Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Eight)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three     Part Four     Part Five     Part Six     Part Seven Textual variants were not the reason for the change in doctrine on the preservation of scripture.  Those began to exist after men started making hand copies of the Greek New Testament from the originals.  Everyone […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Seven)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three     Part Four     Part Five     Part Six The quotations for this series rate as worth two or three times the gargantuan amount already provided, because they represent what biblical theologians, pastors, and churches thought and believed.  Even if men are going to claim those confessions […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Six)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three     Part Four     Part Five In 1743, Benjamin Franklin — yes, that Benjamin Franklin, a printer — printed the first edition of the Philadelphia Baptist Confession (PBC) of Faith.  It essentially embraced still the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession, except adding two articles to that London […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Five)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three     Part Four The views on the preservation of scripture in 1.8 of the Westminster Confession of Faith didn’t start there.  They represented the historic doctrine of preservation.  It didn’t stop there either.  Chapter one of the Second London Baptist Confession of Faith on the “Holy Scriptures” […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Four)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three Westminster Confession of Faith 1.8 in the section on the Holy Scriptures reads: The Old Testament in Hebrew (which was the native language of the people of God of old), and the New Testament in Greek (which, at the time of the writing of it, was most […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Three)

Part One     Part Two Why a Journal Article on This? Why do modern textual criticism and multiple contemporary version advocates want to read a novel message into the writings of members of the Westminster Assembly of the 17th century?  It’s a big enough deal that they include their argument in the Journal for the […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Two)

Part One Cherry Picking Quotes Instead of Showing Direct Evidence Zachary Cole apparently presented his paper, “Providential Preservation of Scripture and Textual Criticism in the Sermons of Westminster Divines” (68.3 (2025): 405–23), in a late 2025 edition of JETS at a recent meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society.  I don’t want to misrepresent him.  His […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly

True doctrine comes from scripture.  It doesn’t come from consensus and so-called science.  The first question about the correct position on the preservation of the Bible should be, “What does the Bible say about its own preservation?”  Armed with what God’s Word says about itself, one considers all related materials. Through history men made errors […]

Continue Reading →

Predominant Criteria for Worship That Distort and Corrupt Worship of God

Just to keep track of what’s going on here, I’ve got several series still ongoing.  I wanted to remind you and perhaps assure you, that Lord-willing I will, definitely want to, finish these.  Monday, I published the fourth in a series entitled, The Spectrum on Israel Accepted in the MAGA Movement (parts one, two, three, […]

Continue Reading →

The Spectrum on Israel Accepted in the MAGA Movement (part four)

Part One     Part Two      Part Three Anyone remotely knowledgeable of the MAGA movement understands “America First” as another name for the movement.  Making America first is part of making America great again.  This does also relate to the former foreign policy of the Republican Party, what people call, “neoconservative.”  One side, however, […]

Continue Reading →