Home » Posts tagged 'perfect preservation'

Tag Archives: perfect preservation

Recent Posts

INDEX FOR WHAT IS TRUTH

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Five)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three     Part Four The views on the preservation of scripture in 1.8 of the Westminster Confession of Faith didn’t start there.  They represented the historic doctrine of preservation.  It didn’t stop there either.  Chapter one of the Second London Baptist Confession of Faith on the “Holy Scriptures” […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Four)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three Westminster Confession of Faith 1.8 in the section on the Holy Scriptures reads: The Old Testament in Hebrew (which was the native language of the people of God of old), and the New Testament in Greek (which, at the time of the writing of it, was most […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly (Part Two)

Part One Cherry Picking Quotes Instead of Showing Direct Evidence Zachary Cole apparently presented his paper, “Providential Preservation of Scripture and Textual Criticism in the Sermons of Westminster Divines” (68.3 (2025): 405–23), in a late 2025 edition of JETS at a recent meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society.  I don’t want to misrepresent him.  His […]

Continue Reading →

Textual Variants, Preservation of Scripture, and the Westminster Assembly

True doctrine comes from scripture.  It doesn’t come from consensus and so-called science.  The first question about the correct position on the preservation of the Bible should be, “What does the Bible say about its own preservation?”  Armed with what God’s Word says about itself, one considers all related materials. Through history men made errors […]

Continue Reading →

What Is the “False Doctrine” of Only One Text of the Bible? (Part Five)

Part One     Part Two     Part Three     Part Four So, no apology is necessary for saying there’s one Bible.  Why?  There’s one Bible.  Is that Bible the King James Version?  It is the underlying text.  I recently heard someone say, the underlying text for the King James Version text didn’t happen until 1881.  […]

Continue Reading →

AI Friday: “Did God Perfectly Preserve Every Word of the Bible?”

I asked Artificial Intelligence this question:  “Did God perfectly preserve every word of the Bible?”  It answered with the following. Understanding the Doctrine of Preservation The doctrine of preservation is a crucial aspect of Christian theology, which asserts that God has perfectly preserved every word of the Bible. This doctrine is rooted in the Bible […]

Continue Reading →

New List of Reasons for Maximum Certainty for the New Testament Text

ANSWERING AGAIN THE “WHAT TR?” QUESTION Sixty-Six Books Many evangelicals claim maximum certainty on sixty-six books of the Bible.  “Are you certain there are sixty-six books of the BIble?”  “Yes.”  “What verse in the Bible says to expect sixty-six books?”  “None.”  “So what is your basis for sixty-six books of the Bible?”  Many of their […]

Continue Reading →

The Effect of Leaving Out Just a Couple of Words of Scripture

Proponents of.modern English versions of the Bible very often talk about the minimal or negligible effect of word differences between the received text and the modern critical text of the New Testament.  These men might show a side by side of either of the two texts and their translation to show how few changes appear.  […]

Continue Reading →

The Horrific Distortion of the Lord Now in Matthew 5:17-20

Related Post Number One    Related Post Number Two     Related Post Number Three Perfect Preservation You required payment from me on a certain future date and I had no money except the exact change for the payment in a large jar.  You needed full payment and I had it in the way of coinage.  […]

Continue Reading →

The Shell Game Played With Words About the Bible

You know right now the concern about the gender of pronouns used to address the sexes.  The controversy revolves around calling a biological male, “him,” or a biological female, “her.”  People change the meaning of the words and expect us to play along.  You know it’s a man, but you call him, a her.  You […]

Continue Reading →

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Pages

Recent Comments

Archives

Meta