drink it, you’re hurting yourself, you’re also disobeying God, and you’re causing others to stumble. None of those are permissible in scripture.
Recent Comments