I wasn’t happy about the very recent Supreme Court ruling that disallowed states to punish child rapists with the death penalty. I don’t see anything in the Constitution that would disallow that. The moderate Reagan appointed Justice Kennedy is the new swing vote on the Court and he said NO to killing child rapists. Too harsh! On the other hand, and the stated topic of this post, I was very appreciative of and thankful for the ruling on the second amendment that again came down to a 5-4 vote and I guess we’ll have to say that Kennedy was the swing vote again. However, on this Justice Scalia writes a brilliant opinion in favor of individual gun rights. For your convenience, I am providing a link to the 157 page decision (Click on link for pdf). You constitutional law and history buffs as well as second amendment supporters, enjoy!
Home » Uncategorized » The Supreme Court Ruling on the Second Amendment
Recent Posts
- A Sincere, Accurate Assessment Contrasting Translational Choices Versus Underlying Original Language Text
- Crucial to a Gospel Presentation: Explain Belief (part two)
- Video Review by Thomas Ross of the Ward-Haifley KJV Intelligibility Debate
- The Important Quality of Loyalty
- Educational Stratification in the United States
INDEX FOR WHAT IS TRUTH
Entire Index (Click for Whole Index)
Topical — Alphabetical
TOPICAL INDEX, A to E
TOPICAL INDEX, F to J
TOPICAL INDEX, K to O
TOPICAL INDEX, P to T
TOPICAL INDEX, U to Z
TopicalĀ — Specific
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: BAPTISTS AND CHURCH
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: BEAUTY, MUSIC, WORLDLINESS, AND WORSHIP
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: CERTAINTY, CULTURE, EPISTEMOLOGY, MEANING, TRUTH, WORLDVIEW
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: CONTINUATIONISM AND CESSATIONISM, HOLY SPIRIT, AND SPIRITUALITY
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: DIVORCE, GENDER OR SEX, MARRIAGE, COMPLEMENTARIANISM
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: DRESS OR APPEARANCE
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: EVANGELICALISM AND FUNDAMENTALISM
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: EVANGELISM AND PREACHING
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: OBTAINING A LIFE’S PARTNER
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: PRAYER
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: PRESERVATION OF SCRIPTURE AND VERSIONS
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: SALVATION
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: SANCTIFICATION
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: SCRIPTURE
INDEX BY SPECIFIC TOPIC: SEPARATION OR UNITY
Scriptural
AUTHORS OF THE BLOG
- Kent Brandenburg
- Thomas Ross
Pages
Recent Comments
- Kent on Crucial to a Gospel Presentation: Explain Belief (part two)
- Priscilla Bednar on Crucial to a Gospel Presentation: Explain Belief (part two)
- Kent on Crucial to a Gospel Presentation: Explain Belief (part two)
- Priscilla Bednar on Crucial to a Gospel Presentation: Explain Belief (part two)
- Kent on Educational Stratification in the United States
Truth is, our Law abiding Citizens wants protection in their homes.
And they are tired of the Law taking advantage of Authority, by one thing leading to another. When they took away our Gun Rights 30 years ago, in DC. They overstepped their Authority, by also taking away our Self Defense Rights. If an intruder comes into your home, and you kill him with your bare hands or a knife, you go right straight to jail, no question about it. And the Judge has no Right to let you go, even if you proved that you were attacked first. Cause there is no Self Defense in DC and it happened right after the Gun Ban took affect, in 1976. You call that Law?
Well I am glad they overturned it. Now that we got our Self Defense back, now we can protect ourselves. And if the Law went the other way, it would’ve did nothing but spread throughout the United States. where they would’ve lost their Rights to Self Defense.Putting everybody at risk, Even Politicians. No way, that is why they overturned it.
Them Upper Class moving into DC aren’t going for this lack of HomeRule. Know what I’m saying?
They want the same Rights they had when they were in Maryland or Virginia, Or other parts of the U.S, Know what I’m saying?
Just apply your strict rules,as far as buying and registering guns. You know what I mean? with steady background checks, etc.
Thats all you have to do
Did you already read the 157 pages?
WOW!
I read the first 50 pages. It’s a quick read if you don’t read the footnotes. I’ll read the rest because Scalia and his gange are interesting writers and I think the constitutional arguments are fascinating too.