Do miracles take place today—yes or no? This blog post will not deal with
the Biblical evidence for the cessation of the sign gifts (click here for more on that topic).
Rather, it will examine the question: “Does Scriptural cessationism
require the cessation of miracles today?” What is the answer to that
question? Is the new birth a miracle? Is sanctification a
miracle? Is an answer to prayer a miracle? Is God’s preserving
Scripture perfectly a miracle? The answer to the question of whether miracles have ceased is “Yes—miracles do not occur today,” and also
“No—miracles do occur today,” depending on the how one defines the word miracle.
“Yes—miracles do not occur today,” because acts of God such as regeneration and
the Holy Spirit’s work in sanctification can properly be designated supernatural, but not
specifically miraculous.
The word miracle in the King James Version specifically
refers to an act whereby God breaks the natural order and has the character of
a sign. The English word miracle in the Authorized Version appears in
the following texts: Exodus 7:9; Numbers 14:22; Deuteronomy 11:3; 29:3;
Judges 6:13; Mark 6:52; 9:39; Luke 23:8; John 2:11, 23; 3:2; 4:54; 6:2, 14, 26;
7:31; 9:16; 10:41; 11:47; 12:18, 37; Acts 2:22; 4:16, 22; 6:8; 8:6, 13; 15:12;
19:11; 1 Corinthians 12:10, 28–29; Galatians 3:5; Hebrews 2:4; Revelation
13:14; 16:14; 19:20. In all of these texts it refers to a sign and a
wonder, not something that is certainly supernatural, such as the new birth,
but is not a sign or wonder.
“Yes, miracles do not occur today” is also supported by the Hebrew and Greek
words rendered miracle,
although other words indicate that, in a different sense, it is legitimate to
call an act such as regeneration a miracle,
not simply something supernatural.
Three words are translated miracle in the Old Testament: mofeth, ‘oth, and pala’. Mofeth appears 36 times (Exodus 4:21; 7:3, 9;
11:9–10; Deuteronomy 4:34; 6:22; 7:19; 13:1-2; 26:8; 28:46; 29:2; 34:11; 1
Kings 13:3, 5; 1 Chronicles 16:12; 2 Chronicles 32:24, 31; Nehemiah 9:10; Psalm
71:7; 78:43; 105:5, 27; 135:9; Isaiah 8:18; 20:3; Jeremiah 32:20–21; Ezekiel
12:6, 11; 24:24, 27; Joel 3:3; Zechariah 3:8). It is predominantly
translated wonder (25x), then sign (8x). It is rendered miracle twice (Exodus 7:9; Deuteronomy
29:3). The word is used of miracles such as the ten plagues the Lord
brought on Egypt (Exodus 7:3; 11:9) or the miraculous rending of the altar at
Bethel (1 Kings 13:3, 5) or the wonders God will perform in the Tribulation
period (Joel 2:30) or God’s miraculously making Hezekiah’s sundial go backward
ten degrees (2 Chronicles 32:24, 31). It is also used of supernatural
wonders done by false prophets (Deuteronomy 13:1-2). The word is also
used of Isaiah, Ezekiel, and others who, by their actions or in other ways,
visibly typed or manifested the supernaturally given prophecies of the prophets
(Isaiah 8:18; 20:3; Ezekiel 12:6, 11; 24:24, 27; Zechariah 3:8). The
miraculous, as mofeth,
functions in character as a sign by its unique character, causing men to
wonder. All these instances—the large majority of uses, which include
both texts where the English word miracle appears—refer to events that
unquestionably pass beyond providence to match the limited definition of miracle consistent with the cessation of
miracles today. Indeed, the Theological
Dictionary of the New Testament affirms
that mofeth is “always connected with a miraculous
occurrence” (Vol. 7, pg. 209, article on semeion).
Deuteronomy 28:46 and Psalm 71:7 constitute the only possible exceptions, where
the word could apparently be used of what are evident signs of God’s working
but which do not necessarily surpass the level of providence. However,
Psalm 71:7 affirms not that the Psalmist “is” a “wonder” or mofeth, tEpwøm, but that he
is “as a wonder,” simply making a comparison. Furthermore, the language
of “sign . . . and . . . wonder” in Deuteronomy 28:46 recalls the judgments
Jehovah put uponEgypt
(Deuteronomy 4:34; 6:22; 7:19; 26:8; 29:3; 34:11), which were clearly
miraculous. While the Deuteronomic curses predicted by Moses in 28:46
certainly include awful providential judgments uponIsrael ,
they will ultimately be fulfilled in the miraculous judgments upon unconvertedIsrael
Tribulation period (which include the descent of the unconverted into hell),
described in the book of Revelation with significant allusion to the Egyptian
plagues in Exodus. Consequently, there are no clear or certain exceptions
to the pattern that mofeth points to a sign, wonder, or “miracle”
in the narrow sense, a sense in which miracles have ceased today.
11:9–10; Deuteronomy 4:34; 6:22; 7:19; 13:1-2; 26:8; 28:46; 29:2; 34:11; 1
Kings 13:3, 5; 1 Chronicles 16:12; 2 Chronicles 32:24, 31; Nehemiah 9:10; Psalm
71:7; 78:43; 105:5, 27; 135:9; Isaiah 8:18; 20:3; Jeremiah 32:20–21; Ezekiel
12:6, 11; 24:24, 27; Joel 3:3; Zechariah 3:8). It is predominantly
translated wonder (25x), then sign (8x). It is rendered miracle twice (Exodus 7:9; Deuteronomy
29:3). The word is used of miracles such as the ten plagues the Lord
brought on Egypt (Exodus 7:3; 11:9) or the miraculous rending of the altar at
Bethel (1 Kings 13:3, 5) or the wonders God will perform in the Tribulation
period (Joel 2:30) or God’s miraculously making Hezekiah’s sundial go backward
ten degrees (2 Chronicles 32:24, 31). It is also used of supernatural
wonders done by false prophets (Deuteronomy 13:1-2). The word is also
used of Isaiah, Ezekiel, and others who, by their actions or in other ways,
visibly typed or manifested the supernaturally given prophecies of the prophets
(Isaiah 8:18; 20:3; Ezekiel 12:6, 11; 24:24, 27; Zechariah 3:8). The
miraculous, as mofeth,
functions in character as a sign by its unique character, causing men to
wonder. All these instances—the large majority of uses, which include
both texts where the English word miracle appears—refer to events that
unquestionably pass beyond providence to match the limited definition of miracle consistent with the cessation of
miracles today. Indeed, the Theological
Dictionary of the New Testament affirms
that mofeth is “always connected with a miraculous
occurrence” (Vol. 7, pg. 209, article on semeion).
Deuteronomy 28:46 and Psalm 71:7 constitute the only possible exceptions, where
the word could apparently be used of what are evident signs of God’s working
but which do not necessarily surpass the level of providence. However,
Psalm 71:7 affirms not that the Psalmist “is” a “wonder” or mofeth, tEpwøm, but that he
is “as a wonder,” simply making a comparison. Furthermore, the language
of “sign . . . and . . . wonder” in Deuteronomy 28:46 recalls the judgments
Jehovah put upon
(Deuteronomy 4:34; 6:22; 7:19; 26:8; 29:3; 34:11), which were clearly
miraculous. While the Deuteronomic curses predicted by Moses in 28:46
certainly include awful providential judgments upon
they will ultimately be fulfilled in the miraculous judgments upon unconverted
Tribulation period (which include the descent of the unconverted into hell),
described in the book of Revelation with significant allusion to the Egyptian
plagues in Exodus. Consequently, there are no clear or certain exceptions
to the pattern that mofeth points to a sign, wonder, or “miracle”
in the narrow sense, a sense in which miracles have ceased today.
‘oth appears 79 times (Genesis 1:14; 4:15;
9:12–13, 17; 17:11; Exodus 3:12; 4:8–9, 17, 28, 30; 7:3; 8:19; 10:1–2; 12:13;
13:9, 16; 31:13, 17; Numbers 2:2; 14:11, 22; 17:3, 25; Deuteronomy 4:34; 6:8,
22; 7:19; 11:3, 18; 13:2–3; 26:8; 28:46; 29:2; 34:11; Joshua 2:12; 4:6; 24:17;
Judges 6:17; 1 Samuel 2:34; 10:7, 9; 14:10; 2 Kings 19:29; 20:8–9; Isaiah 7:11,
14; 8:18; 19:20; 20:3; 37:30; 38:7, 22; 44:25; 55:13; 66:19; Jeremiah 10:2;
32:20–21; 44:29; Ezekiel 4:3; 14:8; 20:12, 20; Psalm 65:9; 74:4, 9; 78:43;
86:17; 105:27; 135:9; Job 21:29; Nehemiah 9:10). The word is translated sign sixty times, token 14 times, and miracle twice (Numbers 14:22; Deuteronomy
11:3). ‘oth usually describes unquestionable
miracles, such as the plagues in Egypt wrought through Moses (Exodus 7:3;
8:23), or the miracles wrought in the wilderness journey from Egypt to Canaan
(Numbers 14:11, 22), or the miraculous fire brought out of a rock by the Angel
of the LORD (Judges 6:17), or the miracle of making Hezekiah’s sundial go back
ten degrees (2 Kings 20:8-9; Isaiah 38:7), or the virgin birth of the Messiah
(Isaiah 7:14). The word is employed alongside mofeth of the supernatural works or prophecies
of false prophets—their prophecies sometimes come to pass (Deuteronomy 13:1-2)
but sometimes do not (Isaiah 44:25). Like mofeth, ‘oth is employed, although not as
frequently, of people that type or manifest supernaturally given prophecy
(Isaiah 8:18; 20:3), as well as of actions that type or manifest prophecy
(Ezekiel 4:3). However, ‘oth is also employed of what is obviously
less than strictly miraculous, such as the sign of circumcision (Genesis 17:11)
or the celebration of the feast of Unleavened Bread (Exodus 13:9) or the
Sabbath (Exodus 31:17). It is used of the sign or token Rahab requested
from the spies (Joshua 2:12) and of the twelve stones taken from theJordan river and made a monument (Joshua 4:6), as well as
other monuments (Isaiah 19:20). It is used of the providentially guided
answer of the Philistines to Jonathan and his armorbearer (1 Samuel 14:10), of
the “signs of heaven” that the heathen feared in their pagan astrology but at
which the people of God were not to be dismayed (Jeremiah 10:2), and of the
ensigns of war of the ungodly (Psalm 74:4). Thus, while ‘oth is very often a reference to what is
in the strictest sense a miracle,
broader uses are also present, and in that broader use of ‘oth for a “sign,” it still can take place
today.
9:12–13, 17; 17:11; Exodus 3:12; 4:8–9, 17, 28, 30; 7:3; 8:19; 10:1–2; 12:13;
13:9, 16; 31:13, 17; Numbers 2:2; 14:11, 22; 17:3, 25; Deuteronomy 4:34; 6:8,
22; 7:19; 11:3, 18; 13:2–3; 26:8; 28:46; 29:2; 34:11; Joshua 2:12; 4:6; 24:17;
Judges 6:17; 1 Samuel 2:34; 10:7, 9; 14:10; 2 Kings 19:29; 20:8–9; Isaiah 7:11,
14; 8:18; 19:20; 20:3; 37:30; 38:7, 22; 44:25; 55:13; 66:19; Jeremiah 10:2;
32:20–21; 44:29; Ezekiel 4:3; 14:8; 20:12, 20; Psalm 65:9; 74:4, 9; 78:43;
86:17; 105:27; 135:9; Job 21:29; Nehemiah 9:10). The word is translated sign sixty times, token 14 times, and miracle twice (Numbers 14:22; Deuteronomy
11:3). ‘oth usually describes unquestionable
miracles, such as the plagues in Egypt wrought through Moses (Exodus 7:3;
8:23), or the miracles wrought in the wilderness journey from Egypt to Canaan
(Numbers 14:11, 22), or the miraculous fire brought out of a rock by the Angel
of the LORD (Judges 6:17), or the miracle of making Hezekiah’s sundial go back
ten degrees (2 Kings 20:8-9; Isaiah 38:7), or the virgin birth of the Messiah
(Isaiah 7:14). The word is employed alongside mofeth of the supernatural works or prophecies
of false prophets—their prophecies sometimes come to pass (Deuteronomy 13:1-2)
but sometimes do not (Isaiah 44:25). Like mofeth, ‘oth is employed, although not as
frequently, of people that type or manifest supernaturally given prophecy
(Isaiah 8:18; 20:3), as well as of actions that type or manifest prophecy
(Ezekiel 4:3). However, ‘oth is also employed of what is obviously
less than strictly miraculous, such as the sign of circumcision (Genesis 17:11)
or the celebration of the feast of Unleavened Bread (Exodus 13:9) or the
Sabbath (Exodus 31:17). It is used of the sign or token Rahab requested
from the spies (Joshua 2:12) and of the twelve stones taken from the
other monuments (Isaiah 19:20). It is used of the providentially guided
answer of the Philistines to Jonathan and his armorbearer (1 Samuel 14:10), of
the “signs of heaven” that the heathen feared in their pagan astrology but at
which the people of God were not to be dismayed (Jeremiah 10:2), and of the
ensigns of war of the ungodly (Psalm 74:4). Thus, while ‘oth is very often a reference to what is
in the strictest sense a miracle,
broader uses are also present, and in that broader use of ‘oth for a “sign,” it still can take place
today.
When a specific event is designated a “sign and wonder,” employing ‘oth and mofeth together, reference is always made
to the work of Jehovah, and the strictly miraculous is always in view:
Exodus 7:3; Deuteronomy 4:34; 6:22; 7:19; 26:8; 28:46; 29:2; 34:11; Nehemiah
9:10; Psalm 78:43; 105:27; 135:9; Isaiah 8:18; 20:3; Jeremiah 32:20–21.
Note that Deuteronomy 13:1-2 does not fit in this category, because it refers
to a sign “or” wonder. Isaiah 8:18 and 20:3 refer to the confirmation of
miraculously given prophecy.
The verb pala’, which is usually
rendered with a form of wondrous or marvelous, is also frequently
used of the strictly miraculous (thus, the Niphals in Exodus 3:20; 34:20;
Joshua 3:5; Judges 6:13 [the sole text where the word is translated miracle]; Jeremiah 21:2;
etc.)—indeed, the verb is employed when the Lord distinguishes His wondrous and
miraculous power, manifest in the Exodus, as superior to anything performed at
any previous time in any nation before that period, indicating that Divine
miracles of Exodus-like character were not performed constantly nor replicated
by fallen angels. For example, note: “And he said, Behold, I make a
covenant: before all thy people I will do marvels [pala’], such as have
not been done in all the earth, nor in any nation: and all the people among
which thou art shall see the work of the LORD: for it is a terrible thing that I will do with
thee” (Exodus 34:10; in the Tribulation period, miracles will be in a class
comparable to those of the Exodus, Micah 7:15). The Niphal (a particular
Hebrew verb tense) of pala’ is also frequently used for
“wondrous works” that include both the miraculous and non-miraculous acts of
God (cf. Job 5:9; 9:10; Psalm 9:2; 26:7; 71:17; 72:18; 75:1; 78:4, 11, 32; 86:10,
etc.); the fundamental idea of the word is not in the strictest sense miracle, but an act that
produces wonder in those who learn of it. The Niphal is consequently
employed of what is clearly not miraculous but is wonderful (Deuteronomy 17:8;
30:11; 2 Samuel 1:26; 13:2; Job 42:3; Proverbs 30:18; Daniel 11:36; etc.)
The miracle idea is not at all strong outside of the Niphal (Piel, Leviticus
22:21; Numbers 15:3, 8; Hiphil, Leviticus 27:2; Numbers 6:2; Deuteronomy 28:59;
Judges 13:19 (an instance of the miraculous outside of the Niphal); 2
Chronicles 2:9; 26:15; Psalm 17:7; 31:21; Isaiah 28:29; Joel 2:26; Hithpael,
Job 10:16). The complete list of texts with the verb is: Genesis
18:14; Exodus 3:20; 34:10; Leviticus 22:21; 27:2; Numbers 6:2; 15:3, 8;
Deuteronomy 17:8; 28:59; 30:11; Joshua 3:5; Judges 6:13; 13:19; 2 Samuel 1:26;
13:2; 1 Chronicles 16:9, 12, 24; 2 Chronicles 2:9; 26:15; Nehemiah 9:17; Psalm
9:1; 17:7; 26:7; 31:21; 40:5; 71:17; 72:18; 75:1; 78:4, 11, 32; 86:10; 96:3;
98:1; 105:2, 5; 106:7, 22; 107:8, 15, 21, 24, 31; 111:4; 118:23; 119:18, 27;
131:1; 136:4; 139:14; 145:5; Job 5:9; 9:10; 10:16; 37:5, 14; 42:3; Proverbs
30:18; Isaiah 28:29; Jeremiah 21:2; 32:17, 27; Daniel 8:24; 11:36; Joel 2:26;
Micah 7:15; Zechariah 8:6.
rendered with a form of wondrous or marvelous, is also frequently
used of the strictly miraculous (thus, the Niphals in Exodus 3:20; 34:20;
Joshua 3:5; Judges 6:13 [the sole text where the word is translated miracle]; Jeremiah 21:2;
etc.)—indeed, the verb is employed when the Lord distinguishes His wondrous and
miraculous power, manifest in the Exodus, as superior to anything performed at
any previous time in any nation before that period, indicating that Divine
miracles of Exodus-like character were not performed constantly nor replicated
by fallen angels. For example, note: “And he said, Behold, I make a
covenant: before all thy people I will do marvels [pala’], such as have
not been done in all the earth, nor in any nation: and all the people among
which thou art shall see the work of the LORD: for it is a terrible thing that I will do with
thee” (Exodus 34:10; in the Tribulation period, miracles will be in a class
comparable to those of the Exodus, Micah 7:15). The Niphal (a particular
Hebrew verb tense) of pala’ is also frequently used for
“wondrous works” that include both the miraculous and non-miraculous acts of
God (cf. Job 5:9; 9:10; Psalm 9:2; 26:7; 71:17; 72:18; 75:1; 78:4, 11, 32; 86:10,
etc.); the fundamental idea of the word is not in the strictest sense miracle, but an act that
produces wonder in those who learn of it. The Niphal is consequently
employed of what is clearly not miraculous but is wonderful (Deuteronomy 17:8;
30:11; 2 Samuel 1:26; 13:2; Job 42:3; Proverbs 30:18; Daniel 11:36; etc.)
The miracle idea is not at all strong outside of the Niphal (Piel, Leviticus
22:21; Numbers 15:3, 8; Hiphil, Leviticus 27:2; Numbers 6:2; Deuteronomy 28:59;
Judges 13:19 (an instance of the miraculous outside of the Niphal); 2
Chronicles 2:9; 26:15; Psalm 17:7; 31:21; Isaiah 28:29; Joel 2:26; Hithpael,
Job 10:16). The complete list of texts with the verb is: Genesis
18:14; Exodus 3:20; 34:10; Leviticus 22:21; 27:2; Numbers 6:2; 15:3, 8;
Deuteronomy 17:8; 28:59; 30:11; Joshua 3:5; Judges 6:13; 13:19; 2 Samuel 1:26;
13:2; 1 Chronicles 16:9, 12, 24; 2 Chronicles 2:9; 26:15; Nehemiah 9:17; Psalm
9:1; 17:7; 26:7; 31:21; 40:5; 71:17; 72:18; 75:1; 78:4, 11, 32; 86:10; 96:3;
98:1; 105:2, 5; 106:7, 22; 107:8, 15, 21, 24, 31; 111:4; 118:23; 119:18, 27;
131:1; 136:4; 139:14; 145:5; Job 5:9; 9:10; 10:16; 37:5, 14; 42:3; Proverbs
30:18; Isaiah 28:29; Jeremiah 21:2; 32:17, 27; Daniel 8:24; 11:36; Joel 2:26;
Micah 7:15; Zechariah 8:6.
In summary, the
Old Testament employs the terms mofeth, ‘oth, and pala’ to speak of miracles. Pala’ and ‘oth are used both for the strictly
miraculous and for wonders and signs that are broader than a strict definition
of miracle. Mofeth, on the other hand, is
always associated with the strictly miraculous; it constitutes a sign and
wonder that is an evident breaking of the supernatural into the natural order.
Old Testament employs the terms mofeth, ‘oth, and pala’ to speak of miracles. Pala’ and ‘oth are used both for the strictly
miraculous and for wonders and signs that are broader than a strict definition
of miracle. Mofeth, on the other hand, is
always associated with the strictly miraculous; it constitutes a sign and
wonder that is an evident breaking of the supernatural into the natural order.
The New
Testament translates both dunamis and semeion as miracle.
The words teras, megaleion, endoxon, paradoxon, and are also related
(cf. § xci, Synonyms of the
New Testament, Trench).
Testament translates both dunamis and semeion as miracle.
The words teras, megaleion, endoxon, paradoxon, and are also related
(cf. § xci, Synonyms of the
New Testament, Trench).
The noun dunamis is usually translated power (77x out of 120 uses); mighty work (11x) is the second most common
rendering. The word is translated miracle in Mark 9:39; Acts 2:22; 8:13; 19:11;
1 Corinthians 12:10, 28-29; Galatians 3:5; Hebrews 2:4. When dunamis is used of miracles, it emphasizes the power or capability involved. While the word is
employed in senses where the performance of a miracle is not in view, in every
such case a particular act is not under consideration (Matthew 6:13; 22:29;
24:29–30; 25:15; 26:64; Mark 9:1; 12:24; 13:25–26; 14:62; Luke 21:26–27; 22:69;
Romans 1:20; 8:38; 1 Corinthians 14:11; 15:24; 15:56; 2 Corinthians 1:8; 4:7; 6:7;
8:3; 12:9; Ephesians 1:21; 2 Thessalonians 1:7; Hebrews 6:5; 7:16; 11:34; 1
Peter 3:22; 2 Peter 2:11; Rev 1:16; 3:8; 4:11; 5:12; 7:12; 11:17; 12:10; 15:8;
17:13; 18:3; 19:1). When a particular act is specified with dunamis, the act in question is
always miraculous. Non-miraculous works are never clearly identified with dunamis. Thus, the word
is regularly used of the performance of miraculous acts (Matthew 7:22; 11:20,
21, 23; 13:54, 58; 14:2; Mark 6:2, 5, 14; 9:39; Luke 10:13; 19:37; Acts 2:22;
8:13; 19:11; 1 Corinthians 12:10, 28-29; 2 Corinthians 12:12; Galatians 3:5; 2
Thessalonians 2:9; Hebrews 2:4). In other uses the word is clearly
associated and related to the performance of miracles (Mark 5:30; Luke 1:17,
35; 4:14; 4:36; 5:17; 6:19; 8:46; 9:1; 10:13, 19; 24:49; Acts 1:8; 3:12; 4:7,
33; 6:8; 8:10; 10:38; Romans 1:4, 16; 9:17; 15:13; 15:19; 1 Corinthians 1:18;
24; 2:4–5; 4:19–20; 5:4; 6:14; 12:10; 15:43; 2 Corinthians 13:4; Ephesians
1:19; 3:7; 3:16, 20; Philippians 3:10; Colossians 1:11, 29; 1 Thessalonians
1:5; 2 Thessalonians 1:11; 2 Timothy 1:7–8; 3:5; Hebrews 1:3; 11:11; 1 Peter
1:5; 2 Peter 1:3, 16; Revelation 13:2). (Luke 1:17 is a legitimate
instance, despite John 10:41, where semeion,
not dunamis, is
employed. The Baptist led many to miraculous regeneration—he led many to
turn from disobedience to wisdom so that Israel could be prepared for the Lord,
as Elijah also had done [cf. 1 Kings 18:39]. John’s work of bringing many
to regeneration through his preaching as a prophet was a miracle as dunamis,
but not as seimeion.).
The Theological Dictionary of
the New Testament (ed.
Kittel, pg. 230, Vol. 7) notes that “in the plural dunamis even became a technical term for
‘miracles’ in the NT,” an affirmation supported by the evidence (Matthew 7:22;
11:20–21, 23; 13:54, 58; 14:2; Mark 6:2, 14; Luke 10:13; 19:37; 21:26; Acts
2:22; 8:13; 19:11; 1 Corinthians 12:10, 28–29; 2 Corinthians 12:12; Galatians
3:5; Hebrews 2:4; 6:5—the sole exceptions are instances where dunamis does not refer to acts at all:
Matthew 24:29; Mark 13:25; Luke 21:26; Romans 8:38; 1 Peter 3:22). The
best argument against dunamis referring specifically to the
miraculous would be the class of texts where the word is employed in
association with Christian salvation, a category which is inclusive of
sanctification and of bestowing spiritual gifts (Romans 1:16; 15:13; 1
Corinthians 1:18; Ephesians 1:19; 3:7, 16, 20; Philippians 3:10; Colossians
1:11, 29; 1 Thessalonians 1:5; 2 Thessalonians 1:11; 2 Timothy 1:7, 8; 3:5; 1
Peter 1:5; 2 Peter 1:3). However, it is better to conclude from the
existence of this category that regeneration is a miraculous work of Divine
power and that the Spirit’s power in progressively eradicating indwelling sin
in Christians, producing spiritual fruit, and performing other works associated
with salvation is a similar work of Divine power, rather than a priori concluding that Christian salvation is
non-miraculous, and from this a
priori establishing a
category, otherwise not clearly attested in the New Testament, where dunamis refers to non-miraculous
actions. The identification of salvation with the miraculous is clearly
supported elsewhere in Scripture with texts that indicate that personal regeneration is in the same category as a work of
Divine power with the transformation or cosmic regeneration involved in
establishing the Millennial earth (Matthew 19:28; Titus 3:5; palingennesia) or the fact that
both bringing into being a universe and bringing into being a clean heart are
works of creation (Genesis 1:1; Psalm 51:10; bara’). Furthermore, the
identification of dunamis with the miraculous establishes that a
Biblical miracle, as a
work of God’s power, is not necessarily a rare event, for the exercise of
Almighty power in sustaining the universe employs dunamis (Hebrews 1:3). While God
constantly sustains the universe, Scripture indicates that this is a miracle in
the sense of dunamis.
Furthermore, while they are not able to replicate everything done by the
Almighty, the powers of darkness can perform miracles (2 Thessalonians 2:9).
The word semeion appears 77 times in the New
Testament (Matthew 12:38–39; 16:1, 3–4; 24:3, 24, 30; 26:48; Mark 8:11–12;
13:4, 22; 16:17, 20; Luke 2:12, 34; 11:16, 29–30; 21:7, 11, 25; 23:8; John
2:11, 18, 23; 3:2; 4:48, 54; 6:2, 14, 26, 30; 7:31; 9:16; 10:41; 11:47; 12:18,
37; 20:30; Acts 2:19, 22, 43; 4:16, 22, 30; 5:12; 6:8; 7:36; 8:6, 13; 14:3;
15:12; Romans 4:11; 15:19; 1 Corinthians 1:22; 14:22; 2 Corinthians 12:12; 2
Thessalonians 2:9; 3:17; Hebrews 2:4; Revelation 12:1, 3; 13:13–14; 15:1;
16:14; 19:20), and is translated by a form of sign 50 times, by miracle 23 times, by wonder three times, and as token once. The word is translated
“miracle” in Luke 23:8; John 2:11, 23; 3:2; 4:54; 6:2, 14, 26; 7:31; 9:16;
10:41; 11:47; 12:18, 37; Acts 4:16, 22; 6:8; 8:6; 15:12; Revelation 13:14;
16:14; 19:20. With the exception of a handful of texts where the word
signifies “a visible mark by which someone or something is recognized” (Matthew
26:48; Luke 2:12; Romans 4:11; 2 Thessalonians 3:17), semeion refers to miraculous signs:
Matthew 12:38-39; 16:1, 3, 4, 24:3, 24, 30; Mark 8:11, 12; 13:4, 22; 16:17, 20;
Luke 2:34 (Christ Himself is a semeion because of the miracle of the
incarnation; cf. Luke 11:30; Isaiah 11:10-12); 11:16, 29, 30; 21:7, 11, 25;
23:8; John 2:11, 18, 23; 3:2; 4:48, 54; 6:2, 14, 26, 30; 7:31; 9:16; 10:41;
11:47; 12:18, 37; 20:30; Acts 2:19, 22, 43; 4:16, 22, 30, 5:12; 6:8; 7:36, 8:6,
13; 14:3; 15:12; Romans 15:19; 1 Corinthians 1:22; 14:22; 2 Corinthians 12:12
(Apostles have miracle-working power to validate their office); 2 Thessalonians
2:9; Hebrews 2:4; Revelation 12:1, 3, 13:13, 14; 15:1; 16:14; 19:20. The
powers of darkness can perform false signs or miracles (semeion);
Matthew 24:24; Mark 13:22; 2 Thessalonians 2:9; Revelation 13:13-14; 16:14;
19:20. “In the religious sphere, sēmeion has always meant a prodigy that is
recognizable and provides proof for everyone. In the NT, it is a category of
miracle, together with mighty works (dynameis) and wonders (terata,
Acts 2:22; 2 Thess 2:9; 2 Cor 12:12; Heb 2:4); but it retains its value as a
sign or demonstration” (pg. 252, Theological
Lexicon of the New Testament Vol.
3, Spicq). The semeion,
unlike the dunamis, always
refers to something specific and unique: “If in face of the varied nature
of NT usage a basic meaning can be laid down . . . this seems to reside in the
fact that in a specific situation which cannot be repeated semeion states or indicates a possibility
or intention or the indispensability of a definite human reference” (pg. 231, Theological Dictionary of the New
Testament Vol. 7,
Kittel). Consequently, semeion is not used for works such as
human regeneration and sanctification, as is dunamis.
Thus, while a miracle as an act of God’s power (dunamis),
is broader in scope than the strict definition of miracle as a sign, a miracle in the sense of semeion does support that strict
definition. The glorious and stupendous acts of God’s power in both the
parting of the Red Sea and in raising a dead sinner to new life are miracles in the sense of dunamis; only the former is a sign-miracle,
a semeion.
In conclusion,
while there are words that designate miracles in the Old and New Testament that
encompass ideas broader than the strict sense of a miracle as a sign and wonder, the strict sense
designated by mofeth or a semeion,
this strict sense has particular words assigned to it in the canon and has
clear Biblical support. Do miracles occur today? In the sense in
which the English of the Authorized Version employs the word “miracle,” the
answer is “no.” In the sense of the Hebrew word mofeth and the Greek word semeion, the answer is
“no.” In the sense of a few other Hebrew and Greek words, the answer is
“yes,” although in those instances the KJV did not translate the words as
“miracle.” Do miracles take place today? In the sense of a sign and
a wonder, the answer is “no.” In a looser sense, the answer is “yes.”
while there are words that designate miracles in the Old and New Testament that
encompass ideas broader than the strict sense of a miracle as a sign and wonder, the strict sense
designated by mofeth or a semeion,
this strict sense has particular words assigned to it in the canon and has
clear Biblical support. Do miracles occur today? In the sense in
which the English of the Authorized Version employs the word “miracle,” the
answer is “no.” In the sense of the Hebrew word mofeth and the Greek word semeion, the answer is
“no.” In the sense of a few other Hebrew and Greek words, the answer is
“yes,” although in those instances the KJV did not translate the words as
“miracle.” Do miracles take place today? In the sense of a sign and
a wonder, the answer is “no.” In a looser sense, the answer is “yes.”
May God help us
to think His thoughts after Him and be clear in our understanding and teaching
about miracles.
to think His thoughts after Him and be clear in our understanding and teaching
about miracles.
A version of
the study above is found as part of the analysis here.
the study above is found as part of the analysis here.
I wanted a shorter article but that would have been a miracle, kidding. I appreciate your study, Brother Tom. Thank you. No sign-gift, however spectacular, has ever broken hard hearts and wrought repentance and faith in a sinner. The power to save belongs to God. He ordained for us to be His witnesses. He gave us a powerful and effectual Word (the Bible). We need to rely upon Him (or yield ourselves to Him) and be faithful preachers of the Lord Jesus Christ. Obedience is our responsibility but the results are all up to Him. Let's be faithful heralds of the Gospel which is the power of God unto salvation. Be well.
We've got to be careful with the use of that term. Someone can say he's not Charismatic, but he has all the qualities of a Charismatic. He's not a Charismatic, but God still speaks to him, still validates Himself to him with miraculous signs, and he also received a baptism of the Spirit, which has been accompanied by these circumstances. But he's not Charismatic. If we are going to have all the characteristics of a Charismatic, why not go for the extent that Charismatics have them or more?
Dear Billy,
Thanks, and I agree.
Dear Pastor Brandenburg,
Thanks for the comment. I agree.
I also think that any charismatic, or a professed non-charismatic who act like a charismatic, who cares enough about Scripture to study it with an open mind on topics like what miracles are and what the sign gifts are will become a non-charismatic.
Thanks.