Part One     Part Two

Religious or Spiritual Ecstasy, Soft Continuationism

Again and again through the years, I wrote on religious ecstasy, a perversion of true spirituality experienced in Corinth (1 Corinthians 12:1-3) [see here, here, here, here, here, and here].  In 1 Corinthians 1, when Paul said that the Jews seek after signs (1 Cor 1:22), they were seeking for some experiential means of authenticating their spirituality.  God settled the faith once and for all (Jude 1:3) with the completion of scripture.  God chooses to use the oracles of God and that glorifies Him (1 Peter 4:11).

With true signs not available, except for something demonically manufactured to impersonate them, men use cheap, superficial counterfeits.  Usually these are a form of what some termed, “soft continuationism.”  What Paul confronted in Corinth was ecstatic experience.  Ecstasy means:  “an emotional or religious frenzy or trance-like state, originally one involving an experience of mystic self-transcendence”  More than any other way, to give this mystical feeling that the Holy Spirit is working, what is religious ecstasy, comes through music.

Asbury “Revival”

A Description

Someone seeking to justify the recent Asbury, Kentucky experience as revival, challenged what I wrote in part one in the comment section, to which I wrote on March 2:

I watched the earliest posted meeting at Asbury and zoomed through a very long period of Charismatic style emotionalism, repetitious, rock rhythmed, sentimental, superficial, doctrinally ambiguous, led by women, ecstatic music before getting to the “sermon,” which was nothing like Edwards or Whitefield. Maybe the aesthetic and spirit of the so-called worship means nothing to you, but it clashed with the biblical nature of God. It more reminded me of a Corinthian style revival.

If Charles Finney were alive, he would likely be proud of it. Everyone appeared in the egalitarian, postmodern casual, sloppy, and disordered dress (ripped blue jeans, etc.), giving no indication of anyone in authority. The man I heard used a few verses from a modern version, but at best you would be unsure what salvation was. It sounded more like Jesus as therapist. His list of sins that you put into your makeshift cup to give to Jesus included racism and terrorism. No one would even know who Jesus was, why or what it meant to believe in Him.

In Contrast

I continued.

I heard no biblical exposition. This is an updated kind of revival for today’s generation, like one of those Bibles with a hippie cover, to show how relevant the Bible could become. All of what I saw and heard conformed to the spirit of the age, would not dare distinguish itself, probably could not do that and be acceptable to that crowd.

It seemed that people in the audience were stirred to a certain degree. They were affected. I saw some emotion. Is that indications of the Holy Spirit? I have seen the same spirit, aroused by music in Charismatic settings, giving the impression that something spiritual is going on, but it choreographed by the feelings led by the music.

Similar Comments at the Shepherd’s Conference on March 8-10

After I wrote that on March 2, in the Q and A at his Shepherd’s Conference (the conference was March 8-10), someone asked John MacArthur about the Asbury so-called “revival.”  The host referenced Jonathan Edwards and his historic and biblical teaching on the marks of revival.  If it is revival, Edwards would say it must bear certain marks, or else it is fraudulent, a kind of impersonation like I said above.  He said one assesses a true work of God based upon the Word of God and not emotion or feelings.

John MacArthur and Scott Aniol

MacArthur commented then on the Asbury Revival:

For most of those kids, it was not about Christ, but about the chords.  It was about singing the same words for twenty minutes in a row in some kind of mesmerizing pseudo-spiritual experience that had no relationship to sound doctrine, to the depth of the gospel.  I would like to know if that same revival would have occurred without the music.  Shut the music down and find out what God is really doing.

I’m glad to hear MacArthur say essentially the same thing I said.  Scott Aniol also picked up on this with an excellent article, you all should read, written on March 13, entitled, “Christ or Chords? The Manipulated Emotionalism of Hillsong, Asbury, and Pentecostalized Evangelical Worship.”  He picked up on the comment by MacArthur, “not about Christ, but about the chords.”  This is such an important theme for today.

Strange Fire?

MacArthur in the past gave a pass to contemporary style worship, using it in his own conference again and again.  If anyone, like myself, criticized it, the MacArthur allies came out of the woodwork to attack me vehemently.  In his now renowned Strange Fire Conference, MacArthur said the following, actually in contradiction of much of his own historic practice:

The contemporary evangelical church has very little interest in theology and doctrine, so you’re going to have a tough sell. It’s about style. And style is the Trojan Horse that lets Charismatics in the church. Because once you let the music in, the movement follows. It all of a sudden becomes common.

We sound like the Charismatics, sing like they do, have the same emotional feelings that they have. It’s a small step from doing the same music to buying into the movement. So the tough thing is you’re going back to a church that is thinking like that. It’s hard to make sound doctrine the issue when style is much more the interest of the leaders of the church.

Later he said:

I don’t think it has to do with what the teachers are saying. I think it’s the music. It’s like getting drunk so you don’t have to think about the issues of life. If you shut down the music, turn on the lights, and have someone get up there and try to sell that with just words, it’s not going to work. You’ve got to have some way to manipulate their minds.

Consistency and Discernment

The people MacArthur used in the Shepherd’s Conference in the past use a Charismatic style of worship, led by women very often, and giving the same kind of trance-like ecstatic experience.  I believe he’s changing on this, and Scott Aniol latches on to that in his article.

Independent and even unaffiliated Baptists regularly produce their ecstasy in a kind of soft continuationism.  It is a huge lack of discernment and it is very often ignored completely as a matter of fellowship.  In other words, they encourage false worship through these forms of strange fire.  Let this be a serious warning to us all and for the glory of God.