Home » Kent Brandenburg » Are the Doctrines of Crucification and Mortification the Same?

Are the Doctrines of Crucification and Mortification the Same?

Crucification Not an English Word

As you read the above title, you read a word that doesn’t seem to appear in the English language, that is, crucification.  No one used crucification in the history of theology either.  Men used the concept of crucification, but not the word itself.

You have the English words crucify, crucified, and crucifixion.  You find those in a dictionary.  However, the words “mortification” and “vivification” do occur, which are in the spirit of crucification.  I’m still going to use “crucification,” because no one has a word to represent a separate doctrine, that is a definite unique feature of salvation in scripture.

Crucifixion and Crucification

Crucifixion is a kind of death.  Someone dies physically on a cross.  Apparently either the Assyrians or the Babylonians invented crucifixion as a means of execution, but the Persians then used it regularly.  It finally got to the Romans, who are most famous in history for crucifixion.  When Jesus died on the cross, it was Roman crucifixion.  The Lord Jesus made the cross a symbol and then the Apostle Paul took it further in Romans and Galatians.

If I say, the doctrine of crucifixion, that doesn’t mean anything.  If I say, the doctrine of mortification, that means something.  However, is it the same as, bear with me, a doctrine of crucification?  I use that “word” because crucification as a doctrine is different than mortification, as I see it in scripture.  Both crucification and mortification involve death, but mean something significantly different.  You can see that by the usage of “crucified” and “mortify” in the New Testament.

“Crucified,” “Mortify,” and “Dead”

“Crucified”

Galatians 5:24 says,

And they that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.

To clarify and summarize everything that he said in Galatians 5, Paul wrote Galatians 5:24.  He had written earlier in Galatians something similar in 2:20:

I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me.

The only other place you see this is again by Paul in Romans 6:6:

Knowing this, that our old man is crucified with him, that the body of sin might be destroyed, that henceforth we should not serve sin.

We should add Galatians 6:14, because it fits here too:

But God forbid that I should glory, save in the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom the world is crucified unto me, and I unto the world.

Paul uses the word “crucified” (sustauroo or stauroo).  The word “cross” is the noun, stauros.  Galatians 5:24 is aorist active.  Galatians 2:20 is perfect passive.  Romans 6:6 is aorist passive.  Galatians 6:14 is perfect passive.  All four of these verbs mean completed action in the past.  The active is the subject doing something.  The passive is the subject having something done to it.  The perfect means completed action, yet with ongoing results.

“Mortify”

Before I dive back into crucification, that non-word in the English language, consider the references that mention mortification.

Romans 8:13, “For if ye live after the flesh, ye shall die: but if ye through the Spirit do mortify the deeds of the body, ye shall live.”

Colossians 3:5, “Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry.”

Those are the only two times “mortify” appears in the King James Version.  They are actually two different Greek words.  Romans 8:13 is thanatoo, which is present indicative active, continuous action.  Colossians 3:5 is nekroo, which is aorist imperative active.  That is aorist, which is not continuous action.  However, both Romans 8:13 and Colossians 3:5 describe something occurring post-justification, that is, after the point of someone’s conversion.

“Dead”

The New Testament also uses the word “dead” in the verb form, describing a completed condition at the moment of justification.  For instance, Romans 6:2 says:

God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?

Peter also writes in 1 Peter 2:24:

Who his own self bare our sins in his own body on the tree, that we, being dead to sins, should live unto righteousness: by whose stripes ye were healed.

Both of those are the Greek word, apothnesko, and both aorist indicative active.  They are again completed action.

Crucification and Mortification, Different

From all the scriptural data, crucification and mortification are different.  Crucification occurs at the moment of salvation.  It’s completed then.  One could also say that it occurred at the crucifixion of Jesus Christ, since Paul uses the language, “crucified with Christ.”  Crucification occurred with Christ at His crucifixion and occurred at the moment of conversion.

On the other hand, mortification occurs after conversion or after justification.  It keeps occurring.  Mortification will not stop in the life of a believer until his glorification.  He keeps putting to death the deeds of his body and his members until he sees Jesus.

Maybe you’re already asking some good questions like these:  “Why does someone need to keep putting to death something that is already dead?  If I am crucified, past tense and completed action, why more ongoing putting to death of apparently the same thing?  If true believers are dead indeed unto sin at the moment of conversion, why does God require further putting to death or mortification?”

What Is Crucification?

The questions of the previous paragraph are good questions and they relate to the doctrine of crucification.

Jesus died by crucifixion.  Crucifixion is a particular kind of death, a slow death.  This helps those in Galatia and Rome to understand why they still struggle with sin.  Jesus hung on the cross for hours.

The flesh is crucified at the moment of conversion, the instance of justification, but he necessarily keeps dying a slow death of crucifixion.  As a result, he must continue dying.  He becomes more and more dead to the flesh and its affections and lusts and to the world.  He becomes more alive then as well.  The latter is the doctrine of vivification.

Judicial Death and Ethical Death

Galatians 5:24 says true believers at the moment of their conversion “have crucified the flesh.”  Thomas Ross is the only one in church history that I read who refers to Romans 6:6:  “the body dominated by sin when the Christian was still unconverted, has been judicially destroyed.”  That language, judicially destroyed, I believe Ross coins.  Ross writes:

Judicial and Ethical Destruction

The “body of sin,” the body dominated by sin when the Christian was still unconverted, has been judicially destroyed.  This destruction is associated with positional sanctification.  In terms of progressive sanctification, the flesh, the ethically sinful “body of sin,” has received its death blow, and its ultimate destruction at glorification is certain, as a man who is on a cross is certain of ultimate death, although he still can struggle and fight within certain limits.

The flesh within the believer is certain of utter destruction at death or the return of Christ, but during this life, although crucified and growing weaker, it can still influence the Christian to sin. These remnants of sin in the believer are to be mortified, put to death, to bring the legal and judicial truth and the ultimate certainty of glorification closer to practical reality in this life.

Glorification

This crucifixion with Christ in the believer has the result “that the body of sin might be destroyed.” This destruction, judicially completed at the time of Christ’s crucifixion, and positionally and legally declared for the believer at the moment of his regeneration, will take place ultimately at glorification, when the remnants of sin in the Christian are entirely removed, finally and completely destroyed.

However, the beginnings of this utter destruction are already set in motion, even as the crucifixion of the old man with Christ, which took place legally at the time of the Savior’s own crucifixion and begins experientially in the life of the elect at the point of their regeneration, progressively removes the life and strength from the old man, the body of sin.

Negative Mortification and Positive Vivification

The negative aspects of the progressive mortification of sin in this life, is the converse to the vivification, the progressive cleansing, sanctification of the believer, and growth of the new man, produced by the Triune God and especially the Holy Spirit through the Scriptures. This vivification culminates in glorification, when the Christian will be entirely without spot or wrinkle (Ephesians 5:26-27).

I broke his one paragraph into five paragraphs, which are still hard to read.  I encourage you to read it again to get a grasp of (what I’m calling) “crucification” versus mortification.  Crucification, mortification, and vivification are all three necessary.

The Slow Death of Crucifixion

Strong

Augustus Strong agrees with this position on crucification, that it is a slow death.  He wrote in his Systematic Theology:

The Christian is “crucified with Christ” (Gal. 2:20), but the crucified man does not die at once.  Yet he is as good as dead.  Even after the old man is crucified, we are still to mortify him or put him to death (Rom. 8:13, Col. 3:5).

Fraser

James Fraser in his The Scripture Doctrine of Sanctification wrote speaking of Romans 6:6:

The expression . . . is not, that the old man is put to death.  Persons may live a considerable while, yea, some days on the cross.  Crucifixion is not a state of death, but a state of pain, and torment, tending to death.

Fraser also saw Paul for a specific purpose use “crucified” rather than “put to death.”  “Crucified” is a slow death akin to the reality of sanctification.  It could harmonize with the completed action of “crucified” and the ongoing action of “mortify.”  He never called a separate doctrine.  I am.

Henry

Matthew Henry in his commentary through the Bible on Romans 6 wrote:

The death of the cross was a slow death; the body, after it was nailed to the cross, gave many a throe and many a struggle: but it was a sure death, long in expiring, but expired at last; such is the mortification of sin in believers. It was a cursed death, Galatians 3:13. Sin dies as a malefactor, devoted to destruction; it is an accursed thing. Though it be a slow death, yet this must needs hasten it that it is an old man that is crucified; not in the prime of its strength, but decaying: that which waxeth old is ready to vanish away.

Ross differentiates what occurs when one has crucified the flesh with mortification by characterizing the former as “judicial” and the latter as “ethical.”  This is a good differentiation.

Evidence of Crucification

As a part of crucification in Galatians 5:24, Paul says “they that are Christ’s have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.”  Let’s call “affections” in this case, “feelings,” and “lusts,” “desires.”  “Feelings” and “desires” come along with “the flesh.”  A believer does not operate characteristically, habitually, or as a lifestyle according to his feelings and desires.

A believer crucified “feelings” and “desires” when he became “Christ’s.”  He does not function according to his feelings and desires, but Christ’s will, because he is Christ’s.  In Galatians, Paul says he “walks in the Spirit.”  He no longer fulfills the lusts of the flesh, which produce the works of the flesh.

The crucifixion of the flesh at the point of conversion is reality.  How does someone know it occurred?  He doesn’t see the works of the flesh in his life in a characteristic or habitual way or as a lifestyle.  He sees instead fruit of the Spirit.

In addition, someone with a crucified flesh will continue mortifying his members and the deeds of his body.  He will not allow sin to reign in his mortal body (Rom 6:12).  He lives in the Spirit.


8 Comments

  1. Brother Kent,

    Overall, it is an excellent overview of being crucified with Christ. It is a past tense event in the sense that it began when “you first believed”, but it is up to us to mortify the deeds of the flesh, in that “I die daily”. This is why I believe that Paul wrote Galatians 2:20 which I memorized many years ago.

    It is a biblical principle that is very important, hardly understood or taught, that will keep a man of God abiding in Christ.

    Tom

  2. Hi Tom,

    I didn’t want not to reply to your comment, but I also didn’t want to correct anything. I agree with everything in your first two lines. We should mortify daily, it’s true. It’s just that in 1 Corinthians 15:31, when Paul says, “I die daily,” I believe he’s talking about actual physical death. Paul was so threatened by enemies in his ministry that he risked his life every day, which is why resurrection, the theme of the chapter, was so important to him.

    Second, Galatians 2:20 is not about mortification. It is again, past tense, which means Paul refers to what I’m calling, crucification. Crucifixion is a death to the flesh that goes along with the moment of justification I didn’t want to disagree with you, but I do in these two instances.

    Have a good day.

  3. Hello Kent,

    You are correct when teaching 1 Corinthians 15:31 exegetically and in context to the enemy being death, which in context is speaking about a physical death. I did not use “I die daily” to teach an exegetical truth, but to show the doctrinal truth of Galatians 2:20 by comparing scripture with scripture.

    Therefore, I disagree with you on the doctrinal teaching of Galatians 2:20. Why do you say that “I am crucified” is past tense? Because it uses crucified as a past tense verb that is connected to a simple present tense, “I am”? It is a perfect present tense clause (a present-tense state of an action that has been completed but has effects in the now). that is similar to the clause, “He is done”. It has been completed (crucified, done), yet it is true and its effects are present (I am, He is). Galatians 2:19 clarifies that teaching.

    So do the following verses:
    Always bearing about in the body the dying of the Lord Jesus, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our body. For we which live are alway delivered unto death for Jesus’ sake, that the life also of Jesus might be made manifest in our mortal flesh. So then death worketh in us, but life in you. (2Co 4:10-12)

    And he said to them all, If any man will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross daily, and follow me. (Luke 9:23)

    Therefore, “take up his cross daily”, and “Always bearing… the dying”, and “always delivered unto death…” is matched with “I die daily” and “I am crucified,,,” by comparing scripture with scripture. This teaches a daily death of self through “mortifying (to subdue, bring in subjection, to put to death) the deeds of the flesh”.

    How else are you going to abide in Christ if you do not see yourself as Christ sees you in the flesh, dead, therefore “Walk in the Spirit, and ye shall not fulfil the lust of the flesh” (Galatians 5:17), for “I am crucified WITH Christ…”.

    Amen.

    Tom

    • Tom,

      The action of “I am crucified” is completed in the past with ongoing results. It isn’t present tense. It’s also the verb, “crucified,” which is prominent in this piece you said you agreed with. Then you proceeded to write something that contradicted what I said above, which is true.

      Tom, your comment really is a good example of what occurs in conversations, it seems, with you. All the time. On an obvious point, “I die daily,” you can’t admit that you were quoting verbatim from the KJV. “I die daily” is found exactly one time in the Bible, 1 Corinthians 15:31, and you say that’s not what you meant. Okay, Tom.

      I ask you to think about what you write here. There’s no competition. It’s not a contest. If you get it right, I am glad to admit it. In this case, I really didn’t want to reply, because of those two things. I went ahead and did that, and the result was, sad to say, about how I thought it would go.

      • Brother Kent,

        Just say, “I do not completely agree with what you wrote, but I understand it” and just leave it at that.

        Have a prosperous and joyous day in the Lord.

        I know you will agree completely with that.

        Tom

  4. Brother Kent,

    I thought to give ChatGPT a try in grammatically parsing Galatians 2:20. It first acknowledges “am crucified” as a present tense verb in the indicative mood. It can also can be passive voice, “was crucified”.

    I acknowledge it as present form (with my supporting verses), with the reality that there was also a past form, a beginning “that I was crucified, when I first believed”.

    They are both true, simultaneously.

    Parsing:

    “I” – subject of the verbs “am crucified,” “live,” and “live.”
    “am crucified” – verb phrase in the present tense, first person singular, indicative mood, indicating the current state or condition of the subject “I.” It’s also passive voice, indicating that “I” was crucified with Christ.
    “with Christ” – prepositional phrase modifying “crucified,” indicating the agent with whom the subject “I” was crucified.

    Tom

    • Tom,

      Do you know what perfect tense is? It is perfect tense, which is completed action with ongoing results. I’m saying that with complete sincerity, not as an insult to you. It’s perfect tense. When Jesus said, “it is finished” on the cross, same tense of the verb. Completed action. It’s one of the glories of those words from Jesus.

      • Brother Kent,

        You can also say it this way, “the current state or condition of the subject” which perfectly correlates with “nevertheless I live”.

        Since Paul says “nevertheless I live”, it shows that he is applying the “crucified life” to his current state, that being crucified with Christ, he continues to live by applying a profound spiritual truth about the believer’s union with Christ and the transformative power of His resurrection to his daily life.

        I am not sure why you want to stick to just a past event without seeing that the completed action of the past as the current state of all believers who are “crucified with Christ” when they are “abiding in Him”.

        Is it because what I wrote somehow lessons the truth of eternal security?

        Tom

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

AUTHORS OF THE BLOG

  • Kent Brandenburg
  • Thomas Ross

Archives